Proposing a new score to measure personal happiness by identifying the contributing factors

Happiness score; Oxford Happiness Questionnaire; Personal Happiness Measurement; Subjective well-being; Statistical tests; Chi-square tests; Clustering methods; Contributing factor; Socio-demographic factors; Structural equation modeling; Well being; Surveys

Abstract :

[en] Different assessment tools and questionnaires have been developed to measure happiness. The Oxford Happiness Questionnaire (OHQ), that has 29 items, has been used widely to estimate personal happiness. The OHQ is used to quantify personal happiness based on an equal effectiveness assumption for all 29 items. Although the OHQ has been used by several studies, very few studies assess the contribution of the individual OHQ items in explaining personal happiness. The current study attempts to fill this gap by assessing the contribution of the individual OHQ items in explaining personal happiness as a latent variable. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) is used to assess the relationship of the individual OHQ items in explaining personal happiness in Skudai, Johor, Malaysia. The significant OHQ items that are extracted from SEM results, are used to develop a new personal happiness measurement score. The SEM factor loading values are used to weight the extracted items. All usual clustering methods are used in this study and the most suitable one based on the higher silhouette value is chosen to cluster the proposed personal happiness index. Finally, the relationships between socio demographic factors and the proposed personal happiness index clusters are tested by Gamm and Pearson Chi-Square tests. The SEM results show that 16 out of the 29 OHQ items have poor associations with personal happiness and can be excluded from the model. Most of the non-significant items (items with low level of association) are negatively worded items and the majority of the significant items are related to personal attitudes. The proposed personal happiness index can help to save time and avoid confusion. © 2019 Elsevier Ltd

Disciplines :

Civil engineering
Special economic topics (health, labor, transportation...)

Author, co-author :

Moeinaddini, Mehdi ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département ArGEnCo > Transports et mobilité

Asadi-Shekari, Zohreh; Centre for Innovative Planning and Development (CIPD), Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor 81310, Malaysia

Aghaabbasi, Mahdi; Centre for Innovative Planning and Development (CIPD), Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor 81310, Malaysia

Saadi, Ismaïl ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département ArGEnCo > Transports et mobilité

Zaly Shah, Muhammad; Centre for Innovative Planning and Development (CIPD), Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor 81310, Malaysia

Cools, Mario ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département ArGEnCo > Transports et mobilité

Language :

English

Title :

Proposing a new score to measure personal happiness by identifying the contributing factors

Publication date :

2020

Journal title :

Measurement

ISSN :

0263-2241

eISSN :

1873-412X

Publisher :

Elsevier, Netherlands

Volume :

151

Pages :

107115

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Available on ORBi :

