Asatiani, A., Malo, P., Nagbol, P., Penttinen, E., Rinta-Kahila, T., & Salovaara, A. (2021). Sociotechnical envelopment of artificial intelligence: An approach to organizational deployment of inscrutable artificial intelligence systems. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 22(2), 325–352. DOI: 10.17705/1jais.00664
Aysolmaz, B., Iren, D., & Dau, N. (2020). Preventing algorithmic Bias in the development of algorithmic decision-making systems: A Delphi study. Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii international conference on system sciences, 3, 5267–5276. https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2020.648.
Baskerville, R. L., Myers, M. D., & Yoo, Y. (2020). Digital first: The ontological reversal and new challenges for information systems research. MIS Ouarterly, 44(2), 509–523.
Benbya, H., Pachidi, S., Davenport, T., &; Jarvenpaa, S. (2019). Call for papers JAIS-MISQE joint SI on artificial intelligence in organizations – JAIS-MISQE SI on artificial intelligence.
Benbya, H., Pachidi, S., & Jarvenpaa, S. (2021). Special issue editorial: Artificial intelligence in organizations: Implications for information systems research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 22(2), 281–303. DOI: 10.17705/1jais.00662
Brynjolfsson, E., & Mcafee, A. (2017). The business of artificial intelligence. What it can — And cannot — Do for your organization. Harvard Business Review, 4–11.
Calabretta, G., Gemser, G., & Wijnberg, N. M. (2017). The interplay between intuition and rationality in strategic decision making: A paradox perspective. Organization Studies, 38(3–4), 365–401. 10.1177/0170840616655483 DOI: 10.1177/0170840616655483
Can, H., Lu, M., & Gan, L. (2011). The research on application of information technology in sports stadiums. Physics Procedia, 604–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2011.11.093
Cortsen, K., & Rascher, D. A. (2018). The application of sports technology and sports data for commercial purposes. In: The use of technology in sports - Emerging challenges. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.12.014.
Dellermann, D., Ebel, P., Söllner, M., & Leimeister, J. M. (2019). Hybrid Intelligence. Business and Information Systems Engineering. 10.1007/s12599-019-00595-2
Du, W. (Derek), Pan, S. L., Leidner, D. E., & Ying, W. (2019). Affordances, experimentation and actualization of FinTech: A blockchain implementation study. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(1), 50–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2018.10.002.
Dubé, L., & Robey, D. (2009). Surviving the paradoxes of virtual teamwork. Information Systems Journal, 19(1), 3–30. 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2008.00313.x DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2008.00313.x
Dumoulin. (2020). Accuracy and National Bias of figure skating judges: The good, the bad and the ugly. MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference.
Duong, A. (2008). Bias in the 2008 Beijing Olympics (gymnastics).
Faraj, S., Pachidi, S., & Sayegh, K. (2018). Working and organizing in the age of the learning algorithm. Information and Organization, 28(1), 62–70. 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.005 DOI: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.005
Ferger, K., & Hackbarth, M. (2017). New way of determining horizontal displacement in competitive trampolining. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 9(3), 303–310.
Flessas, K., Mylonas, D., Panagiotaropoulou, G., Tsopani, D., Korda, A., Siettos, C., … Smyrnis, N. (2014). Judging the judges’ performance in rhythmic gymnastics. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 47(3), 640–648. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000425.
Fujiwara, H., & Ito, K. (2018). ICT-based judging support system for artistic gymnastics and intended new world created through 3D sensing technology. Fujitsu Scientific & Technical Journal, 54(4), 66–72.
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2012). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. 10.1177/1094428112452151 DOI: 10.1177/1094428112452151
Goebeler, L., Standaert, W., & Xiao, X. (2021). Hybrid sport configurations: The intertwining of the physical and the digital. Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii international conference on system sciences.
Harding, J., & James, D. (2010). Performance assessment innovations for elite snowboarding. Procedia Engineering, 2(2), 2919–2924. 10.1016/j.proeng.2010.04.088 DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2010.04.088
Harding, J., Toohey, K., Martin, D., Hahn, A., & James, D. (2008). Technology and half-pipe snowboard competition — Insight from elite- level judges. 7th ISEA conference. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-99056-4.
