deep learning; digital twins; drug discovery; machine learning (ML); systems biology; systems medicine; Humans; Algorithms; Neural Networks, Computer; Adaptive Algorithms; Soft Computing; Deep Learning; Drug Development/methods; Drug Discovery; Drug Development; Biophysics; Biochemistry
Abstract :
[en] The costly process of bringing new therapeutics to market and high attrition rates have motivated the search for new frameworks in drug research and development (R&D). These challenges extend to the clinical space with the need for better patient stratification and therapy matching. Moreover, despite significant leaps in deep learning, even the most sophisticated methods rely on static analytical structures. Thus, unaddressed needs in therapy development and applications call for unconventional thinking to capture dynamic processes across preclinical and clinical spaces. With this review, we trace how crucial algorithmic pieces have been coming together over the past decades for the next generation of deep learning, which we define as adaptive learning. This new class of robust analytical architectures will be enabled through self-organised models where inputs changing over time can guide deep networks to adapt to biases and optimise learning. There have already been glimpses of such groundbreaking solutions in liquid neural networks (LNNs), graph attention algorithms, digital twins, and engineering research. As we review multiple examples and applications, we want to highlight the emerging fundamental shifts in discovery and analytical paradigms. Only by continuing to develop new frameworks can we capture complex disease interactomes and identify or improve therapeutic avenues. Insight Box Our work underscores the emerging shifts in research and development (R&D) and drug discovery from a deep learning perspective. First, we identify and discuss the missing link in drug discovery that affects multiple areas in translational research. We then demonstrate how critical algorithmic, analytical, and technological pieces have been coming together to address these challenges. Furthermore, we illustrate how applied AI and deep learning frameworks will need to change and what solutions are already available. Consequently, we employ examples of novel deep learning architectures, digital twins, and clinical research. Notably, there has been very little discussion to acknowledge current limitations in deep learning from a translational perspective. Thus, our work offers not only new insights but also a direction of travel for future developments, which we define as adaptive learning.
Disciplines :
Engineering, computing & technology: Multidisciplinary, general & others
Author, co-author :
Kanapeckaite, Auste ; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Hammer Health Sciences Building, 1208, 701 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032, United States ; Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine, M. K. Ciurlionio g. 21, Vilnius 03101, Lithuania
Peters, Christopher John; Academic Department of Surgery, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom
Laurinavicius, Arvydas; Centre for Digital Medicine, Translational Health Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Santariskių g. 5, Vilnius 08410, Lithuania
Geris, Liesbet ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département d'aérospatiale et mécanique > Génie biomécanique ; Biomechanics Section and Skeletal Biology & Engineering Research Center, KU Leuven, Waaistraat 6, Leuven 3000, Belgium
Language :
English
Title :
Novel discovery framework: harnessing adaptive learning for breakthroughs in drug development and clinical applications.
Minikel EV, Painter JL, Dong CC et al. Refining the impact of genetic evidence on clinical success. Nature 2024; 629: 624-9. 10.1038/s41586-024-07316-0.
Sun D, Gao W, Hu H et al. Why 90% of clinical drug development fails and how to improve it? Acta Pharm Sin B 2022; 12: 3049-62. 10.1016/j.apsb.2022.02.002.
DiMasi JA, Grabowski HG. The cost of biopharmaceutical R&D: is biotech different? Manag Decis Econ 2007; 28: 469-79. 10.1002/mde.1360.
DiMasi JA, Grabowski HG, Hansen RW. Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: new estimates of R&D costs. J Health Econ 2016; 47: 20-33. 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.01.012.
Lanne A, Usselmann LEJ, Llowarch P et al. A perspective on the changing landscape of HTS. Drug Discov Today 2023; 28: 103670. 10.1016/j.drudis.2023.103670.
Jentzsch V, Osipenko L, Scannell JW et al. Costs and causes of oncology drug attrition with the example of insulin-like growth Factor-1 receptor inhibitors. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6: e2324977. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.24977.
Katsoulakis E, Wang Q, Wu H et al. Digital twins for health: a scoping review. NPJ Digit Med 2024; 7: 77. 10.1038/s41746-024-01073-0.
