Article (Scientific journals)
Biologics for eosinophilic otitis media: a retrospective case study in a multidisciplinary center.
CZAJKOWSKI, Mathieu; Machiels, S; LECLERCQ, Chantal et al.
2024In European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
b47307cf-698f-4800-8c37-92705d39ad2a.pdf
Author postprint (1.98 MB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Asthma; Biologics; CRSwNP; Otitis media; Type 2 inflammatory disease; Urticaria
Abstract :
[en] [en] PURPOSE: Eosinophilic otitis media (EOM) is a difficult-to-treat otitis media characterized by eosinophilic accumulation in the middle ear mucosa and effusion. It is refractory to conventional treatments and is strongly associated with asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). The diagnostic criteria for EOM were established by IINO in 2011. With the recognition of type 2 inflammatory diseases, the gold standard of treatment is the systemic and topical administration of corticosteroids. Recently, several retrospective studies have demonstrated the efficacy of biologic treatments in EOM. We aimed to share our experience regarding the response of EOM after the use of biologics. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational analysis including patients with refractory EOM treated with different biologics (benralizumab, omalizumab, mepolizumab, dupilumab) for concomitant severe asthma, urticaria and/or severe uncontrolled CRSwNP from 2011 to 2023. Treatment effectiveness in terms of EOM severity was measured using medical Global Evaluation of Treatment Effectiveness (GETE). RESULTS: We illustrated 4 clinical cases of uncontrolled comorbid EOM and demonstrated the complexity of multidisciplinary medical pathway with good response to biologics. We also observed that response to EOM and CRSwNP does not always follow that of asthma. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our small sample were consistent with those found in the literature and showed control of EOM with biologics. We need a larger multicentric sample and methodology to confirm these results and to compare the efficacy of different biologics.
Disciplines :
Otolaryngology
Author, co-author :
CZAJKOWSKI, Mathieu ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service d'ORL, d'audiophonologie et de chir. cervico-faciale
Machiels, S;  ENT Department, Citadelle Regional Hospital, Liège, Belgium
LECLERCQ, Chantal ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service d'ORL, d'audiophonologie et de chir. cervico-faciale
Poirrier, Anne-Lise  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques
Schleich, Florence  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > GIGA > GIGA I3 - Pneumology
Louis, Renaud  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques > Pneumologie - Allergologie
Dezfoulian, Bita  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques
Lefèbvre, Philippe  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques > Oto-rhino-laryngologie et audiophonologie
Defaweux, Valérie  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences biomédicales et précliniques > Histologie
CAMBY, Séverine  ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service de chirurgie plastique et maxillo-faciale
Rogister, Florence  ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service d'ORL, d'audiophonologie et de chir. cervico-faciale
Language :
English
Title :
Biologics for eosinophilic otitis media: a retrospective case study in a multidisciplinary center.
Publication date :
13 September 2024
Journal title :
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
ISSN :
0937-4477
eISSN :
1434-4726
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Germany
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 16 September 2024

Statistics


Number of views
4 (3 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
0 (0 by ULiège)

OpenCitations
 
0
OpenAlex citations
 
0

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi