Article (Scientific journals)
Evaluation of Owner-Reported Clinical Signs and Fecal Occult Blood Tests as Predictors of Equine Gastric Ulcer Syndrome in Competition Dressage Horses.
Frippiat, Thibault; Bonhomme, Maëlle; Dyson, Sue et al.
2025In Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, 39 (6), p. 70248
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Veterinary Internal Medicine - 2025 - Frippiat - Evaluation of Owner%E2%80%90Reported Clinical Signs and Fecal Occult Blood Tests.pdf
Publisher postprint (776.64 kB) Creative Commons License - Attribution, Non-Commercial, No Derivative
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
clinical epidemiology; equine sports medicine; gastric ulcers; gastrointestinal agents; gastroscopy; horse; Animals; Horses; Case-Control Studies; Male; Female; Gastroscopy/veterinary; Horse Diseases/diagnosis; Horse Diseases/pathology; Stomach Ulcer/veterinary; Stomach Ulcer/diagnosis; Stomach Ulcer/pathology; Occult Blood
Abstract :
[en] [en] BACKGROUND: Equine gastric ulcer syndrome (EGUS) adversely affects the health, welfare, and performance of sports horses, requiring gastroscopy for definitive diagnosis. Owners frequently consider girth aversion as highly suggestive of EGUS. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether owner-reported clinical signs or fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs) can help identify horses needing gastroscopy for EGUS diagnosis or monitoring treatment, thereby reducing unnecessary procedures in unaffected horses. ANIMALS: Eighty competition dressage horses referred by veterinarians for EGUS evaluation. METHODS: Case-control study including questionnaire, clinical examination, gastroscopy, and FOBT. Based on gastroscopic findings, horses were classified as cases (presenting equine squamous gastric disease, equine glandular gastric disease, or both) or controls (no lesions). Nineteen horses underwent a follow-up examination after EGUS treatment. Predictive values of clinical signs and fecal hemoglobin were assessed using the Wilson-Brown method, and group differences were analyzed using Mann-Whitney and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: Fifty-five horses (69%) had EGUS. The most commonly reported clinical signs in this cohort included girth aversion (78%), poor performance (33%), and weight loss (30%), with no differences between groups (p = 0.44-0.99). Neither clinical signs nor FOBT had sufficient sensitivity or specificity for EGUS screening. Among the 19 horses reevaluated after treatment, resolution of clinical signs did not reliably predict mucosal healing, with poor agreement between owner-reported clinical response and gastroscopic outcome. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: In competition dressage horses, owner-reported clinical signs and FOBT results are unreliable predictors of EGUS or treatment outcomes. Gastroscopy remains essential for accurately diagnosing and monitoring EGUS in sports horses.
Disciplines :
Veterinary medicine & animal health
Author, co-author :
Frippiat, Thibault  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Fundamental and Applied Research for Animals and Health (FARAH) ; Sporthorse Medical Diagnostic Centre (SMDC), Heesch, the Netherlands
Bonhomme, Maëlle  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Fundamental and Applied Research for Animals and Health (FARAH) > FARAH: Médecine vétérinaire comparée
Dyson, Sue ;  The Cottage, Market Weston, UK
Votion, Dominique  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Fundamental and Applied Research for Animals and Health (FARAH) > FARAH: Médecine vétérinaire comparée
Language :
English
Title :
Evaluation of Owner-Reported Clinical Signs and Fecal Occult Blood Tests as Predictors of Equine Gastric Ulcer Syndrome in Competition Dressage Horses.
Publication date :
2025
Journal title :
Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
ISSN :
0891-6640
eISSN :
1939-1676
Publisher :
Wiley, United States
Volume :
39
Issue :
6
Pages :
e70248
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 10 October 2025

Statistics


Number of views
52 (0 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
20 (0 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
0
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
0
OpenCitations
 
0
OpenAlex citations
 
0

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi