Developmental Language Disorder; Generalisation; Vocabulary; Variability
Abstract :
[fr] Les enfants avec un trouble développemental du langage présentent des difficultés de généralisation au niveau morphosyntaxique. La généralisation est également nécessaire pour les acquisitions lexico-sémantiques, mais cet aspect n’est encore que peu documenté chez ces enfants. Nous nous intéressons donc ici à la généralisation de nouveaux mots et aux facteurs pouvant la faciliter, afin d’envisager ce mécanisme chez les enfants présentant un trouble développemental du langage. [en] Children with developmental language disorders have difficulty in generalizing morphosyntactic structures. Generalization is also required for lexical-semantic acquisitions, but this has not been investigated much in these children. We are therefore interested in the generalization of novel words and in the variables that can facilitate it, with the aim of considering this mechanism in children with developmental language disorders. [es] Los niños con un trastorno del desarollo del lenguaje presentan dificultades de generalización a nivel morfosintáctico. La generalización es igualmente necesaria para la adquisición a nivel lexicosemántico, pero este aspecto no esta aún muy documentado en estos niños. Nos hemos basado en la generalización de nuevas palabras y en los factores que pueden facilitarla para presentar este mecanismo en los niños con trastorno del desarollo del lenguaje.
Aguilar, J. M., Plante, E. & Sandoval, M. (2018). Exemplar variability facilitates retention of word learning by children with specific language impairment Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49(1), 72-84.
Augier, L. & Thibaut, J.P. (2013). The benefits and costs of comparisons in a novel object categorization task: Interactions with development. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(6), 1126-1132.
Bybee, J. (2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Christie, S. & Gentner, D. (2010). Where hypotheses come from: Learning new relations by structural alignment. Journal of Cognition and Develop¬ ment, 11(3), 356-373.
Collinson, B. A., Grêla, B., Spaulding, T., Rueckl, J. G. & Magnuson, J. S. (2015). Individual differences in the shape bias in preschool children with specific language impairment and typical language development: Theoretical and clinical implications. Developmental Science, 3,373-388.
Cordes, A. K. (2017). The roles of analogy, categorization, and generalization in entrenchment. In H.-J. Schmid (Ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge (pp. 269-288). Berlin, Germany: Oe Gruyter.
Gentner, D. (2005). The development of relational category knowledge. In L Gershkoff-Stowe & D. H. Rakison, (Eds.), Building object categories in developmental time (pp. 245-275). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gentner, D., Anggoro, F. K. & Klibanoff, R. S. (2011). Structure mapping and relational language support children's learning of relational categories. Child Development, 82(4), 1173-1188.
Gentner, O. & Namy, L L(1999). Comparison in the development of categories. Cognitive Development, 14,487-513.
Graham, S. A., Namy, L L, Gentner, D. & Meagher, K. (2010). The role of comparison in preschoolers' novel object categorization. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 107,280-290.
Gray, S. (1998). Lexical acquisition by children with specific language impairment: Phonological and semantic effects on and performance predictions among fast mapping, word learning, and word extension (Doctoral dissertation). University of Arizona, Tucson, USA.
Grunow, H., Spaulding, T. J., Gomez, R. L. & Plante, E. (2006). The effects of variation on learning word order rules by adults with and without language-based learning disabilities. Journal of Communication Disorders, 39(2), 158-170.
Hupp, J. M. (2015). Development of the shape bias during the second year. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 176(2), 82-92.
Jones, S.S. & Smith, L B. (1998). How children name objects with shoes. Cognitive Development, 13,323-334.
Jones, S.S., Smith, L B. & Landau, B. (1991). Object properties and knowledge in early lexical learning. Child Development, 62,499-516.
Keil, F. C. & Batterman, N. (1984). A characteristic-to-defining shift in the development of word meaning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23(2), 221-236.
Khomsi, A. (2001). ELO: évaluation du langage oral. Paris, France: ECPS.
Kiernan, B. J. & Snow, D. P. (1999). Bound-morpheme generalization by children with SU: Is there a functional relationship with accuracy of response to training targets? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42,649-662.
Krzemien, M., Jemel, B. & Maillait, C. (in preparation). Relational noun generalization and within-category comparison in children with Developmental Language Disorder.
Krzemien, M.,Thibaut J.-P, Levaux, E. & Maillart, C. (submitted). How do typically-developing children and children with developmental language disorder extend new nouns? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology.
Leonard, L B., Davis, J. & Deevy, P. (2007). Phonotactic probability and past tense use by children with specific language impairment and their typically developing peers. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 21,747-758.
Namy, L L & Gentner, D. (2002). Making a silk purse out of two sow's ears: Young children's use of comparison in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 737(1), 5-15.
Plante, E., Gomez, R. & Gerken, L (2002). Sensitivity to word order cues by normal and language/learning disabled adults. Journal of Communication Disorders, 35(5), 453462.
Rispens, J.E.&De Bree, E. H. (2014). Past tense productivity in Dutch children with and without SU: The role of morphophonology and frequency. Journal of Child Language, 41,200-225.
Schwartz, R. G., Leonard, L B., Messick, C. & Chapman, K. (1987). The acquisition of object names in children with specific language impairment: Action context and word extension. Applied Psycholinguistics, 8(3), 233-244.
Snape, S. & Krott, A. (2018). The role of inhibition in moving beyond perceptually focused noun extensions, first Language, 38(1), 95-108.
Soja, N.N., Carey, S. & Spelke, E.S. (1991). Ontological categories guide young children's inductions of word meaning: Object terms and substance terms. Cognition, 38,179-211.
Taverna, A. S. & Peralta, O. A. (2012). Comparacion e inferencia en la categorization de artefactos no familiares: Un estudio con ninos pequenos. Psykhe,21(1) 21-36.
Tomas, E., Demuth, K. & Petocz, P. (2017). The role of frequency in learning morphophonological alternations: Implications for children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(5), 1316-1329.
Vang Christensen, R. & Hansson, K. (2012). The use and productivity of past tense morphology in specific language impairment: An examination of Danish. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55,1671 1689.
Von Koss Torkildsen, J., Dailey, N. S., Aguilar, J. M., Gômez, R. & Plante, E. (2013). Exemplar variability facilitates rapid learning of an otherwise unlearnable grammar by individuals with language-based learning disability. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 56,618-629.
Wechsler, D. (2005). WISC IV - Wechsler intelligence scale for children - fourth edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
