“Debriefing and Organizational Lessons Learned” (DOLL): A Qualitative Study to Develop a Classification Framework for Reporting Clinical Debriefing Results
PAQUAY, Méryl; Dubois, Nadège; Diep, Anh Nguyetet al.
[en] BackgroundThe COVID-19 crisis has radically affected our healthcare institutions. Debriefings in clinical settings provide a time for the clinicians to reflect on the successes (pluses) and difficulties (deltas) encountered. Debriefings tend to be well-received if included in the broader management of the unit. The goal of this study was to develop a framework to categorize these debriefings and to assess its worthiness.MethodsA qualitative approach based on a grounded theory research method was adopted resulting in the “Debriefing and Organizational Lessons Learned” (DOLL) framework. Debriefings were conducted within two Emergency Departments of a Belgian University Hospital during an 8-week period. In the first step, three researchers used debriefing transcripts to inductively develop a tentative framework. During the second step, these three researchers conducted independent categorizations of the debriefings using the developed framework. In step 3, the team analyzed the data to understand the utility of the framework. Chi-square was conducted to examine the associations between the item types (pluses and deltas) and the framework's dimensions.ResultsThe DOLL is composed of seven dimensions and 13 subdimensions. Applied to 163 debriefings, the model identified 339 items, including 97 pluses and 242 deltas. Results revealed that there was an association between the frequency of pluses and deltas and the dimensions (p < 0.001). The deltas were mainly related to the work environment (equipment and maintenance) (p < 0.001) while the pluses identified tended to be related to the organization of the unit (communication and roles) (p < 0.001). With leadership's support and subsequent actions, clinicians were more enthusiastic about participating and the researchers anecdotally detected a switch toward a more positive organizational learning approach.ConclusionThe framework increases the potential value of clinical debriefings because it organizes results into actionable areas. Indeed, leadership found the DOLL to be a useful management tool. Further research is needed to investigate how DOLL may work in non-crisis circumstances and further apply the DOLL into incident reporting and risk management process of the unit.
Disciplines :
Public health, health care sciences & services
Author, co-author :
PAQUAY, Méryl ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service des urgences
Dubois, Nadège ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Simulation en santé publique
Diep, Anh Nguyet ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Santé publique : de la Biostatistique à la Promotion de la Santé
Graas, Gwennaëlle ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Simulation médicale en situation critique
Sassel, Tamara
PIAZZA, Justine ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service des urgences
Servotte, Jean-Christophe ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique
GHUYSEN, Alexandre ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service des urgences
Language :
English
Title :
“Debriefing and Organizational Lessons Learned” (DOLL): A Qualitative Study to Develop a Classification Framework for Reporting Clinical Debriefing Results
Peiffer-Smadja N Lucet JC Deconinck L Gérard S Giordano L Bendjelloul G et al. Quelles sont les conséquences de l'épidémie COVID-19 sur l'organisation des soins? Med Mal Infect. (2020) 50:S101. 10.1016/j.medmal.2020.06.206
Kaye AD Okeagu CN Pham AD Silva RA Hurley JJ Arron BL et al. Economic impact of COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare facilities and systems: International perspectives. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. (2021) 35:293–306. 10.1016/j.bpa.2020.11.00934511220
Phua J Weng L Ling L Egi M Lim CM Divatia JV et al. Intensive care management of coronavirus disease 2019. (COVID-19): challenges and recommendations. Lancet Respir Med. (2020) 8:506–17. 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30161-232272080
Tannenbaum SI Traylor AM Thomas EJ Salas E. Managing teamwork in the face of pandemic: Evidence-based tips. BMJ Quality and Safety. (2021). 30:59–63. 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-01144732471858
Denning M Goh ET Scott A Martin G Markar S Flott K et al. What has been the impact of COVID-19 on safety culture? A case study from a large metropolitan healthcare trust. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2020) 17:1–12. 10.3390/ijerph1719703432993013
