Collecter des données sur l’évolution du patient pour augmenter son efficacité thérapeutique en orthophonie

Martinez Perez, Trecy; Geurten, Marie; Willems, Sylvie

Download

Article (Scientific journals)

Collecter des données sur l’évolution du patient pour augmenter son efficacité thérapeutique en orthophonie

Martinez Perez, Trecy; Geurten, Marie; Willems, Sylvie

2021 • In ANAE: Approche Neuropsychologique des Apprentissages chez l'Enfant, 173

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2268/260676

Files (2)Send to Details Statistics Bibliography Similar publications

Files

Full Text

ANAE_Monitoring_VF.pdf

Author preprint (937.17 kB)

Download

Annexes

ANAE_Materiel_supplementaire_VF.pdf

(1.35 MB)

Matériel supplémentaire

Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Keywords :

Évaluation continue; progrès du patient; efficacité; prise de décision; biais cognitifs

Abstract :

[en] L’expertise clinique constitue l’un des piliers au cœur d’une pratique basée sur les preuves. Mais comment exploiter davantage son expertise clinique tout en évitant les erreurs d’interprétation ? Comment les cliniciens peuvent-ils augmenter l’efficacité de leurs interventions en suivant en temps réel les progrès des patients ? L’objectif de cet article est d’ « outiller » les orthophonistes dans la récolte d’informations fiables et régulières sur l’évolution de leurs patients afin de prendre des décisions éclairées sur les prises en charge proposées.

Disciplines :

Social & behavioral sciences, psychology: Multidisciplinary, general & others

Author, co-author :

Martinez Perez, Trecy ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Logopédie clinique

Geurten, Marie ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Neuropsychologie

Willems, Sylvie ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Clinique psychologique et logopédique universitaire (CPLU)

Language :

French

Title :

Collecter des données sur l’évolution du patient pour augmenter son efficacité thérapeutique en orthophonie

Alternative titles :

[en] Collecting data on patient progress status to increase therapeutic efficacy in speech and language therapy

Publication date :

2021

Journal title :

ANAE: Approche Neuropsychologique des Apprentissages chez l'Enfant

ISSN :

0999-792X

Publisher :

PDG Communication, France

Special issue title :

L'efficacité en orthophonie

Volume :

173

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Available on ORBi :

