L’evidence-based practice en psychologie : une approche tri- partite souvent mal comprise

Blause, Sacha; Durieux, Nancy; Tirelli, Ezio; Willems, Sylvie

doi:10.1016/j.prps.2024.03.005

Request a copy

Article (Scientific journals)

L’evidence-based practice en psychologie : une approche tri- partite souvent mal comprise

Blause, Sacha; Durieux, Nancy; Tirelli, Ezio et al.

2024 • In Pratiques Psychologiques

Peer reviewed

Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2268/318226

DOI
10.1016/j.prps.2024.03.005

Files (1)Send to Details Statistics Bibliography Similar publications

Files

Full Text

1-s2.0-S1269176324000075-main.pdf

Author postprint (611.93 kB)

Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Keywords :

evidence-based practice; clinical practice; survey; psychology

Abstract :

[fr] Raisons, buts, et objectifs La pratique fondée sur les preuves (EBP) est une approche qui encourage les cliniciens à fonder leur pratique et leurs décisions cliniques sur des preuves (piliers de l’EBP) afin d’améliorer la qualité des soins aux patients. Cependant, l’état des connaissances et des pratiques des psychologues en Europe francophone est encore inconnu. L’objectif de cette étude était de savoir ce que les psychologues connaissaient de l’EBP et s’ils utilisaient cette approche dans leur pratique quotidienne. Méthode Un questionnaire de 50 questions à choix multiples destiné aux psychologues belges francophones a été mis en ligne sur les réseaux sociaux. Les questions portaient sur les connaissances et les croyances des psychologues concernant l’EBP et les informations qui guident les cliniciens dans leur pratique. Résultats Un total de 110 psychologues ont répondu à l’enquête. Seul un tiers des psychologues interrogés savait ce qu’était l’EBP. Dans leur prise de décision quotidienne, les cliniciens s’appuient sur leur expérience passée, les connaissances accumulées, et les difficultés présentées par le patient, mais les publications scientifiques, les préférences, et les opinions du patient en matière de traitement et les avis d’experts guident peu leur pratique. En outre, les obstacles perçus par les psychologues qui connaissaient l’EBP, tels que le manque de connaissances et de savoir-faire, semblent empêcher les psychologues d’utiliser l’EBP dans leur pratique quotidienne. Conclusion Un manque de connaissance de l’EBP chez les psychologues belges a été mis en évidence. De plus, les comportements mis en œuvre dans la pratique quotidienne n’étaient pas entièrement conformes à ce qui est recommandé dans l’approche EBP. Les données de l’enquête indiquent qu’il y a un besoin de formations pour les cliniciens afin d’améliorer leur compréhension de la pratique.

Disciplines :

Theoretical & cognitive psychology

Author, co-author :

Blause, Sacha ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de Psychologie > Neuropsychologie de l'adulte ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de Psychologie > Méta-recherche et éthique de la méthodologie quantitative ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Psychologie et Neuroscience Cognitives (PsyNCog)

Durieux, Nancy ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Unités de recherche interfacultaires > Research Unit for a life-Course perspective on Health and Education (RUCHE)

Tirelli, Ezio ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de Psychologie

Willems, Sylvie ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Psychologie et Neuroscience Cognitives (PsyNCog) ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de Psychologie > Neuropsychologie de l'adulte

Language :

French

Title :

L’evidence-based practice en psychologie : une approche tri- partite souvent mal comprise

Publication date :

15 May 2024

Journal title :

Pratiques Psychologiques

ISSN :

1269-1763

Publisher :

Elsevier Masson, Paris, France

Peer reviewed :

Peer reviewed

Available on ORBi :

since 16 May 2024

Statistics

Number of views

18 (6 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

1 (1 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenAlex citations

Bibliography

Aarons, G.A., Mental health provider attitudes toward adoption of evidence-based practice: The evidence-based practice attitude scale (EBPAS). Mental Health Services Research 6:2 (2004), 61–74, 10.1023/b:mhsr.0000024351.12294.65.
Agoritsas, T., Vandvik, P., Neumann, I., Rochwerg, B., Jaeschke, R., Hayward, R., McKibbon, K., Finding current best evidence. Users’ guides to the medical literature: A manual for evidence-based clinical practice, 3rd ed., 2015, McGraw Hill, Chicago.
American Psychological Association. Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. 2017 https://www.apa.org. https://www.apa.org/ethics/code.
APA Presidential Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice. Evidence-based practice in psychology. The American Psychologist 61:4 (2006), 271–285, 10.1037/0003-066X.61.4.271.
Babione, J.M., Evidence-based practice in psychology: An ethical framework for graduate education, clinical training, and maintaining professional competence. Ethics & Behavior 20:6 (2010), 443–453, 10.1080/10508422.2010.521446.
Baker, T.B., McFall, R.M., Shoham, V., Current status and future prospects of clinical psychology: Toward a scientifically principled approach to mental and behavioral health care. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 9:2 (2008), 67–103, 10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01036.x.
Barlow, D.H., Bullis, J.R., Comer, J.S., Ametaj, A.A., Evidence-based psychological treatments: An update and a way forward. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 9:1 (2013), 1–27, 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185629.
Bearman, S.K., Wadkins, M., Bailin, A., Doctoroff, G., Pre-practicum training in professional psychology to close the research-practice gap: Changing attitudes towards evidence-based practice. Training and Education in Professional Psychology 9:1 (2015), 13–20, 10.1037/tep0000052.
Beauchamp, S., Drapeau, M., Dionne, C., The development of practice guidelines in the social and human sciences. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne 56:4 (2015), 357–367, 10.1037/a0038811.
Berg, H., Evidence-based practice in psychology fails to be tripartite: A conceptual critique of the scientocentrism in evidence-based practice in psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2019, 2253, 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02253.
Berke, D.M., Rozell, C.A., Hogan, T.P., Norcross, J.C., Karpiak, C.P., What clinical psychologists know about evidence-based practice: Familiarity with online resources and research methods. Journal of Clinical Psychology 67:4 (2011), 329–339, 10.1002/jclp.20775.
Borntrager, C.F., Chorpita, B.F., Higa-McMillan, C., Weisz, J.R., Provider attitudes toward evidence-based practices: Are the concerns with the evidence or with the manuals?. Psychiatric Services 60:5 (2009), 677–681, 10.1176/ps.2009.60.5.677.
Caldwell, K., Coleman, K., Copp, G., Bell, L., Ghazi, F., Preparing for professional practice: How well does professional training equip health and social care practitioners to engage in evidence-based practice?. Nurse Education Today 27:6 (2007), 518–528, 10.1016/j.nedt.2006.08.014.
Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. OCEBM Levels of Evidence. 2011 [Web Page]. https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/levels-of-evidence/ocebm-levels-of-evidence.
Chan, A.K., McCabe, P., Madill, C.J., The implementation of evidence-based practice in the management of adults with functional voice disorders: A national survey of speech-language pathologists. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 15:3 (2013), 334–344, 10.3109/17549507.2013.783110.
Cohen, L.H., Sargent, M.M., Sechrest, L.B., Use of psychotherapy research by professional psychologists. American Psychologist 41:2 (1986), 198–206, 10.1037/0003-066X.41.2.198.
Coulter, A., Collins, A., Making shared decision-making a reality: No decision about me, without me. 2011, King's Fund, Londres.
Denzin, N.K., Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 6:2 (2012), 80–88, 10.1177/1558689812437186.
Durieux, N., Étienne, A.-M., Willems, S., Introduction à l'evidence-based practice en psychologie. Le Journal des psychologues, 345(3), 2017, 16, 10.3917/jdp.345.0016.
Ebbels, S.H., Intervention research: Appraising study designs, interpreting findings and creating research in clinical practice. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 19:3 (2017), 218–231, 10.1080/17549507.2016.1276215.
Echeburúa, E., de Corral Gargallo, P., Salaberría, K., Efectividad de las terapias psicológicas: Un análisis de la realidad actual. Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica, 15(2), 2010, 10.5944/rppc.vol.15.num.2.2010.4088.