Vanhaecht K Seys D Bruyneel L Cox B Kaesemans G Cloet M et al. COVID-19 is having a destructive impact on health-care workers' mental well-being. Int J Qual Heal care J Int Soc Qual Heal Care. (2021) 33:1–6. 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa15833270881
Rock LK Rudolph JW Fey MK Szyld D Gardner R Minehart RD et al. “Circle Up”: Workflow adaptation and psychological support via briefing, debriefing, and peer support. Nejm Catal Innov Care Deliv. 10.1056/CAT.20.0240
Kolbe M Schmutz S Seelandt JC Eppich WJ Schmutz JB. Team debriefings in healthcare: Aligning intention and impact. BMJ. (2021) 374. 10.1136/bmj.n204234518169
Seelandt JC Walker K Kolbe M. A debriefer must be neutral” and other debriefing myths: a systemic inquiry-based qualitative study of taken-for-granted beliefs about clinical post-event debriefing. Adv Simul. (2021) 6:1–15. 10.1186/s41077-021-00161-533663598
Hicks CW Rosen M Hobson DB Ko C Wick EC. Improving safety and quality of care with enhanced teamwork through operating room briefings. JAMA Surg. (2014) 149:863–8. 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.17225006700
Tavares W Eppich W Cheng A Miller S Teunissen PW Watling CJ et al. Learning conversations: an analysis of the theoretical roots and their manifestations of feedback and debriefing in medical education. Academic Med. (2020). 95:1020–5. 10.1097/ACM.000000000000293231365391
Schmutz JB Eppich WJ. Promoting learning and patient care through shared reflection: A conceptual framework for team reflexivity in health care. Academic Med. (2017) 1555–63. 10.1097/ACM.000000000000168828445215
Mullan PC Wuestner E Kerr TD Christopher DP Patel B. Implementation of an in situ qualitative debriefing tool for resuscitations. Resuscitation. (2013) 84:946–51. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.12.00523266394
Szyld D Arriaga AF. Implementing clinical debriefing programmes. Emerg Med J. (2021). 10.1136/emermed-2021-21113334039643
Servotte JC Welch-Horan TB Mullan P Piazza J Ghuysen A Szyld D. Development and implementation of an end-of-shift clinical debriefing method for emergency departments during COVID-19. Adv Simul. (2020) 5:32. 10.1186/s41077-020-00150-033292850
Bentley SK McNamara S Meguerdichian M Walker K Patterson M Bajaj K. Debrief it all: a tool for inclusion of Safety-II. Adv Simul. (2021) 6:9. 10.1186/s41077-021-00163-333781346
Azizoddin DR Vella Gray K Dundin A Szyld D. Bolstering clinician resilience through an interprofessional, web-based nightly debriefing program for emergency departments during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Interprof Care. (2020) 34:711–5. 10.1080/13561820.2020.181369732990108
Brazil V Symon B Twigg S. Clinical debriefing in the emergency department. Emerg Med Australas. (2021) 33:778–9. 10.1111/1742-6723.1383434535044
Denzin NK Lincoln YS. Handbook of qualitative research. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc. (1994). p. xii, 643–xii, 643.
O'Brien BC Harris IB Beckman TJ Reed DA Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research. Acad Med. (2014) 89:1245–51. 10.1097/ACM.000000000000038824979285
Rudolph JW Simon R Rivard P Dufresne RL Raemer DB. Debriefing with good judgment: combining rigorous feedback with genuine inquiry. Anesthesiol Clin. (2007) 25:361–76. 10.1016/j.anclin.2007.03.00717574196
Vincent C Taylor-Adams S Stanhope N. Framework for analysing risk and safety in clinical medicine. BMJ. (1998) 316:1154–7. 10.1136/bmj.316.7138.11549552960
Ishikawa K. Guide to quality control. Asian Productivity Organization. Tokyo. (1982) p. 226.
Leka S Jain A Cox T Kortum E. The development of the European framework for psychosocial risk management: PRIMA-EF. J Occup Health. (2011) 53:137–43. 10.1539/joh.O1001021325735
Lane AS Roberts C. The learning pathways grid. Int J Qual Methods. (2018) 17:160940691879160. 10.1177/1609406918791605
Wang X Zhang X He J. Challenges to the system of reserve medical supplies for public health emergencies: reflections on the outbreak of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) epidemic in China. Biosci Trends. (2020) 14. 10.5582/bst.2020.0104332062645
Rose C. Am I part of the cure or am I part of the disease? Keeping coronavirus out when a doctor comes home. N Engl J Med. (2020) 382:1684–5. 10.1056/NEJMp200476832187461
He Q Xiao H Ming LH Bei ZB Wei LC Fjian Y et al. Practice in information technology support for fangcang shelter hospital during COVID-19 epidemic in Wuhan, China. J Med Syst. (2021) 45. 10.1007/s10916-021-01721-y33608811
