ethnography; European research council; informed consent; migration; research ethics; Education
Abstract :
[en] Social Scientists using ethnographic methods are increasingly confronted with ethical clearance procedures imposed by universities, national authorities, professional organizations and funders. In this article, we focus on informed consent procedures in particular and discuss how they govern fieldwork interactions. To do so, we first show how ethical clearance procedures in Europe have been influenced by biomedical science, creating a risk of “governing the social science research in the name of ethics” (Haggerty, 2004) through “anticipatory regulatory regimes” (Murphy and Dingwall, 2007). We subsequently discuss the implementation of ethical procedures negotiated with an ethical review panel in the framework of an EU-funded project in migration studies. In doing so, we show how Research Ethics Committees (RECs) can incentivize researchers to comply with ethical guidelines and procedures in order to be considered as “ethics ready” by the funder. Providing examples of different ethnographic situations, we argue that —while informed consent procedures might reinforce participants’ vulnerabilities— they can also activate their desire to assert power. The article concludes with three recommendations that call for a redefinition of the relationships between institutions, researchers and participants through a co-construction of research ethics.
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by H2020 European Research Council grant from 680014.
American Anthropological Association. (1971). Principles of professional responsibilities. http://www.aaanet.org/stmts/ethstmnt.htm
Association Française des Anthropologues. (1993). Éthique professionnelle et expérience de terrain. In Journal des Anthropologues, 50–51. https://www.persee.fr/issue/jda_1156-0428_1992_num_50_1
Bosk C. L. De Vries R. G. (2004). Bureaucracies of mass deception: Institutional review boards and the ethics of ethnographic research. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 595(1), 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716204266913
Bradburd D. (2006). Fuzzy boundaries and hard rules: Unfunded research and the IRB. American Ethnologist, 33(4), 492–498. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.2006.33.4.492
Callahan D. (2012). The Roots of Bioethics. Health, progress, Technology, Death. Oxford University Press.
Charbonneau R. (1984). Ethics in human research. The IDRC Reports, 13(1), 20–21.
Dingwall R. (2006). Confronting the anti-democrats: The unethical nature of ethical regulation in social science. Medical Sociology Online, 1(1), 51–58.
Duneier M. (2001). On the evolution of Sidewalk. In Emerson R. (Ed.), Contemporary field research: Perspectives and formulations (pp. 167–187). Waveland Press.
Düvell F. Triandafyllidou A. Vollmer B. (2010). Ethical issues in irregular migration research in Europe. Population, Space and Place, 16(3), 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.590
Fassin D. (2006). The end of ethnography as collateral damage of ethical regulation? American Ethnologist, 33(4), 522–524. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.2006.33.4.522
Fassin D. (2008). L’éthique, au-delà de la règle: Réflexions autour d’une enquête ethnographique sur les pratiques de soins en Afrique du Sud. Sociétés Contemporaines, 71(3), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.3917/soco.071.0117
Fassin D. (2014). The ethical turn in anthropology: Promises and uncertainties. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 4(1), 429–435. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau4.1.025
Faubion J. (2011). An anthropology of ethics. Cambridge University Press.
Fernandes L. (2013). Transnational feminism in the United States: Knowledge, ethics, and power. NYU Press.
Foucault M. (1994 [1982]). Dits et écrits.
Guillemin M. Gillam L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity and “ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403262360
Haggerty K. D. (2004). Ethics creep: Governing social science research in the name of ethics. Qualitative Sociology, 27(4), 391–414. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:quas.0000049239.15922.a3
Heusch F. Wenger C. Lafleur J. M. (2022). États et diasporas face à la mort en migration: Une analyse comparée des cas sénégalais et tunisien avant et pendant la pandémie de la COVID-19. Revue européenne des migrations internationales, 38(38), 37–62. https://doi.org/10.4000/remi.19950
Hirsch F. Karatzas I. Zilgalvis P. (2009). Intégrer l’éthique dans les programmes de recherche de l’Union européenne. Médecine/Sciences, 25(8-9), 756–760. https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2009258-9756
Hoonaard W. C. (2008). Is research-ethics review a moral panic? Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie, 38(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-618x.2001.tb00601.x
Howell S. (1997). The ethnography of moralities. Routledge.
