[en] Ecosystem complexity is among the important drivers of biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, and unmanned aerial systems (UASs) are becoming an important tool for characterizing vegetation patterns and processes. The variety of UASs applications is immense, and so are the procedures to process UASs data described in the literature. Optimizing the workflow is still a matter of discussion. Here, we present a comprehensive synthesis aiming to identify common rules that shape workflows applied in UAS-based studies facing complexity in ecosystems. Analysing the studies, we found similarities irrespective of the ecosystem, according to the character of the property addressed, such as species composition (biodiversity), ecosystem structure (stand volume/complexity), plant status (phenology and stress levels), and dynamics (disturbances and regeneration). We propose a general framework allowing to design UAS-based vegetation surveys according to its purpose and the component of ecosystem complexity addressed. We support the framework by detailed schemes as well as examples of best practices of UAS studies covering each of the vegetation properties (i.e. composition, structure, status and dynamics) and related applications. For an efficient UAS survey, the following points are crucial: knowledge of the phenomenon, choice of platform, sensor, resolution (temporal, spatial and spectral), model and classification algorithm according to the phenomenon, as well as careful interpretation of the results. The simpler the procedure, the more robust, repeatable, applicable and cost effective it is. Therefore, the proper design can minimize the efforts while maximizing the quality of the results.
Disciplines :
Environmental sciences & ecology
Author, co-author :
Müllerová, Jana
Gago, Xurxo
Bučas, Martynas
Company, Jaume
Estrany, Joan
Fortesa, Josep
Manfreda, Salvatore
Michez, Adrien ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département GxABT > Gestion des ressources forestières et des milieux naturels
Aguilar, F.J., Rivas, J.R., Nemmaoui, A., Peñalver, A., Aguilar, M.A., UAV-based digital terrain model generation under leaf-off conditions to support teak plantations inventories in tropical dry forests. A case of the coastal region of Ecuador. Sensors, 19(8), 2019, 1934.
Alvarez-Vanhard, E., Houet, T., Mony, C., Lecoq, L., Corpetti, T., Can UAVs fill the gap between in situ surveys and satellites for habitat mapping?. Remote Sens. Environ., 243, 2020, 111780.
Anderson, K., Gaston, K.J., Lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles will revolutionize spatial ecology. Front. Ecol. Environ. 11:3 (2013), 138–146.
Augustine, D.J., McNaughton, S.J., Ungulate effects on the functional species composition of plant communities: herbivore selectivity and plant tolerance. J. Wildl. Manag. 62:4 (1998), 1165–1183.
Bagaram, M., Giuliarelli, D., Chirici, G., Giannetti, F., Barbati, A., UAV remote sensing for biodiversity monitoring: are forest canopy gaps good covariates?. Remote Sensing., 10(9), 2018, 1397.
Bailon-Ruiz, R., Lacroix, S., Bit-Monnot, A., Planning to monitor wildfires with a fleet of UASs. 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2018, IEEE, 4729–4734.
Baltsavias, E., Gruen, A., Eisenbeiss, H., Zhang, L., Waser, L.T., High-quality image matching and automated generation of 3D tree models. Int. J. Remote Sens. 29:5 (2008), 1243–1259.
Banerjee, B.P., Raval, S., Cullen, P.J., UAS-hyperspectral imaging of spectrally complex environments. Int. J. Remote Sens. 41:11 (2020), 4136–4159.
Beland, M., Parker, G., Sparrow, B., Harding, D., Chasmer, L., Phinn, S., Antonarakis, A., Strahler, A., On promoting the use of lidar systems in forest ecosystem research. For. Ecol. Manage., 450, 2019, 117484.
Berra, E.F., Gaulton, R., Barr, S., Assessing spring phenology of a temperate woodland: A multiscale comparison of ground, unmanned aerial vehicle and Landsat satellite observations. Remote Sens. Environ. 223 (2019), 229–242.
Calsamiglia, A., Gago, J., Garcia-Comendador, J., Bernat, J.F., Calvo-Cases, A., Estrany, J., Evaluating functional connectivity in a small agricultural catchment under contrasting flood events by using UAS. Earth Surf. Proc. Land. 45:4 (2020), 800–815.
Camarretta, N., Harrison, P.A., Bailey, T., Potts, B., Lucieer, A., Davidson, N., Hunt, M., Monitoring forest structure to guide adaptive management of forest restoration: a review of remote sensing approaches. New Forest. 51:4 (2020), 573–596.
Cardil, A., Vepakomma, U., Brotons, L., Assessing pine processionary moth defoliation using unmanned aerial systems. Forests., 8(10), 2017, 402.
Carl, C., Landgraf, D., der Maaten-Theunissen, V., Biber, P., Pretzsch, H., Robinia pseudoacacia L. flower analyzed by using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). Remote Sensing., 9(11), 2017, 1091.
Chadwick, K.D., Asner, G.P., Organismic-scale remote sensing of canopy foliar traits in lowland tropical forests. Remote Sensing., 8(2), 2016, 87.
Colomina, I., Molina, P., Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: A review. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 92 (2014), 79–97.
Cruz, H.O., Eckert, M., Meneses, J.M., Martínez, J.F., Precise real-time detection of nonforested areas with UAVs. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 55:2 (2016), 632–644.
Cunliffe, A.M., Brazier, R.E., Anderson, K., Ultra-fine grain landscape-scale quantification of dryland vegetation structure with drone-acquired structure-from-motion photogrammetry. Remote Sens. Environ. 183 (2016), 129–143.
Dandois, J.P., Ellis, E.C., Remote sensing of vegetation structure using computer vision. Remote Sensing. 2 (2010), 1157–1176.
Dandois, J.P., Ellis, E.C., High spatial resolution three-dimensional mapping of vegetation spectral dynamics using computer vision. Remote Sens. Environ. 136 (2013), 259–276.
D'Odorico, P., Besik, A., Wong, C.Y., Isabel, N., Ensminger, I., High-throughput drone-based remote sensing reliably tracks phenology in thousands of conifer seedlings. New Phytol. 226:6 (2020), 1667–1681.
Estrany, J., Ruiz, M., Calsamiglia, A., Carriquí, M., García-Comendador, J., Nadal, M., Fortesa, J., López-Tarazón, J.A., Hipólito, M., Gago, J., Sediment connectivity linked to vegetation using UASs: High-resolution imagery for ecosystem management. Sci. Total Environ. 671 (2019), 1192–1205.
Fahlgren, N., Gehan, M.A., Baxter, I., Lights, camera, action: high-throughput plant phenotyping is ready for a close-up. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 24 (2015), 93–99.
Fawcett, D., Bennie, J., Anderson, K., Monitoring spring phenology of individual tree crowns using drone-acquired NDVI data. Remote Sens. Ecol. Conserv. 7:2 (2020), 227–244.
Fedele, G., Locatelli, B., Djoudi, H., Mechanisms mediating the contribution of ecosystem services to human well-being and resilience. Ecosyst. Serv. 28 (2017), 43–54.
Fernández-Guisuraga, J.M., Sanz-Ablanedo, E., Suárez-Seoane, S., Calvo, L., Using unmanned aerial vehicles in postfire vegetation survey campaigns through large and heterogeneous areas: Opportunities and challenges. Sensors., 18(2), 2018, 586.
Franklin, S.E., Pixel-and object-based multispectral classification of forest tree species from small unmanned aerial vehicles. Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems. 6:4 (2018), 195–211.
Gago, J., Estrany, J., Estes, L., Fernie, A.R., Alorda, B., Brotman, Y., Flexas, J., Escalona, J.M., Medrano, H., Nano and Micro Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs): A New Grand Challenge for Precision Agriculture?. Current Protocols in Plant Biology., 5(1), 2020, e20103.
