Memory; Recollection; Familiarity; Metacognition; Cognitive Development; Children
Abstract :
[en] We tested whether changes in attribution processes could account for the developmental differences observed in how children’s use fluency to guide their memory decisions. Children ranging in age from 4 to 9 years studied a list of familiar or unfamiliar cartoon characters. In Experiment 1 (n=84), participants completed a recognition test during which the perceptual fluency of some items was enhanced using a prime. In Experiment 2 (n=96), participants completed a source recollection judgment on their recognition decisions. Primed items were recognized at a higher rate than unprimed items. However, while young children rely on fluency for all items, older children use fluency only for unfamiliar items. This pattern came together with a reduction in familiarity-based —but not recollection-based— memory responses.
Disciplines :
Theoretical & cognitive psychology
Author, co-author :
Geurten, Marie ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Neuropsychologie
Willems, Sylvie ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Clinique psychologique et logopédique universitaire (CPLU)
Loyd, Marianne
Language :
English
Title :
Too Much Familiarity! The Developmental Path of the Fluency Heuristic in Children
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.
Bibliography
Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309341564
Drummey, A., & Newcombe, N. (1995). Remembering versus knowing the past: Children′s explicit and implicit memories for pictures. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 59, 549–565. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1995.1025
Geurten, M., Bastin, C., Salmon, E., & Willems, S. (2019). Hunting down the source: How amnesic patients avoid fluency-based memory errors. Neuropsychology, 34(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000566
Geurten, M., Lloyd, M., & Willems, S. (2017). Hearing “quack” and remembering a duck: Evidence for fluency attribution in young children. Child Development, 88, 514–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12614
Geurten, M., & Willems, S. (2016). Metacognition in early childhood: Fertile ground to understand memory development? Child Development Perspectives, 10, 263–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12201
Geurten, M., & Willems, S. (2017). The learned reinterpretation of fluency in amnesia. Neuropsychologia, 101, 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.05.012
Geurten, M., Willems, S., Germain, S., & Meulemans, T. (2015). Less is more: The availability heuristic in early childhood. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 33, 405–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12114
Ghetti, S., & Angelini, L. (2008). The development of recollection and familiarity in childhood and adolescence: Evidence from the dual-process signal detection model. Child Development, 79, 339–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01129.x
Ghetti, S., Qin, J., & Goodman, G. S. (2002). False memories in children and adults: age, distinctiveness, and subjective experience. Developmental Psychology, 38, 705–718. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.38.5.705
Glaser, W. R. (1992). Picture naming. Cognition, 42, 61–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(92)90040-O
Gomes, C. A., Mecklinger, A., & Zimmer, H. (2019). The neural mechanism of fluency-based memory illusions: the role of fluency context. Learning & Memory, 26, 61–65. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.048637.118
Guttentag, R. E., & Dunn, J. (2003). Judgments of remembering: The revelation effect in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86, 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0965(03)00135-8
Hayes, B. K., & Hennessy, R. (1996). The nature and development of nonverbal implicit memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 22–43. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1996.0041
Holcomb, P. J., Reder, L., Misra, M., & Grainger, J. (2005). The effects of prime visibility on ERP measures of masked priming. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.01.003
Jacoby, L. L., & Whitehouse, K. (1989). An illusion of memory: False recognition influenced by unconscious perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.118.2.126
Kurilla, B., & Westerman, D. (2008). Processing fluency affects subjective claims of recollection. Memory & Cognition, 36, 82–92. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.1.82
Lie, E., & Newcombe, N. S. (1999). Elementary school children's explicit and implicit memory for faces of preschool classmates. Developmental Psychology, 35, 102–112. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.1.102
Lindsay, D. S., & Kelley, C. M. (1996). Creating illusions of familiarity in a cued recall remember/know paradigm. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.0011
Lloyd, M. E., Westerman, D. L., & Miller, J. K. (2003). The fluency heuristic in recognition memory: The effect of repetition. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 603–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00535-1
Miller, J. K., & Lloyd, M. E. (2011). The development of the fluency heuristic in childhood: More questions than answers. In P. A. Higham & J. P. Leboe (Eds.), Constructions of Remembering and Metacognition (pp. 28–39). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230305281
Miller, J. K., Lloyd, M. E., & Westerman, D. L. (2008). When does modality matter? Perceptual versus conceptual fluency-based illusions in recognition memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 1080–1094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.006
Mitchell, D. B., & Brown, A. S. (1988). Persistent repetition priming in picture naming and its dissociation from recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 213–222. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.14.2.213
Mitchum, A. L., Kelley, C. M., & Fox, M. C. (2016). When asking the question changes the ultimate answer: Metamemory judgments change memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 200–219. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039923
Naito, M. (1990). Repetition priming in children and adults: Age-related dissociation between implicit and explicit memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 50, 462–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(90)90081-I
Olds, J. M., & Westerman, D. L. (2012). Can fluency be interpreted as novelty? Retraining the interpretation of fluency in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 653–664. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026784
Perfect, T. J. (1996). Does context discriminate recollection from familiarity in recognition memory? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 49, 797–813. https://doi.org/10.1080/713755644
Taylor, J. R., & Henson, R. N. (2012). Could masked conceptual primes increase recollection? The subtleties of measuring recollection and familiarity in recognition memory. Neuropsychologia, 50, 3027–3040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.029
Thapar, A., & Westerman, D. L. (2009). Aging and fluency-based illusions in recognition memory. Psychology and Aging, 24, 595–603. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016575
Unkelbach, C. (2006). The learned interpretation of cognitive fluency. Psychological Science, 17, 339–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01708.x
Wais, P. E., Mickes, L., & Wixted, J. T. (2008). Remember/know judgments probe degrees of recollection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 400–405. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20041
Wechsler, D. (2004). Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence: WPPSI–III. Paris, France: Les Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.
Wechsler, D. (2005). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children: WISC–IV. Paris, France: Les Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.
Westerman, D. (2008). Relative fluency and illusions of recognition memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 1196–1200. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.6.1196
Westerman, D., Miller, J., & Lloyd, M. (2003). Change in perceptual form attenuates the use of the fluency heuristic in recognition. Memory & Cognition, 31, 619–629. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196102
Whittlesea, B. W. A. (1993). Illusions of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1235–1253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.19.6.1235
Whittlesea, B. A., & Price, J. (2001). Implicit /explicit memory versus analytic/nonanalytic processing: Rethinking the mere exposure effect. Memory & Cognition, 29, 234–246. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194917
Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Williams, L. D. (2000). The source of feelings of familiarity: The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 547–565. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.3.547
Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Williams, L. D. (2001a). The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: I. The heuristic basis of feelings and familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.27.1.3
Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Williams, L. D. (2001b). The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: II. Expectation, uncertainty, surprise, and feelings of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 14–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.27.1.14
Willems, S., & Van der Linden, M. (2006). Mere exposure effect: A consequence of direct and indirect fluency–preference links. Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 323–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2005.06.008
Yonelinas, A. P., Kroll, N. E. A., Quamme, J. R., Lazzara, M. M., Sauvé, M.-J., Widaman, K. F., & Knight, R. T. (2002). Effects of extensive temporal lobe damage or mild hypoxia on recollection and familiarity. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 1236–1241. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn961
Similar publications
Sorry the service is unavailable at the moment. Please try again later.
This website uses cookies to improve user experience. Read more
Save & Close
Accept all
Decline all
Show detailsHide details
Cookie declaration
About cookies
Strictly necessary
Performance
Strictly necessary cookies allow core website functionality such as user login and account management. The website cannot be used properly without strictly necessary cookies.
This cookie is used by Cookie-Script.com service to remember visitor cookie consent preferences. It is necessary for Cookie-Script.com cookie banner to work properly.
Performance cookies are used to see how visitors use the website, eg. analytics cookies. Those cookies cannot be used to directly identify a certain visitor.
Used to store the attribution information, the referrer initially used to visit the website
Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. Websites use cookies to help users navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. Cookies that are required for the website to operate properly are allowed to be set without your permission. All other cookies need to be approved before they can be set in the browser.
You can change your consent to cookie usage at any time on our Privacy Policy page.
