What information do neuropsychologists use to guide their clinical decisions? A survey on knowledge and application of evidence-based practice in a French-speaking population

Objective: Evidence-based practice (EBP) is an approach that encourages clinicians to base their practice on evidence to improve the quality of patient care and reduce uncertainty in their clinical decisions. However, the state of knowledge and practice of
neuropsychologists in French-speaking countries is still unknown. This study aimed to find out what these neuropsychologists
know about EBP and whether they use it.
Method: A questionnaire with 39 questions for French-speaking neuropsychologists was distributed. The questions focused on neuropsychologists’ knowledge and use of EBP and information that guide their clinical decisions.
Results: A total of 392 respondents started the survey. The data show that only 35% correctly defined EBP and there was confusion between this practice and the strict use of research data. In practice, their decisions are influenced by multiple factors,
including the patient’s difficulties and advice from peers. Regarding the research, a significant proportion of the sample stated that they did not search the scientific literature frequently. Barriers to accessing scientific information and ineffective article-
reading behavior were highlighted.
Conclusion: A lack of knowledge of EBP among French-speaking neuropsychologists was observed. Furthermore, the factors influencing their decision-making do not clearly fit the definitions of EBP. Information-seeking behaviors show several weaknesses and barriers to the integration of scientific evidence into practice. These results are like those of other studies conducted among psychologists or in other health professions. We will discuss possible courses of action that could be implemented to improve the knowledge and use of EBP.