Clusmann J, Kolbinger FR, Muti HS et al. The future landscape of large language models in medicine. Commun Med (Lond) 2023; 3: 141. 10.1038/s43856-023-00370-1.
Mirzadeh I, Alizadeh K, Shahrokhi H. et al. GSM-symbolic: understanding the limitations of mathematical reasoning in large language models arXiv [preprint]. 2024. arXiv:2410.05229.
Lappin S. Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of large language models. J of Log Lang and Inf 2024; 33: 9-20. 10.1007/s10849-023-09409-x.
Mazzocchi F. Complexity in biology. Exceeding the limits of reductionism and determinism using complexity theory. EMBO Rep 2008; 9: 10-4. 10.1038/sj.embor.7401147.
Parasrampuria DA, Benet LZ, Sharma A. Why drugs fail in late stages of development: case study analyses from the last decade and recommendations. AAPS J 2018; 20: 46. 10.1208/s12248-018-0204-y.
Vincent F, Nueda A, Lee J et al. Phenotypic drug discovery: recent successes, lessons learned and new directions. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2022; 21: 899-914. 10.1038/s41573-022-00472-w Epub 2022 May 30. Erratum in: Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2022 Jul;21(7):541. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-022-00503-6.
Nejati B, Shahhosseini R, Hajiabbasi M et al. Cancer-on-chip: a breakthrough organ-on-a-chip technology in cancer cell modeling. Med Biol Eng Comput 2025; 63: 321-37. 10.1007/s11517-024-03199-5.
Singh G, Mishra A, Mathur A et al. Advancement of organ-on-chip towards next generation medical technology. Biosens Bioelectron X 2024; 18: 100480. 10.1016/j.biosx.2024.100480.
Allwardt V, Ainscough AJ, Viswanathan P et al. Translational roadmap for the organs-on-a-Chip industry toward broad adoption. Bioengineering (Basel) 2020; 7: 112. 10.3390/bioengineering7030112.
Berg EL. The future of phenotypic drug discovery. Cell Chem Biol 2021; 28: 424-30. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2021.01.010.
Deben C, De La Hoz EC, Compte ML et al. OrBITS: label-free and time-lapse monitoring of patient derived organoids for advanced drug screening. Cell Oncol (Dordr) 2023; 46: 299-314. 10.1007/s13402-022-00750-0.
Sertkaya A, Beleche T, Jessup A et al. Costs of drug development and Research and Development intensity in the US, 2000-2018. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7: e2415445. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.15445.
Ong M. A comprehensive framework identifying barriers to global health R&D innovation and access. BMJ Glob Health 2023; 8: e013076. 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013076.
Swinney DC, Anthony J. Anthony J how were new medicines discovered? Nat Rev Drug Discov 2011; 10: 507-19. 10.1038/nrd3480.
Jayatunga MKP, Ayers M, Bruens L et al. How successful are AI-discovered drugs in clinical trials? A first analysis and emerging lessons. Drug Discov Today 2024; 29: 104009. 10.1016/j.drudis.2024.104009.
Xie RZ, Towse A, Garrison LP Jr. Should we pay for scientific knowledge Spillovers? The underappreciated value of "failed" R&D efforts. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2022; 38: e31. 10.1017/S0266462322000150.
Millrine D, Kishimoto T. A brighter side to thalidomide: its potential use in immunological disorders. Trends Mol Med 2017; 23: 348-61. 10.1016/j.molmed.2017.02.006.
Portela RMC, Varsakelis C, Richelle A et al. When is an In Silico representation a digital twin? A biopharmaceutical industry approach to the digital twin concept. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 2021; 176: 35-55. 10.1007/10_2020_138.
Michoel T, Zhang JD. Causal inference in drug discovery and development. Drug Discov Today 2023; 28: 103737. 10.1016/j.drudis.2023.103737.
Wray J, Whitmore A. Network-driven drug discovery. Methods Mol Biol 2022; 2390: 177-90. 10.1007/978-1-0716-1787-8_7.
Gartner report for AI, 2023. https://www.gartner.com/en/articles/what-s-new-in-artificial-intelligence-from-the-2023-gartner-hype-cycle
Gartner report for AI, 2024. https://www.gartner.com/en/documents/5505695
Mnih V, Kavukcuoglu K, Silver D et al. Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature 2015; 518: 529-33. 10.1038/nature14236.
Feder E, Rathod I, Shyamsukha P. et al. Lazy self-adjusting bounded-degree networks for the matching model. In: IEEE INFOCOM 2022 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications; 2022 May 2-5. pp. 1089-98. London, UK. 10.1109/INFOCOM48880.2022.9796885.
Yoshida E, Murata S, Tomita K et al. Experimental study on a self-repairing modular machine. Robot Auton Syst 1999; 29: 79-89. 10.1016/S0921-8890(99)00040-8.
Kim J, Jeerapan I, Sempionatto JR et al. Wearable bioelectronics: enzyme-based body-worn electronic devices. Acc Chem Res 2018; 51: 2820-8. 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00451.
Khemani B, Patil S, Kotecha K et al. A review of graph neural networks: concepts, architectures, techniques, challenges, datasets, applications, and future directions. J Big Data 2024; 11: 18. 10.1186/s40537-023-00876-4.
Chandra A, Malik OP, Hope GS. A self-tuning controller for the control of multi-machine power systems. IEEE Trans Power Syst 1988; 3: 1065-71. 10.1109/59.14563.
Fukuda T, Nakagawa S, Kawauchi Y. et al. Structure decision method for self organizing robots based on cell structure - CEBOT. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. pp. 695-700. Scottsdale, AZ, 1989.
Ghobadi M, Mahajan R, Phanishayee A. et al. Projector: Agile reconfigurable data center interconnect. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGCOMM Conference. pp. 216-29. Florianópolis, Brazil, 2016.
Unagolla JM, Jayasuriya AC. Recent advances in organoid engineering: a comprehensive review. Appl Mater Today 2022; 29: 101582. 10.1016/j.apmt.2022.101582.
Kobayashi Y, Hashizume H, Takiguchi S et al. A microfluidics platform for simultaneous evaluation of sensitivity and side effects of anti-cancer drugs using a three-dimensional culture method. Sci Rep 2025; 15: 39. 10.1038/s41598-024-84297-0.
Pearl J. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Burlington, Morgan kaufmann, 1988.
Elliman D, Pulido JRG. Visualizing ontology components through self-organizing maps. In: Proceedings sixth international conference on information visualisation. pp. 434-8. IEEE, 2002.
Harper R. Self-adjusting computation. In: Díaz J, Karhumäki J, Lepistö A et al. (eds.). Automata, Languages and Programming. ICALP 2004. Berlin, Springer, 2004, 1-32.
Bengio Y. Learning deep architectures for AI. Foundations and trends® in Machine Learning 2.1 2009; 1-127.
Sarukkai RR. Supervised self-coding in multilayered feedforward networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 1996; 7: 1184-95. 10.1109/72.536313.
LeCun Y, Bottou L, Bengio Y et al. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proc IEEE 1998; 86: 2278-324. 10.1109/5.726791.
Mandic D, Chambers J. Recurrent Neural Networks for Prediction: Learning Algorithms, Architectures and Stability. New York, Wiley, 2001.
Nadif M, Role F. Unsupervised and self-supervised deep learning approaches for biomedical text mining. Brief Bioinform 2021; 22: 1592-603. 10.1093/bib/bbab016.
Choi SR, Lee M. Transformer architecture and attention mechanisms in genome data analysis: a comprehensive review. Biology (Basel) 2023; 12: 1033. 10.3390/biology12071033.
Jaeger H. The "echo state" approach to analysing and training recurrent neural networks-with an erratum note. Bonn, Germany: German national research center for information technology gmd technical report 2001; 148: 13.
Maass W, Natschläger T, Markram H. Real-time computing without stable states: a new framework for neural computation based on perturbations. Neural Comput 2002; 14: 2531-60. 10.1162/089976602760407955.
Ceni A, Gallicchio C. Edge of stability Echo state network. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 2025; 36: 7555-64. 10.1109/TNNLS.2024.3400045.
Krenzer D, Bogdan M. Reinforced liquid state machines-new training strategies for spiking neural networks based on reinforcements. Front Comput Neurosci 2025; 19: 1569374. 10.3389/fncom.2025.1569374.
