[en] Remembering past events usually takes less time than their actual duration-their unfolding is temporally compressed in episodic memory. The rate of temporal compression (i.e., the ratio of the actual duration of an event to the duration of its remembering) is not constant but varies between individuals and as a function of the structure of events (e.g., how they can be divided into shorter subevents). However, the cognitive mechanisms underlying these variations remain poorly understood. Given its role in the encoding and retrieval of information in episodic memory, working memory (WM) capacity could be an important determinant of temporal compression rates. We tested this hypothesis in two experiments in which we asked participants to watch and then mentally replay short videos showing people engaged in daily life activities. We showed that temporal compression rates depend on an interplay between WM and the structure of the remembered events: participants' WM capacity (assessed using complex span tasks) was negatively associated with temporal compression rates, but only when the remembered events contained few event boundaries (i.e., few subevents). This suggests that the temporal compression of events in episodic memory emerges when some of the subevents to be retained are too long to be fully represented in WM. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
Disciplines :
Theoretical & cognitive psychology
Author, co-author :
Leroy, Nathan ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de Psychologie
Majerus, Steve ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Psychologie et Neuroscience Cognitives (PsyNCog)
Andermane, N., Joensen, B. H., & Horner, A. J. (2021). Forgetting across a hierarchy of episodic representations. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 67, 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2020.08.004
Anwyl-Irvine, A., Dalmaijer, E. S., Hodges, N., & Evershed, J. K. (2021). Realistic precision and accuracy of online experiment platforms, web browsers, and devices. Behavior Research Methods, 53(4), 1407–1425. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01501-5
Anwyl-Irvine, A. L., Massonnié, J., Flitton, A., Kirkham, N., & Evershed, J. K. (2020). Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder. Behavior Research Methods, 52(1), 388–407. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01237-x
Arnold, A. E. G. F., Iaria, G., & Ekstrom, A. D. (2016). Mental simulation of routes during navigation involves adaptive temporal compression. Cognition, 157, 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.009
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. A. Bower (Ed.), Recent advances in learning and motivation (Vol 8, pp. 47–89). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60452-1
Bangert, A. S., Kurby, C. A., & Zacks, J. M. (2019). The influence of everyday events on prospective timing “in the moment”. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(2), 677–684. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1526-6
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
Bird, C. M. (2020). How do we remember events? Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 32, 120–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.01.020
Bonasia, K., Blommesteyn, J., & Moscovitch, M. (2016). Memory and navigation: Compression of space varies with route length and turns. Hippocampus, 26(1), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.22539
Brauer, M., & Curtin, J. J. (2018). Linear mixed-effects models and the analysis of nonindependent data: A unified framework to analyze categorical and continuous independent variables that vary within-subjects and/or within-items. Psychological Methods, 23(3), 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000159
Brown, V. A. (2021). An introduction to linear mixed-effects modeling in R. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), Article 2515245920960351. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920960351
Brunec, I. K., Moscovitch, M., & Barense, M. D. (2018). Boundaries shape cognitive representations of spaces and events. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(7), 637–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.03.013
Brysbaert, M., & Stevens, M. (2018). Power analysis and effect size in mixed effects models: A tutorial. Journal of Cognition, 1(1), Article 9. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.10
Clewett, D., DuBrow, S., & Davachi, L. (2019). Transcending time in the brain: How event memories are constructed from experience. Hippocampus, 29(3), 162–183. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.23074
Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(5), 769–786. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196772
D’Argembeau, A. (2020). Zooming in and out on one’s life: Autobiographical representations at multiple time scales. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 32(11), 2037–2055. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01556
D’Argembeau, A., Jeunehomme, O., & Stawarczyk, D. (2022). Slices of the past: How events are temporally compressed in episodic memory. Memory, 30(1), 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2021.1896737
DeBruine, L. M., & Barr, D. J. (2021). Understanding mixed-effects models through data simulation. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), Article 2515245920965119. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920965119
Diamond, N. B., & Levine, B. (2020). Linking detail to temporal structure in naturalistic-event recall. Psychological Science, 31(12), 1557–1572. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620958651
Eisenberg, M. L., & Zacks, J. M. (2016). Ambient and focal visual processing of naturalistic activity. Journal of Vision, 16(2), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1167/16.2.5
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
Folville, A., Jeunehomme, O., Bastin, C., & D’Argembeau, A. (2020). The impact of age on the temporal compression of daily life events in episodic memory. Psychology and Aging, 35(4), 484–496. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000456
Foster, J. L., Shipstead, Z., Harrison, T. L., Hicks, K. L., Redick, T. S., & Engle, R. W. (2015). Shortened complex span tasks can reliably measure working memory capacity. Memory & Cognition, 43(2), 226–236. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0461-7
