Classification strategies from the end of the Ramesside Period until the Late Period: a living system

Chantrain, Gaëlle

doi:10.1515/zaes-2021-0108

Request a copy

Article (Scientific journals)

Classification strategies from the end of the Ramesside Period until the Late Period: a living system

Chantrain, Gaëlle

2021 • In Zeitschrift für Agyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde, 148 (1), p. 1-15

Peer reviewed

Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2268/263339

DOI
10.1515/zaes-2021-0108

Files (1)Send to Details Statistics Bibliography Similar publications

Files

Full Text

10.1515_zaes-2021-0108.pdf

Publisher postprint (575.59 kB)

Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Keywords :

classifiers; ancient Egyptian; diachrony

Abstract :

[en] This study is part of a diptych. It is conceived as a general theoretical introduction to a forthcoming sub- stantial case study describing the economy of the classifi- ers system in the Late Period tomb of Menekhibnekau in Abusir. In the first part of the present paper, I shall first go through an overview of the functioning of the classifier system and some suggestions about its evolutive dynam- ics in diachrony. In the second part, I will introduce five classification strategies that can be encountered in the texts from the end of the Ramesside period down to the Late Period. These strategies will be explained and illus- trated by means of two case studies: the manuscript L of the Teaching of Amenemope and the texts from the tomb of Menekhibnekau

Disciplines :

Languages & linguistics

Author, co-author :

Chantrain, Gaëlle ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de l'antiquité > Egyptologie

Language :

English

Title :

Classification strategies from the end of the Ramesside Period until the Late Period: a living system

Publication date :

2021

Journal title :

Zeitschrift für Agyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde

ISSN :

0044-216X

Publisher :

Walter de Gruyter, Germany

Volume :

148 (1)

Pages :

1-15

Peer reviewed :

Peer reviewed

Available on ORBi :