since 06 February 2020

Statistics

Number of views

141 (9 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

11 (2 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

OpenAlex citations

Bibliography

Alloway, T. P., Copello, E., Loesch, M., Soares, C., Watkins, J., Miller, D., Campell, G., Tarter, A., Law, N., Soares, C., & Ray, S. (2016). Investigating the reliability and validity of the Multidimensional Emotional Empathy Scale. Measurement, 90, 438–442.
Argyle, M., Martin, M., & Crossland, J. (1989). Happiness as a function of personality and social encounters. In J. P. Forgas & J. M. Innes (Eds.), Recent Advances in Social Psychology (pp. 189 - 203): Elsevier.
Ballas, D., & Dorling, D. (2013). The geography of happiness. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2011). International happiness: A new view on the measure of performance. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 25, 6–22
Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. US: Guilford Publications.
Chandaka, S., Chatterjee, A., & Munshi, S. (2009). Support vector machines employing cross-correlation for emotional speech recognition. Measurement, 42, 611–618.
Chión, S. J., Charlesa, V., & Tavanac, M. (2018). Impact of incentive schemes and personality-tradeoffs on two-agent coopetition with numerical estimations. Measurement, 125, 182–195.
Cordero, J. M., Salinas-Jiménez, J., & Salinas-Jiménez, M. M. (2017). Exploring factors affecting the level of happiness across countries: A conditional robust nonparametric frontier analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 256, 663–672.
D'Acci, L. (2011). Measuring Well-Being and Progress. Social Indicators Research, 104, 47–65.
Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.
Diener, E. (2006). Guidelines for national indicators of subjective well-being and ill-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 397–404.
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.
Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 94–122.
Ferreira, S & Moro, M. (2010). On the use of subjective well-being data for environmental valuation. Environmental and Resource Economics, 46(3), 249–273.
Gowdy, J. (2005). Toward a new welfare economics for sustainability. Ecological Economics, 53(2), 211–222.
Hair, J., Hult, T., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM): Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Hartig, T., Van Den Berg, A., Hagerhall, C. M., Tomalak, M., Bauer, N., Hansmann, R., Ojala, A., Syngollitou, E., Carrus, G., van Herzele, A., Bell, S., Podesta, M. T. C., Waseth, G. (2010). Health benefits of nature experience: Psychological, social and cultural processes. In K. Nilsson, M. Sangster, C. Gallis, T. Hartig, S. de Vries, K. Seeland, J. Schipperijn (Eds.), Forests, Trees and Human Health. New York City, US: Springer.
Helliwell, J. F., Layard, R., Sachs, J. (2015). Setting the Stage. In J. F. Helliwell, R. Layard, J. Sachs (Eds.), World Happiness Report 2015. New York City, US: Columbia University.
Helliwell, J, F. Layard, R & Sachs, J, D (2018) world happiness report. United Nations
Hills, P., & Argyle, M. (2002). The Oxford Happiness Questionnaire: a compact scale for the measurement of psychological well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 1073–.1082.
Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society Princeton, NJ: Princeton: University Press.
Kashdan, T. (2004). The assessment of subjective well-being (issues raised by the Oxford Happiness Questionnaire). Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1225–1232.
Kim, K. A & Mueller, D. A (2001). To Balance or not to Balance: Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Affect-Balance Scale. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2, 289-306.
Kim, M.S., Kim, H.W., Cha, K.H., & Lim, J. (2007). What makes Koreans happy?: Exploration on the structure of happy life among Korean adults. Social Indicators Research, 82, 265-286.
Kim-Prieto, C., Diener, E., Tamir, M., Scollon, C. N., & Diener, M. (2005). Integrating the diverse definitions of happiness: A time-sequential framework of subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 261–300.
Kozma, A., & Stones, M. J. (1980). The measurement of happiness: Development of the Memorial University of Newfoundland Scale of Happiness (MUNSH). Journal of Gerontology, 35, 906- 912.
Kozma, A., & Stones, M. J. (1983). Re-validation of the Memorial University of Newfoundland Scale of Happiness. Canadian Journal on Aging, 2, 27-29.
Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Wood, A. M., Hurling, G. O. R. (2009). Measuring happiness: The higher order factor structure of subjective and psychological well-being measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 878-884.
Lu, Q., & Guo, F. (2019). Personalized information recommendation model based on context contribution and item correlation. Measurement, 142, 30–39.
Luhmann, M., Necka, E. A., Schönbrodt, F & Hawkley, L. (2016). Is valuing happiness associated with lower well-being? A factor-level analysis using the Valuing Happiness Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 60, 46-50.
Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46, 137-155.
Lyubomirsky, S., & Sheldon, K. M. (2005). Pursuing Happiness: The Architecture of Sustainable Change. Review of General Psychology, 9, 111–131.
Lyubomirsky, S. (2001). Why are some people happier than others? The role of cognitive and motivational processes in well-being. American Psychologist, 56, 239–249.
MacKerron, G., & Mourato, S. (2009). Life satisfaction and air quality in London. Ecological Economics, 68, 1441–1453.
Marans, R. W., & Stimson, R. J. (2011). An Overview of Quality of Urban Life. In R. W. Marans & R. J. Stimson (Eds.), Investigating quality of urban life: Theory, Methods, and Empirical Research. New York City, US: Springer.
Maul, A., Irribarra, D. T., & Wilson, M. (2016). On the philosophical foundations of psychological Measurement. Measurement, 79, 311–320.
Medvedev, O. N., Siegert, R. J., Mohamed, A. D., Shepherd, D., Landhuis, E., & Kra¨geloh, C. U. (2017). The Oxford Happiness Questionnaire: Transformation from an Ordinal to an Interval Measure Using Rasch Analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18, 1425–1443.
Mehrdadi, A., Sadeghian, S., Direkvand-Moghadam, A., & Hashemian, A. (2016). Factors Affecting Happiness: A Cross-Sectional Study in the Iranian Youth. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 10, VC01-VC03.
Menz, T., & Welsch, H. (2010). Population aging and environmental in OECD countries: The case of air pollution. Ecological Economics, 69, 2582–2589.
Monk-Turner, E. & Turner, C. (2009). Subjective well being among those who exchange sex and money, Yunnan, China and Thailand. Social Indicators Research, 1 11.
Nowland, T., Beath, A., & Boag, S. (2019). Objectivity, realism, and psychometrics. Measurement, 145, 292–299.
Penna, M. P., Agusa, M., Hitchcotta, P.K., & Pessac, E. (2018). Psychometric methods: The need for new conceptual advances. Measurement, 117, 96–107.
Radwan, M. F. (2014). The Psychology of Attraction Explained: Understand what attracts people to each other: Create Space: Independent Publishing Platform.
Rodríguez-Pose, A & Berlepsch, V (2014). Social Capital and Individual Happiness in Europe. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 357-386.
Rossi, G. B., & Berglund, B. (2011). Measurement involving human perception and interpretation. Measurement, 44, 815–822.
Savageau, D. (2007). Places rated Almanac. Washington, DC: Places Rated Books LLC.
Sijtsma, K. (2011). Introduction to the measurement of psychological attributes. Measurement, 44, 1209–1219.
Sing, M. (2009). The quality of life in Hong Kong. Social Indicators Research, 92, 295 335.
Stewart, M. E., Watson, R., Clark, A., Ebmeier, K. P., & Deary, I. J. (2010). A hierarchy of happiness? Mokken scaling analysis of the Oxford Happiness Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 845–848.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics (6th Edition): Pearson.
Tambyah, S.K., Tan, S.J., Kau, A.K. (2009). The quality of life in Singapore. Social Indicators Research, 92, 337 376.
Uchida, Y., & Kitayama, S. (2009). Happiness and unhappiness in East and West: Themes and variations. Emotion, 9, 441 456.
Ullman, J. B. (2006). Reviewing the Basics and Moving Forward. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87, 35–50.
Veenhoven, R. (2008). Healthy happiness: Effects of happiness on physical health and the consequences for preventive health care. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 449–469
Welsch, H., & Kühling, J. (2009). Using happiness data for environmental valuation: Issues and applications. Journal of Economic Surveys, 23, 385-406.
Whittaker, T. A. (2011). Using the Modification Index and Standardized Expected Parameter Change for Model Modification. The Journal of Experimental Education, 80, 26-44.
Wijbrandt, V. S. (2003). Mokken scale analysis: Between the Guttman scale and parametric item response theory. Political Analysis. 11 (2), 139–163.
Xu, J. (2016). A study of the validity and reliability of the Teacher Homework Involvement Scale: A psychometric evaluation. Measurement, 93, 102–107.