Lutter contre les freins à l’Evidence-Based Assessment : Création d’une grille pour examiner la qualité des outils d’évaluation en psychologie, neuropsychologie et orthophonie
Evidence-Based Assessment, Psychométrie, Fonction de l’évaluation, Guide d’évaluation, données probantes
Abstract :
[fr] L’analyse des qualités métriques des outils est jugée comme un frein à l’Evidence-Based Assessment (Youngstrom et al., 2022). Un consensus d’expert a permis de créer une grille d’évaluation applicable par les cliniciens. Les propriétés métriques pertinentes ont été extraites des guides existants, des fonctions d’évaluation ont été définies et chaque propriété métrique a été jugée selon son degré d’importance pour chaque fonction. La grille obtenue est ainsi plus adaptée aux besoins cliniques.
Disciplines :
Treatment & clinical psychology
Author, co-author :
Burnay, Jonathan ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de Psychologie > Psychologie clinique cognitive et comportementale
Grégoire, Jacques
Monseur, Christian ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des Sciences de l'éducation > Psychométrie et édumétrie
Willems, Sylvie ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Psychologie et Neuroscience Cognitives (PsyNCog)
Language :
French
Title :
Lutter contre les freins à l’Evidence-Based Assessment : Création d’une grille pour examiner la qualité des outils d’évaluation en psychologie, neuropsychologie et orthophonie
Alternative titles :
[en] Addressing barriers to Evidence-Based Assessment: Creation of a grid to examine the quality of assessment tools in psychology, neuropsychology, and speech therapy
Publication date :
2024
Journal title :
ANAE: Approche Neuropsychologique des Apprentissages chez l'Enfant
AERA, APA, & NCME (2014). Standards for EduCDtional and Psychological Testing.Washington, DC:American Educational Research Association.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Asso· ciation, & National Council on Measurement in Education (2014). Stan· dards for Educational and Psychological Testing.Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Blause, 5., Tirelli, E., Wauquiez, G., Raffard, 5., &Willems, S. (2023). What information do neuropsychologists use to guide their clinical decisions? Asurvey on knowledge and application of evidence·based practice in a French·speaking population. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 39(2), 140·156. Doi: 10.1 093/arciin/acad057
Bornstein, R. F. (2017). Evidence·Based Psychological Assess· ment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 99(4), 435·445. Doi: 10.10BO/00223891.2016.1236343
Boulkedid, R., Abdoul, H., loustau, M., Sibony, 0., &Alberti, C. (2011). Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic review. PloS one, 6(6), e20476. Doi: 10.13711 journal.pone.0020476
Crawford,J. R., &Garthwaite, P. H. (2005). Evaluation of Criteria for Classical Dissociations in Single·Case Studies by Monte Carlo Simulation. Neuropsy· chology, 19(5), 664·678. Doi: 10.1037/0894·4105.19.5.664
Croskeny, P. (2003). The Importance of Cognitive Errors in Diagnosis and Strategies to Minimize Them. Academic Medicine, 78(8), 775·780. Doi: 10.1097/00001888·200308000·00003
Diamantopoulos, A., &Siguaw, J. A.(2000). Introducing L1SREL: AGuide for the Uninitiated (1st ed.). SAGE Publications ltd.
Dorceus, S. (2019). Enquete sur les pratiques professionnelles d'evaluation psychometrique en sante mentale et en relations humaines au Quebec (These de doctorat, Universite de Sherbrooke).
Evers, A., Hestmrelingen, A., Lindley, P., Muniz, J., Sjiiberg, A. (2013). Efpa Review Model for the Description and Evaluation of Psychological and Educational Tests. Accessed May 11,2023.
Evers, A., Muniz, J., Hagemeister, c., Hetmrelingen, A., Lindley, P., Sjoberg, A. et al. (2013). Assessing the quality of tests: revision of the EFPA review model. Psicothema, 25(3), 283- 91. Doi: 10.7334/psicothema2013.97
Fermanian, J. (2005). Validation des echelles d'evaluation en medecine physique et de readaptation: comment apprecier correctement leurs qualites psychometriques. Annales de Readaptation et de Medecine Physique, 48(6),281-287. Doi: 10.1016/j.annrmp.2005.04.004
Friberg, J. C. (2010). Considerations for test selection: How do validity and reliability impact diagnostic decisions? Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 26(1),77-92. Doi: 10.117710265659009349972
Geurten, M., Catale, c., Gay, P., Deplus, S., &Billieux, J. (2021). Measuring Impulsivity in Children: Adaptation and Validation of a Short Version of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behaviors Scale in Children and Investigation of its links With ADHD. Journal ofAttention Disorders, 25(1), 105-114. Doi: 10.117711087054718775831
Hogan, P. T. (2017). Introduction ala psychometrie, 2e ed. Gaetan Morin Cheneliere Education.
Hulin, c., Netemeyer, R., &Cudeck, R. (2001). Can a Reliability Coefficient Be Too High. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 70, 55-58. https:l/doi. orgl10.1207/S15327663JCP1001&2_05
Hunsley, J., &Mash, E. J. (2007). Evidence·Based Assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 3, 29-51. Doi: 10.1146/annurev. clinpsy.3.022806.091419
International Test Commission (2001). International Guidelines for Test Use.lnternationalJournalofTesting, 7(2),93-114.
Jenkins, M. M., &Youngstrom, E. A. (2016). ARandomized Controlled Trial of Cognitive Debiasing Improves Assessment and Treatment Selection for Pediatric Bipolar Disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 84(4),323-333. Doi: 10.1037/ccp0000070
Laveault, D., &Gregoire, J. (2023). Introduction aux theories des tests en psychologie et en sciences de I'education, 4e edition. Paris, France: DeBoeck Superieur.
Snowling, M. J., A., Nash, H. M., &Hulme, C. (2019). longitudinal relationships between speech perception, phonological skills and reading in children at high-risk of dyslexia. Developmental Science, 22(1), e12723. Doi: 10.1111/desc.12723
Willcutt, E. G., Doyle, A. E., Nigg, J. T., Faraone, S. V., &Pennington, B. E (2005). Validity of the executive function theory of attention·deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a meta-analytic review. Biological psychiatry, 57(11), 1336-1346. Doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.02.006
Wright, C. V., Beattie, S. G., Galper, D.I., Church,A. S., Bulka, l. E, Brabender, V. M., &Smith, B. l. (2017). Assessment Practices of Professional Psychologists: Results of a National Survey. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 48(2), 73-78. Doi: 10.1037/pro0000086
Youngstrom, E.A., Prinstein, M.J., Mash, E.J., &Barkley, R.A.(Eds.)(2022). Assessment ofDisorders in Childhood andAdolescence (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Youngstrom, E. A., Van Meter, A., Frazier, T. W., Hunsley, J., Prinstein, M. J., Ong, M. l., &Youngstrom, J. K. (2017). Evidence-Based Assessment as an Integrative Model for Applying Psychological Science to Guide the Voyage of Treatment. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 24(4), 331-346. Doi: 10.11111cpsp.12207
