Opening the organisational black box to grasp the difficulties of agroecological transition. An empirical analysis of tensions in agroecological production cooperatives
agroecological transition; agricultural production cooperative; self-management; institutional logics; paradoxical tension
Abstract :
[en] Whereas many studies adopting a broad perspective on sustainability have highlighted the differences and interactions between alternative and conventional models of agricultural production, very few have investigated the contradictions internal to farm organizations engaged in agroecological transition. In order to understand the difficulties faced by farmers in combining multiple aspirations, we study agroecological production cooperatives (APCs) through the tensions between their different institutional logics. We use a qualitative analysis to address these tensions, and the responses to them, related to their territorial, self-management, and agroecological logics. Various local actors have different conceptions of agroecology, based on diverse levels of knowledge of agricultural practices and on dissimilar interests. This entails various preferences regarding technical choices and farm management. Agroecology's emphasis on diversity, local resources, experimentation, labour intensity and the long run may contradict financial considerations and the quality of working conditions of farmers. Setting up deliberation arenas is key to elaborating agreed compromises regarding the agroecological conception, as well as the governance of farm organizations.
Disciplines :
Agriculture & agronomy
Author, co-author :
Plateau, Lou
Roudart, Laurence
Hudon, Marek
Maréchal, Kevin ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département GxABT > Modélisation et développement
Language :
English
Title :
Opening the organisational black box to grasp the difficulties of agroecological transition. An empirical analysis of tensions in agroecological production cooperatives
Altieri, M., Nicholls, C., Agroecology and the reconstruction of a post-COVID-19 agriculture. J. Peasant Stud. 47 (2020), 881–898, 10.1080/03066150.2020.1782891.
Anderson, C.R., Bruil, J., Chappell, M.J., Kiss, C., Pimbert, M.P., From transition to domains of transformation: getting to sustainable and just food systems through agroecology. Sustainability, 11, 2019, 5272.
Arora, S., Van Dyck, B., Sharma, D., Stirling, A., Control, care, and conviviality in the politics of technology for sustainability. Sustain. Sci. Pract. Pol. 16 (2020), 247–262.
Aubron, C., Noël, L., Lasseur, J., Labor as a driver of changes in herd feeding patterns: evidence from a diachronic approach in Mediterranean France and lessons for agroecology. Ecol. Econ. 127 (2016), 68–79, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.02.013.
Audebrand, L.K., Expanding the scope of paradox scholarship on social enterprise: the case for (re) introducing worker cooperatives. M@n@gement 20 (2017), 368–393.
Bacon, C., Getz, C., Kraus, S., Montenegro, M., Holland, K., The social dimensions of sustainability and change in diversified farming systems. Ecol. Soc., 17, 2012.
Bardin, L., L'analyse de contenu. 1977, Press. Univ. Fr, Paris.
Battilana, J., Dorado, S., Building sustainable hybrid organizations: the case of commercial microfinance organizations. Acad. Manag. J. 53 (2010), 1419–1440.
Battilana, J., Lee, M., Advancing research on hybrid organizing – insights from the study of social enterprises. Acad. Manag. Ann. 8 (2014), 397–441.
Battilana, J., Besharov, M., Mitzinneck, B., On hybrids and hybrid organizing: a review and roadmap for future research. SAGE Handb. Organ. Institution. 2 (2017), 133–169.
Belgian Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs, Chiffres clés de L'agriculture 2020. 2020, SPF Economie, Direction Générale Statistiques, Brussel.
Bélières, J.-F., Bonnal, P., Bosc, P.-M., Losch, B., Marzin, J., Sourisseau, J.-M., Les agricultures familiales du monde. Définitions, Contributions et Politiques Publiques, 2013, Cirad, Montpellier.
Bonny, S., High-tech agriculture or agroecology for tomorrow's agriculture?. Harv. Coll. Rev. Environ. Soc., 28–34, 2017.
Born, B., Purcell, M., Avoiding the local trap: scale and food systems in planning research. J. Plan. Educ. Res. 26 (2006), 195–207.
Bui, S., Cardona, A., Lamine, C., Cerf, M., Sustainability transitions: insights on processes of niche-regime interaction and regime reconfiguration in Agri-food systems. J. Rural. Stud. 48 (2016), 92–103.
Bui, S., Costa, I., De Schutter, O., Dedeurwaerdere, T., Hudon, M., Feyereisen, M., Systemic ethics and inclusive governance: two key prerequisites for sustainability transitions of Agri-food systems. Agric. Hum. Values 36:2 (2019), 277–288.
Calame, M., Mouchet, C., Quelles techniques pour l'agriculture écologique?. Pensée Ecol., 5, 2020.
Campenhoudt, V., Luc, Chaumont, Franssen, A., La Méthode D'analyse en Groupe: Applications aux Phénomènes Sociaux. 2005, Dunod, Paris.
Castoriadis, C., Autogestion et hiérarchie. Le Contenu Du Socialisme, 1979, 10–18 Paris.
Chayanov, A., [1927]. The Theory of Peasant Co-Operatives. 1991, I.B.Tauris, London.
Cheney, G., Santa Cruz, I., Peredo, A.M., Nazareno, E., Cheney, G., Santa Cruz, I., Peredo, A.M., Nazareno, E., Worker cooperatives as an organizational alternative: challenges, achievements and promise in business governance and ownership. Organization 21 (2014), 591–603.
Chiffoleau, Y., Millet-Amrani, S., Canard, A., From short food supply chains to sustainable agriculture in urban food systems: food democracy as a vector of transition. Agriculture, 6, 2016, 57.
Chomel, C., Declerck, F., Filippi, M., Frey, O., Mauget, R., Les coopératives agricoles: identité, gouvernance et stratégies. 2013, Larcier, Brussel.
Cordellier, S., Une histoire de la coopération agricole de production en France. Rev. Int. Écon. Soc. Recma 331 (2014), 45–58.
Cowton, C.J., The use of secondary data in business ethics research. J. Bus. Ethics 17 (1998), 423–434.
De Herde, V., Maréchal, K., Baret, P.V., Lock-ins and agency: towards an embedded approach of individual pathways in the Walloon dairy sector. Sustainability, 11, 2019, 4405.
De Schutter, O., Agroecology and the right to food. Report submitted by the special rapporteur on the right to food. 16th Session of the United Nations Human Rights Council [A/HRC/16/49], Geneva, 2011.
Defourny, J., Nyssens, M., Mapping social enterprise models: some evidence from the “ICSEM” project. Soc. Enterp. J. 13 (2017), 318–328.
Diaz-Correa, J., López-Navarro, M., Managing sustainable hybrid organisations: a case study in the agricultural sector. Sustainability, 10, 2018, 3010.
Doherty, B., Haugh, H., Lyon, F., Social enterprises as hybrid organizations: a review and research agenda. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 16 (2014), 417–436.
Dubois, A., Gadde, L.-E., Systematic combining: an abductive approach to case research. J. Bus. Res. 55 (2002), 553–560.
Dufays, F., Exploring the drivers of tensions in social innovation management in the context of social entrepreneurial teams. Manag. Decis. 57 (2019), 1344–1361, 10.1108/MD-01-2017-0089.
Dumont, A.M., Baret, P.V., Why working conditions are a key issue of sustainability in agriculture? A comparison between agroecological, organic and conventional vegetable systems. J. Rural. Stud. 56 (2017), 53–64.
Dumont, A.M., Vanloqueren, G., Stassart, P.M., Baret, P.V., Clarifying the socioeconomic dimensions of agroecology: between principles and practices. Agroecol. Sustain. Food Syst. 40 (2016), 24–47.
Duru, M., Therond, O., Fares, M., Designing agroecological transitions; a review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 35 (2015), 1237–1257.
Ekers, M., The curious case of ecological farm interns: on the populism and political economy of agro-ecological farm work. J. Peasant Stud. 46 (2019), 21–43.
Emery, S.B., Independence and individualism: conflated values in farmer cooperation?. Agric. Hum. Values 32 (2015), 47–61.
Emery, S.B., Forney, J., Wynne-Jones, S., The more-than-economic dimensions of cooperation in food production. J. Rural. Stud. 53 (2017), 229–235, 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.05.017.
Estrin, S., Le développement des coopératives de travailleurs. Defourny, J., (eds.) L'entreprise Coopérative, 1988, Tradition et Renouveau. Labor, Brussel, 91–119.
Ferguson, B.G., Maya, M.A., Giraldo, O., Cacho, M., Morales, H., Rosset, P., Special issue editorial: what do we mean by agroecological scaling?. Agroecol. Sustain. Food Syst. 43 (2019), 722–723.
