Guemazi-Kheffi F., Gagnayre R & Leclercq D. (2022). L’apport d’un débat métacognitif basé sur les degrés de certitude dans les connaissances d’adolescents atteints d’un diabète.

In the context of Patient Education, 13 teens have been tested with the 50 True/false items of the AJD (Aide aux Jeunes Diabétiques). In aditin to each response, they were asked to provide a confidence degree (exepressed in % of chances for their responses to be correct) chosen among 6 possibilities : 5 20 40 60 80 95%. They were immediately infomed of the correct answers. For the12 first items, a debate was organized where the reasons for errors or doubts were exchanged, according to the Spectral Metacognitive Test (SMT) principles. Three monthes later, the same 50 questions were anew answered by the same 13 young pattents. This enabled to compare the average evolution in the 12 STM items (gains) and the 38 non-STM items (status quo).