Gago, J., Fernie, A.R., Nikoloski, Z., Tohge, T., Martorell, S., Escalona, J.M., Ribas-Carbó, M., Flexas, J., Medrano, H., Integrative field scale phenotyping for investigating metabolic components of water stress within a vineyard. Plant Methods. 13:1 (2017), 1–14.
Getzin, S., Nuske, R.S., Wiegand, K., Using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) to quantify spatial gap patterns in forests. Remote Sensing. 6:8 (2014), 6988–7004.
Getzin, S., Wiegand, K., Schöning, I., Assessing biodiversity in forests using very high-resolution images and unmanned aerial vehicles. Methods Ecol. Evol. 3:2 (2012), 397–404.
Ghosal, S., Blystone, D., Singh, A.K., Ganapathysubramanian, B., Singh, A., Sarkar, S., An explainable deep machine vision framework for plant stress phenotyping. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 115:18 (2018), 4613–4618.
Giannetti, F., Puletti, N., Quatrini, V., Travaglini, D., Bottalico, F., Corona, P., Chirici, G., Integrating terrestrial and airborne laser scanning for the assessment of single-tree attributes in Mediterranean forest stands. Eur. J. Remote Sens. 51:1 (2018), 795–807.
Gini, R., Passoni, D., Pinto, L., Sona, G., Use of unmanned aerial systems for multispectral survey and tree classification: A test in a park area of northern Italy. Eur. J. Remote Sens. 47:1 (2014), 251–269.
Goddard, M.A., Davies, Z.G., Guenat, S., Ferguson, M.J., Fisher, J.C., Akanni, A., Dallimer, M., A global horizon scan of the future impacts of robotics and autonomous systems on urban ecosystems. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5 (2021), 219–230.
Gonzalez, L.F., Montes, G.A., Puig, E., Johnson, S., Mengersen, K., Gaston, K.J., Unmanned aerial vehicles (UASs) and artificial intelligence revolutionizing wildlife monitoring and conservation. Sensors, 16(1), 2016, 97.
Guerra-Hernández, J., González-Ferreiro, E., Monleón, V.J., Faias, S.P., Tomé, M., Díaz-Varela, R.A., Use of multi-temporal UAS-derived imagery for estimating individual tree growth in Pinus pinea stands. Forests, 8(8), 2017, 300.
Holman, F.H., Riche, A.B., Michalski, A., Castle, M., Wooster, M.J., Hawkesford, M.J., High throughput field phenotyping of wheat plant height and growth rate in field plot trials using UAS based remote sensing. Remote Sens., 8(12), 2016, 1031.
Hyyppä, E., Hyyppä, J., Hakala, T., Kukko, A., Wulder, M.A., White, J.C., Kaartinen, H., Under-canopy UAV laser scanning for accurate forest field measurements. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 164 (2020), 41–60.
Jetz, W., McGeoch, M.A., Guralnick, R., Ferrier, S., Beck, J., Costello, M.J., Turak, E., Essential biodiversity variables for mapping and monitoring species populations. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3:4 (2019), 539–551.
Jiménez López, J., Mulero-Pázmány, M., Drones for conservation in protected areas: present and future. Drones., 3(1), 2019, 10.
Jones, H.G., Vaughan, R.A., Remote Sensing of Vegetation: Principles, Techniques, and Applications. 2010, Oxford University Press.
Kašpar, V., Hederová, L., Macek, M., Müllerová, J., Prošek, J., Surový, P., Wild, J., Kopecký, M., Temperature buffering in temperate forests: comparing microclimate models based on ground measurements with active and passive remote sensing. Remote Sens. Environ., 263, 2021, 112522.
Kattenborn, T., Eichel, J., Wiser, S., Burrows, L., Fassnacht, F.E., Schmidtlein, S., Convolutional Neural Networks accurately predict cover fractions of plant species and communities in Unmanned Aerial Vehicle imagery. Remote Sens. Ecol. Conserv. 6:4 (2020), 472–486.
Kent, R., Lindsell, J.A., Laurin, G.V., Valentini, R., Coomes, D.A., Airborne LiDAR detects selectively logged tropical forest even in an advanced stage of recovery. Remote Sensing. 7:7 (2015), 8348–8367.
Lambers, H., Chapin, F.S. III, Pons, T.L., Plant Physiological Ecology. 2008, Springer Science Business Media.
Larrinaga, A.R., Brotons, L., Greenness indices from a low-cost UAV imagery as tools for monitoring post-fire forest recovery. Drones., 3(1), 2019, 6.
Laslier, M., Hubert-Moy, L., Corpetti, T., Dufour, S., Monitoring the colonization of alluvial deposits using multitemporal UAV RGB-imagery. Appl. Veg. Sci. 22 (2019), 561–572.
Lefsky, M.A., Cohen, W.B., Parker, G.G., Harding, D.J., Lidar remote sensing for ecosystem studies: Lidar, an emerging remote sensing technology that directly measures the three-dimensional distribution of plant canopies, can accurately estimate vegetation structural attributes and should be of particular interest to forest, landscape, and global ecologists. Bioscience 52:1 (2002), 19–30.
Lisein, J., Michez, A., Claessens, H., Lejeune, P., Discrimination of deciduous tree species from time series of unmanned aerial system imagery. PLoS ONE, 10(11), 2015, e0141006.
Lisein, J., Pierrot-Deseilligny, M., Bonnet, S., Lejeune, P., A photogrammetric workflow for the creation of a forest canopy height model from small unmanned aerial system imagery. Forests. 4 (2013), 922–944.
Liu, T., Abd-Elrahman, A., Morton, J., Wilhelm, V.L., Comparing fully convolutional networks, random forest, support vector machine, and patch-based deep convolutional neural networks for object-based wetland mapping using images from small unmanned aircraft system. GIScience Remote Sensing. 55:2 (2018), 243–264.
Ludwig, M., Runge, C.M., Friess, N., Koch, T.L., Richter, S., Seyfried, S., Wraase, L., Lobo, A., Sebastià, M.-T., Reudenbach, C., Nauss, T., Quality Assessment of Photogrammetric Methods—A Workflow for Reproducible UAS Orthomosaics. Remote Sensing., 12(22), 2020, 3831.
Manfreda, S., McCabe, M.F., Miller, P.E., Lucas, R., Pajuelo Madrigal, V., Mallinis, G., Toth, B., On the use of unmanned aerial systems for environmental monitoring. Remote Sensing., 10(4), 2018, 641.
Martin, F.M., Müllerová, J., Borgniet, L., Dommanget, F., Breton, V., Evette, A., Using single-and multi-date UAV and satellite imagery to accurately monitor invasive knotweed species. Remote Sensing., 10(10), 2018, 1662.
Marvin, D.C., Koh, L.P., Lynam, A.J., Wich, S., Davies, A.B., Krishnamurthy, R., Stokes, E., Starkey, R., Asner, G.P., Integrating technologies for scalable ecology and conservation. Global Ecol. Conserv. 7 (2016), 262–275.
Meneses, N.C., Baier, S., Reidelstürz, P., Geist, J., Schneider, T., Modelling heights of sparse aquatic reed (Phragmites australis) using Structure from Motion point clouds derived from Rotary- and Fixed-Wing Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) data. Limnologica. 72 (2018), 10–21.
Michez, A., Piégay, H., Lisein, J., Claessens, H., Lejeune, P., Classification of riparian forest species and health condition using multi-temporal and hyperspatial imagery from unmanned aerial system. Environ. Monit. Assess., 188(3), 2016, 146.
