Preprint_Schiller et al. (in press) - Effects of noise and a speaker's impaired voice quality on school-aged children's spoken language processing - a systematic review and meta-analysis.pdf
[en] Purpose: Background noise and voice problems among teachers can degrade listening conditions in classrooms. The aim of this literature review is to understand how these acoustic degradations affect spoken language processing in 6-18-year-old children. Method: In a narrative report and meta-analysis, we systematically review studies that examined the effects of noise and/or impaired voice on children’s response accuracy and response time (RT) in listening tasks. We propose the SPADE framework to classify relevant findings according to three processing dimensions – speech perception, listening comprehension, and auditory working memory – and highlight potential moderators. Results: Thirty-one studies are included in this systematic review. Our meta-analysis shows that noise can impede children’s accuracy in listening tasks across all processing dimensions (Cohen’s d between –0.67 and –2.65, depending on signal-to-noise ratio), and that impaired voice lowers children’s accuracy in listening comprehension tasks (d = –0.35). A handful of studies assessed RT, but results are inconclusive. The impact of noise and impaired voice can be moderated by listener-, task-, environmental-, and exposure factors. The interaction between noise and impaired voice remains under-investigated. Conclusions: Overall, this review suggests that children have more trouble perceiving speech, processing verbal messages, and recalling verbal information when listening to speech in noise or to a dysphonic speaker. Impoverished speech input could impede pupils’ motivation and academic performance at school.
Research center :
PsyNCog - Psychologie et Neuroscience Cognitives - ULiège EQUALE - Évaluation et Qualité de l'Enseignement - ULiège
Schiller, Isabel ; RWTH Aachen University > Institute of Psychology > Teaching and Research Area Work and Engineering Psychology
Remacle, Angélique ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Faculty of Psychology, Speech and Language Therapy, and Educational Sciences > Research Unit for a Life-Course Perspective on Health & Education
Durieux, Nancy ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Faculty of Psychology, Speech and Language Therapy, and Educational Sciences > Research Unit for a Life-Course Perspective on Health & Education
Morsomme, Dominique ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Faculty of Psychology, Speech and Language Therapy, and Educational Sciences > Research Unit for a Life-Course Perspective on Health & Education
Language :
English
Title :
Effects of noise and a speaker’s impaired voice quality on spoken language processing in school-aged children: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Publication date :
January 2022
Journal title :
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
ISSN :
1092-4388
eISSN :
1558-9102
Publisher :
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, United States - Maryland
Volume :
65
Pages :
169-199
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Name of the research project :
Spoken language processing in children: Effects of noise and the speaker's voice quality
American National Standards Institute. (2010). Acoustical performance criteria, design requirements, and guidelines for schools, part 1: Permanent Schools. ANSI S12.60–2010/Part 1. Acoustical Society of America.
*Bradley, J. S., & Sato, H. (2008). The intelligibility of speech in elementary school classrooms. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123(4), 2078–2086. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2839285
*Brännström, K. J., Kastberg, T., von Lochow, H., Haake, M., Sahlén, B., & Lyberg-Åhlander, V. (2018). The influence of voice quality on sentence processing and recall performance in school-age children with normal hearing. Speech, Language and Hearing, 21(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/2050571X.2017. 1309787
*Brännström, K. J., von Lochow, H., Lyberg-Åhlander, V., & Sahlén, B. (2018). Immediate passage comprehension and encoding of information into long-term memory in children with normal hearing: The effect of voice quality and multitalker babble noise. American Journal of Audiology, 27(2), 231–237. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_AJA-17-0061
*Chui, J. C. H., & Ma, E. P. M. (2018). The impact of dysphonic voices on children’s comprehension of spoken language. Journal of Voice, 33(5), 801.e7–801.e16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice. 2018.03.004
*Crandell, C. C., & Smaldino, J. J. (1996). Speech perception in noise by children for whom English is a second language. American Journal of Audiology, 5(3), 47–51. https://doi.org/10. 1044/1059-0889.0503.47
De Bodt, M., Van den Steen, L., Mertens, F., Raes, J., Van Bel, L., Heylen, L., Pattyn, J., Gordts, F., & Van de Heyning, P. (2015). Characteristics of a dysphonic population referred for voice assessment and/or voice therapy. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 67(4), 178–186. https://doi.org/10.1159/000369339
Fitzpatrick, J., & Wheeldon, L. (2000). Phonology and phonetics in psycholinguistic models of speech perception. In N. Burton-Roberts, P. Carr, & G. Docherty (Eds.), Phonological knowledge: Conceptual and empirical issues (pp. 131–160). Oxford University Press.