Heiniger, S., & Mercier, H. (2018). National Bias of international gymnastics judges during the 2013-2016 Olympic cycle. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.10033.
Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Lang, K. R. (2005). Managing the paradoxes of Mobile technology. Information Systems Management, 22(4), 7–23. 10.1201/1078.10580530/45520.22.4.20050901/90026.2 DOI: 10.1201/1078.10580530/45520.22.4.20050901/90026.2
Kallinikos, J., Aaltonen, A., & Marton, A. (2013). The ambivalent ontology of digital artifacts. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 357–370. DOI: 10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.2.02
Keller, R., Stohr, A., Fridgen, G., Lockl, J., & Rieger, A. (2019). Affordance-experimentation-actualization theory in artificial intelligence research - a predictive maintenance story. 40th international conference on information systems, 1–17.
Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020). Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 366–410. 10.5465/annals.2018.0174 DOI: 10.5465/annals.2018.0174
Kerr, R. (2018). Technologies for judging, umpiring and refereeing. In: Sport and technology (pp. 114–134). https://doi.org/10.7765/9781784995201.00010.
Klein, H., & Myers, M. (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 67–93. DOI: 10.2307/249410
Kolbinger, O., & Lames, M. (2017). Scientific approaches to technological officiating aids in game sports. Current Issues in Sport Science (CISS), 2, 1–10. 10.15203/ciss_2017.001 DOI: 10.15203/ciss_2017.001
Konovsky, M. a. (2000). Understanding procedural justice and its impact on business organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 489–511. 10.1177/014920630002600306 DOI: 10.1177/014920630002600306
Lee, A. S., & Baskerville, R. L. (2003). Generalizing generalizability in information systems research. Information Systems Research, 14(3). 10.1287/isre.14.3.221.16560
Leveaux, R. (2010). Facilitating Referee’s decision making in sport via the application of technology. Communications of the IBIMA. 10.5171/2010.545333
Leveaux, R. (2012). 2012 Olympic games decision making Technologies for Taekwondo Competition. Communications of the IBIMA. 10.5171/2012.834755
Lewis, M. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 760–776. 10.1080/15358593.2015.1116592 DOI: 10.1080/15358593.2015.1116592
Majchrzak, A., Faraj, S., Kane, G. C., & Azad, B. (2013). The contradictory influence of social media affordances on online communal knowledge sharing. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(1), 38–55. 10.1111/jcc4.12030 DOI: 10.1111/jcc4.12030
Mazurova, E., Penttinen, E., & Salovaara, A. (2021). Stakeholder-dependent views on biases of human- and machine-based judging systems. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
Mercier, H., & Heiniger, S. (2018). Judging the judges: Evaluating the performance of international gymnastics judges. ArXiv, 1–12.
Meske, C., Bunde, E. (2020). Transparency and trust in human-AI-interaction: The role of model-agnostic explanations in computer vision-based decision support. Proceedings of the international conference of AI in HCI 2020, 12217 LNCS, 54–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50334-5_4.
Meske, C., Bunde, E., Schneider, J., & Gersch, M. (Forthcoming). Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Objectives, Stakeholders, and Future Research Opportunities. Information Systems Management, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2020.1849465
Nadeem, A., Abedin, B., & Marjanovic, O. (2020). Gender Bias in AI: A review of contributing factors and mitigating strategies. ACIS 2020 proceedings.
Omorczyk, J., Nosiadek, L., Ambroży, T., & Nosiadek, A. (2015). High-frequency video capture and a computer program with frame-by-frame angle determination functionality as tools that support judging in artistic gymnastics. Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics, 17(3), 85–93.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. 10.1177/1035719X0300300213 DOI: 10.1177/1035719X0300300213
Perederij, V. V. (2013). The problem of the quality of judging in rhythmic gymnastics. Pedagogics, Psychology, Medical-Biological Problems of Physical Training and Sports, 3, 43–46. 10.6084/m9.figshare.647325 DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.647325
Plessner, H., & Haar, T. (2006). Sports performance judgments from a social cognitive perspective. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 7(6), 555–575. 10.1016/j.psychsport.2006.03.007 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2006.03.007
Plessner, H., & Schallies, E. (2005). Judging the cross on rings: A matter of achieving shape constancy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(9), 1145–1156. 10.1002/acp.1136 DOI: 10.1002/acp.1136
Poole, M., & van de Ven, A. (1989). Using paradox to build management and organization theories. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 562–578. DOI: 10.2307/258559
Rai, A. (2020). Explainable AI: From black box to glass box. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(1), 137–141. 10.1007/s11747-019-00710-5 DOI: 10.1007/s11747-019-00710-5
Rai, A., Constantinides, P., & Sarker, S. (2019). Next-generation digital platforms: Toward human–AI hybrids. MIS Quarterly, 43(1), iii–ix.
Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and management: The automation–augmentation paradox. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 192–210. 10.5465/AMR.2018.0072 DOI: 10.5465/AMR.2018.0072
Robey, D., & Boudreau, M. (1999). Accounting for the contradictory organizational consequences of information technology: Theoretical directions and methodological implications. Information Systems Research, 10(June), 167–185. 10.1287/isre.10.2.167 DOI: 10.1287/isre.10.2.167
Rzepka, C., & Berger, B. (2018). User interaction with AI-enabled systems: A systematic review of IS research. International conference on information systems 2018, ICIS 2018, (December).
Salovaara, A., Lyytinen, K., & Penttinen, E. (2019). High reliability in digital organizing: Mindlessness, the frame problem, and digital operations. MIS Quarterly, 43(2), 555–578. 10.25300/MISQ/2019/14577 DOI: 10.25300/MISQ/2019/14577
Schad, J., Lewis, M. W., Raisch, S., & Smith, W. K. (2016). Paradox research in management science: Looking Back to move forward. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 5–64. 10.1080/19416520.2016.1162422 DOI: 10.1080/19416520.2016.1162422
Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
Shrestha, Y. R., Ben-Menahem, S. M., & von Krogh, G. (2019). Organizational decision-making structures in the age of artificial intelligence. California Management Review, 61(4), 66–84. 10.1177/0008125619862257 DOI: 10.1177/0008125619862257
Siggelkow, N. (2007). Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 20–24. 10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160882 DOI: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160882
Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403. 10.5465/amr.2011.59330958 DOI: 10.5465/amr.2011.59330958
Stefani, R. (1998). Predicting outcomes. In J. Bennett (Ed.), Statistics in sport (pp. 249–275). Hodder Education Publishers.
Tan, F. T. C., Tan, B., & Pan, S. L. (2016). Developing a leading digital multi-sided platform: Examining IT affordances and competitive actions in alibaba.com. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 38(1), 738–760. 10.17705/1CAIS.03836 DOI: 10.17705/1CAIS.03836
Taymazov, V., Bakulev, S., Pavlenko, A., Simakov, A., & Chistyakov, V. (2013). To a question of electronic refereeing systems application in taekwondo (VTF). Uchenye Zapiski Universiteta Imeni P.F. Lesgafta, 155–160. 10.5930/issn.1994-4683.2013.04.98.p155-160
van den Broek, E., Sergeeva, A., & Huysman, M. (2019). Hiring algorithms: An ethnography of fairness in practice. 40th international conference on information systems, ICIS 2019.
van den Broek, E., Sergeeva, A., & Huysman, M. (2021). When the machine meets the expert: An ethnography of developing AI for hiring. MIS Quarterly, 45(3b), 1557–1580. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2021/16559
Walsham, G. (2006). Doing interpretive research. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(3), 320–330. 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000589 DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000589
Wimelius, H., Mathiassen, L., Holmström, J., & Keil, M. (2021). A paradoxical perspective on technology renewal in digital transformation. Information Systems Journal, 31(1), 198–225. 10.1111/isj.12307 DOI: 10.1111/isj.12307
Xiao, X., Chian Tan, F. Ter, Lim, E. T. K., Henningsson, S., Vatrapu, R., Hedman, J., … Van Hillegersberg, J. (2017). Sports digitalization: An overview and a research agenda. 38th international conference on information systems, 1–21.
Xu, J., Benbasat, I., & Cenfetelli, R. T. (2014). The nature and consequences of trade-off transparency in the context of recommendation agents. MIS Quarterly, 38(2), 379–406. DOI: 10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.2.03
Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage Publications.
