Article (Scientific journals)
Harmonization of strategies for the validation of quantitative analytical procedures - A SFSTP proposal - Part II
Hubert, Philippe; Nguyen-Huu, J.-J.; Boulanger, Bruno et al.
2007In Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 45 (1), p. 70-81
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
articlephhJPBAPartII_2007.pdf
Publisher postprint (1.02 MB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
analytical procedure; validation; harmonization; quantitative analysis; accuracy profile; total error; experimental protocol
Abstract :
[en] As reported in a previous paper[1], the main objective of the new commission of the Societe Francaise des Sciences et Techniques Pharmaceutiques (SFSTP) was the harmonisation of approaches for the validation of quantitative analytical procedures. In a series of meetings, members of this Commission have first tried to review the objectives of analytical methods and the objectives of validation methods and to recommend the use of two-sided beta-expectation tolerance intervals for total error of validation samples (accuracy profile) in the acceptance/rejection of analytical method in validation phase. In the context of the harmonization, the other objectives were: (i) to propose a consensus on the norms usually recognized, while widely incorporating the ISO terminology; (ii) to recommend to validate the analytical procedure accordingly to the way it will be used in routine; (iii) to elaborate a rational, practical and statistically reliable strategy to assure the quality of the analytical results generated. This strategy has been formalised in a guide and the three latter objectives made by the Commission are summarised in the present paper which is the second part of summary report of the SFSTP commission. The SFSTP guide has been produced to help analysts to validate their analytical methods. It is the result of a consensus between professionals having expertise in analytical and/or statistical fields. The suggestions presented in this paper should therefore help the analyst to design and perform the minimum number validation experiments needed to obtain all the required information to establish and demonstrate the reliability of its analytical procedure. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Disciplines :
Pharmacy, pharmacology & toxicology
Chemistry
Author, co-author :
Hubert, Philippe  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Chimie analytique
Nguyen-Huu, J.-J.;  Aventis
Boulanger, Bruno ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de pharmacie > Analyse des médicaments
Chapuzet, Eric;  QUALILAB (Olivet)
Chiap, Patrice ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de pharmacie > Analyse des médicaments
Cohen, N.;  EXPANSCIENCE (Epernon)
Compagnon, Pierre-Albert;  Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des produits de santé - AFSSAPS > Unité physico-chimie
Dewé, Walthère ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Analyse des médicaments
Feinberg, Max;  Institut national de la recherche agronomique - INRA
Lallier, M.;  INNOTHERA (Arcueil, France)
Laurentie, Michel;  Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des produits de santé - AFSSAPS
Mercier, N.;  QUALILAB (Olivet, France)
Muzard, G.
Nivet, C.
Valat, L.
Rozet, Eric ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Chimie analytique
More authors (6 more) Less
Language :
English
Title :
Harmonization of strategies for the validation of quantitative analytical procedures - A SFSTP proposal - Part II
Publication date :
21 September 2007
Journal title :
Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis
ISSN :
0731-7085
eISSN :
1873-264X
Publisher :
Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford, United Kingdom
Volume :
45
Issue :
1
Pages :
70-81
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 13 February 2009

Statistics


Number of views
282 (40 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
45 (11 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
318
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
256
OpenCitations
 
268

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi