[en] Neural circuits often alternate between tonic and burst firing, two distinct activity regimes that reflect changes in excitability and neuromodulatory state. While tonic firing produces asynchronous spikes driven by diverse external inputs, collective burst firing consists of rapid clusters of spikes followed by a period of silence, happening synchronously within the network. Synaptic plasticity has typically been studied only in either one of these regimes, leaving unclear how their distinct plasticity dynamics can be combined when circuits alternate between regimes. Here, we use a conductance-based network model endowed with calcium-based or spike-timing-based plasticity rules to examine how synaptic weights evolve across tonic and burst firing regimes. During tonic firing, synaptic weights are driven by the statistics of external inputs, producing a broad distribution across the network. In contrast, during collective burst firing, weights converge to a narrow region in weight space: a burst-induced attractor. We derive the location of this attractor analytically in terms of plasticity parameters and activity statistics, and confirm its emergence across diverse plasticity rules. The attractor reflects the synchronization of plasticity-driving signals during bursts, which homogenizes synaptic dynamics and forces convergence toward shared fixed points. We further show that neuromodulation and synaptic tagging can shift or split the burst-induced attractor, stabilizing selected synapses while weakening others. Together, these results identify burst-induced attractors as a robust emergent property of collective bursting. Alternation between tonic and burst firing provides a biologically plausible context in which heterogeneous, input-driven synaptic configurations formed during tonic activity can be selectively consolidated or down-selected by the burst-induced attractor during subsequent bursts. By showing how they can be analytically predicted and experimentally modulated, our work provides a general computational framework linking firing state transitions, synaptic plasticity, and memory organization.
Disciplines :
Engineering, computing & technology: Multidisciplinary, general & others
Author, co-author :
Jacquerie, Kathleen ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département d'électricité, électronique et informatique (Institut Montefiore) > Systèmes et modélisation ; Biology Department, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States of America
Tyulmankov, Danil; Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America ; Center for Theoretical Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America
Sacré, Pierre ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département d'électricité, électronique et informatique (Institut Montefiore) > Robotique intelligente
Drion, Guillaume ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département d'électricité, électronique et informatique (Institut Montefiore) > Systèmes et modélisation
Language :
English
Title :
Burst firing creates an attractor in synaptic weight dynamics.
1. McGinley MJ, Vinck M, Reimer J, Batista-Brito R, Zagha E, Cadwell CR, et al. Waking State: Rapid Variations Modulate Neural and Behavioral Responses. Neuron. 2015;87(6):1143–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.012 PMID: 26402600
2. McCormick DA, McGinley MJ, Salkoff DB. Brain state dependent activity in the cortex and thalamus. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2015;31:133–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2014.10.003 PMID: 25460069
3. Lee S-H, Dan Y. Neuromodulation of brain states. Neuron. 2012;76(1):209–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2012.09.012 PMID: 23040816
4. Dastgheib M, Kulanayagam A, Dringenberg HC. Is the role of sleep in memory consolidation overrated?. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022;140:104799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104799 PMID: 35905801
5. Jacquerie K, Drion G. Robust switches in thalamic network activity require a timescale separation between sodium and T-type calcium channel activations. PLoS Comput Biol. 2021;17(5):e1008997. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008997 PMID: 34003841
6. Lisman JE. Bursts as a unit of neural information: making unreliable synapses reliable. Trends Neurosci. 1997;20(1):38–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2236(96)10070-9 PMID: 9004418
7. Sherman SM. Tonic and burst firing: dual modes of thalamocortical relay. Trends Neurosci. 2001;24(2):122–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-2236(00)01714-8 PMID: 11164943
8. Steriade M, Timofeev I, Grenier F. Natural waking and sleep states: a view from inside neocortical neurons. J Neurophysiol. 2001;85(5):1969–85. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.2001.85.5.1969 PMID: 11353014
9. Swanson RA, Chinigò E, Levenstein D, Vöröslakos M, Mousavi N, Wang X-J, et al. Topography of putative bi-directional interaction between hippocampal sharp-wave ripples and neocortical slow oscillations. Neuron. 2025;113(5):754-768.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2024.12.019 PMID: 39874961
10. Timofeev I, Grenier F, Bazhenov M, Houweling AR, Sejnowski TJ, Steriade M. Short- and medium-term plasticity associated with augmenting responses in cortical slabs and spindles in intact cortex of cats in vivo. J Physiol. 2002;542(Pt 2):583–98. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2001.013479 PMID: 12122155
11. Hedrick T, Waters J. Effect of temperature on spiking patterns of neocortical layer 2/3 and layer 6 pyramidal neurons. Front Neural Circuits. 2012;6:28. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncir.2012.00028 PMID: 22593736
12. Shao J, Liu Y, Gao D, Tu J, Yang F. Neural Burst Firing and Its Roles in Mental and Neurological Disorders. Front Cell Neurosci. 2021;15:741292. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2021.741292 PMID: 34646123
13. Lamprecht R, LeDoux J. Structural plasticity and memory. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004;5(1):45–54. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1301 PMID: 14708003
14. Fauth M, Tetzlaff C. Opposing Effects of Neuronal Activity on Structural Plasticity. Front Neuroanat. 2016;10:75. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2016.00075 PMID: 27445713
15. Citri A, Malenka RC. Synaptic plasticity: multiple forms, functions, and mechanisms. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008;33(1):18–41. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.npp.1301559 PMID: 17728696
16. Magee JC, Grienberger C. Synaptic Plasticity Forms and Functions. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2020;43:95–117. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-090919-022842 PMID: 32075520
17. Tyulmankov D. Computational models of learning and synaptic plasticity. Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference. Elsevier. 2025. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-443-15754-7.00078-x
18. Song S, Miller KD, Abbott LF. Competitive Hebbian learning through spike-timing-dependent synaptic plasticity. Nat Neurosci. 2000;3(9):919–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/78829 PMID: 10966623
19. van Rossum MC, Bi GQ, Turrigiano GG. Stable Hebbian learning from spike timing-dependent plasticity. J Neurosci. 2000;20(23):8812–21. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-23-08812.2000 PMID: 11102489
20. Pfister J-P, Gerstner W. Triplets of spikes in a model of spike timing-dependent plasticity. J Neurosci. 2006;26(38):9673–82. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1425-06.2006 PMID: 16988038
21. Shouval HZ, Bear MF, Cooper LN. A unified model of NMDA receptor-dependent bidirectional synaptic plasticity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(16):10831–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.152343099 PMID: 12136127
22. Graupner M, Wallisch P, Ostojic S. Natural Firing Patterns Imply Low Sensitivity of Synaptic Plasticity to Spike Timing Compared with Firing Rate. J Neurosci. 2016;36(44):11238–58. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0104-16.2016 PMID: 27807166
23. Deperrois N, Graupner M. Short-term depression and long-term plasticity together tune sensitive range of synaptic plasticity. PLoS Comput Biol. 2020;16(9):e1008265. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008265 PMID: 32976516
25. Graupner M, Brunel N. Calcium-based plasticity model explains sensitivity of synaptic changes to spike pattern, rate, and dendritic location. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(10):3991–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1109359109 PMID: 22357758
26. Tyree SM, de Lecea L. Optogenetic Investigation of Arousal Circuits. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(8):1773. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18081773 PMID: 28809797
27. Hill S, Tononi G. Modeling sleep and wakefulness in the thalamocortical system. J Neurophysiol. 2005;93(3):1671–98. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00915.2004 PMID: 15537811
28. Bazhenov M, Timofeev I, Steriade M, Sejnowski TJ. Model of thalamocortical slow-wave sleep oscillations and transitions to activated States. J Neurosci. 2002;22(19):8691–704. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-19-08691.2002 PMID: 12351744
