Keywords :
Formaldehyde; Indoor air quality; Mold; Vertical greenery system (VGS); Volatile organic compounds; Aesthetic value; Case-studies; Indoor air; Indoor environment; Luxembourg; Occupant healths; Public buildings; Vertical greenery system; Volatile organics; Environmental Engineering; Civil and Structural Engineering; Geography, Planning and Development; Building and Construction
Abstract :
[en] Vertical greenery systems (VGS) have become increasingly popular in indoor environments due to their aesthetic value and potential to improve air quality. However, their real impact on indoor air and occupant health remains under-documented, especially in operational public buildings. This case study assesses the effects of VGS on indoor air quality (IAQ) in a recently renovated administrative building in Luxembourg, where five VGS comprising both depolluting and ornamental plant species were installed across three floors. Over 46 weeks, concentrations of formaldehyde, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and airborne mold spores were systematically monitored near the VGS and in reference locations without VGS, alongside environmental parameters and qualitative feedback from staff. Formaldehyde concentrations were consistently lower in areas equipped with VGS compared to reference sites, with reductions of up to 40% in separate zones. While the overall VOC burden remained similar with and without VGS, a significant decrease was observed in the concentration of aromatic compounds and ketones near VGS installed in confined or well-ventilated zones. However, the presence of VGS led to increased mold spore concentrations, particularly where high humidity or suboptimal maintenance favored fungal growth. No toxic or pathogenic molds were detected. The study demonstrates that VGS can contribute to lowering certain indoor air pollutants, primarily formaldehyde, yet underscores the importance of proper design and maintenance to control mold risks. Recommendations address irrigation, substrate hygiene, and system location for optimal IAQ and user acceptability.
Disciplines :
Physical, chemical, mathematical & earth Sciences: Multidisciplinary, general & others
Funding text :
This study was supported by the Luxembourg Ministry of Energy and Spatial Planning through the Climate and Energy fund, and carried out by a consortium including the engineering office Neobuild ( https://neobuild.lu ), the Luxembourg Ministry of Energy and Spatial Planning (Climate and Energy), the \u201CSensing of Atmospheres and Monitoring\u201D team at the University of Li\u00E8ge, Sound Ecology ( https://www.sound-ecology.com/ ) and Cita-Verdi ( https://www.citaverdi.com/ ).This work was supported by Luxembourg Ministry of Energy and Spatial Planning with the Climate and Energy fund [grant numbers F0370500891650 , 2021 ].
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
0