Fox, M. C., Ericsson, K. A., & Best, R. (2011). Do procedures for verbal reporting of thinking have to be reactive? A meta-analysis and recommendations for best reporting methods. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 316–344. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021663
Gonthier, C., Thomassin, N., & Roulin, J.-L. (2016). The composite complex span: French validation of a short working memory task. Behavior Research Methods, 48(1), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0566-3
Green, P., & MacLeod, C. J. (2016). SIMR: An R package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7(4), 493–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12504
Hard, B. M., Recchia, G., & Tversky, B. (2011). The shape of action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(4), 586–604. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024310
Harrison, T. L., Shipstead, Z., Hicks, K. L., Hambrick, D. Z., Redick, T. S., & Engle, R. W. (2013). Working memory training may increase working memory capacity but not fluid intelligence. Psychological Science, 24(12), 2409–2419. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613492984
Hassabis, D., & Maguire, E. A. (2007). Deconstructing episodic memory with construction. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(7), 299–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.05.001
Healey, M. K., Long, N. M., & Kahana, M. J. (2019). Contiguity in episodic memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(3), 699–720. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1537-3
Howard, M. W., & Kahana, M. J. (1999). Contextual variability and serial position effects in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(4), 923–941. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.25.4.923
Jafarpour, A., Buffalo, E. A., Knight, R. T., & Collins, A. G. E. (2022). Event segmentation reveals working memory forgetting rate. iScience, 25(3), Article 103902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.103902
Jeunehomme, O., & D’Argembeau, A. (2019). The time to remember: Temporal compression and duration judgements in memory for real-life events. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(4), 930–942. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021818773082
Jeunehomme, O., & D’Argembeau, A. (2020). Event segmentation and the temporal compression of experience in episodic memory. Psychological Research, 84(2), 481–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1047-y
Jeunehomme, O., & D’Argembeau, A. (2023). Memory editing: The role of temporal discontinuities in the compression of events in episodic memory editing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 49(5), 766–775. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001141
Jeunehomme, O., Heinen, R., Stawarczyk, D., Axmacher, N., & D’Argembeau, A. (2022). Representational dynamics of memories for real-life events. iScience, 25(11), Article 105391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.105391
Jeunehomme, O., Leroy, N., & D’Argembeau, A. (2020). The temporal compression of events during episodic future thinking. Cognition, 205, Article 104416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104416
Johnson, P. C. D. (2014). Extension of Nakagawa & Schielzeth’s R 2 GLMM to random slopes models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 5(9), 944–946. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12225
Judd, C. M., Westfall, J., & Kenny, D. A. (2017). Experiments with more than one random factor: Designs, analytic models, and statistical power. Annual Review of Psychology, 68(1), 601–625. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033702
Kahana, M. J. (1996). Associative retrieval processes in free recall. Memory & Cognition, 24(1), 103–109. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197276
Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., Tuholski, S. W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T. W., & Engle, R. W. (2004). The generality of working memory capacity: A latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(2), 189–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.189
Koller, M. (2013). Robust estimation of linear mixed models [Doctoral thesis, ETH Zurich]. ETH Repository for Publications and Research Data. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-007632241
Koller, M. (2016). Robustlmm: An R package for robust estimation of linear mixed-effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 75(6), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v075.i06
Kumle, L., Võ, M. L.-H., & Draschkow, D. (2021). Estimating power in (generalized) linear mixed models: An open introduction and tutorial in R. Behavior Research Methods, 53(6), 2528–2543. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01546-0
Kurby, C. A., & Zacks, J. M. (2008). Segmentation in the perception and memory of events. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(2), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.11.004
Kurby, C. A., & Zacks, J. M. (2011). Age differences in the perception of hierarchical structure in events. Memory & Cognition, 39(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-010-0027-2
Leroy, N., & D’Argembeau, A. (2023a, July 5). The relation between WM capacity and the temporal structure of events in episodic memory: An individual differences approach. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/JT9PH
Leroy, N., & D’Argembeau, A. (2023b, July 5). The relation between WM capacity and the temporal structure of events in episodic memory: An individual differences approach. https://osf.io/5xeha
Loschky, L. C., Larson, A. M., Smith, T. J., & Magliano, J. P. (2020). The Scene Perception & Event Comprehension Theory (SPECT) applied to visual narratives. Topics in Cognitive Science, 12(1), 311–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12455
Lugtmeijer, S., de Haan, E. H. F., & Kessels, R. P. C. (2019). A comparison of visual working memory and episodic memory performance in younger and older adults. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 26(3), 387–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2018.1451480
McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. L. Erlbaum Associates.
Memel, M., Woolverton, C. B., Bourassa, K., & Glisky, E. L. (2019). Working memory predicts subsequent episodic memory decline during healthy cognitive aging: Evidence from a cross-lagged panel design. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 26(5), 711–730. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2018.1521507
Michelmann, S., Hasson, U., & Norman, K. A. (2023). Evidence that event boundaries are access points for memory retrieval. Psychological Science, 34(3), 326–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976221128206
Michelmann, S., Staresina, B. P., Bowman, H., & Hanslmayr, S. (2019). Speed of time-compressed forward replay flexibly changes in human episodic memory. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(2), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0491-4
Miller, A. L., Gross, M. P., & Unsworth, N. (2019). Individual differences in working memory capacity and long-term memory: The influence of intensity of attention to items at encoding as measured by pupil dilation. Journal of Memory and Language, 104, 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2018.09.005
Mirman, D. (2014). Growth curve analysis and visualization using R (1st ed.). Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315373218
Nakagawa, S., Johnson, P. C. D., & Schielzeth, H. (2017). The coefficient of determination R2 and intra-class correlation coefficient from generalized linear mixed-effects models revisited and expanded. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 14(134), Article 20170213. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2017.0213
Nakagawa, S., & Schielzeth, H. (2013). A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4(2), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x
Palan, S., & Schitter, C. (2018). Prolific.ac—A subject pool for online experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 17, 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2017.12.004
Peer, E., Rothschild, D., Gordon, A., Evernden, Z., & Damer, E. (2022). Data quality of platforms and panels for online behavioral research. Behavior Research Methods, 54(4), 1643–1662. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01694-3
R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Logiciel]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
Radvansky, G. A., & Zacks, J. M. (2017). Event boundaries in memory and cognition. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 17, 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.08.006
Revelle, W., & Zinbarg, R. E. (2009). Coefficients Alpha, Beta, Omega, and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika, 74(1), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9102-z
Richmond, L. L., & Zacks, J. M. (2017). Constructing experience: Event models from perception to action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(12), 962–980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.08.005
RStudio Team. (2020). RStudio: Integrated development environment for R. https://www.rstudio.com/
Sahu, A., Christman, S. D., & Propper, R. E. (2016). The contributions of handedness and working memory to episodic memory. Memory & Cognition, 44(8), 1149–1156. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0625-8
Sargent, J. Q., Zacks, J. M., Hambrick, D. Z., Zacks, R. T., Kurby, C. A., Bailey, H. R., Eisenberg, M. L., & Beck, T. M. (2013). Event segmentation ability uniquely predicts event memory. Cognition, 129(2), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.07.002
Schielzeth, H. (2010). Simple means to improve the interpretability of regression coefficients: Interpretation of regression coefficients. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 1(2), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00012.x
Schwartz, M. F., Reed, E. S., Montgomery, M., Palmer, C., & Mayer, N. H. (1991). The quantitative description of action disorganisation after brain damage: A case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8(5), 381–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643299108253379
Smith, M. E., Loschky, L. C., & Bailey, H. R. (2021). Knowledge guides attention to goal-relevant information in older adults. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 6(1), Article 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00321-1
Sörqvist, P., & Rönnberg, J. (2012). Episodic long-term memory of spoken discourse masked by speech: What is the role for working memory capacity? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(1), 210–218. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0353)
Spillers, G. J., & Unsworth, N. (2011). Variation in working memory capacity and temporal–contextual retrieval from episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(6), 1532–1539. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024852
Unsworth, N. (2019). Individual differences in long-term memory. Psychological Bulletin, 145(1), 79–139. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000176
Unsworth, N., Brewer, G. A., & Spillers, G. J. (2009). There’s more to the working memory capacity—Fluid intelligence relationship than just secondary memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(5), 931–937. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.5.931
Unsworth, N., Heitz, R. P., Schrock, J. C., & Engle, R. W. (2005). An automated version of the operation span task. Behavior Research Methods, 37(3), 498–505. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192720
Zacks, J. M. (2020). Event perception and memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 71(1), 165–191. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-051101
Zacks, J. M., Speer, N. K., Swallow, K. M., Braver, T. S., & Reynolds, J. R. (2007). Event perception: A mind-brain perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 133(2), 273–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.2.273
Zheng, Y., Zacks, J. M., & Markson, L. (2020). The development of event perception and memory. Cognitive Development, 54, Article 100848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2020.100848