since 02 June 2021

Statistics

Number of views

3140 (114 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

2588 (93 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

Bibliography

Byiers, B.J., Reichle,J.,&Symons, F.J. (2012). Single-subject experimental design for evidence-based practice. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 27(4), 397-414.
Christ, T. J., & Silberglitt, B. (2007). Estimates of the standard error of measurement for curriculum-based measures of oral reading fluency. School Psychology Review, 3(5(1), 130-146.
De Jong, K., van Sluis, P., Nugter, M. A., Heiser, W. J., & Spinhoven, P. (2012). Understanding the differential impact of outcome monitoring: Therapist variables that moderate feedback effects in a randomized clinical trial. Psychotherapy research, 22(4), 464-474.
Ebbels, S. H.(2017). Intervention research: Appraising study designs, interpreting findings and creating research in clinical practice. International journal of speech-language pathology, J 9(3), 218-231.
European Speech and Language Therapy Association (2021). ESLA's Scope of Practice Statement. Retrieved from https://eslaeurope.eu/practice/
FitzGerald, C, & Hurst, S. (2017). Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review. BMC medical ethics, 78(1), 1-18.
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading research quarterly, 41(1), 93-99.
Gage, N. A., & Lewis, T. J. (2013). Analysis of effect for single-case design research. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 25(1), 46-60.
Gillam, S. L, & Justice, L (2010). RTI progress monitoring tools: Assessing primary-grade students in response-to-intervention programs. The ASHA Leader, 75(11), 12-15.
Gondek, D., Edbrooke, J., Childs, F., Finks, E., Deighton, J., & Wolpert, M. (2016). Feedback from outcome measures and treatment effectiveness, treatment efficiency, and collaborative practice: A systematic review. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 43,325-343.
Hall-Mills, S. (2018). Language progress monitoring for elementary students. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 3(1), 170-179.
Hartmann, D. P., & Hall, R. V. (1976). The changing criterion. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9(4), 527-532.
Hoffman, L M., & Ireland, M. C. (2018). A Panoramic Introduction to Language Intervention Progress Monitoring. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 3(1), 161-169.
Janse, P. D., De Jong, K., Van Dijk, M. K„ Hutschemaekers, G. J., & Verbraak, M. J. (2017). Improving the efficiency of cognitive-behavioural therapy by using formal client feedback. Psychotherapy Research, 27(5), 525-538.
Klein, L A., Houlihan, D., Vincent, J. L, & Panahon, C. J. (2017). Best practices in utilizing the changing criterion design. Behavior Analysis Practice, 70,52-61.
Krasny-Pacini, A., Daudey, E., Francois, P. O., Vidal, C, Vautravers, P., & Bagot, E. (2015). Utilisationdu Goal Attainment Scaling en reeducation cognitive et applicability la reeducation del'aphasie.dp/ias/eera'oma/nesassocre's, 3,3-12.
Krasny-Pacini, A., & Evans, J. (2018). Single-case experimental designs to assess intervention effectiveness in rehabilitation: A practical guide./trma/s of physical and rehabilitation medicine, 67(3), 164-179.
Lilienfeld, S. O., Ritschel, L A., Lynn, S. J., Cautin, R. L, & Latzman, R. 0. (2014). Why ineffective psychotherapies appear to work: A taxonomy of causes of spurious therapeutic effectiveness. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(4), 355-387.
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2019). L'entretien motivationnel • 2" id.: Aider la personne a engager le changement. Interflditions.
Miller, D. J., Spengler, E. S., & Spengler, P. M. (2015). A meta-analysis of confidence and judgment accuracy in clinical decision making. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62(4), 553.
Mugford, M., Banfield, P., & O'Hanlon, M. (1991). Effects of feedback of information on clinical practice: a review. British Medical Journal, 303(6799),398-402.
National Center on Response to Intervention (2021). Essential Components of MTSS: Progress monitoring. Retrieved from http://www.mtss4sur.cess. org
Neil, N., & Jones, E. A. (2015). Studying Treatment Intensity: Lessons from Two Preliminary Studies. Journal of Behavioral Education, 24(1), 51-73.
Olswang, L. B., & Bain, B. (1994). Data collection: Monitoring children's treatment progress. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 3(3), 55-66.
Parker, R.I., & Vannest K.J. (2009). An improved effect size for single case research: Non-overlap of all pairs (NAP). Behavior Therapy, 40(4), 357-367.
Parker, R.I., Vannest K.J., Davis, J.L, & Sauber, S.B. (2010). Combining non-overlap and trend for single case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42,284-299.
Parker, Z. J., & Waller, G. (2015). Factors related to psychotherapists' self-assessment when treating anxiety and other disorders. Behaviour Research andTherapy, 66,1-7.
Sanrey, C, Bressoux, P., Lima, L, & Pansu, P. (2020). A new method for studying the halo effect in teachers'judgement and its antecedents: Bringing out the role of certainty. British Journal of Educational Psychology, e12385.
Saposnik, G., Redelmeier, D., Ruff, C. C, & Tobler, P. N. (2016). Cognitive biases associated with medical decisions: a systematic review. BMC medical informatics and decision making, 76(1), 1-14.
Sapyta, J., Riemer, M., & Bickman, L (2005). Feedback to clinicians: Theory, research, and practice. Journal of clinical psychology, 6 7(2), 145-153.
Seron, X. (2016). Chapitre 4: Evaluation de refficaciti des traitements et de la prise en charge des patients. Traiti de neuropsychologic clinique de l'adulte: Tome 2 • Rteducation, 57. Deboeck
Shimokawa, K., Lambert, M. J., & Smart, D. W. (2010). Enhancing treatment outcome of clients at risk of treatment failure: Meta-analytic and mega-analytic review of a psychotherapy quality assurance system. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 78,298-311.
Staudt, M. (2007). Treatment Engagement with Caregivers of At-risk Children: Gaps in Research and Conceptualization. Jouma/of C/i/'W and fam/'/y Studies, 76,183-196.
Tate, R. L (2019). Measuring outcomes and monitoring progress in the era of evidence-based clinical practice. Brain Impairment, 20(3), 276-288.
Tate, R. L, Perdices, M., Rosenkoetter, U., McDonald, S.Jogher, L, Shadish, W & Vohra, S. (2016). The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016: Explanation and elaboration. Archives of Scientific Psychology, 4(1), 10.
Vannest K. J., & Ninci, J. (2015). Evaluating treatment effects in single-case research designs. Journal of Counseling & Development, 93,403-411.
Walfish, S., McAlister, B., O'Donnell, P., & Lambert, M. J. (2012). An Investigation of Self- Assessment Bias in Mental Health Providers. Psychological Reports, 7 70(2), 639-644.
Watson, P. J., & Workman, E. A. (1981). The non-concurrent multiple baseline across-individuals design: An extension of the traditional multiple baseline design. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 72(3), 257-259.