Distracted driving; Motorcyclists; Road safety; SOR; Smartphone use while riding; TPB; Humans; Vietnam; Male; Female; Young Adult; Adult; Surveys and Questionnaires; Adolescent; Accidents, Traffic/prevention & control; Accidents, Traffic/psychology; Latent Class Analysis; Motorcycles; Smartphone/statistics & numerical data; Intention; Distracted Driving/psychology; Automobile Driving/psychology; Motorcyclist; Road traffic accidents; Smart phones; Stimulus-organism-response; Theory of Planned Behavior; Time pressures; Viet Nam; Accidents, Traffic; Automobile Driving; Smartphone; Human Factors and Ergonomics; Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality; Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health; Law
Abstract :
[en] The pervasive use of smartphones has significantly contributed to distracted driving, a leading cause of road traffic accidents globally. This study investigates the behavioural intentions and patterns of smartphone use while riding among motorcyclists in Vietnam, integrating the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) with the Stimuli-Organism-Response (SOR) framework to encompass factors such as riding exposure and time pressure. A questionnaire survey was conducted, gathering data from 1,051 young motorcyclists. Using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM), the study identifies high levels of smartphone engagement during riding, driven primarily by Perceived Behavioural Control (PBC), which exhibited a stronger influence on behaviour than Attitudes and Social Norms. Notably, time pressure significantly enhanced the intention to use smartphones, suggesting that riding under time constraints could exacerbate the risk of distracted riding incidents. The findings highlight critical implications for road safety interventions and policy formulation, emphasising the need for targeted educational programmes and stricter enforcement measures to mitigate smartphone-induced distractions among motorcyclists at a higher risk of traffic accidents. The study contributes to understanding distracted riding behaviours in motorcycle-dominant regions, providing a foundation for future research and preventive strategies.
Precision for document type :
Review article
Disciplines :
Social & behavioral sciences, psychology: Multidisciplinary, general & others
Author, co-author :
Hoang, Ha ✱; Université de Liège - ULiège > Urban and Environmental Engineering
Moeinaddini, Mehdi ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Urban and Environmental Engineering ; Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, University Rd, Belfast, BT7 1NN, UK
Cools, Mario ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département ArGEnCo > Transports et mobilité
✱ These authors have contributed equally to this work.
Language :
English
Title :
Riding with distraction: Exploring the intention and behaviour of smartphone use while riding among motorcyclists in Vietnam.
WBI - Wallonie-Bruxelles International F.R.S.-FNRS - Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique
Funding text :
This work was supported by grant obtained from Wallonie-Bruxelles International (WBI), Belgium for the project 2.17 (Renforcement des comp\u00E9tences en mati\u00E8re de recherche, d'enseignement et de consultance dans le domaine de la logistique) and by the FNRS, Belgium fund supporting the sabbatical leave of Mario Cools.
Ab Hamid, M.R., Sami, W., Sidek, M.H.M., Discriminant Validity Assessment: Use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT Criterion. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 890(1), 2017, 012163, 10.1088/1742-6596/890/1/012163.
Ajzen, I., The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50:2 (1991), 179–211, 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
Ajzen, I., Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 32:4 (2002), 665–683, 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x.
Al-Ashkar, I., Ibrahim, A., Ghazy, A., Attia, K., Al-Ghamdi, A.A., Al-Dosary, M.A., Assessing the correlations and selection criteria between different traits in wheat salt-tolerant genotypes. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 28:9 (2021), 5414–5427, 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.05.076.
Armitage, C.J., Conner, M., Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 40:4 (2001), 471–499, 10.1348/014466601164939.
Backer-Grøndahl, A., Sagberg, F., Driving and telephoning: Relative accident risk when using hand-held and hands-free mobile phones. Saf. Sci. 49:2 (2011), 324–330, 10.1016/j.ssci.2010.09.009.
Baikejuli, M., Shi, J., Qian, Q., Mobile phone use among truck drivers: The application and extension of the theory of planned behavior. Accid. Anal. Prev., 179, 2023, 106894, 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106894.
Brandt, R.K., Haustein, S., Hagenzieker, M., Møller, M., Cyclists’ handheld phone use and traffic rule knowledge. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 86 (2022), 121–130, 10.1016/j.trf.2022.02.004.
Brown, P.M., George, A.M., Rickwood, D., Perceived risk and anticipated regret as factors predicting intentions to text while driving among young adults. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 62 (2019), 339–348, 10.1016/j.trf.2019.01.014.
Brusque, C., Alauzet, A., Analysis of the individual factors affecting mobile phone use while driving in France: Socio-demographic characteristics, car and phone use in professional and private contexts. Accid. Anal. Prev. 40:1 (2008), 35–44, 10.1016/j.aap.2007.04.004.
Bui, H.T., Saadi, I., Torfs, K., Moeinaddini, M., Cools, M., Understanding the growing role of driving anger in the risk of traffic incidents involving Vietnamese motorcyclists. Traffic Inj. Prev. 23:5 (2022), 215–220, 10.1080/15389588.2022.2056598.
Carroll, P.S., Classifications of driving exposure and accident rates for highway safety analysis. Accid. Anal. Prev. 5:2 (1973), 81–94, 10.1016/0001-4575(73)90017-1.
Chajut, E., Algom, D., Selective attention improves under stress: implications for theories of social cognition. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 85:2 (2003), 231–248, 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.231.
Chan, D.C., Wu, A.M., Hung, E.P., Invulnerability and the intention to drink and drive: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Accid. Anal. Prev. 42:6 (2010), 1549–1555, 10.1016/j.aap.2010.03.011.
Chang, H.-J., Eckman, M., Yan, R.-N., Application of the stimulus-organism-response model to the retail environment: the role of hedonic motivation in impulse buying behavior. Int. Rev. Retail. Distrib. Consum. Res. 21:3 (2011), 233–249, 10.1080/09593969.2011.578798.
Chen, C.-F., Chen, C.-W., Speeding for fun? Exploring the speeding behavior of riders of heavy motorcycles using the theory of planned behavior and psychological flow theory. Accid. Anal. Prev. 43:3 (2011), 983–990, 10.1016/j.aap.2010.11.025.
Chen, G., So, K.K.F., Hu, X., Poomchaisuwan, M., Travel for affection: A stimulus-organism-response model of honeymoon tourism experiences. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 46:6 (2022), 1187–1219, 10.1177/10963480211011720.
Chin, W.W., The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Marcoulides, G.A., (eds.) Modern Methods for Business Research Methodology for business and management, 1998, Psychology Press, New York, 295–336, 10.4324/9781410604385.
Chipman, M.L., MacGregor, C.G., Smiley, A.M., Lee-Gosselin, M., Time vs. distance as measures of exposure in driving surveys. Accid. Anal. Prev. 24:6 (1992), 679–684, 10.1016/0001-4575(92)90021-A.
Cœugnet, S., Miller, H., Anceaux, F., Naveteur, J., How do time pressured drivers estimate speed and time?. Accid. Anal. Prev. 55 (2013), 211–218, 10.1016/j.aap.2013.02.040.
Cœugnet, S., Naveteur, J., Antoine, P., Anceaux, F., Time pressure and driving: Work, emotions and risks. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 20 (2013), 39–51, 10.1016/j.trf.2013.05.002.
Cristea, M., Paran, F., Delhomme, P., Extending the theory of planned behavior: The role of behavioral options and additional factors in predicting speed behavior. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 21 (2013), 122–132, 10.1016/j.trf.2013.09.009.
De Gruyter, C., Truong, L.T., Nguyen, H.T.T., Who's calling? Social networks and mobile phone use among motorcyclists. Accid. Anal. Prev. 103 (2017), 143–147, 10.1016/j.aap.2017.04.010.
Delaney, A., Lough, B., Whelan, M., Cameron, M., A Review of Mass Media Campaigns in Road Safety: Technical Report 220., 2004, Monash University Accident Research Centre, Victoria, Australia URL https://www.monash.edu/__data/assets/pdf_file/0012/217200/A-review-of-mass-media-campaigns-in-road-safety.pdf.
Delhomme, P., Vaa, T., Meyer, T., Goldenbeld, C., Jaermark, S., Christie, N., Rehnova, V., Evaluated Road Safety Media Campaigns: An Overview of 265 Evaluated Campaigns and Some Meta-Analysis on Accidents (GADGET Project Deliverable 4): Technical Report., 1999, INRETS, Arceuil, France.
Dhoke, A., Choudhary, P., Is there a relationship between time pressure and pedestrian non-compliance? A systematic review. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 93 (2023), 68–89, 10.1016/j.trf.2023.01.001.
Dingus, T.A., Guo, F., Lee, S., Antin, J.F., Perez, M., Buchanan-King, M., Hankey, J., Driver crash risk factors and prevalence evaluation using naturalistic driving data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113:10 (2016), 2636–2641, 10.1073/pnas.1513271113.
Do, T.T.T., Le, M.D., Van Nguyen, T., Tran, B.X., Le, H.T., Nguyen, H.D., Nguyen, L.H., Nguyen, C.T., Tran, T.D., Latkin, C.A., Ho, R.C.M., Zhang, M.W.B., Receptiveness and preferences of health-related smartphone applications among Vietnamese youth and young adults. BMC Public Health, 18(1), 2018, 764, 10.1186/s12889-018-5641-0.
Elliott, B., Road Safety Mass Media Campaigns: A Meta Analysis: CR 118., 1993, Federal Office of Road Safety, Canberra, Australia URL https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/migrated/roads/safety/publications/1993/pdf/Edu_Media_1.pdf.