since 13 September 2021

Statistics

Number of views

42 (1 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

2 (1 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

OpenAlex citations

Bibliography

Allon, N., 2010, “At the Outskirts of a System. Classifiers and Word Dividers in Foreign Phrases and Texts”, LingAeg. 18, 1-17.
Bareš, Ladislav & Květa Smoláriková (Hgg.), 2011, Abusir XXV: The Shaft Tomb of Menekhibnekau, Volume 1: Archaeology. Excavations of the Czech Institute of Egyptology, Prague.
Chantrain, G., 2014, “The Use of Classifiers in the New Kingdom. A global Reorganization of the Classifiers System?”, LingAeg. 22, 39-59.
Chantrain, G. & Di Biase-Dyson, C., 2017, “Making a Case for Multidimensionality in Ramesside Figurative Language”, in: Kammerzell, F., Richter, T. S. & D. A. Werning (Hgg.), Crossroads (LingAeg 25): Whence and Whither? Egyptian-Coptic linguistics in Comparative Perspectives, February 17-20, 2016, Hamburg.
Chantrain, G., 2019, “Semantic Changes in Ancient Egyptian. Some Case Studies”, in: Proceedings from the International Congress for Young Egyptologists, Vienna, 15-19 September 2015, 149-159.
Chantrain, G., in press, Éléments de la terminologie du temps en égyptien ancien. Une étude de sémantique lexicale en diachronie, LingAeg. StudMon., approx. 350 pages.
Chantrain, G., in preparation, “Classifiers Economy in the Late Period Tomb of Menekhibnekau in Abusir”.
David, A., 2000, De l'infériorité à la perturbation: l'oiseau du “mal” et la catégorisation en Égypte ancienne. Classification and Categorization in Ancient Egypt 1; Göttinger Orientforschungen, 4. Reihe: Ägypten 38. Wiesbaden.
David, A., 2006, Syntactic and Lexico-Semantic Aspects of the Legal register in Ramesside Royal Decrees. Classification and Categorization in Ancient Egypt 5; Göttinger Orientforschungen, 4. Reihe: Ägypten 38, Wiesbaden.
David, A., 2007, “Ancient Egyptian Forensic Metaphors and Categories”, ZÄS 134, 1-14.
Goldwasser, O.,1995. From Icon to Metaphor: Studies in the Semiotics of the Hieroglyphs, OBO 142, Freiburg/Göttingen.
Goldwasser, O., 2002, Prophets, Lovers and Giraffes. Wor(l)d Classification in Ancient Egypt; with an Appendix by Matthias Müller. GOF IV. Reihe: Ägypten 38/3 = Classification and Categorization in Ancient Egypt 3, Wiesbaden.
Goldwasser, O., 2005. Where is Metaphor? Conceptual Metaphor and Alternative Classification in the Hieroglyphic Script. Metaphor and Symbol 20 (2), 95-113.
Goldwasser, O., 2006. On the New Definition of Classifier Languages and Scripts. Lingua Aegyptia 14, 473-484.
Hussein, R. B., 2017, “Text Transmission or Text Reproduction? The Shifting Materiality of Pyramid Texts spell 267”, in: Bickel, Susanne and Lucía Díaz-Iglesias (Hgg.), Studies in Ancient Egyptian Funerary Literature, 295-329, Leuven.
iClassifier, URL: https://www.iclassifier.pw
Kilani, M., 2019, Group Writing: A New Proposal, LingAeg. StudMon. 20, Hamburg.
Laboury, D., 2017, “Tradition and Creativity: Toward a Study of Intericonicity in Ancient Egyptian Art”, in: Gillen, Todd (Hgg.), (Re)productive Traditions in Ancient Egypt: Proceedings of the Conference Held at the University of Liège, 6th-8th February 2013, 229-258. Liège.
Laisney, V., 2007, L'Enseignement d'Aménémopé. Studia Pohl: series maior 19, Rome.
Landgráfová, R. et al., forthcoming, The Shaft Tomb of Menekhibnekau, Texts, Excavations of the Czech Institute of Egyptology, Prague.
Lincke, E.-S., 2011, Die Prinzipien der Klassifizierung im Altägyptischen, Classification and Categorization in Ancient Egypt 6, GOF, 4 Reihe: Ägypten 38, Wiesbaden.
Lincke, E.-S. & Kammerzell, F., 2012, Egyptian Classifiers at the Interface of Lexical Semantics and Pragmatics, in: Grossman, E., Polis, St. & J. Winand (Hgg.), Lexical Semantics in Ancient Egyptian, 55-112, Hamburg.
Loprieno, A., 1995, Ancient Egyptian: A Linguistic Introduction, New York.
Loprieno, A., 2001, La pensée et l'écriture: Pour une analyse sémiotique de la culture égyptienne. Quatre séminaires à l'École Pratique des Hautes Études, Section des Sciences religieuses, Paris.
Loprieno, A., 2003, “Is the Egyptian Hieroglyphic Determinative Chosen or Prescribed?”, in: Morra/Bazzanella (Hgg.) Philosophers and Hieroglyphs, 237-250.
Loprieno, A., 2011, “Vom Schriftbild”, in: A. Loprieno/C. Knigge Salis/B. Mersmann (Hgg.), Bild, Macht, Schrift: Schriftkulturen in bildkritischer Perspektive, Weilerswist, 15-36.
Polis, St. and Rosmorduc, S., 2015, “The Hieroglyphic Sign Functions: Suggestions for a Revised Taxonomy”, in: Amstutz, H., A. Dorn, M. Müller, M. Ronsdorf, and S. Uljas (Hggs.), Fuzzy Boundaries: Festschrift für Antonio Loprieno 1, 149-174, Hamburg.
Thuault, S., 2018, “De l'usage des classificateurs dans les textes funéraires: l'exemple des toponymes Jskn, Ndj.t et GHs. tj dans les Textes des pyramides et les Textes des sarcophages”, ÉNiM 11, 7-22.
Verhoeven, U., 2001, Untersuchungen zur späthieratischen Buchschrift, OLA 99, Leuven.
Winand, J., 1992, La morphologie verbale. Études de néo-égyptien 1, AegLeod 2.
Winand, J., 2015, “Dialects in Pre-Coptic Egyptian. With a special attention to Late Egyptian”, LingAeg 23, 229-269.