Chen RT, Rubanova Y, Bettencourt J et al. Neural ordinary differential equations. Adv Neural Inf Proces Syst 2018; 31.
Lent P, Bunkova O, Magyar B et al. Jaxkineticmodel: neural ordinary differential equations inspired parameterization of kinetic models. PLoS Comput Biol 2025; 21: e1012733. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012733.
Tegelen E, Voorn G, Athanasiadis IN et al. Neural ordinary differential equations for learning and extrapolating system dynamics across bifurcations. Chaos: an interdisciplinary. Journal of Nonlinear Science 2025; 35.
Hossain I, Fanfani V, Quackenbush J et al. Biologically informed NeuralODEs for genome-wide regulatory dynamics Res Sq [Preprint]. 2023; rs.3.rs-2675584. 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2675584/v1 Update in: Genome Biol. 2024 May 21;25(1):127. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-024-03264-0.
Pawlak WA, Howard N. Neuromorphic algorithms for brain implants: a review. Front Neurosci 2025; 19: 1570104. 10.3389/fnins.2025.1570104.
Hasani R, Lechner M, Amini A et al. Liquid Time-Constant Networks. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 35, 2021, pp. 7657-66.
Lechner M, Hasani R, Amini A et al. Neural Circuit Policies Enabling Auditable Autonomy. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2022.
Mughees M, Li Y, Li YR. From c. elegans to liquid neural networks: A robust wind power multi-time scale prediction framework. In: IECON 2024-50th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society. pp. 1-6. IEEE, 2024.
Kavakli M, Uçar F. Liquid neural networks-classification and time series forecasting use case. In: 2024 8th International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing Symposium (IDAP). pp. 1-7. IEEE, 2024.
Gaudelet T, Day B, Jamasb AR et al. Utilizing graph machine learning within drug discovery and development. Briefings in Bioinformatics 2021; 22.
Han P, Wang J, Liu D et al. Robust temporal knowledge inference via pathway snapshots with liquid neural network. Methods 2025; 241: 24-32. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2025.05.003.
Kudithipudi D, Schuman C, Vineyard CM et al. Neuromorphic computing at scale. Nature 2025; 637: 801-12. 10.1038/s41586-024-08253-8.
Mehonic A, Ielmini D, Roy K et al. Roadmap to neuromorphic computing with emerging technologies. APL Mater 2024; 12: 18-21. 10.1063/5.0179424.
Krauhausen I, Griggs S, McCulloch I et al. Bio-inspired multimodal learning with organic neuromorphic electronics for behavioral conditioning in robotics. Nat Commun 2024; 15: 4-7. 10.1038/s41467-024-48881-2.
Nye L. Digital twins for patient care via knowledge graphs and closed-form continuous-time liquid neural networks arXiv [preprint]. 2023 arXiv:2307.04772. 10.48550/arxiv.2307.04772.
Li X, Loscalzo J, Mahmud AKMF et al. Digital twins as global learning health and disease models for preventive and personalized medicine. Genome Med 2025; 17: 11. 10.1186/s13073-025-01435-7.
Meng C, Griesemer S, Cao D et al. When physics meets machine learning: a survey of physics-informed machine learning. Mach Learn Comput Sci Eng 2025; 1: 20. 10.1007/s44379-025-00016-0.
Yazdani A, Lu L, Raissi M et al. Systems biology informed deep learning for inferring parameters and hidden dynamics. PLoS Comput Biol 2020; 16: e1007575. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007575.
Kritzinger W, Karner M, Traar G et al. Digital twin in manufacturing: a categorical literature review and classification. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2018; 51: 1016-22. 10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.474.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; National Academy of Engineering; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences; Board on Life Sciences; Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate; Computer Science and Telecommunications Board; Board on Mathematical Sciences and Analytics. In: Casola L (ed.). Opportunities and Challenges for Digital Twins in Biomedical Research: Proceedings of a Workshop - in Brief. Washington (DC), National Academies Press (US), 2023.
De Domenico M, Allegri L, Caldarelli G et al. Challenges and opportunities for digital twins in precision medicine from a complex systems perspective. NPJ Digit Med 2025; 8: 37. 10.1038/s41746-024-01402-3.