Garnier, M., & Henrich, N. (2014). Speaking in noise: How does the Lombard effect improve acoustic contrasts between speech and ambient noise? Computer Speech & Language, 28, 580–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2013.07.005
Garnier, M., Ménard, L., & Alexandre, B. (2018). Hyper-articulation in Lombard speech: An active communicative strategy to enhance visible speech cues? The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 144(2), 1059–1074. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5051321
Geay, C., McNally, S., & Telhaj, S. (2013). Non-native speakers of English in the classroom: What are the effects on pupil perfor-mance? The Economic Journal, 123(570), F281–F307. https://doi. org/10.1111/ecoj.12054
Gheller, F., Lovo, E., Arsie, A., & Bovo, R. (2020). Classroom acoustics: Listening problems in children. Building Acoustics, 27(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1351010X19886035
Higgins, J. P., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ, 327, Article 7414. 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
Holt, L. L., & Lotto, A. J. (2010). Speech perception as categori-zation. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 72, 1218–1227. https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.5.1218
*Howard, C. S., Munro, K. J., & Plack, C. J. (2010). Listening effort at signal-to-noise ratios that are typical of the school classroom. International Journal of Audiology, 49(12), 928–932. https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2010.520036
Hozo, S. P., Djulbegovic, B., & Hozo, I. (2005). Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 5(1), Article 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-5-13
*Hurtig, A., van de Poll, M. K., Pekkola, E. P., Hygge, S., Ljung, R., & Sörqvist, P. (2016). Children’s recall of words spoken in their first and second language: Effects of signal-to-noise ratio and reverberation time. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 2029. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02029
Ishikawa, K., Nudelman, C., Park, S., & Ketring, C. (in press). Perception and acoustic studies of vowel intelligibility in dysphonic speech. Journal of Voice, 35(4), 659.e11–659.e24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.12.022
International Organization for Standardization. (2008). ISO 3382-2—Acoustics—Measurement of room acoustic parameters—Part 2: Reverberation time in ordinary rooms.
*Jamieson, D. G., Kranjc, G., Yu, K., & Hodgetts, W. E. (2004). Speech intelligibility of young school-aged children in the presence of real-life classroom noise. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 15(07), 508–517. https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.15.7.5
Klatte, M., Bergström, K., & Lachmann, T. (2013). Does noise affect learning? A short review on noise effects on cognitive performance in children. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 578. https://doi. org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00578
Klatte, M., Lachmann, T., & Meis, M. (2010). Effects of noise and reverberation on speech perception and listening comprehension of children and adults in a classroom-like setting. Noise and Health, 12(12), 270–282. https://doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.70506
*Klatte, M., Meis, M., Sukowski, H., & Schick, A. (2007). Effects of irrelevant speech and traffic noise on speech perception and cognitive performance in elementary school children. Noise and Health, 9(36), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.36982
Korpershoek, H., Harms, T., de Boer, H., van Kuijk, M., & Doolaard, S. (2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of classroom management strategies and classroom management pro-grams on students’ academic, behavioral, emotional, and motivational outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 643–680. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626799
Kraft, M. A., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547–588. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268
Leibold, L. J., & Buss, E. (2013). Children’s identification of conso-nants in a speech-shaped noise or a two-talker masker. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56(4), 1144–1155. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0011)
Leibold, L. J., Hillock-Dunn, A., Duncan, N., Roush, P. A., & Buss, E. (2013). Influence of hearing loss on children’s identification of spondee words in a speech-shaped noise or a two-talker masker. Ear and Hearing, 34(5), 575–584. https://doi. org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182857742
Lyberg-Åhlander, V., Brännström, K. J., & Sahlén, B. S. (2015). On the interaction of speakers’ voice quality, ambient noise and task complexity with children’s listening comprehension and cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 871. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00871
*Lyberg-Åhlander, V., Haake, M., Brännström, J., Schötz, S., & Sahlén, B. (2015). Does the speaker’s voice quality influence children’s performance on a language comprehension test? International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17(1), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2014.898098
*Lyberg-Åhlander, V., Holm, L., Kastberg, T., Haake, M., Brännström, K. J., & Sahlén, B. (2015). Are children with stronger cognitive capacity more or less disturbed by classroom noise and dysphonic teachers? International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17(6), 577–588. https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2015.1024172
Martins, R. H. G., Pereira, E. R. B. N., Hidalgo, C. B., & Tavares, E. L. M. (2014). Voice disorders in teachers. A re-view. Journal of Voice, 28(6), 716–724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.02.008
Mattys, S. L., Brooks, J., & Cooke, M. (2009). Recognizing speech under a processing load: Dissociating energetic from informational factors. Cognitive Psychology, 59, 203–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.04.001
Mattys, S. L., Davis, M. H., Bradlow, A. R., & Scott, S. K. (2012). Speech recognition in adverse conditions: A review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27(7-8), 953–978. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2012.705006
*McCreery, R. W., & Stelmachowicz, P. G. (2013). The effects of limited bandwidth and noise on verbal processing time and word recall in normal-hearing children. Ear and Hearing, 34(5), 585–591. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e31828576e2
*McGarrigle, R., Dawes, P., Stewart, A. J., Kuchinsky, S. E., & Munro, K. J. (2017). Measuring listening-related effort and fatigue in school-aged children using pupillometry. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 161, 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.04.006
Mealings, K. (2016). Classroom acoustic conditions: Understanding what is suitable through a review of national and international standards, recommendations, and live classroom measurements. In I. Hillock & D. Mee (Eds.), Proceedings of Acoustics 2016—The Second Australasian Acoustical Societies Conference (pp. 145–172). The Australian Acoustical Society.
Medwetsky, L. (2011). Spoken language processing model: Bridging auditory and language processing to guide assessment and intervention. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 42(3), 286–296. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2011/10-0036)
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLOS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pmed.1000097
*Morsomme, D., Minell, L., & Verduyckt, I. (2011). Impact of teachers’ voice quality on children’s language processing skills (pp. 9–15). Stem En Stemstoornissen: VOCOLOGIE.
*Morton, V., & Watson, D. R. (2001). The impact of impaired vocal quality on children’s ability to process spoken language. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 26(1), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14015430118232
*Nakeva von Mentzer, C., Sundström, M., Enqvist, K., & Hällgren, M. (2018). Assessing speech perception in Swedish school-aged children: Preliminary data on the Listen-Say test. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 43(3), 106–119. https://doi. org/10.1080/14015439.2017.1380076
National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute. (2019) Study quality assessment tools: Quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools/
*Nelson, P., Kohnert, K., Sabur, S., & Shaw, D. (2005). Classroom noise and children learning through a second language. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 36(6), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2005/022)
Neuman, A. C., Wroblewski, M., Hajicek, J., & Rubinstein, A. (2010). Combined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition performance of normal-hearing children and adults. Ear and Hearing, 31(3), 336–344. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD. 0b013e3181d3d514
*Nirme, J., Haake, M., Lyberg-Åhlander, V., Brännström, J., & Sahlén, B. (2019). A virtual speaker in noisy classroom condi-tions: Supporting or disrupting children’s listening comprehen-sion? Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 44(2), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/14015439.2018.1455894
O’Malley, M., Uhl Chamot, A., & Küpper, L. (1989). Listening comprehension strategies in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 10(4), 418–437. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/10.4.418
*Osman, H., & Sullivan, J. R. (2014). Children’s auditory working memory performance in degraded listening conditions. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57(4), 1503–1511. https://doi.org/10.1044/2014_JSLHR-H-13-0286
*Peng, J., & Jiang, P. (2016). Chinese word identification and sentence intelligibility in primary school classrooms. Archives of Acoustics, 41(2), 213–219. https://doi.org/10.1515/aoa-2016-0021
*Peng, J., Zhang, H., & Yan, N. (2016). Effect of different types of noises on Chinese speech intelligibility of children in elementary school classrooms. Acta Acustica united with Acus-tica, 102(5), 938–944. https://doi.org/10.3813/AAA.919008
*Peng, J., & Wu, S. (2018). Chinese speech intelligibility of children in noisy and reverberant environments. Indoor and Built Environment, 27(10), 1357–1363. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X17716236
Pichora-Fuller, M. K., Kramer, S. E., Eckert, M. A., Edwards, B., Hornsby, B. W. Y., Humes, L. E., Larry, E., Lemke, U., Lunner, T., Matthen, M., Mackersie, C., Naylor, G., Phillips, N., Richter, M., Rudner, M., Sommers, M., Tremblay, K., & Wingfield, A. (2016). Hearing impairment and cognitive en-ergy: The Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL). Ear and Hearing, 37, 5S–27S. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000312
*Picou, E. M., Bean, B. N., Marcrum, S. C., Hornsby, B. W., & Ricketts, T. A. (2019). Moderate reverberation does not increase subjective fatigue, subjective listening effort, or behavioral listening effort in school-aged children. Frontiers in Psy-chology, 10, 1749. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01749
*Prodi, N., Visentin, C., Borella, E., Mammarella, I. C., & Di Domenico, A. (2019). Noise, age and gender effects on speech intelligibility and sentence comprehension for 11-to 13-year-old children in real classrooms. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2166. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02166
*Prodi, N., Visentin, C., Peretti, A., Griguolo, J., & Bartolucci, G. B. (2019). Investigating listening effort in classrooms for 5-to 7-year-old children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 50(2), 196–210. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_LSHSS-18-0039
R Studio Team. (2019). RStudio: Integrated Development for R [Computer software]. http://www.rstudio.com/
Rodrigues, A. L. V., de Medeiros, A. M., & Teixeira, L. C. (2017). Impactos da voz do professor na sala de aula: Revisão da literatura [Impact of the teacher’s voice in the classroom: A literature review]. Distúrb. Comun, 29(1), 2–9. https://doi.org/10. 23925/2176-2724.2017v29i1p2-9
*Rogerson, J., & Dodd, B. (2005). Is there an effect of dysphonic teachers’ voices on children’s processing of spoken language? Journal of Voice, 19(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2004.02.007
Rönnberg, J., Lunner, T., Zekveld, A., Sörqvist, P., Danielsson, H., Lyxell, B., Dahlström, Ö., Signoret, C., Stenfelt, S., Pichora-Fuller, M. K., & Rudner, M. (2013). The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) model: Theoretical, empirical, and clinical advances. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 7, 31. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2013.00031
Roy, N., Merrill, R. M., Thibeault, S., Parsa, R. A., Gray, S. D., & Smith, E. M. (2004). Prevalence of voice disorders in teachers and the general population. Journal of Speech, Lan-guage, and Hearing Research, 47(2), 281–293. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2004/023)
Rueschemeyer, S.-A., Gaskell, M., & G. (Eds.). (2018). The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics: Second edition. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198786825.001.0001
*Sahlén, B., Haake, M., von Lochow, H., Holm, L., Kastberg, T., Brännström, K. J., & Lyberg-Åhlander, V. (2017). Is children’s listening effort in background noise influenced by the speaker’s voice quality? Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 43(2), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/14015439.2017.1324914
Schiller, I., Morsomme, D., Kob, M., & Remacle, A. (2019). Children’s perception of degraded speech at normal vs. fast speech rate. In M. Ochmann, M. Vorländer, & J. Fels (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd International Congress on Acoustics, integrating 4th EAA Euroregio 2019 (pp. 5961–5967). Deutsche Gesellschaft für Akustik eV (DEGA).