Forssell, S., Lankoski, L., The sustainability promise of alternative food networks: an examination through “alternative” characteristics. Agric. Hum. Values 32 (2015), 63–75, 10.1007/s10460-014-9516-4.
Francis, C., Lieblein, G., Gliessman, S., Breland, T.A., Creamer, N., Harwood, R., Salomonsson, L., Helenius, J., Rickerl, D., Salvador, R., Wiedenhoeft, M., Simmons, S., Allen, P., Altieri, M., Flora, C., Poincelot, R., Agroecology: the ecology of food systems. J. Sustain. Agric. 22 (2003), 99–118.
Friedland, R., Alford, R.R., Powell, W., DiMaggio, P.J., (eds.) Bringing Society Back in: Symbols, Practices and Institutional Contradictions, 1991, The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago, 232–267.
Galera, G., The evolution of the co-operative form: An international perspective. Borzaga, C., Spear, R., (eds.) Trends and Challenges for Co-Operatives and Social Enterprises in Developed and Transition Countries. Edizioni 31, Trento, 2004, 17–38.
Giraldo, O.F., Rosset, P.M., Agroecology as a territory in dispute: between institutionality and social movements. J. Peasant Stud. 45 (2018), 545–564.
Gliessman, S.R., Agroecology: The Ecology of Sustainable Food Systems. Third ed., 2014, CRC Press, Boca Raton [US], 10.1201/b17881.
Gonzalez, R.A., Going back to go forwards? From multi-stakeholder cooperatives to open cooperatives in food and farming. J. Rural. Stud. 53 (2017), 278–290.
Gonzalez de Molina, M., Agroecology and politics. How to get sustainability? About the necessity for a political agroecology. Agroecol. Sustain. Food Syst. 37 (2013), 45–59.
Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E.R., Lounsbury, M., Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Acad. Manag. Ann. 5 (2011), 317–371.
Guzmán, E.S., Woodgate, G., Agroecology: foundations in agrarian social thought and sociological theory. Agroecol. Sustain. Food Syst. 37 (2013), 32–44.
Hatt, S., Artru, S., Brédart, D., Lassois, L., Francis, F., Haubruge, E., Garré, S., Stassart, P.M., Dufrêne, M., Monty, A., Towards sustainable food systems: the concept of agroecology and how it questions current research practices. A review. Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ. 20 (2016), 215–224.
Haugh, H., The importance of theory in social enterprise research. Soc. Enterp. J. 8 (2012), 7–15.
Hermans, F., Roep, D., Klerkx, L., Scale dynamics of grassroots innovations through parallel pathways of transformative change. Ecol. Econ. 130 (2016), 285–295.
Hermesse, J., Van der Linden, M., Plateau, L., Le bénévolat, un soutien au maraîchage professionnel agroécologique en phase d'installation. VertigO - Rev. Élect. en Sci. Environ., 2020, 10.4000/vertigo.28009.
Hodgson, G.M., Darwinian coevolution of organizations and the environment. Ecol. Econ. 69 (2010), 700–706.
Hubeau, M., Marchand, F., Coteur, I., Mondelaers, K., Debruyne, L., Van Huylenbroeck, G., A new Agri-food systems sustainability approach to identify shared transformation pathways towards sustainability. Ecol. Econ. 131 (2017), 52–63.
Hudon, M., Huybrechts, B., From distant neighbours to bedmates: exploring the synergies between the social economy and sustainable development. Ann. Publ. Coop. Econ. 88 (2017), 141–154.
Huybrechts, B., Defourny, J., Nyssens, M., Bauwens, T., Brolis, O., De Cuyper, P., Degavre, F., Hudon, M., Périlleux, A., Pongo, T., Rijpens, J., Thys, S., Social Enterprise in Belgium: A Diversity of Roots, Models and Fields, ICSEM Working Paper No. 27. Liège [Belgium]. 2016.
IPES-Food, From Uniformity to Diversity: A Paradigm Shift from Industrial Agriculture to Diversified Agroecological Systems (Report). 2016, International Panel of Experts on Sustainable Food systems.
IPES-Food, Breaking Away from Industrial Food and Farming Systems: Seven Case Studies of Agroecological Transition (Report). 2018, International Panel of Experts on Sustainable Food systems.
Jay, J., Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Acad. Manag. J. 56 (2013), 137–159.
Kapgen, D., Roudart, L., Proposal of a principle cum scale analytical framework for analyzing agroecological development projects. Agroecol. Sustain. Food Syst., 2020, 1–26, 10.1080/21683565.2020.1724582.