European Commission, B., European road safety observatory: Facts and figures Young people., 2021, European Commission, Directorate General for Transport, Brussels URL https://road-safety.transport.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2022-01/F%26F_young_people_20211221.pdf.
Farmer, C.M., Klauer, S.G., McClafferty, J.A., Guo, F., Relationship of near-crash/crash risk to time spent on a cell phone while driving. Traffic Inj. Prev. 16:8 (2015), 792–800, 10.1080/15389588.2015.1019614.
Fitzpatrick, C.D., Samuel, S., Knodler Jr., M.A., The use of a driving simulator to determine how time pressures impact driver aggressiveness. Accid. Anal. Prev. 108 (2017), 131–138, 10.1016/j.aap.2017.08.017.
Forward, S.E., The theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive norms and past behaviour in the prediction of drivers’ intentions to violate. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 12:3 (2009), 198–207, 10.1016/j.trf.2008.12.002.
Fuller, R., Gormley, M., Stradling, S., Broughton, P., Kinnear, N., O'Dolan, C., Hannigan, B., Impact of speed change on estimated journey time: Failure of drivers to appreciate relevance of initial speed. Accid. Anal. Prev. 41:1 (2009), 10–14, 10.1016/j.aap.2008.07.013.
Garsten, E., Smartphone use leading to more distracted driving deaths, safety officials say. 2023 URL https://www.forbes.com/sites/edgarsten/2023/04/28/addictive-smartphone-use-leading-to-distracted-driving-deaths-safety-officials-say/.
Gauld, C.S., Lewis, I., White, K.M., Concealed texting while driving: What are young people's beliefs about this risky behaviour?. Saf. Sci. 65 (2014), 63–69, 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.12.017.
Gauld, C.S., Lewis, I., White, K.M., Concealing their communication: Exploring psychosocial predictors of young drivers’ intentions and engagement in concealed texting. Accid. Anal. Prev. 62 (2014), 285–293, 10.1016/j.aap.2013.10.016.
Gauld, C.S., Lewis, I., White, K.M., Fleiter, J.J., Watson, B., Smartphone use while driving: What factors predict young drivers’ intentions to initiate, read, and respond to social interactive technology?. Comput. Hum. Behav. 76 (2017), 174–183, 10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.023.
Gauld, C.S., Lewis, I.M., White, K.M., Watson, B., Young drivers’ engagement with social interactive technology on their smartphone: Critical beliefs to target in public education messages. Accid. Anal. Prev. 96 (2016), 208–218, 10.1016/j.aap.2016.07.041.
Ge, Y., Liu, X., Shen, B., Qu, W., Does a prosocial attitude reduce risky driving behaviour under time pressure?. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 84 (2022), 1–8, 10.1016/j.trf.2021.11.018.
Gefen, D., Straub, D., Boudreau, M.-C., Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 4(1), 2000, 10.17705/1CAIS.00407.
George, A.M., Brown, P.M., Scholz, B., Scott-Parker, B., Rickwood, D., “I need to skip a song because it sucks”: Exploring mobile phone use while driving among young adults. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 58 (2018), 382–391, 10.1016/j.trf.2018.06.014.
Gibbon, J., Church, R.M., Meck, W.H., Scalar timing in memory. Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 423:1 (1984), 52–77, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1984.tb23417.x.
Gras, M.E., Cunill, M., Sullman, M.J., Planes, M., Aymerich, M., Font-Mayolas, S., Mobile phone use while driving in a sample of spanish university workers. Accid. Anal. Prev. 39:2 (2007), 347–355, 10.1016/j.aap.2006.08.006.
Gunson, H.P., Beanland, V., Salmon, P.M., Road-related anger in motorcyclists versus car drivers. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 62 (2019), 327–338, 10.1016/j.trf.2019.01.006.
Hadiuzzman, M., Das, T., Hasnat, M.M., Hossain, S., Rafee Musabbir, S., Structural equation modeling of user satisfaction of bus transit service quality based on stated preferences and latent variables. Transp. Plan. Technol. 40:3 (2017), 257–277, 10.1080/03081060.2017.1283155.
Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M., Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Plan. 46:1–2 (2013), 1–12, 10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.001.
Hair, J.F. Jr., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N.P., Ray, S., Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A Workbook, first ed. Classroom Companion: Business, 2021, Springer, Cham, 10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7.
Haq, M.D., Tseng, T.-H., Cheng, H.-L., Chiu, C.-M., An empirical analysis of eWOM valence effects: Integrating stimulus-organism-response, trust transfer theory, and theory of planned behavior perspectives. J. Retail. Consum. Serv., 81, 2024, 104026, 10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104026.