Schiller, I. S., Morsomme, D., Kob, M., & Remacle, A. (2021). Listening to a dysphonic speaker in noise may impede chil-dren’s spoken language processing in a realistic classroom set-ting. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 52(1), 396–408. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_LSHSS-20-00078
Schiller, I. S., Morsomme, D., Kob, M., & Remacle, A. (2020). Noise and a speaker’s impaired voice quality disrupt spoken language processing in school-aged children: Evidence from performance and response time measures. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 63(7), 2115–2131. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00348
Schiller, I. S., Remacle, A., & Morsomme, D. (2019). Imitating dys-phonic voice: A suitable technique to create speech stimuli for spoken language processing tasks? Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 45(4), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/14015439.2019.1659410
Shield, B. M., & Dockrell, J. E. (2003). The effects of noise on children at school: A review. Building Acoustics, 10(2), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1260/135101003768965960
*Sullivan, J. R., Osman, H., & Schafer, E. C. (2015). The effect of noise on the relationship between auditory working memory and comprehension in school-age children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58(3), 1043–1051. https://doi. org/10.1044/2015_JSLHR-H-14-0204
Talarico, M., Abdilla, G., Aliferis, M., Balazic, I., Giaprakis, I., Stefanakis, T., Foenander, K., Grayden, D. B., & Paolini, A. G. (2007). Effect of age and cognition on childhood speech in noise perception abilities. Audiology and Neurotology, 12(1), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1159/000096153
Van Houtte, E., Claeys, S., Wuyts, F., & Van Lierde, K. (2011). The impact of voice disorders among teachers: Vocal complaints, treatment-seeking behavior, knowledge of vocal care, and voice-related absenteeism. Journal of Voice, 25(5), 570–575. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2010.04.008
Valente, D. L., Plevinsky, H. M., Franco, J. M., Heinrichs-Graham, E. C., & Lewis, D. E. (2012). Experimental investigation of the effects of the acoustical conditions in a simulated classroom on speech recognition and learning in children. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(1), 232–246. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3662059
Vandenbroucke, L., Spilt, J., Verschueren, K., Piccinin, C., & Baeyens, D. (2018). The classroom as a developmental context for cognitive development: A meta-analysis on the importance of teacher–student interactions for children’s executive functions. Review of Educational Research, 88(1), 125–164. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317743200
*von Lochow, H., Lyberg-Åhlander, V., Sahlén, B., Kastberg, T., & Brännström, K. J. (2018). The effect of voice quality and competing speakers in a passage comprehension task: Performance in relation to cognitive functioning in children with normal hearing. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 43(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14015439.2017.1298835
Wingfield, A. (2016). Evolution of models of working memory and cognitive resources. Ear and Hearing, 37, 35S–43S. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000310
Wróblewski, M., Lewis, D. E., Valente, D. L., & Stelmachowicz, P. G. (2012). Effects of reverberation on speech recognition in stationary and modulated noise by school-aged children and young adults. Ear and Hearing, 33(6), 731–744. https://doi. org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e31825aecad
*Yacullo, W. S., & Hawkins, D. B. (1987). Speech recognition in noise and reverberation by school-age children. Audiology, 26(4), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.3109/00206098709081552
*Zhang, D., Tenpierik, M., & Bluyssen, P. M. (2019). Interaction effect of background sound type and sound pressure level on children of primary schools in the Netherlands. Applied Acoustics, 154, 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2019.05.007