Lanneau, G., L'entraide et la coopération au village. Communautés Sud Contrib. à Anthropol. Collectiv. Rural. Occ. Paris UGE, 2, 1975, 435–499.
Le Velly, R., Allowing for the projective dimension of Agency in Analysing Alternative Food Networks. Sociol. Rural. 59 (2019), 2–22, 10.1111/soru.12217.
Lejeune, C., Manuel d'analyse qualitative. Analyser sans compter ni classer. 2014, De Boeck, Louvain-la-Neuve.
Lindsay, G., Hems, L., Sociétés Coopératives d'Intérêt Collectif: the arrival of social enterprise within the French social economy. Voluntas 15 (2004), 265–286.
Lucas, V., Gasselin, P., Ploeg, J.D.V.D., Local inter-farm cooperation: a hidden potential for the agroecological transition in northern agricultures. Agroecol. Sustain. Food Syst. 43 (2019), 145–179, 10.1080/21683565.2018.1509168.
Madelrieux, S., Buclet, N., Lescoat, P., Moraine, M., Écologie et économie des interactions entre filières agricoles et territoire: quels concepts et cadre d'analyse?. Cah. Agric., 26, 2017, 24001.
Magrini, M.-B., Anton, M., Cholez, C., Corre-Hellou, G., Duc, G., Jeuffroy, M.-H., Meynard, J.-M., Pelzer, E., Voisin, A.-S., Walrand, S., Why are grain-legumes rarely present in cropping systems despite their environmental and nutritional benefits? Analyzing lock-in in the French agrifood system. Ecol. Econ. 126 (2016), 152–162.
Maréchal, K., Plateau, L., Holzemer, L., La durabilité des circuits courts, une question d’échelle? L'importance de court-circuiter les schémas classiques d'analyse. Écon. Rural. 367 (2019), 45–60, 10.4000/economierurale.6487.
Mazoyer, M., Roudart, L., A History of World Agriculture: From the Neolithic Age to the Current Crisis. 2006, Earthscan Publications, London.
Méndez, V.E., Bacon, C.M., Cohen, R., Agroecology as a transdisciplinary, participatory, and action-oriented approach. Agroecol. Sustain. Food Syst. 37 (2013), 3–18.
Mooney, P.H., Democratizing rural economy: institutional friction, sustainable struggle and the cooperative movement. Rural. Sociol. 69 (2004), 76–98.
Morel, K., Léger, F., A conceptual framework for alternative farmers’ strategic choices: the case of French organic market gardening microfarms. Agroecol. Sustain. Food Syst. 40 (2016), 466–492.
Münkner, H.-H., Multi-stakeholder co-operatives and their legal framework. Borzaga, C., Spear, R., (eds.) Trends and Challenges for Co-Operatives and Social Enterprises in Developed and Transition Countries. Edizioni 31, Trento, 2004, 49–81.
Narotzky, S., Where have all the peasants gone?. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 45 (2016), 301–318.
Obern, C.C., Jones, S.D., Critical factors affecting agricultural production cooperatives. Ann. Publ. Coop. Econ. 52 (1981), 317–349.
Pache, A.-C., Santos, F., When worlds collide: the internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Acad. Manag. Rev. 35 (2010), 455–476.
Pache, A.-C., Santos, F., Inside the hybrid organization: selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Acad. Manag. J. 56 (2013), 972–1001.
Plateau, L., Organisations de Coopération Agricole au Stade de la Production en Belgique: Typologie, Difficultés Internes et Transition Agroécologique. (PhD thesis in Social and Political Science), 2021, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussel Forthcoming.
Plateau, L., Maughan, N., Pipart, N., Visser, M., Hermesse, J., Maréchal, K., La viabilité du maraîchage urbain à l’épreuve de l'installation professionnelle. Cah. Agric., 28, 2019, 6.
Poulain, J.-P., The Sociology of Food: Eating and the Place of Food in Society. 2017, Bloomsbury Academic, London.
Schiller, O., Co-operation and integration in agricultural production. Concepts and Practical Application, an International Synopsis, 1969, Asia Publishing House, London.
Smith, W.K., Lewis, M.W., Toward a theory of paradox: a dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Acad. Manag. Rev. 36 (2011), 381–403.
Smith, W.K., Gonin, M., Besharov, M.L., Managing social-business tensions: a review and research agenda for social enterprise. Bus. Ethics Q. 23 (2013), 407–442.
Smith, W.K., Erez, M., Jarvenpaa, S., Lewis, M.W., Tracey, P., Adding complexity to theories of paradox, tensions, and dualities of innovation and change: introduction to organization studies special issue on paradox, tensions, and dualities of innovation and change. Organ. Stud. 38 (2017), 303–317.
Spear, R., Formes coopératives hybrides. Rev. Int. Écon. Soc. Recma, 2011, 26–42.
Stassart, P.M., Crivits, M., Hermesse, J., Tessier, L., Van Damme, J., Dessein, J., The generative potential of tensions within Belgian agroecology. Sustainability, 10, 2018, 2094.
Stengers, I., Autonomy and the intrusion of Gaia. South Atl. Q 116 (2017), 381–400.
Strauss, A., Corbin, J., Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. 1990, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills.
Thornton, P.H., Ocasio, W., Institutional logics. Greenwood, R., Olivier, C., Suddaby, R., Sahlin, K., (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 2008, Sage Publications, London, 99–129.
Thornton, P.H., Ocasio, W., Lounsbury, M., The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process. 2012, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Timmermann, C., Félix, G.F., Agroecology as a vehicle for contributive justice. Agric. Hum. Values 32 (2015), 523–538, 10.1007/s10460-014-9581-8.
Timmermans, S., Tavory, I., Theory construction in qualitative research: from grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociol. Theory 30 (2012), 167–186.
Valentinov, V., Iliopoulos, C., Economic theories of nonprofits and agricultural cooperatives compared: new perspectives for nonprofit scholars. Nonprofit Volunt. Sect. Q. 42 (2013), 109–126.
van der Ploeg, J.D., The New Peasantries: Struggles for Autonomy and Sustainability in an Era of Empire and Globalization. 2009, Routledge, Londres.
van der Ploeg, J.D., Barjolle, D., Bruil, J., Brunori, G., Madureira, L.M.C., Dessein, J., Drąg, Z., Fink-Kessler, A., Gasselin, P., de Molina, M.G., Gorlach, K., Jürgens, K., Kinsella, J., Kirwan, J., Knickel, K., Lucas, V., Marsden, T.K., Maye, D., Migliorini, P., Milone, P., Egon, N., Nowak, P., Parrott, N., Peeters, A., Rossi, A., Schermer, M., Ventura, F., Visser, M., Wezel, A., The economic potential of agroecology: empirical evidence from Europe. J. Rural. Stud. 71 (2019), 46–61.
Van Dooren, P.J., The viability of agricultural production cooperatives. Ann. Publ. Coop. Econ. 53 (1982), 71–88.
Vanloqueren, G., Baret, P.V., Why are ecological, low-input, multi-resistant wheat cultivars slow to develop commercially? A Belgian agricultural ‘lock-in'case study. Ecol. Econ. 66 (2008), 436–446.
Walloon Regional Ministry of Agricultural Affairs, Observatoire du foncier agricole wallon. 2020, SPW Agriculture, Namur.
Washington, H., Maloney, M., The need for ecological ethics in a new ecological economics. Ecol. Econ., 169, 2020, 106478.
Wezel, A., Bellon, S., Doré, T., Francis, C., Vallod, D., David, C., Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 29 (2009), 503–515.
Wezel, A., Casagrande, M., Celette, F., Vian, J.-F., Ferrer, A., Peigné, J., Agroecological practices for sustainable agriculture. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 34 (2014), 1–20, 10.1007/s13593-013-0180-7.
Wezel, A., Brives, H., Casagrande, M., Clement, C., Dufour, A., Vandenbroucke, P., Agroecology territories: places for sustainable agricultural and food systems and biodiversity conservation. Agroecol. Sustain. Food Syst. 40 (2016), 132–144.
Wezel, A., Herren, B.G., Kerr, R.B., Barrios, E., Gonçalves, A.L.R., Sinclair, F., Agroecological principles and elements and their implications for transitioning to sustainable food systems. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 40 (2020), 1–13.
Whatmore, S., Stassart, P., Renting, H., What's alternative about alternative food networks?. Environ. Plan. A 35 (2003), 389–391.
Woodhouse, P., Beyond industrial agriculture? Some questions about farm size, productivity and sustainability. J. Agrar. Chang. 10 (2010), 437–453.
Yin, R.K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 2009, Sage Publication, Thousand Oaks.