Hatakka, M., Keskinen, E., Katila, A., Laapotti, S., Self-reported driving habits are valid predictors of violations and accident. Rothengatter, T., Vaya, E.C., (eds.) Traffic and Transport Psychology: Theory and Application, 1997, Pergamon/Elsevier Science Inc, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 295–303.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M., A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 43:1 (2015), 115–135, 10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M., Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares. Int. Mark. Rev. 33:3 (2016), 405–431, 10.1108/IMR-09-2014-0304.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., Sinkovics, R.R., The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Sinkovics, R.R., Ghauri, P.N., (eds.) New Challenges to International Marketing Advances in International Marketing, Vol. 20, 2009, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, 277–319, 10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014.
Hill, L., Rybar, J., Styer, T., Fram, E., Merchant, G., Eastman, A., Prevalence of and attitudes about distracted driving in college students. Traffic Inj. Prev. 16:4 (2015), 362–367, 10.1080/15389588.2014.949340.
Hoang, H., Le Tan, T., Unveiling digital transformation: Investigating technology adoption in Vietnam's food delivery industry for enhanced customer experience. Heliyon, 9(9), 2023, e19719, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19719.
Holland, C., Rathod, V., Influence of personal mobile phone ringing and usual intention to answer on driver error. Accid. Anal. Prev. 50 (2013), 793–800, 10.1016/j.aap.2012.07.004.
Hossain, M.M., Zhou, H., Das, S., Sun, X., Hossain, A., Young drivers and cellphone distraction: Pattern recognition from fatal crashes. J. Transp. Saf. Secur. 15:3 (2023), 239–264, 10.1080/19439962.2022.2048763.
Hou, M., Chen, S., Cheng, J., The effect of risk perception and other psychological factors on mobile phone use while crossing the street among pedestrians. Accid. Anal. Prev., 170, 2022, 106643.
Huang, S.-Z., Sadiq, M., Chien, F., Dynamic nexus between transportation, urbanization, economic growth and environmental pollution in ASEAN countries: does environmental regulations matter?. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30:15 (2023), 42813–42828, 10.1007/s11356-021-17533-z.
Ichikawa, M., Nakahara, S., Japanese high school students’ usage of mobile phones while cycling. Traffic Inj. Prev., 2008, 10.1080/15389580701718389.
Irimia-Diéguez, A., Liébana-Cabanillas, F., Blanco-Oliver, A., Lara-Rubio, J., What drives consumers to use P2P payment systems? An analytical approach based on the stimulus-organism-response (SOR) model. Eur. J. Manag. Bus. Econ., ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print), 2023, 10.1108/EJMBE-12-2022-0374.
Ishigami, Y., Klein, R.M., Is a hands-free phone safer than a handheld phone?. J. Saf. Res. 40:2 (2009), 157–164, 10.1016/j.jsr.2009.02.006.
Islam, M., The effect of motorcyclists’ age on injury severities in single-motorcycle crashes with unobserved heterogeneity. J. Saf. Res. 77 (2021), 125–138, 10.1016/j.jsr.2021.02.010.
Jacoby, J., Stimulus-organism-response reconsidered: an evolutionary step in modeling (consumer) behavior. J. Consum. Psychol. 12:1 (2002), 51–57, 10.1207/S15327663JCP1201_05.
James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., An Introduction to Statistical Learning: with Applications in R, second ed. Springer Texts in Statistics, 2023, Springer, New York, 10.1007/978-1-0716-1418-1 Corrected printing.
Jannusch, T., Shannon, D., Völler, M., Murphy, F., Mullins, M., Smartphone use while driving: an investigation of young novice driver (YND) behaviour. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 77 (2021), 209–220, 10.1016/j.trf.2020.12.013.
Jiang, K., Ling, F., Feng, Z., Wang, K., Shao, C., Why do drivers continue driving while fatigued? An application of the theory of planned behaviour. Transp. Res. A: Policy Pr. 98 (2017), 141–149, 10.1016/j.tra.2017.02.003.
Jiang, K., Yang, Z., Feng, Z., Yu, Z., Bao, S., Huang, Z., Mobile phone use while cycling: a study based on the theory of planned behavior. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 64 (2019), 388–400, 10.1016/j.trf.2019.05.020.
Kock, F., Berbekova, A., Assaf, A.G., Understanding and managing the threat of common method bias: Detection, prevention and control. Tour. Manag., 86, 2021, 104330, 10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104330.
Kong, X., Das, S., Zhou, H., Zhang, Y., Characterizing phone usage while driving: Safety impact from road and operational perspectives using factor analysis. Accid. Anal. Prev., 152, 2021, 106012, 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106012.
Koppel, S., Charlton, J., Kopinathan, C., Taranto, D., Are child occupants a significant source of driving distraction?. Accid. Anal. Prev. 43:3 (2011), 1236–1244, 10.1016/j.aap.2011.01.005.
