Researching discursive ressources in gendered research institutions: new approaches to studying the articulation of science and gender in the making

􏰚􏰑􏰃 􏰂􏰊􏰈􏰓􏰃 􏰐􏰕 􏰅􏰑􏰃 􏰞􏰎􏰃􏰈􏰢􏰏 􏰔􏰂􏰔􏰃􏰎􏰂􏰄􏰃􏰠􏰗 􏰛􏰑􏰂􏰁􏰑 􏰊􏰈􏰏 􏰐􏰕 􏰁􏰐􏰍􏰋􏰌􏰃 􏰒􏰃 􏰁􏰋􏰂􏰅􏰂􏰁􏰂􏰌􏰃􏰉 􏰉􏰍􏰃 􏰅􏰐 􏰈 􏰊􏰈􏰌􏰁􏰍􏰎􏰂􏰄􏰃 􏰜􏰂􏰌􏰂􏰐􏰄 􏰐􏰕 􏰎􏰂􏰄􏰃􏰈􏰋 􏰁􏰈􏰋􏰃􏰃􏰋􏰌􏰗 􏰁􏰈􏰄 􏰄􏰐􏰄􏰃􏰅􏰑􏰃􏰎􏰃􏰌􏰌 􏰃􏰟􏰔􏰋􏰃􏰌􏰌 􏰅􏰑􏰂􏰌 􏰔􏰋􏰐􏰓􏰋􏰃􏰌􏰌􏰂􏰜􏰃 􏰉􏰂􏰌􏰈􏰔􏰔􏰃􏰈􏰋􏰈􏰄􏰁􏰃 􏰐􏰕 􏰛􏰐􏰊􏰃􏰄 􏰛􏰑􏰂􏰎􏰃 􏰁􏰎􏰂􏰊􏰒􏰂􏰄􏰓 􏰅􏰑􏰃 􏰁􏰈􏰋􏰃􏰃􏰋 􏰎􏰈􏰉􏰉􏰃􏰋 􏰖􏰤􏰎􏰔􏰃􏰋 􏰩􏰪􏰪􏰫􏰬 􏰭􏰃􏰋􏰋􏰏􏰊􏰈􏰄 􏰩􏰪􏰮􏰫􏰘􏰙 􏰚􏰑􏰂􏰌 􏰔􏰑􏰃􏰄􏰐􏰊􏰃􏰄􏰐􏰄 􏰁􏰈􏰄 􏰒􏰃 􏰋􏰃􏰈􏰉􏰂􏰎􏰏 􏰂􏰊􏰈􏰓􏰂􏰄􏰃􏰉 􏰈􏰄􏰉 􏰑􏰃􏰎􏰔􏰌 􏰂􏰄 􏰂􏰉􏰃􏰄􏰅􏰂􏰕􏰏􏰂􏰄􏰓 􏰅􏰑􏰃 􏰌􏰂􏰅􏰍􏰈􏰅􏰂􏰐􏰄􏰗 􏰒􏰍􏰅 􏰅􏰑􏰃 􏰊􏰍􏰎􏰅􏰂􏰔􏰎􏰃 􏰍􏰄􏰉􏰃􏰋􏰎􏰏􏰂􏰄􏰓 􏰁􏰐􏰄􏰉􏰂􏰅􏰂􏰐􏰄􏰌 􏰈􏰄􏰉 􏰊􏰃􏰁􏰑􏰈􏰄􏰂􏰌􏰊􏰌 􏰈􏰋􏰃 􏰄􏰐􏰅 􏰃􏰈􏰌􏰂􏰎􏰉􏰃􏰁􏰂􏰔􏰑􏰃􏰋􏰈The sixth chapter offers another perspective on the analytical construct of the gender pipeline, using a multidimensional and multilevel approach, thus under-lining how such a phenomenon highlights different typical features according to varying social and organisational contexts. On the basis of a meta- analysis of the case studies conducted in the GARCIA project, Farah Dubois- Shaik, Bernard Fusulier and Caroline Vincke develop a typology where social, organisational and career- based dimensions are combined with costs at stake, i.e. those costs that each specific configuration generates for science, for organisations and for individuals, particularly in terms of gender balance and inequality. In particular, three types of careers and experiences are identified: (i) persisting in precarious career paths, at a high cumulative cost; (ii) continuing in ambivalent career paths, at moderate cost; and (iii) striving to win in competitive career paths, at a specific cost. Such a typology can be a useful tool for research institutions to allow them to think about their own leaky pipeline situation and to identify strat-egies that can reduce relative costs through the re- thinking of how work is organ-ised, in particular in terms of workforce casualisation and its conditions, as well as that pertaining to its female components