Article (Scientific journals)
Laser welding and syncristallization techniques comparison: in vitro study.
Fornaini, C; Merigo, E; Vescovi, P et al.
2012In International Journal of Dentistry, 2012, p. 720538
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
720538.pdf
Author postprint (5.61 MB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Dentistry (all); General Dentistry
Abstract :
[en] Background. Laser welding was first reported in 1967 and for many years it has been used in dental laboratories with several advantages versus the conventional technique. Authors described, in previous works, the possibility of using also chair-side Nd : YAG laser device (Fotona Fidelis III, λ = 1064 nm) for welding metallic parts of prosthetic appliances directly in the dental office, extra- and also intra-orally. Syncristallisation is a soldering technique based on the creation of an electric arc between two electrodes and used to connect implants to bars intra-orally. Aim. The aim of this study was to compare two different laser welding devices with a soldering machine, all of these used in prosthetic dentistry. Material and Methods. In-lab Nd : YAG laser welding (group A = 12 samples), chair-side Nd : YAG laser welding (group B = 12 samples), and electrowelder (group C = 12 samples) were used. The tests were performed on 36 CrCoMo plates and the analysis consisted in evaluation, by microscopic observation, of the number of fissures in welded areas of groups A and B and in measurement of the welding strength in all the groups. The results were statistically analysed by means of one-way ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison tests. Results. The means and standard deviations for the number of fissures in welded areas were 8.12 ± 2.59 for group A and 5.20 ± 1.38 for group B. The difference was statistical significant (P = 0.0023 at the level 95%). On the other hand, the means and standard deviations for the traction tests were 1185.50 ± 288.56 N for group A, 896.41 ± 120.84 N for group B, and 283.58 ± 84.98 N for group C. The difference was statistical significant (P = 0.01 at the level 95%). Conclusion. The joint obtained by welding devices had a significant higher strength compared with that obtained by the electrowelder, and the comparison between the two laser devices used demonstrated that the chair-side Nd : YAG, even giving a lower strength to the joints, produced the lowest number of fissures in the welded area.
Disciplines :
Dentistry & oral medicine
Author, co-author :
Fornaini, C;  Department of Dental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium
Merigo, E;  Oral Medicine and Laser-Assisted Surgery Unit, Dental School, University of Parma, 12-143121 Parma, Italy
Vescovi, P;  Oral Medicine and Laser-Assisted Surgery Unit, Dental School, University of Parma, 12-143121 Parma, Italy
Meleti, M;  Oral Medicine and Laser-Assisted Surgery Unit, Dental School, University of Parma, 12-143121 Parma, Italy
Namour, Samir  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences dentaires
Language :
English
Title :
Laser welding and syncristallization techniques comparison: in vitro study.
Publication date :
2012
Journal title :
International Journal of Dentistry
ISSN :
1687-8728
eISSN :
1687-8736
Publisher :
Hindawi Limited, Egypt
Volume :
2012
Pages :
720538
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 28 March 2023

Statistics


Number of views
17 (2 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
6 (0 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
6
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
3
OpenCitations
 
4

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi