Distinctiveness heuristic; Metamemory; False memory; Children
Abstract :
[en] The present experiment investigates whether young children are able to reduce their false recognition rate after distinctive encoding by implementing a strategic metacognitive rule. Seventy-two children, aged 4, 6, and 9 years, studied two lists of unrelated items. One of these lists was visually displayed (picture condition) while the other was presented auditorily (word condition). After each study phase, participants completed recognition tests. Finally, they answered questions about their explicit knowledge of the distinctive-encoding effect. The results revealed that even the youngest children in our sample showed a smaller proportion of intrusions in the picture condition than in the word condition. Furthermore, the results of the signal detection analyses were consistent with the hypothesis that the lower rate of false recognitions after picture encoding results from the implementation of a conservative response criterion based on metacognitive expectations (distinctiveness heuristic). Moreover, the absence of correlation between children’s explicit knowledge of the distinctiveness rule and their effective use of this metacognitive heuristic seems to indicate that its involvement in memory decisions could be mediated by implicit mechanisms.
Disciplines :
Theoretical & cognitive psychology
Author, co-author :
Geurten, Marie ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de Psychologie : cognition et comportement > Neuropsychologie
Willems, Sylvie ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Clinique psychologique et logopédique universitaire (CPLU)
Meulemans, Thierry ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Doyen de la Faculté de Psychologie et des sc. de l'éducation
Language :
English
Title :
Are Children Conservative, Liberal or Metacognitive? Preliminary Evidence for the Involvement of the Distinctiveness Heuristic in Decision Making
Publication date :
2015
Journal title :
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
ISSN :
0022-0965
eISSN :
1096-0457
Publisher :
Academic Press, New York, United States - New York
Brainerd C., Reyna V., Ceci S. Developmental reversals in false memory: A review of data and theory. Psychological Bulletin 2008, 134:343-382.
Cragg L., Nation K. Self-ordered pointing as a test of working memory in typically developing children. Memory 2007, 15:526-535.
Dobbins I.G., Kroll N.E.A. Distinctiveness and the recognition mirror effect: Evidence for an item-based criterion placement heuristic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2005, 31:1186-1198.
Dodson C.S., Schacter D.L. Aging and strategic retrieval processes: Reducing false memories with a distinctiveness heuristic. Psychology and Aging 2002, 17:405-415.
Drewe E. Go-no go learning after frontal lobe lesions in humans. Cortex 1975, 11:8-16.
Dunn L., Thériault-Whalen C., Dunn L. Echelle de vocabulaire en images Peabody: Adaptation française du Peabody Vocabulary Test-Revised 1993, PsyCan, Toronto, Canada.
Gallo D.A., Bell D.M., Beier J.S., Schacter D.L. Two types of recollection-based monitoring in younger and older adults: Recall-to-reject and the distinctiveness heuristic. Memory 2006, 14:730-741.
Geurten M., Willems S., Meulemans T. Beyond the experience: Detection of metamemorial regularities. Consciousness and Cognition 2015, 33:16-23.
Ghetti S., Qin J., Goodman G.S. False memories in children and adults: Age, distinctiveness, and subjective experience. Developmental Psychology 2002, 38:705-718.
Grammer J.K., Purtell K.M., Coffman J.L., Ornstein P.A. Relations between children's metamemory and strategic performance: Time-varying covariates in early elementary school. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2011, 108:139-155.
Hege A.C., Dodson C.S. Why distinctive information reduces false memories: Evidence for both impoverished relational-encoding and distinctiveness heuristic accounts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2004, 30:787-795.
Koriat A., Ackerman R., Lockl K., Schneider W. The memorizing effort heuristic in judgments of learning: A developmental perspective. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2009, 102:265-279.
Lipowski S.L., Merriman W.E., Dunlosky J. Preschoolers can make highly accurate judgments of learning. Developmental Psychology 2013, 49:1505-1516.
Lynn S.K., Barrett L.F. "Utilizing" signal detection theory. Psychological Science 2014, 25:1663-1673.
Macmillan N.A., Creelman C.D. Detection theory: A user's guide 2005, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. 2nd ed.
McDonough I.M., Gallo D.A. Illusory expectations can affect retrieval-monitoring accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2012, 38:391-404.
Paulus M., Tsalas N., Proust J., Sodian B. Metacognitive monitoring of oneself and others: Developmental changes during childhood and adolescence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2014, 122:153-165.
Roediger H.L., McDermott K.B. Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1995, 21:803-814.
Rossion B., Pourtois G. Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's object pictorial set: The role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition. Perception 2004, 33:217-236.
Rotello C.M., Macmillan N.A., Van Tassel G. Recall-to-reject in recognition: Evidence from ROC curves. Journal of Memory and Language 2000, 43:67-88.
Schacter D.L., Israel L., Racine C. Suppressing false recognition in younger and older adults: The distinctiveness heuristic. Journal of Memory and Language 1999, 40:1-24.
Schwarz N. Metacognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology 2004, 14:332-348.
Tversky A., Kahneman D. Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology 1973, 5:207-232.
Wechsler D. Echelle d'intelligence de Wechsler pour la période préscolaire et primaire: WPPSI-III 2004, Les Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée, Paris.
Wechsler D. Echelle d'intelligence de Wechsler pour enfants: WISC-IV 2005, Les Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée, Paris.
Zimmermann P., Gondan M., Fimm B. KiTAP: Test d'évaluation de l'attention (Version pour enfants) 2005, PsyTest, Herzogenrath, Germany.