Edwards, W.S., Gordon, T., Making the patient your partner: Communication skills for doctors and other caregivers. 1997, Auburn House.
Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Evidence-based medicine: A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA 268:17 (1992), 2420–2425, 10.1001/jama.1992.03490170092032.
Flick, U., Garms-Homolová, V., Herrmann, W.J., Kuck, J., Röhnsch, G., “I can't prescribe something just because someone asks for it…”: Using mixed methods in the framework of triangulation. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 6:2 (2012), 97–110, 10.1177/1558689812437183.
Galasiński, D., Language and psychiatry. The Lancet Psychiatry 5:3 (2018), 200–201, 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30040-3.
Gigerenzer, G., Gaissmaier, W., Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology 62:1 (2011), 451–482, 10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346.
Goldberg, S.B., Rousmaniere, T., Miller, S.D., Whipple, J., Nielsen, S.L., Hoyt, W.T., Wampold, B.E., Do psychotherapists improve with time and experience? A longitudinal analysis of outcomes in a clinical setting. Journal of Counseling Psychology 63:1 (2016), 1–11, 10.1037/cou0000131.
Greenhalgh, T., How to read a paper: The basics of evidence-based medicine and healthcare (sixth edition). 2019, Wiley Blackwell.
Greenwald, A.G., Banaji, M.R., The implicit revolution: Reconceiving the relation between conscious and unconscious. American Psychologist 72:9 (2017), 861–871, 10.1037/amp0000238.
Guba, E.G., Lincoln, Y.S., Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. ECTJ 30:4 (1982), 233–252, 10.1007/BF02765185.
Gyani, A., Shafran, R., Myles, P., Rose, S., The gap between science and practice: How therapists make their clinical decisions. Behavior Therapy 45:2 (2014), 199–211, 10.1016/j.beth.2013.10.004.
Gyani, A., Shafran, R., Rose, S., Lee, M.J., A qualitative investigation of therapists’ attitudes towards research: Horses for courses?. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy 43:4 (2015), 436–448, 10.1017/S1352465813001069.
Haider, T., Dunstan, D.A., Barriers to psychologists’ adherence to evidence-based practice guidelines for treating musculoskeletal injuries within the state insurance regulatory authority compensation schemes. International Journal of Disability Management, 14, 2019, e2, 10.1017/idm.2019.2.
Haverkamp, B. (s.d.), Education and training in assessment for professional psychology: Engaging the “reluctant student”. APA handbook of testing and assessment in psychology, vol. 2. Testing and assessment in clinical and counseling psychology, 2013, American Psychological Association (p. 63–82).
Hayes, S.C., Barlow, D.H., Nelson-Gray, R.O., The scientist practitioner: Research and accountability in the age of managed care. 2nd ed., 1999, Allyn and Bacon.
Hilgard, E., Lowell Kelly, E., Luckey, B., Sanford, N., Shaffer, L., Shakow, D., Recommended graduate training program in clinical psychology. American Psychologist 2 (1947), 239–558.
Juriševič, M., Lazarová, B., Gajdošová, E., Evidence-based practice for psychologists in education: A comparative study from the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Slovenia. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art 12:4 (2019), 79–100, 10.11621/pir.2019.0405.
Kahneman, D., Lovallo, D., Sibony, O., Before you make that big decision. Harvard Business Review 89:6 (2011), 50–60 (137).
Kazdin, A.E., Evidence-based treatment and practice: New opportunities to bridge clinical research and practice, enhance the knowledge base, and improve patient care. American Psychologist 63:3 (2008), 146–159, 10.1037/0003-066X.63.3.146.
Kiresuk, T.J., Sherman, R.E., Goal attainment scaling: A general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs. Community Mental Health Journal 4:6 (1968), 443–453, 10.1007/BF01530764.
Lambert, M., Presidential address: What we have learned from a decade of research aimed at improving psychotherapy outcome in routine care. Psychotherapy Research 17:1 (2007), 1–14, 10.1080/10503300601032506.
Lambert, M.J., Shimokawa, K., Collecting client feedback. Psychotherapy 48:1 (2011), 72–79, 10.1037/a0022238.
Leong, F.T.L., Pickren, W.E., Vasquez, M.J.T., APA efforts in promoting human rights and social justice. American Psychologist 72:8 (2017), 778–790, 10.1037/amp0000220.
Lilienfeld, S.O., Ritschel, L.A., Lynn, S.J., Cautin, R.L., Latzman, R.D., Why ineffective psychotherapies appear to work: A taxonomy of causes of spurious therapeutic effectiveness. Perspectives on Psychological Science 9:4 (2013), 355–387, 10.1177/1745691614535216.
Luebbe, A.M., Radcliffe, A.M., Callands, T.A., Green, D., Thorn, B.E., Evidence-based practice in psychology: Perceptions of graduate students in scientist–practitioner programs. Journal of Clinical Psychology 63:7 (2007), 643–655, 10.1002/jclp.20379.
Meyer, A.E., Reilly, E.E., Daniel, K.E., Hollon, S.D., Jensen-Doss, A., Mennin, D.S., Muroff, J., Schuler, T.A., White, B.A., Teachman, B.A., Characterizing evidence-based practice and training resource barriers: A needs assessment. Training and Education in Professional Psychology 14:3 (2020), 200–208, 10.1037/tep0000261.
