ORBi: Detailled Reference

Article (Scientific journals)

Aspirer à une carrière mathématique : quel rôle jouent le soutien et les attentes de l'enseignant chez les filles et les garçons ?

Jaegers, Doriane; Lafontaine, Dominique

2020 • In Revue Française de Pédagogie, 208

Peer reviewed

Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2268/252474

DOI
10.4000/rfp.9451

Files (1)Send to Details Statistics Bibliography Similar publications

Files

Full Text

JaegersLafontaine2020RFP.pdf

Author postprint (368.29 kB)

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Keywords :

genre; mathématiques; orientation

Abstract :

[fr] Cette étude vise à expliquer les aspirations aux carrières à forte composante mathématique des filles et des garçons en interrogeant d’une part des variables motivationnelles telles que le sentiment d’auto-efficacité, le concept de soi, l’utilité et l’intérêt en mathématiques et d’autre part la perception qu’ont les élèves du soutien social, du soutien académique et des attentes de l’enseignant. Menée en Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles sur un échantillon de 1 091 élèves de 5e secondaire, cette recherche souligne l’influence importante, tant chez les filles que chez les garçons, de la perception des attentes de l’enseignant et de l’utilité des mathématiques. Chez les filles, le sentiment d’auto-efficacité s’avère également une variable déterminante pour leurs aspirations à des carrières mathématiques.

Disciplines :

Education & instruction

Author, co-author :

Jaegers, Doriane ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des Sciences de l'éducation > Analyse des systèmes et pratiques d'enseignement

Lafontaine, Dominique ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des Sciences de l'éducation > Analyse des systèmes et pratiques d'enseignement

Language :

French

Title :

Aspirer à une carrière mathématique : quel rôle jouent le soutien et les attentes de l'enseignant chez les filles et les garçons ?

Alternative titles :

[en] The gender gap in math-related career aspirations: how do teachers' support and expectations matter?

Publication date :

December 2020

Journal title :

Revue Française de Pédagogie

ISSN :

0556-7807

Publisher :

Institut Pedagogique National, France

Volume :

208

Peer reviewed :

Peer reviewed

Funders :

F.R.S.-FNRS - Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique [BE]

Available on ORBi :