Topaz M Peltonen LM Mitchell J Alhuwail D Barakati SS Lewis A et al. How to improve information technology to support healthcare to address the COVID-19 pandemic: an international survey with health informatics experts. Yearb Med Inform. (2021). 10.1055/s-0041-172649133882605
Giménez-Espert M. del C, Prado-Gascó V, Soto-Rubio A. Psychosocial risks, work engagement, and job satisfaction of nurses during COVID-19 pandemic. Front Public Heal. (2020) 8:566896. 10.3389/fpubh.2020.56689633330313
Savitsky B Radomislensky I Hendel T. Nurses' occupational satisfaction during Covid-19 pandemic. Appl Nurs Res. (2021) 59:151416. 10.1016/j.apnr.2021.15141633947510
Restauri N Nyberg E Clark T. Cultivating meaningful work in healthcare: a paradigm and practice. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. (2019) 48:193–5. 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2018.12.00230638757
Both-Nwabuwe JMC Lips-Wiersma M Dijkstra MTM Beersma B. Understanding the autonomy–meaningful work relationship in nursing: a theoretical framework. Nurs Outlook. (2020) 68:104–13. 10.1016/j.outlook.2019.05.00831427079
Monette DL Macias-Konstantopoulos WL Brown DFM Raja AS Takayesu JK. A video-based debriefing program to support emergency medicine clinician well-being during the covid-19 pandemic. West J Emerg Med. (2020) 21. 10.5811/westjem.2020.8.4857933052815
Arabi YM Azoulay E Al-Dorzi HM Phua J Salluh J Binnie A et al. How the COVID-19 pandemic will change the future of critical care. Intensive Care Med. (2021) 47:282–91. 10.1007/s00134-021-06352-y33616696
Qureshi MN AlRajhi A. Challenge of COVID-19 crisis managed by emergency department of a big tertiary centre in Saudi Arabia. Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med. (2020) 7:147–52. 10.1016/j.ijpam.2020.08.00132868998
Rubin R. The challenges of expanding rapid tests to Curb COVID-19. JAMA. (2020) 324:1813–5. 10.1001/jama.2020.2110633084882
Soltan AAS Kouchaki S Zhu T Kiyasseh D Taylor T Hussain ZB et al. Rapid triage for COVID-19 using routine clinical data for patients attending hospital: development and prospective validation of an artificial intelligence screening test. Lancet Digit Heal. (2021) 3:e78–87. 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30274-033509388
Wasserteil N Nun A Bin Mimouni FB Kasirer Y. Handover of patients: the challenges of COVID-19. J Perinatol. (2020) 40:1453–4. 10.1038/s41372-020-00792-y32826937
Pokrajac N Schertzer K Poffenberger CM Alvarez A Marin-Nevarez P Winstead-Derlega C et al. Mastery learning ensures correct personal protective equipment use in simulated clinical encounters of COVID-19. West J Emerg Med. (2020) 21:1089–94. 10.5811/westjem.2020.6.4813232970559
Kwon JH Burnham CAD Reske KA Liang SY Hink T Wallace MA et al. Assessment of healthcare worker protocol deviations and self-contamination during personal protective equipment donning and doffing. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. (2017) 38:1077–83. 10.1017/ice.2017.12128606192
Ryan S Ward M Vaughan D Murray B Zena M O'Connor T et al. Do safety briefings improve patient safety in the acute hospital setting? A systematic review. J Adv Nurs. (2019) 75:2085–98. 10.1111/jan.1398430816565
Barsuk JH Cohen ER Williams M V Scher J Jones SF Feinglass J et al. Simulation-based mastery learning for thoracentesis skills improves patient outcomes: a randomized trial. Acad Med. (2018) 93:729–35. 10.1097/ACM.000000000000196529068818
Li Sharpe E. Innovative approach to procedure skills: A nurse practitioner educator's response to covid-19. J Nurs Educ. (2020) 59:692–6. 10.3928/01484834-20201118-0633253398
Shelton C Huda T Lee A. The role of clinical simulation in preparing for a pandemic. BJA Edu. (2021) 21:172–9. 10.1016/j.bjae.2020.12.00633520288
Cheung VKL So EHK Ng GWY So SS Hung JLK Chia NH. Investigating effects of healthcare simulation on personal strengths and organizational impacts for healthcare workers during COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. Integr Med Res. (2020) 9:100476. 10.1016/j.imr.2020.10047632802743
Wendelboe AM Miller A Drevets D Salinas L Miller EJ Jackson D et al. Tabletop exercise to prepare institutions of higher education for an outbreak of COVID-19. J Emer Manag. (2020) 18:183–4. 10.5055/jem.2020.046332181874
Franklin BJ Gandhi TK Bates DW Huancahuari N Morris CA Pearson M et al. Impact of multidisciplinaryteam huddles on patient safety: a systematic review and proposed taxonomy. BMJ Qual Safety. (2020). 29:844–53. 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-00991132265256
Woodward S. Moving towards a safety II approach. J Patient Saf Risk Manag. (2019) 24:96–9. 10.1177/2516043519855264