Laato, S., Islam, A.N., Farooq, A., Dhir, A., Unusual purchasing behavior during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: The stimulus-organism-response approach. J. Retail. Consum. Serv., 57, 2020, 102224, 10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102224.
Lennon, A., Oviedo-Trespalacios, O., Matthews, S., Pedestrian self-reported use of smart phones: Positive attitudes and high exposure influence intentions to cross the road while distracted. Accid. Anal. Prev. 98 (2017), 338–347, 10.1016/j.aap.2016.10.028.
Lesch, M.F., Hancock, P.A., Driving performance during concurrent cell-phone use: are drivers aware of their performance decrements?. Accid. Anal. Prev. 36:3 (2004), 471–480, 10.1016/S0001-4575(03)00042-3.
Lewis, I., Watson, B., White, K.M., The step approach to message design and testing (SatMDT): A conceptual framework to guide the development and evaluation of persuasive health messages. Accid. Anal. Prev. 97 (2016), 309–314, 10.1016/j.aap.2015.07.019.
Li, F., Jiang, L., Yao, X., Li, Y., Job demands, job resources and safety outcomes: The roles of emotional exhaustion and safety compliance. Accid. Anal. Prev. 51 (2013), 243–251, 10.1016/j.aap.2012.11.029.
Li, X., Zhou, Y., Wong, Y.D., Wang, X., Yuen, K.F., What influences panic buying behaviour? A model based on dual-system theory and stimulus-organism-response framework. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., 64, 2021, 102484, 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102484.
Liu, Y., Cai, L., Ma, F., Wang, X., Revenge buying after the lockdown: Based on the SOR framework and TPB model. J. Retail. Consum. Serv., 72, 2023, 103263, 10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103263.
Madden, M., Rainie, L., Adults and Cell Phone Distractions: Technical Report., 2010, Pew Research Center, Washington, DC URL https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/media/Files/Reports/2010/PIP_Cell_Distractions.pdf.
Maule, A.J., Svenson, O., Theoretical and empirical approaches to behavioral decision making and their relation to time constraints. Svenson, O., Maule, A.J., (eds.) Time Pressure and Stress in Human Judgment and Decision Making, 1993, Springer, Boston, MA, 3–25, 10.1007/978-1-4757-6846-6_1.
McCartt, A.T., Geary, L.L., Longer term effects of New York State's law on drivers’ handheld cell phone use. Inj. Prev. 10:1 (2004), 11–15, 10.1136/ip.2003.003731.
McDonald, C.C., Kennedy, E., Fleisher, L., Zonfrillo, M.R., Factors associated with cell phone use while driving: A survey of parents and caregivers of children ages 4-10 years. J. Pediatr. 201 (2018), 208–214, 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.06.003.
McEvoy, S.P., Stevenson, M.R., Woodward, M., Phone use and crashes while driving: a representative survey of drivers in two Australian states. Med. J. Aust., 185(11), 2006.
Moan, I.S., Rise, J., Predicting intentions not to “drink and drive” using an extended version of the theory of planned behaviour. Accid. Anal. Prev. 43:4 (2011), 1378–1384, 10.1016/j.aap.2011.02.012.
Montuori, P., Sarnacchiaro, P., Nubi, R., Di Ruocco, D., Belpiede, A., Sacco, A., De Rosa, E., Triassi, M., The use of mobile phone while driving: Behavior and determinant analysis in one of the largest metropolitan area of Italy. Accid. Anal. Prev., 157, 2021, 106161, 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106161.
Murphy, G., Gauld, C., Lewis, I., Predicting the monitoring/reading of communications on a smartphone among young drivers using an extended theory of planned behaviour. Accid. Anal. Prev., 136, 2020, 105403, 10.1016/j.aap.2019.105403.
National Center for Statistics and Analysis, G., Motorcycles: 2016 Data (Updated, Traffic Safety Facts. Report No. DOT HS 812 492): Technical Report., 2018, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC URL https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/Publication/812492.
National Safety Council, G., Understanding the Distracted Brain: Why Driving While Using Hands-Free Cell Phones Is Risky Behavior: White Paper., 2012, National Safety Council URL https://www.nsc.org/getmedia/2ea8fe8b-d7b7-4194-8ea5-306d30a73972/cognitive-distraction-white-paper.pdf.
Nemme, H.E., White, K.M., Texting while driving: Psychosocial influences on young people's texting intentions and behaviour. Accid. Anal. Prev. 42:4 (2010), 1257–1265, 10.1016/j.aap.2010.01.019.
Nguyen, M.H., Nguyen-Phuoc, D.Q., Nguyen, N.A.N., Oviedo-Trespalacios, O., Distracted on duty: A theory-based exploration of influences leading to mobile phone distracted riding among food delivery workers. Accid. Anal. Prev., 202, 2024, 107538, 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107538.