Renaudin CP, Barbier B, Roriz R et al. Coronary arteries: new design for three-dimensional arterial phantoms. Radiology 1994; 190: 579-82. 10.1148/radiology.190.2.8284422.
Shafto M, Conroy M, Doyle R et al. Draft modeling, simulation, information technology & processing roadmap. Technol Area 2010; 11: 1-32.
Popa EO, Hilten M, Oosterkamp E et al. The use of digital twins in healthcare: socio-ethical benefits and socio-ethical risks. Life Sci Soc Policy 2021; 17: 1-25. 10.1186/s40504-021-00113-x.
Nunes C, Anckaert J, De Vloed F et al. HTSplotter: an end-to-end data processing, analysis and visualisation tool for chemical and genetic in vitro perturbation screening. PLoS One 2024; 19: e0296322. 10.1371/journal.pone.0296322.
Ocana A, Pandiella A, Privat C et al. Integrating artificial intelligence in drug discovery and early drug development: a transformative approach. Biomark Res 2025; 13: 45. 10.1186/s40364-025-00758-2.
Liu GP. Control strategies for digital twin systems. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica 2024; 11: 170-80. 10.1109/JAS.2023.123834.
Goh WWB, Wang W, Wong L. Why batch effects matter in omics data, and how to avoid them. Trends Biotechnol 2017; 35: 498-507. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.02.012.
Goh WWB, Yong CH, Wong L. Are batch effects still relevant in the age of big data? Trends Biotechnol 2022; 40: 1029-40. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2022.02.005.
Zhou Y, Hou S, Miao X et al. Decoding cell fate: integrated experimental and computational analysis at the single-cell level. Bioinformatics 2025; 41: btaf603. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf603.
Yu Y, Mai Y, Zheng Y et al. Assessing and mitigating batch effects in large-scale omics studies. Genome Biol 2024; 25: 254. 10.1186/s13059-024-03401-9.
Möller J, Pörtner R. Digital twins for tissue culture techniques - concepts, expectations, and state of the art. PRO 2021; 9: 447. 10.3390/pr9030447.
Alsalloum GA, Al Sawaftah NM, Percival KM et al. Digital twins of biological systems: a narrative review. IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol 2024; 5: 670-7. 10.1109/OJEMB.2024.3426916.
Martinez-Velazquez R, Gamez R, El Saddik A. Cardio twin: A digital twin of the human heart running on the edge. In: IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA). pp. 1-6. IEEE, Istanbul, Turkey, 2019.
Corral-Acero J, Margara F, Marciniak M et al. The 'digital twin' to enable the vision of precision cardiology. Eur Heart J 2020; 41: 4556-64. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa159.
Breton MD, Kanapka LG, Beck RW et al. A randomized trial of closed-loop control in children with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2020; 383: 836-45. 10.1056/NEJMoa2004736.
Sadée C, Testa S, Barba T et al. Medical digital twins: enabling precision medicine and medical artificial intelligence. Lancet Digit Health 2025; 7: 100864. 10.1016/j.landig.2025.02.004.
Cai S, Mao Z, Wang Z et al. Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for fluid mechanics: a review. Acta Mech Sinica 2021; 37: 1727-38. 10.1007/s10409-021-01148-1.
Raissi M, Perdikaris P, Karniadakis GE. Physics-informed neural networks: a deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. J Comput Phys 2019; 378: 686-707. 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045.
Daryakenari NA, Wang S, Karniadakis G. CMINNs: compartment model informed neural networks - unlocking drug dynamics. Comput Biol Med 2025; 184: 109392. 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109392.
Caforio F, Regazzoni F, Pagani S et al. Physics-informed neural network estimation of material properties in soft tissue nonlinear biomechanical models. Comput Mech 2025; 75: 487-513.
Sel K, Mohammadi A, Pettigrew RI et al. Physics-informed neural networks for modeling physiological time series for cuffless blood pressure estimation. NPJ Digit Med 2023; 6: 110. 10.1038/s41746-023-00853-4.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; National Academy of Engineering; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences; Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate; Board on Life Sciences; Computer Science and Telecommunications Board; Committee on Applied and Theoretical Statistics; Board on Mathematical Sciences and Analytics; Committee on Foundational Research Gaps and Future Directions for Digital Twins. Foundational Research Gaps and Future Directions for Digital Twins. Washington (DC), National Academies Press (US), 2024, 7, Toward Scalable and Sustainable Digital Twins. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK605520/.
Folkesson E, Sakshaug BC, Hoel AD et al. Synergistic effects of complex drug combinations in colorectal cancer cells predicted by logical modelling. Front Syst Biol 2023; 3: 1112831. 10.3389/fsysb.2023.1112831.
Kemmer C, Gitzinger M, Daoud-El BM et al. Self-sufficient control of urate homeostasis in mice by a synthetic circuit. Nat Biotechnol 2010; 28: 355-60. 10.1038/nbt.1617.
Kitada T, DiAndreth B, Teague B et al. Programming gene and engineered-cell therapies with synthetic biology. Science 2018; 359: eaad1067. 10.1126/science.aad1067.
Zheng Y, Schupp JC, Adams T et al. A deep generative model for deciphering cellular dynamics and in silico drug discovery in complex diseases. Nat Biomed Eng 2025; 9: 2155-80. 10.1038/s41551-025-01423-7.
Arsène S, Parès Y, Tixier E et al. In Silico clinical trials: is it possible? Methods Mol Biol 2024; 2716: 51-99. 10.1007/978-1-0716-3449-3_4.
Duan XP, Qin BD, Jiao XD et al. New clinical trial design in precision medicine: discovery, development and direction. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2024; 9: 57. 10.1038/s41392-024-01760-0.
Oo C, Ameer B. Revamping the ever-changing landscape of drug development processes in the midst of COVID-19 pandemic. Drug Discov Today 2021; 26: 1337-9. 10.1016/j.drudis.2021.04.024.
Pappalardo F, Russo G, Tshinanu FM et al. In silico clinical trials: concepts and early adoptions. Brief Bioinform 2018; 20: 1699-708. 10.1093/bib/bby043.
Samei E. The future of in silico trials and digital twins in medicine. PNAS Nexus 2025; 4: pgaf123. 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf123.
Pammi M, Shah PS, Yang LK et al. Digital twins, synthetic patient data, and in-silico trials: can they empower paediatric clinical trials? Lancet Digit Health 2025; 7: 100851. 10.1016/j.landig.2025.01.007.
Weinberger N, Hery D, Mahr D et al. Beyond the gender data gap: co-creating equitable digital patient twins. Front Digit Health 2025; 7: 1584415. 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1584415.
Dritsas E, Trigka M. A survey on database systems in the big data era: architectures, performance, and open challenges. IEEE Access 2025; 13: 95068-84. 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3572059.
Rudakov V, Timur M, Yedilkhan A. Comparison of time series databases. In: 2023 17th International Conference on Electronics Computer and Computation (ICECCO); 2023 Jun 1-3; Sanya, China. pp. 1-4. IEEE, 2023.
Chandragandhi S, Arvind C, Srihari K. Advanced predictive disease modeling in biomedical IoT using the temporal adaptive neural evolutionary algorithm. Sci Rep 2025; 15: 20378. 10.1038/s41598-025-08426-z.
Pai S, Bontempi D, Hadzic I et al. Foundation model for cancer imaging biomarkers. Nat Mach Intell 2024; 6: 354-67. 10.1038/s42256-024-00807-9.
Chong B, Jayabaskaran J, Jauhari SM et al. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases: projections from 2025 to 2050. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2024; 32: 1001-15. 10.1093/eurjpc/zwae281.
GBD 2021 Diabetes Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of diabetes from 1990 to 2021, with projections of prevalence to 2050: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2021. Lancet 2023; 402: 203-34. 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01301-6 Epub 2023 Jun 22. Erratum in: Lancet. 2023 Sep 30;402(10408):1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02044-5. Erratum in: Lancet. 2025 Jan 18;405(10474):202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00053-4.
Lin Y, Long Q, Sun J et al. Global trends, health inequalities, and projections in the burden of neglected tropical diseases and malaria from 1990 to 2021. Sci Rep 2025; 15: 20958. 10.1038/s41598-025-05530-y.
Paz S. Climate change: a driver of increasing vector-borne disease transmission in non-endemic areas. PLoS Med 2024; 21: e1004382. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004382.
Mohapatra RK, Mishra S, Kandi V et al. Emerging and reemerging neglected tropical diseases: epidemiology, transmission, mitigation, and vaccines and chemotherapy advancements. Front Pharmacol 2025; 16: 1545801. 10.3389/fphar.2025.1545801.
Rahmandad H, Xu R, Ghaffarzadegan N. Enhancing long-term forecasting: learning from covid-19 models. PLoS Comput Biol 2022; 18: e1010100. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010100.
Hu WH, Sun HM, Wei YY et al. Global infectious disease early warning models: an updated review and lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. Infect Dis Model 2025; 10: 410-22.
Nguyen T, Nguyen D, Pham K. et al. MP-PINN: a multi-phase physics-informed neural network for epidemic forecasting arXiv [preprint]. 2024. arXiv:2411.06781.
Perakis G, Singhvi D, Skali Lami O et al. Covid-19: a multiwave sir-based model for learning waves. Prod Oper Manag 2023; 32: 1471-89. 10.1111/poms.13681.
Pagel C, Yates CA. Role of mathematical modelling in future pandemic response policy. BMJ 2022; 378: e067000. 10.1136/bmj-2022-070615.
Rajnarayanan A, Kumar M, Tridane A. Analysis of a mathematical model for malaria using data-driven approach. Sci Rep 2025; 15: 27272. 10.1038/s41598-025-12078-4.
Hoang MT, Ehrhardt M. Differential equation models for infectious diseases: mathematical modeling, qualitative analysis, numerical methods and applications: MT Hoang. M Ehrhardt SeMA J 2025; 1: 1-36.
Parmanik A, Das S, Kar B et al. Current treatment strategies against multidrug-resistant bacteria: a review. Curr Microbiol 2022; 79: 388. 10.1007/s00284-022-03061-7.
Anderson M, Panteli D, Kessel R et al. Challenges and opportunities for incentivising antibiotic research and development in Europe. Lancet Reg Health Eur 2023; 33: 100705. 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100705.
Stokes JM, Yang K, Swanson K et al. A deep learning approach to antibiotic discovery. Cell 2020; 180: 688-702.e13. 10.1016/j.cell.2020.01.021 Erratum in: Cell. 2020 Apr 16;181(2):475-483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.001.
Liu G, Catacutan DB, Rathod K et al. Deep learning-guided discovery of an antibiotic targeting Acinetobacter baumannii. Nat Chem Biol 2023; 19: 1342-50. 10.1038/s41589-023-01349-8.
Wong F, Zheng EJ, Valeri JA et al. Discovery of a structural class of antibiotics with explainable deep learning. Nature 2024; 626: 177-85. 10.1038/s41586-023-06887-8.
Lin B, Yan S, Zhen B. A machine learning method for predicting molecular antimicrobial activity. Sci Rep 2025; 15: 6559. 10.1038/s41598-025-91190-x.
Spencer NR, Gunabalasingam M, Dial K et al. An integrated AI knowledge graph framework of bacterial enzymology and metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2025; 122: e2425048122. 10.1073/pnas.2425048122.
Wendland P, Schenkel-Haeger C, Wenningmann I et al. An optimal antibiotic selection framework for sepsis patients using artificial intelligence. NPJ Digit Med 2024; 7: 343. 10.1038/s41746-024-01350-y.
Barbieri S, Kemp J, Perez-Concha O et al. Benchmarking deep learning architectures for predicting readmission to the ICU and describing patients-at-risk. Sci Rep 2020; 10: 1111. 10.1038/s41598-020-58053-z.
Chen Y, Ye Z, Zhang Y et al. A deep learning model for accurate diagnosis of infection using antibody repertoires. J Immunol 2022; 208: 2675-85. 10.4049/jimmunol.2200063.
Guo J, Huang X, Dou L et al. Aging and aging-related diseases: from molecular mechanisms to interventions and treatments. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2022; 7: 391. 10.1038/s41392-022-01251-0.
Li Z, Zhang Z, Ren Y et al. Aging and age-related diseases: from mechanisms to therapeutic strategies. Biogerontology 2021; 22: 165-87. 10.1007/s10522-021-09910-5.