Michez, A., Piégay, H., Toromanoff, F., Brogna, D., Bonnet, S., Lejeune, P., Claessens, H., LiDAR derived ecological integrity indicators for riparian zones: Application to the Houille river in Southern Belgium/Northern France. Ecol. Ind. 34 (2013), 627–640.
Minařík, R., Langhammer, J., Use of a Multispectral UAV Photogrammetry for Detection and Tracking of Forest Disturbance Dynamics. 2016, International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing Spatial Information Sciences, 41.
Mokroš, M., Výbošťok, J., Merganič, J., Hollaus, M., Barton, I., Koreň, M., Tomaštík, J., Čerňava, J., Early Stage Forest Windthrow Estimation Based on Unmanned Aircraft System Imagery. Forests., 8, 2017, 306.
Müllerová, J., UAS for Nature Conservation-Monitoring Invasive Species. Sharma, J.B., (eds.) Applications of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems: Best Practices and Case Studies, 2019, CRC Press, 157–178.
Müllerová, J., Bartaloš, T., Brůna, J., Dvořák, P., Vítková, M., Unmanned aircraft in nature conservation: an example from plant invasions. Int. J. Remote Sens. 38 (2017), 2177–2198.
Müllerová, J., Brůna, J., Bartaloš, T., Dvořák, P., Vítková, M., Pyšek, P., Timing Is Important: Unmanned Aircraft vs. Satellite Imagery in Plant Invasion Monitoring. Front. Plant Sci. 8 (2017), 1–13.
Näsi, R., Honkavaara, E., Blomqvist, M., Lyytikäinen-Saarenmaa, P., Hakala, T., Viljanen, N., Kantola, T., Holopainen, M., Remote sensing of bark beetle damage in urban forests at individual tree level using a novel hyperspectral camera from UAV and aircraft. Urban Forestry Urban Green. 30 (2018), 72–83.
Padró, J.C., Muñoz, F.J., Planas, J., Pons, X., Comparison of four UAS georeferencing methods for environmental monitoring purposes focusing on the combined use with airborne and satellite remote sensing platforms. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 75 (2019), 130–140.
Pande-Chhetri, R., Abd-Elrahman, A., Liu, T., Morton, J., Wilhelm, V.L., Object-based classification of wetland vegetation using very high-resolution unmanned air system imagery. Eur. J. Remote Sens. 50:1 (2017), 564–576.
Park, J.Y., Muller-Landau, H.C., Lichstein, J.W., Rifai, S.W., Dandois, J.P., Bohlman, S.A., Quantifying leaf phenology of individual trees and species in a tropical forest using unmanned aerial vehicle (UAS) images. Remote Sens., 11(13), 2019, 1534.
Randlkofer, B., Obermaier, E., Hilker, M., Meiners, T., Vegetation complexity—The influence of plant species diversity and plant structures on plant chemical complexity and arthropods. Basic Appl. Ecol. 11 (2010), 383–395.
Reddy, C.S., Kurian, A., Srivastava, G., Singhal, J., Varghese, A.O., Padalia, H., Rao, P.V.N., Remote sensing enabled essential biodiversity variables for biodiversity assessment and monitoring: technological advancement and potentials. Biodivers. Conserv. 30 (2021), 1–14.
Röder, M., Latifi, H., Hill, S., Wild, J., Svoboda, M., Brůna, J., Macek, M., Nováková, M.H., Gülch, E., Heurich, M., Application of optical unmanned aerial vehicle-based imagery for the inventory of natural regeneration and standing deadwood in post-disturbed spruce forests. Int. J. Remote Sens. 39 (2018), 5288–5309.
Rydell, J., Tulldahl, M., Bilock, E., Axelsson, L., Köhler, P., Autonomous UAV-based forest mapping below the canopy. 2020 IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium (PLANS), 2020, IEEE, 112–117.
de Sá, N.C., Castro, P., Carvalho, S., Marchante, E., López-Núñez, F.A., Marchante, H., Mapping the flowering of an invasive plant using unmanned aerial vehicles: is there potential for biocontrol monitoring?. Front. Plant Sci., 9, 2018, 293.
Schneider-Zapp, K., Cubero-Castan, M., Shi, D., Strecha, C., A new method to determine multi-angular reflectance factor from lightweight multispectral cameras with sky sensor in a target-less workflow applicable to UAS. Remote Sens. Environ. 229 (2019), 60–68.
Seifert, E., Seifert, S., Vogt, H., Drew, D., Van Aardt, J., Kunneke, A., Seifert, T., Influence of drone altitude, image overlap, and optical sensor resolution on multi-view reconstruction of forest images. Remote Sensing., 11(10), 2019, 1252.
Senf, C., Seidl, R., Hostert, P., Remote sensing of forest insect disturbances: Current state and future directions. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 60 (2017), 49–60.
Singh, A., Ganapathysubramanian, B., Singh, A.K., Sarkar, S., Machine learning for high-throughput stress phenotyping in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 21:2 (2016), 110–124.
Smigaj, M., Gaulton, R., Suárez, J.C., Barr, S.L., Canopy temperature from an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle as an indicator of tree stress associated with red band needle blight severity. For. Ecol. Manage. 433 (2019), 699–708.
Stein, A., Gerstner, K., Kreft, H., Environmental heterogeneity as a universal driver of species richness across taxa, biomes and spatial scales. Ecol. Lett. 17:7 (2014), 866–880.
Swetnam, T.L., Gillan, J.K., Sankey, T.T., McClaran, M.P., Nichols, M.H., Heilman, P., McVay, J., Considerations for achieving cross-platform point cloud data fusion across different dryland ecosystem structural states. Front. Plant Sci., 8, 2018, 2144.
Tamondong, A., Nakamura, T., Kobayashi, Y., Garcia, M., Nadaoka, K., Investigating the effects of river discharges on submerged aquatic vegetation using Uav images and GIS techniques. ISPRS Ann. Photogramme. Remote Sens. Spatial Inform. Sci. 5 (2020), 93–99.
Tmušić, G., Manfreda, S., Aasen, H., James, M.R., Gonçalves, G., Ben-Dor, E., Zhuang, R., Current practices in UAS-based environmental monitoring. Remote Sensing., 12(6), 2020, 1001.
Wallace, L., Lucieer, A., Malenovský, Z., Turner, D., Vopěnka, P., Assessment of forest structure using two UAV techniques: A comparison of airborne laser scanning and structure from motion (SfM) point clouds. Forests., 7, 2016, 62.
White, J., Stepper, C., Tompalski, P., Coops, N., Wulder, M., Comparing ALS and image-based point cloud metrics and modelled forest inventory attributes in a complex coastal forest environment. Forests 6:10 (2015), 3704–3732.
Yao, H., Qin, R., Chen, X., Unmanned aerial vehicle for remote sensing applications—A review. Remote Sensing., 11(12), 2019, 1443.
Yuan, C., Zhang, Y., Liu, Z., A survey on technologies for automatic forest fire monitoring, detection, and fighting using unmanned aerial vehicles and remote sensing techniques. Can. J. For. Res. 45:7 (2015), 783–792.
Yuba, N., Kawamura, K., Yasuda, T., Lim, J., Yoshitoshi, R., Watanabe, N., Kurokawa, Y., Maeda, T., Discriminating Pennisetum alopecuoides plants in a grazed pasture from unmanned aerial vehicles using object-based image analysis and random forest classifier. Grassland Sci. 67:1 (2021), 73–82.
Zhang, C., Filella, I., Liu, D., Ogaya, R., Llusià, J., Asensio, D., Peñuelas, J., Photochemical reflectance index (PRI) for detecting responses of diurnal and seasonal photosynthetic activity to experimental drought and warming in a mediterranean shrubland. Remote Sens., 9(11), 2017, 1189.