29. Olcese U, Esser SK, Tononi G. Sleep and synaptic renormalization: a computational study. J Neurophysiol. 2010;104(6):3476–93. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00593.2010 PMID: 20926617
30. Drion G, Dethier J, Franci A, Sepulchre R. Switchable slow cellular conductances determine robustness and tunability of network states. PLoS Comput Biol. 2018;14(4):e1006125. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006125 PMID: 29684009
31. Marder E. Neuromodulation of neuronal circuits: back to the future. Neuron. 2012;76(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2012.09.010 PMID: 23040802
32. Zeldenrust F, Wadman WJ, Englitz B. Neural Coding With Bursts-Current State and Future Perspectives. Front Comput Neurosci. 2018;12:48. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2018.00048 PMID: 30034330
33. Desroches M, Rinzel J, Rodrigues S. Classification of bursting patterns: A tale of two ducks. PLoS Comput Biol. 2022;18(2):e1009752. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009752 PMID: 35202391
34. Fernandez LMJ, Lüthi A. Sleep Spindles: Mechanisms and Functions. Physiol Rev. 2020;100(2):805–68. https://doi.org/10.1152/phys-rev.00042.2018 PMID: 31804897
35. Sjöström PJ, Turrigiano GG, Nelson SB. Rate, timing, and cooperativity jointly determine cortical synaptic plasticity. Neuron. 2001;32(6):1149–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00542-6 PMID: 11754844
36. van Rossum MCW, Shippi M. Computational modelling of memory retention from synapse to behaviour. J Stat Mech. 2013;2013(03):P03007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2013/03/p03007
38. Bi GQ, Poo MM. Synaptic modifications in cultured hippocampal neurons: dependence on spike timing, synaptic strength, and postsynaptic cell type. J Neurosci. 1998;18(24):10464–72. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-24-10464.1998 PMID: 9852584
39. Dorman DB, Blackwell KT. Synaptic plasticity is predicted by spatiotemporal firing rate patterns and robust to in vivo -like variability. openRxiv. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.03.454974
40. Jędrzejewska-Szmek J, Damodaran S, Dorman DB, Blackwell KT. Calcium dynamics predict direction of synaptic plasticity in striatal spiny projection neurons. Eur J Neurosci. 2017;45(8):1044–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13287 PMID: 27233469
41. Brzosko Z, Mierau SB, Paulsen O. Neuromodulation of Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity: Past, Present, and Future. Neuron. 2019;103(4):563–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2019.05.041 PMID: 31437453
42. Zannone S, Brzosko Z, Paulsen O, Clopath C. Acetylcholine-modulated plasticity in reward-driven navigation: a computational study. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):9486. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27393-2 PMID: 29930322
43. Foncelle A, Mendes A, Jędrzejewska-Szmek J, Valtcheva S, Berry H, Blackwell KT, et al. Modulation of Spike-Timing Dependent Plasticity: Towards the Inclusion of a Third Factor in Computational Models. Front Comput Neurosci. 2018;12:49. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2018.00049 PMID: 30018546
44. Salgado H, Köhr G, Treviño M. Noradrenergic “tone” determines dichotomous control of cortical spike-timing-dependent plasticity. Sci Rep. 2012;2:417. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00417 PMID: 22639725
45. Nadim F, Bucher D. Neuromodulation of neurons and synapses. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2014;29:48–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2014.05.003 PMID: 24907657
46. Lisman J, Grace AA, Duzel E. A neoHebbian framework for episodic memory; role of dopamine-dependent late LTP. Trends Neurosci. 2011;34(10):536–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2011.07.006 PMID: 21851992
47. Pawlak V, Wickens JR, Kirkwood A, Kerr JND. Timing is not Everything: Neuromodulation Opens the STDP Gate. Front Synaptic Neurosci. 2010;2:146. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsyn.2010.00146 PMID: 21423532
48. Kirkwood A. Neuromodulation of Cortical Synaptic Plasticity. Monoaminergic Modulation of Cortical Excitability. Springer US. 2007. 209–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72256-6_14
49. Shine JM, Müller EJ, Munn B, Cabral J, Moran RJ, Breakspear M. Computational models link cellular mechanisms of neuromodulation to large-scale neural dynamics. Nat Neurosci. 2021;24(6):765–76. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-021-00824-6 PMID: 33958801