Morrow-Bradley, C., Elliott, R., Utilization of psychotherapy research by practicing psychotherapists. American Psychologist 41:2 (1986), 188–197, 10.1037/0003-066X.41.2.188.
Nelson, T.D., Steele, R.G., Mize, J.A., Practitioner attitudes toward evidence-based practice: Themes and challenges. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 33:3 (2006), 398–409, 10.1007/s10488-006-0044-4.
Pagoto, S.L., Spring, B., Coups, E.J., Mulvaney, S., Coutu, M.-F., Ozakinci, G., Barriers and facilitators of evidence-based practice perceived by behavioral science health professionals. Journal of Clinical Psychology 63:7 (2007), 695–705, 10.1002/jclp.20376.
Petrova, M., Dale, J., Fulford, B.K.W.M., Values-based practice in primary care: Easing the tensions between individual values, ethical principles and best evidence. The British Journal of General Practice: The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners 56:530 (2006), 703–709.
Rousseau, D.M., Gunia, B.C., Evidence-based practice: The psychology of EBP implementation. Annual Review of Psychology 67 (2016), 667–692, 10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033336.
Sackett, D.L., Rosenberg, W.M.C., Gray, J.A.M., Haynes, R.B., Richardson, W.S., Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. BMJ 312:7023 (1996), 71–72, 10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71.
Satterfield, J.M., Spring, B., Brownson, R.C., Mullen, E.J., Newhouse, R.P., Walker, B.B., Whitlock, E.P., Toward a transdisciplinary model of evidence-based practice. The Milbank Quarterly 87:2 (2009), 368–390, 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00561.x.
Schön, D.A., The reflective practitioner. 1st ed., 2017, Routledge, 10.4324/9781315237473.
Shimokawa, K., Lambert, M.J., Smart, D.W., Enhancing treatment outcome of patients at risk of treatment failure: Meta-analytic and mega-analytic review of a psychotherapy quality assurance system. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 78:3 (2010), 298–311, 10.1037/a0019247.
Society of Clinical Psychology. Research-supported psychological treatments. 2014 https://div12.org/psychological-treatments/.
Spengler, P.M., White, M.J., Ægisdóttir, S., Maugherman, A.S., Anderson, L.A., Cook, R.S., Nichols, C.N., Lampropoulos, G.K., Walker, B.S., Cohen, G.R., Rush, J.D., The meta-analysis of clinical judgment project: Effects of experience on judgment accuracy. The Counseling Psychologist 37:3 (2009), 350–399, 10.1177/0011000006295149.
Spring, B., Evidence-based practice in clinical psychology: What it is, why it matters; what you need to know. Journal of Clinical Psychology 63:7 (2007), 611–631, 10.1002/jclp.20373.
Stewart, R.E., Chambless, D.L., Does psychotherapy research inform treatment decisions in private practice?. Journal of Clinical Psychology 63:3 (2007), 267–281, 10.1002/jclp.20347.
Stewart, R.E., Chambless, D.L., Interesting practitioners in training in empirically supported treatments: Research reviews versus case studies. Journal of Clinical Psychology 66:1 (2009), 73–95, 10.1002/jclp.20630.
Stewart, R.E., Stirman, S.W., Chambless, D.L., A qualitative investigation of practicing psychologists’ attitudes toward research-informed practice: Implications for dissemination strategies. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 43:2 (2012), 100–109, 10.1037/a0025694.
Stoyanov, D., Fulford, K.W.M., Stanghellini, G., Van Staden, W., Wong, M.T.H., (eds.) International perspectives in values-based mental health practice: Case studies and commentaries, 2021, Springer.
Straus, S.E., Glasziou, P., Richardson, W.S., Haynes, R.B., Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM. 5th ed., 2019, Elsevier Health Sciences.
Tavris, C., Mind games: Psychological warfare between therapists and scientists. The Chronicle of Higher Education 45:25 (2003), 7–9.
Thyer, B.A., Pignotti, M., Evidence-based practices do not exist. Clinical Social Work Journal 39:4 (2011), 328–333, 10.1007/s10615-011-0358-x.
United Nations. Principles for the protection of persons with mental illness and the improvement of mental health care. 1991, OHCHR https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/principles-protection-persons-mental-illness-and-improvement.
von Ranson, K.M., Robinson, K.E., Who is providing what type of psychotherapy to eating disorder clients? A survey. International Journal of Eating Disorders 39:1 (2006), 27–34, 10.1002/eat.20201.
Westen, D., Novotny, C.M., Thompson-Brenner, H., EBP ≠ EST: Reply to Crits-Christoph et al. (2005) and Weisz et al. (2005). Psychological Bulletin 131:3 (2005), 427–433, 10.1037/0033-2909.131.3.427.
Wilson, J.L., Armoutliev, E., Yakunina, E., Werth, J.L., Practicing psychologists’ reflections on evidence-based practice in psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 40:4 (2009), 403–409, 10.1037/a0016247.