since 12 November 2020

Statistics

Number of views

94 (29 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

12 (12 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

2

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

1

OpenCitations

1

Bibliography

AHMED W., MINNAERT A., VAN DER WERF G. & KUYPER H. (2010). « Perceived social support and early adolescents’ achievement: The mediational roles of motivational beliefs and emotions». Journal of Youth Adolescence, vol. 39, p. 36-46.
BOLLEN K. A. (1989). Structuralequationswithlatentvariables. New York: Wiley.
BYRNE B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York: Routledge.
CERIN E. & MAC KINNON P. D. (2008). «A commentary on current practice in mediation variable analyses in behaviouralnutritionandphysicalactivity».PublicHealthNutrition, vol.12, no8, p.1182-1188.
CHO I. (2012). « The effect of teacher-student gender matching: Evidence from OECD countries». Economics of Education Review, vol. 31, p. 54-67.
CHOW A., ECCLES J., SALMELA-ARO K. (2012). «Task value profiles across subjects and aspirations to physical and IT-related sciences in the United States and Finland». DevelopmentalPsychology, vol.48, no6, p.1612-1628
DECI E. & RYAN R. (2000a). «The“What”and the“Why”of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior». PsychologicalInquiry, vol.11, no4, p.227-268.
DECI E. & RYAN R. (2000b). « Self-Determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being». American Psychologist, vol. 55, no 1, p. 68-78.
DEMARAY M., MALECKI C., RUEGER S., BROWN S. & SUMMERS K. (2009). «The role of youth’s ratings of the importance of socially supportive behaviors in the relationship between social support and self-concept». Journal of YouthAdolescence, vol.38, p.13-28.
DIETRICH J., DICKE A-L., KRACKE B. & NOACK P. (2015). « Teacher support and its influence on students’ intrinsic value and effort: dimensional comparison effects accross subjects». Learning and Instruction, vol. 39, p. 45-54.
DIMITROV D. (2017). «Testing for factorial invariance in the context of construct validation». Measurement and Evaluation Counseling and Development, vol. 43, no 2, p.121-149.
DROESBEKE J.-J., LECRENIER C., TABUTIN D. & VERMANDELE C. (2008). Réussite ou échec à l’université. Trajectoires des étudiants en Belgique francophone. Bruxelles: Éd. de l’Université de Bruxelles.
ECCLES J. (2005). « Subjective task value and the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices». In. A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck, Handbook of competence and motivation. New York: Guilford Press, p. 105-121.
ECCLES J. (2011). «Gendered educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices». InternationalJournalofBehavioral Development, vol.35, no3, p.195-201.
ECCLES J. & BLUMENFELD P. (1985). « Classroom experiences and student gender: Are there differences and do they matter?». In L. C. Wilkinson & C. B. Marrett, Gender influences in classroom interactions. Orlando: Academic Press, p. 79-114.
FAUTH B., DECRISTAN J., RIESER S., KLIEME E. & BÜTTNER G. (2014). « Student ratings of teaching quality in primary school: Dimensions and prediction of student outcomes». Learning and instruction, vol. 29, p. 1-9.
FEDERICI R. & SKAALVIK M. (2013). « Students’ perceptions of emotional and instrumental teacher support: Relations with motivational and emotional responses». International Education Studies, vol. 7, no 1, p. 21-36.
FRANCIS B., SKELTON C., CARRINGTON B., HUTCHINGS M., READ B. & HALL I. (2008). «A perfect match? Pupils’ and teachers’views of the impact of matching educators and learners by gender». ResearchPapersinEducation, vol.23, p.21-36.
GUO J., PARKER P., MARSH H. & MORIN A. (2015). « Achievement, motivation, and educational choices: A longitudinal study of expectancy and value using a multiplicative perspective». Developmental Psychology, vol. 51, no 8, p. 1163-1176.
JAEGERS D. & LAFONTAINE D. (2018). « Perceptions par les élèves du climat de soutien en mathématiques: validation d’échelles et études des différences selon le genre en 5e secondaire». Mesure et évaluation en éducation, vol. 41, no 2, p. 97-130.
JAEGERS D. & LAFONTAINE D. (à paraître). « Pourquoi les filles boudent-elles les STEM? Performances, motivation et choix d’orientation selon le genre». L’Orientation scolaire et professionnelle.
KLIEME E., LIPOWSKY F., RAKOCZY K. & RATSKA N. (2006). « Qualitätsdimensionen und Wirksamkeit von Mathematikunterricht. Theoretische Grundlagen und ausgewählte Ergebnisse des Projekts “Pythagoras”». In M. Prenzel & L. Allolio-Näcke, Untersuchungen zur Bildungsqualität von Schule. Abschlussbericht des DFG-Schwerpunktprogramms. Münster: Waxmann, p. 123-146.
KLINE R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press, 2e éd.
LAZARIDES R. & WATT H. (2015). « Girls’ and boys’ perceived mathematics teacher beliefs, classroom learning environments and mathematical career intentions». Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 41, p. 51-61.
LEROY N., BRESSOUX P., SARRAZIN P. & TROUILLOUD D. (2013). « Un modèle sociocognitif des apprentissages scolaires: style motivationnel de l’enseignant, soutien perçu des élèves et processus motivationnels». Revue française de pédagogie, no 182, p. 71-92.
LITTLE T. D. (1997). « Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues». Multivariate Behavioral Research, vol. 32, p. 53-76.
MARSH H. W., HAU K.-T. & GRAYSON D. (2005). « Goodness of fit evaluation in structural equation modelling». In A. Maydeu-Olivares & J. McArdle, Contemporary psycho-metrics: A festschrift for Roderick P. McDonald. Mahwah: Erlbaum, p. 275-340.
MATA M. DE L., MONTEIRO V. & PEIXOTO F. (2012). « Attitudes towards mathematics: effects of individual motivational, and social support factors». Child Development Research, vol. 2012, p. 1-10.
MUTHEN L. K. & MUTHEN B. O. (1998-2013). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthen & Muthen.
OCDE (2014). « Are boys and girls equally prepared for life?». PISAProducts. En ligne: (consulté le 3 octobre 2019).
PRAETORIUS A.-K., KLIEME E., HERBERT B. & PINGER P. (2018). « Generic dimensions of teaching quality: The German framework of three basic dimensions». ZDM, vol. 50, no 3, p. 407-426.
REDDY R., RHOELES J. & MULHALL P. (2003). «The influence of teacher support on student adjustment in the middle school years: A latent growth curve study». Development andPsychopathology, vol.15, p.119-138.
RICE L., BARTH J., GUADAGNO R., SMITH G. & MCCALLUM D. (2013). « The role of social support in students’ perceived abilities and attitudes toward math and science». Journal of Youth Adolescence, vol. 42, p. 1028-1040.
ROUYER V., MIEYAA Y. & LE BLANC A. (2014). « Socialisation de genre et construction des identités sexuées. Contextes sociétal et scientifique, acquis de la recherche et implications pratiques». Revue française de pédagogie, no 187, p. 97-137.
RUBIE-DAVIES C. M. (2010). «Teacher expectations and perceptions of student characteristics: Is there a relationship?». British Journal of Educational Psychology, vol.80, p.121–135.
RUEGER S., MALECKI C. & DEMARAY M. (2008). « Relationship between multiple sources of perceived social support and psychological and academic adjustment in early adolescence: comparisons across gender». Journal of Youth Adolescence, vol. 39, p. 47-61.
SAKIZ G., PAPE S. J. & HOY A. W. (2012). « Does perceived teacher affective support matter for middle school students in mathematics classrooms?». Journal of School Psychology, vol. 50, no 2, p. 235-255.
SIMPKINS S., DAVIS-KEAN P. & ECCLES J. (2006). « Math and science motivation: A longitudinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs». Developmental Psychology, vol. 42, no 1, p. 70-83.
SPEARMAN J. & WATT H. (2013). «Women’s Aspirations Towards “STEM” Careers». In W. Patton, Conceptualising Women’s Working Lives. Boston: SensePublishers, p.175-191.
TAYLOR B. A. & FRASER B. J. (2013). « Relationship between learning environment and mathematics anxiety». Learning Environments Research, vol. 16, p. 297-313.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION (1998). O*NET: The occupational information network. Washington: Government Printing Office.
WANG M.-T. (2012). « Educational and career interests in math: A longitudinal examination of the links between classroom environment, motivational beliefs, and interests». Developmental Psychology, vol. 48, no 6, p. 1643-1657.
WANG M.-T. & DEGOL J. (2013). « Motivational pathways to STEM career choices: Using expectancy-value perspective to understand individual and gender differences in STEM fields». Developmental Review, vol. 33, p. 304-34.
WANG M.-T. & ECCLES J. (2012). « Social support matters: longitudinal effects of social support on 3 dimensions of school engagement from middle to high school». Child Development, vol. 83, no 3, p. 877-895.
WANG M.-T. & ECCLES J. S. (2014) « Multilevel predictors of math classroom climate: A comparison study of student and teacher perceptions». Journal of Research on Adolescence, vol. 26, no 3, p. 617-634.
WANG M.-T. & HOLCOMBE R. (2010). « Adolescents’ perceptions of school environment, engagement, and academic achievement in middle school». American Educational Research Journal, vol. 47, p. 633–662.
WATSON P., RUBIE-DAVIES C., MEISSEL K., FLINT A., PETERSON E., GARRETT L. & MCDONALD L. (2016). « Gendered teacher expectations of mathematics achievement in new zealand: contributing to a kink at the base of the stem pipeline». International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, vol. 8, no 1, p. 84-102.
WATT H. (2006). «The role of motivation in gendered educational and occupational trajectories related to maths». Educational Research and Evaluation, vol. 12, no 4, p.305-322.
WATT H. (2010). « Gender and occupational choice». In J. C. Chrisler & D. R. McCreary, Handbook of gender research in Psychology. New York: Springer, p. 379-400.
WATT H., SHAPKA J., MORRIS Z., DURIK A., KEATING D. & ECCLES J. S. (2012). «Gendered motivational processes affecting High School mathematics participation, educational aspirations, and career plans: A comparison of samples from Australia, Canada, and the United States». DevelopmentalPsychology, vol.48, p.1594-1611.
WENTZEL K. R., BATTLE A., RUSSELL S. L. & LOONEY L. B. (2010). « Social supports from teachers and peers as predictors of academic and social motivation». Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 35, p. 193-202.
YILDIRIM S. (2012). «Teacher support, motivation, learning strategy use, and achievement: A multilevel mediation model».TheJournalofExperimentalEducation,vol.80,no2, p.150-172.

Similar publications