Iphofen R. (2009). Ethical Decision making. A practical guide. Palgrave Macmillan.
Iphofen R. (AcSS) (2013). Research ethics in ethnography/anthropology. European Commission https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/other/hi/ethics-guide-ethnog-anthrop_en.pdf
Iphofen R. Tolich M. (2018). The SAGE Handbook of qualitative research ethics. Sage.
Katz J. (2006). Ethical escape routes for underground ethnographers. American Ethnologist, 33(4), 499. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.2006.33.4.499
Laidlaw J. (2002). For an anthropology of ethics and freedom. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 8(2), 311-332. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.00110
Laplantine F. (2020). Penser l’intime. CNRS.
Lederman R. (2006). The perils of working at home: IRB “mission creep” as context and content for an ethnography of disciplinary knowledges. American Ethnologist, 33(4), 482–491. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.2006.33.4.482
Leroi-Gourhan A. (1964). Le geste et la parole: Technique et langage. Albin Michel.
Librett M. Perrone D. (2010). “Apples and oranges: Ethnography and the IRB. Qualitative Research, 6(10), 729–747. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794110380548
Littoz-Monnet A. (2016). L’expertise éthique, un outil de gouvernance technocratique. Revue Française D’éthique Appliquée, 2(2), 5–7. https://doi.org/10.3917/rfeap.002.0005
Lugones M. G. (2012). Obrando em autos, obrando em vidas: Formas y fórmulas de Protección Judicial en los Tribunales Prevencionales de Menores de Córdoba, Argentina, a comienzos del siglo XXI. E-Papers.
Metro R. (2014). From the form to the face to face: IRBs, ethnographic researchers, and human subjects translate consent. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 45(2), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/aeq.12057
Murphy E. Dingwall R. (2007). Informed consent, anticipatory regulation and ethnographic practice. Social Science and Medicine, 65(11), 2223–2234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.08.008
Parker M. (2007). Ethnography/ethics. Social Science and Medicine, 65(11), 2248–2259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.08.003
Pels P. (2000). The trickster’s dilemma: Ethics and the technologies of the anthropological self. In Strathern M. (Ed.), Audit Culture: Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy (pp. 135–170) Routledge.
Pels P. Boog I. Henrike Florusbosch J. Kripe Z. Minter T. Postma M. Sleeboom-Faulkner M. Simpson B. Dilger H. Schönhuth M. von Poser A. Castillo R. C. A. Lederman R. Richards-Rissetto H. (2018). Data management in anthropology: The next phase in ethics governance? Social Anthropology, 26(3), 391–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12526
Plattner S. (2006). Comment on IRB regulation of ethnographic research. American Ethnologist, 33(4), 525–528. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.2006.33.4.525
Puaud D. (2012). L’Empathie méthodologique » en travail social. Pensée Plurielle, 30-31(2), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.3917/pp.030.0097
Smith K. E. (2006). Problematising power relations in ‘elite’ interviews. Geoforum, 37(4), 643–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2005.11.002
Souza Lima A. C. D. (2010). Poder tutelar y formación del Estado en brasil: Notas a partir de la creación del Servicio de Protección a los indios y localización de Trabajadores nacionales. Desacatos. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 33(1), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.29340/33.354
Strathern M. (2000). Accountability and ethnography. In Strathern M. (Ed.), Audit Culture: Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy (pp. 279–304). Routledge.
Van Liempt I. Bilger V. (2010). The ethics of migration research methodology: Dealing with Vulnerable migrants. Sussex Academic Press.
Vassy C. Keller R. (2008). Faut-il contrôler les aspects éthiques de la recherche en sciences sociales, et comment. Mouvements, 55-56(3), 128–141. https://doi.org/10.3917/mouv.055.0128
Vivas Romero M. (2017). Entre mutation et métissage. Co-construction d’une ethnographie émancipatrice et féministe. Émulation, revue des jeunes chercheuses et chercheurs en Sciences Sociales, 22(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.14428/emulations.022.003
Yuill C. (2018). Is anthropology legal? Anthropology and the EU general data protection regulation. Anthropology in Action, 25(2), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.3167/aia.2018.250205
Zapata-Barrero R. Yalaz E. (Eds.), (2018). Qualitative research in European migration studies. Springer.