50. Gerstner W, Lehmann M, Liakoni V, Corneil D, Brea J. Eligibility Traces and Plasticity on Behavioral Time Scales: Experimental Support of Neo-Hebbian Three-Factor Learning Rules. Front Neural Circuits. 2018;12:53. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncir.2018.00053 PMID: 30108488
51. Izhikevich EM. Solving the distal reward problem through linkage of STDP and dopamine signaling. Cereb Cortex. 2007;17(10):2443–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhl152 PMID: 17220510
52. Seol GH, Ziburkus J, Huang S, Song L, Kim IT, Takamiya K, et al. Neuromodulators control the polarity of spike-timing-dependent synaptic plasticity. Neuron. 2007;55(6):919–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2007.08.013 PMID: 17880895
53. Bazzari A, Parri H. Neuromodulators and Long-Term Synaptic Plasticity in Learning and Memory: A Steered-Glutamatergic Perspective. Brain Sciences. 2019;9(11):300. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci9110300
54. Butson CR. Computational models of neuromodulation. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2012;107:5–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-404706-8.00002-4 PMID: 23206676
55. Frémaux N, Gerstner W. Neuromodulated Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity, and Theory of Three-Factor Learning Rules. Front Neural Circuits. 2016;9:85. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncir.2015.00085 PMID: 26834568
56. González-Rueda A, Pedrosa V, Feord RC, Clopath C, Paulsen O. Activity-Dependent Downscaling of Subthreshold Synaptic Inputs during Slow-Wave-Sleep-like Activity In Vivo. Neuron. 2018;97(6):1244–52.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.01.047
57. Brzosko Z, Zannone S, Schultz W, Clopath C, Paulsen O. Sequential neuromodulation of Hebbian plasticity offers mechanism for effective reward-based navigation. Elife. 2017;6:e27756. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27756 PMID: 28691903
58. Pedrosa V, Clopath C. The Role of Neuromodulators in Cortical Plasticity. A Computational Perspective. Front Synaptic Neurosci. 2017;8:38. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsyn.2016.00038 PMID: 28119596
59. Frey U, Morris RG. Synaptic tagging and long-term potentiation. Nature. 1997;385(6616):533–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/385533a0 PMID: 9020359
60. Redondo RL, Morris RGM. Making memories last: the synaptic tagging and capture hypothesis. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011;12(1):17–30. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2963 PMID: 21170072
61. Seibt J, Frank MG. Primed to Sleep: The Dynamics of Synaptic Plasticity Across Brain States. Front Syst Neurosci. 2019;13:2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2019.00002 PMID: 30774586
62. Okuda K, H⊘jgaard K, Privitera L, Bayraktar G, Takeuchi T. Initial memory consolidation and the synaptic tagging and capture hypothesis. Eur J Neurosci. 2021;54(8):6826–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14902 PMID: 32649022
65. Benna MK, Fusi S. Computational principles of synaptic memory consolidation. Nat Neurosci. 2016;19(12):1697–706. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4401 PMID: 27694992
66. Zenke F, Agnes EJ, Gerstner W. Diverse synaptic plasticity mechanisms orchestrated to form and retrieve memories in spiking neural networks. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6922. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7922 PMID: 25897632
67. Bezanson J, Edelman A, Karpinski S, Shah VB. Julia: A Fresh Approach to Numerical Computing. SIAM Rev. 2017;59(1):65–98. https://doi.org/10.1137/141000671
68. Hodgkin AL, Huxley AF. A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J Physiol. 1952;117(4):500–44. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004764 PMID: 12991237
69. Zagha E, McCormick DA. Neural control of brain state. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2014;29:178–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2014.09.010 PMID: 25310628
70. Fanselow EE, Sameshima K, Baccala LA, Nicolelis MA. Thalamic bursting in rats during different awake behavioral states. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(26):15330–5. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.261273898 PMID: 11752471
71. Grimm C, Duss SN, Privitera M, Munn BR, Karalis N, Frässle S, et al. Tonic and burst-like locus coeruleus stimulation distinctly shift network activity across the cortical hierarchy. Nat Neurosci. 2024;27(11):2167–77. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-024-01755-8 PMID: 39284964
72. Poulet JFA, Crochet S. The Cortical States of Wakefulness. Front Syst Neurosci. 2019;12:64. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2018.00064 PMID: 30670952