Moffat JG, Vincent F, Lee JA et al. Opportunities and challenges in phenotypic drug discovery: an industry perspective. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2017; 16: 531-43. 10.1038/nrd.2017.111.
Walsh S, Merrick R, Milne R et al. Considering challenges for the new Alzheimer's drugs: clinical, population, and health system perspectives. Alzheimers Dement 2024; 20: 6639-46. 10.1002/alz.14108.
Zhou J, Wei Y, Li X et al. A deep learning model for early diagnosis of alzheimer's disease combined with 3D CNN and video Swin transformer. Sci Rep 2025; 15: 23311. 10.1038/s41598-025-05568-y.
Wang Q, Wu B, Zhu P. et al. ECA-net: Efficient channel attention for deep convolutional neural networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 11534-42 2020.
Song CH, Han HJ, Avrithis Y. All the attention you need: Global-local, spatial-channel attention for image retrieval. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF winter conference on applications of computer vision. pp. 2754-63. Waikoloa, HI, 2022. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.08000.
Woo S, Park J, Lee J-Y. et al. Cbam: Convolutional block attention module. In: Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV). pp. 3-19. Munich, Germany, 2018. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1807.06521.
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists (CTT) Collaboration. Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170 000 participants in 26 randomised trials. Lancet 2010; 376: 1670-81. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61350-5.
Zanoni P, Khetarpal SA, Larach DB et al. Rare variant in scavenger receptor BI raises HDL cholesterol and increases risk of coronary heart disease. Science 2016; 351: 1166-71. 10.1126/science.aad3517.
Rittershaus CW, Miller DP, Thomas LJ et al. Vaccine-induced antibodies inhibit CETP activity in vivo and reduce aortic lesions in a rabbit model of atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2000; 20: 2106-12. 10.1161/01.ATV.20.9.2106.
Forrest MJ, Bloomfield D, Briscoe RJ et al. Torcetrapib-induced blood pressure elevation is independent of CETP inhibition and is accompanied by increased circulating levels of aldosterone. Br J Pharmacol 2008; 154: 1465-73. 10.1038/bjp.2008.229.
Barter PJ, Caulfield M, Eriksson M et al. Effects of torcetrapib in patients at high risk for coronary events. New Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2109-22. 10.1056/NEJMoa0706628.
Learning lessons from Pfizer's $800 million failure. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2011; 10: 163-4. 10.1038/nrd3401.
Cogne T, Ait Oumelloul M, Saadat A et al. Structure-based metabolite function prediction using graph neural networks. Bioinform Adv 2025; 5: vbaf174. 10.1093/bioadv/vbaf174.
Hasibi R, Michoel T, Oyarzún DA. Integration of graph neural networks and genome-scale metabolic models for predicting gene essentiality. NPJ Syst Biol Appl 2024; 10: 24. 10.1038/s41540-024-00348-2.
Celgene. Celgene Provides Update on GED-0301 (Mongersen) Inflammatory Bowel Disease Program 2017. https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/93/NCT02596893/Prot_000.pdf.
Zucker I, Prendergast BJ, Beery AK. Pervasive neglect of sex differences in biomedical research. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2022; 14: a039156. 10.1101/cshperspect.a039156.
Yang K, Gonzalez D, Woodhead JL et al. Leveraging In Silico and artificial intelligence models to advance drug disposition and response predictions across the lifespan. Clin Transl Sci 2025; 18: e70272. 10.1111/cts.70272.
Lu J, Deng K, Zhang X et al. Neural-ODE for pharmacokinetics modeling and its advantage to alternative machine learning models in predicting new dosing regimens. iScience 2021; 24: 102804. 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102804.
Pesapane F, Rotili A, Penco S et al. Digital twins in radiology. J Clin Med 2022; 11: 6553. 10.3390/jcm11216553.
Joshi A. Big data and AI for gender equality in health: Bias is a big challenge. Front Big Data 2024; 7: 1436019. 10.3389/fdata.2024.1436019.
Gross AS, Harry AC, Clifton CS et al. Clinical trial diversity: an opportunity for improved insight into the determinants of variability in drug response. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2022; 88: 2700-17. 10.1111/bcp.15242.