Unpublished conference/Abstract (Scientific congresses and symposiums)
Investigating demyelination, iron accumulation, and synaptic loss in Alzheimer’s disease using multimodal imaging techniques
Moallemian, Soodeh; Salmon, Eric; Bahri, Mohamed Ali et al.
2022Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Conference
 

Files


Full Text
Abstract_qMRIconference2022_SMoallemian.pdf
Author postprint (283.59 kB)
Download
Full Text Parts
presentation_qMRIconference_2022.pdf
Author postprint (2.15 MB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Alzheimer's disease; qMRI; PET; Multivariate analysis
Abstract :
[en] Alzheimer’s disease (AD), the most common type of dementia, is associated with neuronal death and synaptic loss [1], [2]. Pathological aggregation of amyloid-beta and tau protein are key elements of AD pathophysiology. Myelin loss and iron accumulation in the brain are also fundamental features of aging and dementia [3], [4], but are less frequently investigated. Quantitative MRI (qMRI) enables us to determine the brain tissue parameters such as magnetization transfer (MT) and effective transverse relaxation (R2*), which leads to the detection of microstructural tissue-related alterations in aging and neurodegenerative diseases [5]. Here we investigate the association of neurodegeneration (as indexed by loss of synaptic density), increased iron accumulation, and decreased myelination in Alzheimer's disease in cohorts of 24 amyloid-positive patients (AD, 11 males and 13 females) and 19 healthy controls (HC, 9 males, and 10 females). All participants underwent a multiparameter qMRI protocol, which was processed to generate probability maps for MTsat and R2* [5]. Synaptic density was evaluated by the total volume distribution (Vt)maps, representing the distribution of the [18F] UCB-H PET radiotracer in the brain [6]. The data is organized according to the Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) [7]. MRI data processing was performed in MATLAB (The MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA, USA) using the SPM12 framework (www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm) and the hMRI toolbox [8] after modifications to make MR data compatible with the BIDS format [9]. Each multi-parameter map presents a different tissue-related (semi-)quantitative property, and therefore the qMRI maps have specific units. Therefore, all maps were z-transformed to ensure the comparability of the maps in a multivariate model. Then, we used General Linear Model (GLM) to test the groups against each other using age and sex as the covariates. Also, a multivariate GLM (mGLM) was performed on all modalities using the MSPM toolbox (https://github.com/LREN-CHUV/MSPM) to test differences in groups controlling for the age and sex of the participants [10]. Univariate group analysis of MTsat data resulted in a significant difference at the cluster level in the right hippocampus with p_cluster<0.05 FWE corrected and p_voxel<.001 uncorrected as cluster forming threshold (Figure1.A). In contrast, the same analysis for R2* modality reveals no difference between the groups. PET_Vt maps showed a difference between AD and HC at p_voxel<0.05 (FWE corrected) in the right amygdala and hippocampus (Figure1.B), which agrees with previously reported results in [6]. See table.1 for more information. Multimodal analysis combining R2*, MTsat, and PET_Vt shows a bilateral difference in hippocampus between patients and healthy controls for voxel-wise analysis with corrected FWE P-voxel < 0.05 (Figure1.C). The canonical analysis suggests that AD patients had combined decreased myelination, decreased synaptic density, and increased iron in the hippocampus compared to controls. To conclude, in the case of AD, there is an interaction between neuropathological risk factors, therefore, to restrain the true multivariate nature of the data and better control for the false positive rate, one should use the multivariate model over multiple univariate models.
Research center :
CRC - Centre de Recherches du Cyclotron - ULiège
Disciplines :
Neurosciences & behavior
Author, co-author :
Moallemian, Soodeh  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > GIGA > GIGA CRC In vivo Imaging - Aging & Memory
Salmon, Eric  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > GIGA > GIGA CRC In vivo Imaging - Aging & Memory
Bahri, Mohamed Ali  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > GIGA > GIGA CRC In vivo Imaging - Aging & Memory
Beliy, Nikita  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > GIGA > GIGA CRC In vivo Imaging - Aging & Memory
Delhaye, Emma  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > GIGA > GIGA CRC In vivo Imaging - Aging & Memory
Balteau, Evelyne ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > GIGA > GIGA CRC In vivo Imaging - Neuroimaging, data acquisition and processing
Degueldre, Christian ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > GIGA > GIGA CRC In vivo Imaging - Aging & Memory
Phillips, Christophe  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > GIGA > GIGA CRC In vivo Imaging - Neuroimaging, data acquisition and processing
Bastin, Christine  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > GIGA > GIGA CRC In vivo Imaging - Aging & Memory
Language :
English
Title :
Investigating demyelination, iron accumulation, and synaptic loss in Alzheimer’s disease using multimodal imaging techniques
Publication date :
26 October 2022
Event name :
Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Conference
Event place :
Canada
Event date :
from 26 to 28 October 2022
By request :
Yes
Audience :
International
References of the abstract :
[1] M. Calabrò, C. Rinaldi, G. Santoro, and C. Crisafulli, “The biological pathways of Alzheimer disease: a review,” AIMS Neurosci., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 86–132, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2021005. [2] S. Azam, M. E. Haque, R. Balakrishnan, I.-S. Kim, and D.-K. Choi, “The Ageing Brain: Molecular and Cellular Basis of Neurodegeneration,” Front. Cell Dev. Biol., vol. 9, p. 683459, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.683459. [3] G. Bartzokis, “Age-related myelin breakdown: a developmental model of cognitive decline and Alzheimer’s disease,” Neurobiol. Aging, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 5–18, Jan. 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2003.03.001. [4] J. Acosta-Cabronero, M. J. Betts, A. Cardenas-Blanco, S. Yang, and P. J. Nestor, “In Vivo MRI Mapping of Brain Iron Deposition across the Adult Lifespan,” J. Neurosci., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 364–374, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1907-15.2016. [5] N. Weiskopf et al., “Quantitative multi-parameter mapping of R1, PD*, MT, and R2* at 3T: a multi-center validation,” Front. Neurosci., vol. 7, 2013, doi: 10.3389/fnins.2013.00095. [6] C. Bastin et al., “In vivo imaging of synaptic loss in Alzheimer’s disease with [18F]UCB-H positron emission tomography,” Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 390–402, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s00259-019-04461-x. [7] K. J. Gorgolewski et al., “The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments,” Sci. Data, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 160044, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.44. [8] K. Tabelow et al., “hMRI – A toolbox for quantitative MRI in neuroscience and clinical research,” NeuroImage, vol. 194, pp. 191–210, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.029. [9] A. Karakuzu et al., “qMRI-BIDS: An extension to the brain imaging data structure for quantitative magnetic resonance imaging data,” Sci. Data, vol. 9, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01571-4. [10] L. Gyger et al., “Temporal trajectory of brain tissue property changes induced by electroconvulsive therapy,” NeuroImage, vol. 232, p. 117895, May 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117895.
Available on ORBi :
since 26 October 2022

Statistics


Number of views
164 (26 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
85 (6 by ULiège)

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi