Ally, B.A., Gold, C.A., & Budson, A.E. (2009). An evaluation of recollection and familiarity in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment using receiver operating characteristics. Brain and Cognition, 69(3), 504–513. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc. 2008.11.003
Ballesteros, S. & Reales, J.M. (2004). Intact haptic priming in normal aging and Alzheimer’s disease: Evidence for dissociable memory systems. Neuropsychologia, 42(8), 1063–1070. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.12.008
Bastin, C., Besson, G., Simon, J., Delhaye, E., Geurten, M., Willems, S., & Salmon, E. (2019). An integrative memory model of recollection and familiarity to understand memory deficits. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 42, 1–66. doi: 10.1017/ S0140525X19000621
Bomilcar, I., Morris, R.G., Brown, R.G., & Mograbi, D.C. (2018). Implicit behavioral change in response to cognitive tasks in Alzheimer disease. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 31(1), 2–12. doi: 10.1097/wnn.0000000000000145
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cormack, F.K., Tovee, M., & Ballard, C. (2000). Contrast sensitivity and visual acuity in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 15, 614–620. doi: 10.1002/1099-1166(200007)
Efklides, A. & Petkaki, C. (2005). Effects of mood on students’ metacognitive experiences. Learning and Instruction, 15, 415–431. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.010
Embree, L.M., Budson, A.E., & Ally, B.A. (2012). Memorial familiarity remains intact for pictures but not for words in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychologia, 50(9), 2333–2340. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.06.001
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. doi: 10.3758/BF03193146
Fernandez-Duque, D., Baird, J.A., & Posner, M.I. (2000). Executive attention and metacognitive regulation. Consciousness and Cognition, 9, 288–307. doi: 10.1006/ccog.2000.0447
Folstein, M.F., Folstein, S.E., & McHugh, P.R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of psychiatric research, 12(3), 189–198.
Galvin, S.J., Podd, J.V., Drga, V., & Whitmore, J. (2003). Type 2 tasks in the theory of signal detectability: Discrimination between correct and incorrect decisions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(4), 843–876. doi: 10.3758/bf03196546
Geurten, M., Bastin, C., Salmon, E., & Willems, S. (2020). Hunting down the source: How amnesic patients avoid fluency-based memory errors. Neuropsychology, 34(1), 15–23. doi: 10.1037/ neu0000566
Geurten, M., Salmon, E., & Bastin, C. (2019). Impaired explicit self-awareness but preserved behavioral regulation in patients with Alzheimer disease. Aging & Mental Health, 1–7. doi: 10.1080/ 13607863.2019.1675142
Geurten, M. & Willems, S. (2017). The learned reinterpretation of fluency in amnesia. Neuropsychologia, 101, 10–16. doi: 10. 1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.05.012
Geurten, M., Willems, S., & Meulemans, T. (2015). Beyond the experience: Detection of metamemorial regularities. Consciousness and Cognition, 33, 16–23. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.11.009
Geurten, M., Willems, S., Salmon, E., & Bastin, C. (2020). Fluency-based memory decisions in Alzheimer’s disease: A matter of source detection? Neuropsychology, 34(2), 176–185.
Grober, E., Merling, A., Heimlich, T., & Lipton, R.B. (1997). Free and cued selective reminding and selective reminding in the elderly. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 19(5), 643–654. doi: 10.1080/01688639708403750
Jacoby, L.L. & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110(3), 306–340. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.110.3.306
Keane, M.M., Gabrieli, J.D.E., Fennema, A.C., Growdon, J.H., & Corkin, S. (1991). Evidence for a dissociation between perceptual and conceptual priming in Alzheimer’s disease. Behavioral Neuroscience, 105(2), 326–342. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044. 105.2.326
Kelley, C.M. & Rhodes, M.G. (2002). Making sense and nonsense of experience: Attributions in memory and judgment, In B.H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, Vol. 41, (pp. 293–320). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
Levinoff, E.J., Li, K.Z.H., Murtha, S., & Chertkow, H. (2004). Selective attention impairments in Alzheimer’s disease: evidence for dissociable components. Neuropsychology, 18, 580–588. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.18.3.580
McKhann, G.M., Knopman, D.S., Chertkow, H., Hyman, B.T., Jack, C.R., Kawas, C.H.,::: Phelps, C.H. (2011). The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association work-groups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s & Dementia, 7(3), 263–269. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz. 2011.03.005
Mograbi, D.C., Brown, R.G., Salas, C., & Morris, R.G. (2012). Emotional reactivity and awareness of task performance in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychologia, 50(8), 2075–2084. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.05.008
Nelson, T.O. & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 26, 125–141. doi: 10.1016/S0079-7421(08) 60053-5
O’Connor, M.K. & Ally, B.A. (2010). Using stimulus form change to understand memorial familiarity for pictures and words in patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychologia, 48(7), 2068–2074. doi: 10.1016/j. neuropsychologia.2010.03.027
Olds, J.M. & Westerman, D.L. (2012). Can fluency be interpreted as novelty? Retraining the interpretation of fluency in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(3), 653–664. doi: 10.1037/ a0026784
Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 364–382. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3
Simon, J., Bastin, C., Salmon, E., & Willems, S. (2018). Increasing the salience of fluency cues does not reduce the recognition memory impairment in Alzheimer’s disease! Journal of Neuropsychology, 12, 213–230. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12112
Song, C., Kanai, R., Fleming, S.M., Weil, R.S., Schwarzkopf, D.S., & Rees, G. (2011). Relating inter-individual differences in metacognitive performance on different perceptual tasks. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(4), 1787–1792. doi: 10.1016/ j.concog.2010.12.011
Souchay, C. & Moulin, C.J.A. (2009). Memory and consciousness in Alzheimer’s disease. Current Alzheimer Research, 6, 186–195. doi: 10.2174/156720509788486545
Unkelbach, C. (2006). The learned interpretation of cognitive fluency. Psychological Science, 17(4), 339–345. doi: 10.1111/j. 1467-9280.2006.01708.x
Unkelbach, C. (2007). Reversing the truth effect: Learning the interpretation of processing fluency in judgments of truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(1), 219–230. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.219
Unkelbach, C. & Greifeneder, R. (2013). A general model of fluency effects in judgment and decision making, In C. Unkelbach & R. Greifeneder (Eds.), The experience of thinking: How the fluency of mental processes influences cognition and behaviour. New York: Psychology Press.
Westerberg, C.E., Paller, K.A., Weintraub, S., Mesulam, M.M., Holdstock, J.S., Mayes, A.R., & Reber, P.J. (2006). When memory does not fail: Familiarity-based recognition in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychology, 20(2), 193–205. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.20.2.193
Whittlesea, B.W.A. (1993). Illusions of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(6), 1235–1253. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.19.6.1235
Whittlesea, B.W.A., Masson, M.E.J., & Hughes, A.D. (2005). False memory following rapidly presented lists: The element of surprise. Psychological Research, 69(5–6), 420–430. doi: 10.1007/ s00426-005-0213-1
Whittlesea, B.W.A. & Williams, L.D. (1998). Why do strangers feel familiar, but friends don’t? A discrepancy-attribution account of feelings of familiarity. Acta Psychologica, 98(2–3), 141–165. doi: 10.1016/S0001-6918(97)00040-1
Whittlesea, B.W.A. & Williams, L.D. (2000). The source of feelings of familiarity: The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(3), 547–565. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.26. 3.547
Whittlesea, B.W.A. & Williams, L.D. (2001a). The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: I. The heuristic basis of feelings and familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(1), 3–13. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393. 27.1.3
Whittlesea, B.W.A. & Williams, L.D. (2001b). The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: II. Expectation, uncertainty, surprise, and feelings of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(1), 14–33. doi: 10.1037/ 0278-7393.27.1.14
Willems, S., Germain, S., Salmon, E., & Van der Linden, M. (2009). Patients with Alzheimer’s disease use metamemory to attenuate the Jacoby–Whitehouse illusion. Neuropsychologia, 47(12), 2672–2676. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009. 04.029
Willems, S. & Van der Linden, M. (2006). Mere exposure effect: A consequence of direct and indirect fluency–preference links. Consciousness and Cognition, 15(2), 323–341. doi: 10.1016/j. concog.2005.06.008
Wolk, D.A., Signoff, E.D., & DeKosky, S.T. (2008). Recollection and familiarity in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: A global decline in recognition memory. Neuropsychologia, 46(7), 1965–1978. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.01. 017
Yonelinas, A.P., Kroll, N.E.A., Quamme, J.R., Lazzara, M.M., Sauvé, M.-J., Widaman, K.F., & Knight, R.T. (2002). Effects of extensive temporal lobe damage or mild hypoxia on recollection and familiarity. Nature Neuroscience, 5(11), 1236–1241. doi: 10.1038/nn961
