Abstract :
[en] BACKGROUND: Isokinetic dynamometry is widely used to assess muscle fatigability, particularly in athletes, due to its high reproducibility and sensitivity. However, the clinical and practical relevance of fatigability parameters remains debated, especially regarding their added value compared to simpler strength indicators.Objectives: The objectives of this study were to determine (1) the redundancy of measured knee extensor fatigability parameters, (2) the feasibility of predicting them from the best repetition (BR1), and (3) the relationship between initial strength and fatigability.Methods: 189 healthy male volunteers (sedentary to elite athletes) performed 30 maximal concentric knee flexions-extensions at 180°.s−1. Pearson correlations, linear regressions, and k-fold cross-validation (k = 10) assessed parameter relationships and derived predictive equations.Results: Very strong correlations (PCC > 0.80) linked BR1 to most fatigability parameters, indicating high redundancy. Predictive equations based on BR1 accurately estimated total/partial sums (R2 > 0.95, ICC > 0.90). Moreover, stronger individuals exhibited steeper performance declines (PCC < −0.80 between BR1 and slope of the regression of the performance).Conclusions: Fatigability parameters offer limited added value, as they are highly redundant with BR1. Simplified BR1-based protocols suffice for clinical use, while full isokinetic testing remains essential for elite athletes or (neuro)muscular pathology requiring precision.
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
0