Nguyen, D.V.M., Ross, V., Vu, A.T., Brijs, T., Wets, G., Brijs, K., Exploring psychological factors of mobile phone use while riding among motorcyclists in Vietnam. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 73 (2020), 292–306, 10.1016/j.trf.2020.06.023.
Nguyen-Phuoc, D.Q., Oviedo-Trespalacios, O., Su, D.N., De Gruyter, C., Nguyen, T., Mobile phone use among car drivers and motorcycle riders: The effect of problematic mobile phone use, attitudes, beliefs and perceived risk. Accid. Anal. Prev., 143, 2020, 105592, 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105592.
O'Brien, S., Tay, R., Watson, B., Situational factors contributing to the expression of aggression on the roads. IATSS Res. 28:1 (2004), 101–107, 10.1016/S0386-1112(14)60097-2.
Ogden, J., Brown, P.M., George, A.M., Young drivers and smartphone use: The impact of legal and non-legal deterrents. J. Saf. Res. 83 (2022), 329–338, 10.1016/j.jsr.2022.09.007.
Olson, R.L., Hanowski, R.J., Hickman, J.S., Bocanegra, J., Driver Distraction in Commercial Vehicle Operation: Technical Report FMCSA-RRR-09-042., 2009, US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC URL https://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/sites/fmcsa.dot.gov/files/docs/DriverDistractionStudy.pdf.
Olsson, B., Pütz, H., Reitzug, F., Humphreys, D.K., Evaluating the impact of penalising the use of mobile phones while driving on road traffic fatalities, serious injuries and mobile phone use: a systematic review. Inj. Prev. 26:4 (2020), 378–385, 10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043619.
Ortiz, C., Ortiz-Peregrina, S., Castro, J.J., Casares-López, M., Salas, C., Driver distraction by smartphone use (WhatsApp) in different age groups. Accid. Anal. Prev. 117 (2018), 239–249, 10.1016/j.aap.2018.04.018.
Ortiz, N.C., Ramnarayan, M., Mizenko, K., Distraction and road user behavior: An observational pilot study across intersections in Washington, D.C. J. Transp. Heal. 7 (2017), 13–22, 10.1016/j.jth.2017.05.362.
Parker, D., Reason, J.T., Manstead, A.S.R., Stradling, S.G., Driving errors, driving violations and accident involvement. Ergonomics 38:5 (1995), 1036–1048, 10.1080/00140139508925170.
Parr, M.N., Ross, L.A., McManus, B., Bishop, H.J., Wittig, S.M.O., Stavrinos, D., Differential impact of personality traits on distracted driving behaviors in teens and older adults. Accid. Anal. Prev. 92 (2016), 107–112, 10.1016/j.aap.2016.03.011.
Pawar, N.M., Khanuja, R.K., Choudhary, P., Velaga, N.R., Modelling braking behaviour and accident probability of drivers under increasing time pressure conditions. Accid. Anal. Prev., 136, 2020, 105401, 10.1016/j.aap.2019.105401.
Pawar, N.M., Velaga, N.R., Modelling the influence of time pressure on reaction time of drivers. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 72 (2020), 1–22, 10.1016/j.trf.2020.04.017.
Pawar, N.M., Velaga, N.R., Investigating the influence of time pressure on overtaking maneuvers and crash risk. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 82 (2021), 268–284, 10.1016/j.trf.2021.08.017.
Peer, E., The time-saving bias, speed choices and driving behavior. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 14:6 (2011), 543–554, 10.1016/j.trf.2011.06.004.
Potard, C., Kubiszewski, V., Camus, G., Courtois, R., Gaymard, S., Driving under the influence of alcohol and perceived invulnerability among young adults: An extension of the theory of planned behavior. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 55 (2018), 38–46, 10.1016/j.trf.2018.02.033.
Pöysti, L., Rajalin, S., Summala, H., Factors influencing the use of cellular (mobile) phone during driving and hazards while using it. Accid. Anal. Prev. 37:1 (2005), 47–51, 10.1016/j.aap.2004.06.003.
Prat, F., Gras, M.E., Planes, M., González-Iglesias, B., Sullman, M.J.M., Psychological predictors of texting while driving among university students. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 34 (2015), 76–85, 10.1016/j.trf.2015.07.023.
Qu, W., Ge, Y., Guo, Y., Sun, X., Zhang, K., The influence of WeChat use on driving behavior in China: A study based on the theory of planned behavior. Accid. Anal. Prev., 144, 2020, 105641, 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105641.
Quy Nguyen-Phuoc, D., An Ngoc Nguyen, N., Nguyen, M.H., Ngoc Thi Nguyen, L., Oviedo-Trespalacios, O., Factors influencing road safety compliance among food delivery riders: An extension of the job demands-resources (JD-R) model. Transp. Res. A: Policy Pr. 166 (2022), 541–556, 10.1016/j.tra.2022.11.002.
Regev, S., Rolison, J.J., Moutari, S., Crash risk by driver age, gender, and time of day using a new exposure methodology. J. Saf. Res. 66 (2018), 131–140, 10.1016/j.jsr.2018.07.002.
Rendon-Velez, E., van Leeuwen, P.M.., Happee, R., Horváth, I., van der Vegte, W.F., de Winter, J.C.F., The effects of time pressure on driver performance and physiological activity: A driving simulator study. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 41 (2016), 150–169, 10.1016/j.trf.2016.06.013.
Rozario, M., Lewis, I., White, K.M., An examination of the factors that influence drivers’ willingness to use hand-held mobile phones. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 13:6 (2010), 365–376, 10.1016/j.trf.2010.07.002.
Rozenkowska, K., Theory of planned behavior in consumer behavior research: A systematic literature review. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 47:6 (2023), 2670–2700, 10.1111/ijcs.12970.
Rudisill, T.M., Baus, A.D., Jarrett, T., Challenges of enforcing cell phone use while driving laws among police: a qualitative study. Inj. Prev. 25:6 (2019), 494–500, 10.1136/injuryprev-2018-042931.
Santos, J., Merat, N., Mouta, S., Brookhuis, K., de Waard, D., The interaction between driving and in-vehicle information systems: Comparison of results from laboratory, simulator and real-world studies. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 8:2 (2005), 135–146, 10.1016/j.trf.2005.04.001.
Shaaban, K., Gaweesh, S., Ahmed, M.M., Investigating in-vehicle distracting activities and crash risks for young drivers using structural equation modeling. PLoS One, 15(7), 2020, e0235325, 10.1371/journal.pone.0235325.
Sharma, I., Gupta, M., Mishra, S., Velaga, N.R., Exploring the impact of time pressure on motorized two-wheeler riders’ over-speeding behavior. Transp. Lett., 2024, 1–17, 10.1080/19427867.2024.2368348.
Shen, S., Benedetti, M.H., Zhao, S., Wei, L., Zhu, M., Comparing distance and time as driving exposure measures to evaluate fatal crash risk ratios. Accid. Anal. Prev., 142, 2020, 105576, 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105576.
Shi, J., Hua, W., Si, H., Cheng, L., How to stimulate users’ ridesharing intention and behavior? Evidence from structural and multi-group analyses. Travel. Behav. Soc., 37, 2024, 100858, 10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100858.
Singleton, P.A., Multimodal travel-based multitasking during the commute: Who does what?. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 14:2 (2020), 150–162, 10.1080/15568318.2018.1536237.
Stavrinos, D., Jones, J.L., Garner, A.A., Griffin, R., Franklin, C.A., Ball, D., Welburn, S.C., Ball, K.K., Sisiopiku, V.P., Fine, P.R., Impact of distracted driving on safety and traffic flow. Accid. Anal. Prev. 61 (2013), 63–70, 10.1016/j.aap.2013.02.003.
Stead, M., Tagg, S., MacKintosh, A.M., Eadie, D., Development and evaluation of a mass media Theory of Planned Behaviour intervention to reduce speeding. Health Educ. Res. 20:1 (2005), 36–50, 10.1093/her/cyg093.
Stern, E., Reactions to congestion under time pressure. Transp. Res. C: Emerg. Technol. 7:2 (1999), 75–90, 10.1016/S0968-090X(99)00013-3.
Subhan, F., Zhao, S., Diop, E.B., Ali, Y., Zhou, H., Public intention to pay for road safety improvement: A case study of Pakistan. Accid. Anal. Prev., 160, 2021, 106315, 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106315.
Sullman, M.J.M., Hill, T., Stephens, A.N., Predicting intentions to text and call while driving using the theory of planned behaviour. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 58 (2018), 405–413, 10.1016/j.trf.2018.05.002.
Svenson, O., Benson, L., Framing and time pressure in decision making. Svenson, O., Maule, A.J., (eds.) Time Pressure and Stress in Human Judgment and Decision Making, 1993, Springer US, Boston, MA, 133–144, 10.1007/978-1-4757-6846-6_9.
Teschke, K., Harris, M.A., Reynolds, C.C.O., Shen, H., Cripton, P.A., Winters, M., Exposure-based traffic crash injury rates by mode of travel in British Columbia. Can. J. Public Heal. 104:1 (2013), e75–e79, 10.1007/BF03405659.
Topolšek, D., Ojsteršek, T.C., Do drivers behave differently when driving a car or riding a motorcycle?. Eur. Transp.- Trasp. Eur., 66, 2017, 7 URL http://www.istiee.unict.it/europeantransport/papers/N66/P07_66_12_2017.pdf.
Truong, L.T., De Gruyter, C., Nguyen, H.T., Calling, texting, and searching for information while riding a motorcycle: A study of university students in Vietnam. Traffic Inj. Prev. 18:6 (2017), 593–598, 10.1080/15389588.2017.1283490.
Truong, L.T., Nguyen, H.T.T., Mobile phone related crashes among motorcycle taxi drivers. Accid. Anal. Prev., 132, 2019, 105288, 10.1016/j.aap.2019.105288.
Truong, L.T., Nguyen, H.T.T., De Gruyter, C., Mobile phone use while riding a motorcycle and crashes among university students. Traffic Inj. Prev. 20:2 (2019), 204–210, 10.1080/15389588.2018.1546048.
Valliant, R., Dever, J.A., Kreuter, F., Practical Tools for Designing and Weighting Survey Samples, second ed. Statistics for Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2018, Springer, Cham, 10.1007/978-3-319-93632-1.
Vance, D.E., Roenker, D.L., Cissell, G.M., Edwards, J.D., Wadley, V.G., Ball, K.K., Predictors of driving exposure and avoidance in a field study of older drivers from the state of maryland. Accid. Anal. Prev. 38:4 (2006), 823–831, 10.1016/j.aap.2006.02.008.
Waddell, L.P., Wiener, K.K.K., What's driving illegal mobile phone use? Psychosocial influences on drivers’ intentions to use hand-held mobile phones. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 22 (2014), 1–11, 10.1016/j.trf.2013.10.008.
Walsh, S.P., White, K.M., Hyde, M.K., Watson, B., Dialling and driving: Factors influencing intentions to use a mobile phone while driving. Accid. Anal. Prev. 40:6 (2008), 1893–1900, 10.1016/j.aap.2008.07.005.
Wang, X., Xu, R., Asmelash, A., Xing, Y., Lee, C., Characteristics of driver cell phone use and their influence on driving performance: A naturalistic driving study. Accid. Anal. Prev., 148, 2020, 105845, 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105845.
Watling, C.N., Sleepy driving and pulling over for a rest: Investigating individual factors that contribute to these driving behaviours. Pers. Individ. Differ. 56 (2014), 105–110, 10.1016/j.paid.2013.08.031.
WHO, C.N., Global Status Report on Road Safety: Summary: Technical Report WHO/NMH/NVI/18.20., 2018, WHO (World Health Organisation), Geneva URL https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/277370/WHO-NMH-NVI-18.20-eng.pdf.
Wilson, F.A., Stimpson, J.P., Trends in fatalities from distracted driving in the United States, 1999 to 2008. Am. J. Public Health 100:11 (2010), 2213–2219, 10.2105/AJPH.2009.187179.
Yang, H., Liu, X., Su, F., Cherry, C., Liu, Y., Li, Y., Predicting e-bike users’ intention to run the red light: An application and extension of the theory of planned behavior. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 58 (2018), 282–291, 10.1016/j.trf.2018.05.027.
Yang, Y., Yin, D., Easa, S.M., Liu, J., Attitudes toward applying facial recognition technology for red-light running by E-bikers: A case study in Fuzhou, China. Appl. Sci., 12(11), 2022, 211, 10.3390/app12010211.
Yannis, G., Golias, J., Spyropoulou, I., Papadimitriou, E., Mobility patterns of motorcycle and moped riders in Greece. Transp. Res. Rec. 2031:1 (2007), 69–75, 10.3141/2031-09.
Zhang, Z., Guo, Y., Fu, R., Yuan, W., Yang, G., Do situational or cognitive factors contribute more to risky driving? A simulated driving study. Cogn. Technol. Work. 22:4 (2020), 759–767, 10.1007/s10111-020-00630-3.
Zhang, Y., Huang, Y., Wang, Y., Casey, T.W., Who uses a mobile phone while driving for food delivery? The role of personality, risk perception, and driving self-efficacy. J. Saf. Res. 73 (2020), 69–80, 10.1016/j.jsr.2020.02.014.
Zhang, Y., Li, L., Intention of Chinese college students to use carsharing: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 75 (2020), 106–119, 10.1016/j.trf.2020.09.021.
Zheng, Y., Ma, Y., Guo, L., Cheng, J., Zhang, Y., Crash involvement and risky riding behaviors among delivery riders in China: The role of working conditions. Transp. Res. Rec. 2673:4 (2019), 1011–1022, 10.1177/0361198119841028.
Zhou, R., Rau, P.-L.P., Zhang, W., Zhuang, D., Mobile phone use while driving: Predicting drivers’ answering intentions and compensatory decisions. Saf. Sci. 50:1 (2012), 138–149, 10.1016/j.ssci.2011.07.013.
Zhou, R., Wu, C., Patrick Rau, P.-L., Zhang, W., Young driving learners’ intention to use a handheld or hands-free mobile phone when driving. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 12:3 (2009), 208–217, 10.1016/j.trf.2008.11.003.
