Detecting over-reporting of symptoms: the French version of the self-report symptom inventory

[en] Objective: Symptom exaggeration and malingering are core issues in forensic and clinical evaluation. Generally, experts use two main types of instruments to assess the credibility of symptoms: performance validity tests that aim to detect underperformance and self-report validity tests that appraise over-reporting of symptoms. However, while many tools can be used to assess underperformance, far fewer instruments are available to evaluate over-reporting of symptoms. Methods: In this study, we adapted the Self-Report Symptom Inventory (SRSI) for use with French-speaking participants and tested its psychometric properties on a sample of 575 healthy adults (aged from 18 to 65 years), alongside various smaller subgroups. Results: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a two-factor structure for the scale, with a first factor including items questioning genuine symptoms and a second factor including items questioning bizarre or rare symptoms (i.e., pseudosymptoms). Additional analyses emphasized the SRSI’s excellent internal reliability and good convergent validity. Furthermore, our results revealed that both the symptom and pseudosymptom subscales were able to discriminate between participants who were asked to feign cognitive impairments (i.e., malingerers), healthy controls, and patients with genuine cognitive symptoms. Conclusion: Overall, these results suggest that the SRSI may be considered a promising tool to assess the credibility of symptoms in patients evaluated in forensic contexts.

Disciplines :

Treatment & clinical psychology

Author, co-author :

Geurten, Marie ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de Psychologie > Neuroimagerie des troubles de la mémoire et revalid. cogn.

Meulemans, Thierry ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de Psychologie > Neuropsychologie

Seron, Xavier

Language :

English

Title :

Detecting over-reporting of symptoms: the French version of the self-report symptom inventory

Publication date :

2018

Journal title :

Clinical Neuropsychologist

ISSN :

1385-4046

eISSN :

1744-4144

Publisher :

Taylor & Francis, United Kingdom

Volume :

Pages :

164-181

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Available on ORBi :

since 15 February 2019

Statistics

Number of views

111 (9 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

5 (2 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

OpenAlex citations

Bibliography

Ardolf, B. R., Denney, R. L., & Houston, C. M. (2007). Base rates of negative response bias and malingered neurocognitive dysfunction among criminal defendants referred for neuropsychological evaluation. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 21, 899–916.
Boone, K. B. (2007). Assessment of feigned cognitive impairment: A neuropsychological perspective. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Byrne, B. M. (1994). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cattell, R. B., & Vogelmann, S. (1977). A comprehensive trial of the scree and KG criteria for determining the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 12, 289–325.
Conroy, M. A., & Kwartner, P. P. (2006). The definition of malingering. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 2, 30–51.
Dandachi-FitzGerald, B., Ponds, R. W. H. M., & Merten, T. (2013). Symptom validity and neuropsychological assessment: A survey of practices and beliefs of neuropsychologists in six European countries. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 28, 771–783.
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2016). IBM SPSS Statistics 23 step by step: A simple guide and reference. New York, NY: Routledge.
Green, P., Iverson, G. L., & Allen, L. (1999). Detecting malingering in head injury litigation with the Word Memory Test. Brain Injury, 13, 813–819.
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.
Hughes, M. L., Geraci, L., & De Forrest, R. L. (2013). Aging 5 years in 5 minutes: The effect of taking a memory test on older adults’ subjective age. Psychological Science, 24, 2481–2488.
Lange, R. T., Iverson, G. L., Brooks, B. L., & Ashton Rennison, V. L. (2010). Influence of poor effort on self-reported symptoms and neurocognitive test performance following mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 32, 961–972.
Larrabee, G. J. (2012). Assessment of malingering. In G. J., Larrabee (Ed.), Forensic neuropsychology: A scientific approach (2nd ed., pp. 116–159). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Martin, P. K., Schroeder, R. W., & Odland, A. P. (2015). Neuropsychologists’ validity testing beliefs and practices: A survey of North American professionals. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 29, 741–776.
Merten, T., Giger, P., Merckelbach, H., & Stevens, A. (2016). Self-Report Symptom Inventory (SRSI). Handbuch [manual]. Goettingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
Merten, T., & Merckelbach, H. (2013). Symptom validity testing in somatoform and dissociative disorders: A critical review. Psychological Injury and Law, 6, 122–137.
Merten, T., Merckelbach, H., Giger, P., & Stevens, A. (2016). The Self-Report Symptom Inventory (SRSI): A new instrument for the assessment of distorted symptom endorsement. Psychological Injury and Law, 9, 102–111.
Merten, T., Thies, E., Schneider, K., & Stevens, A. (2009). Symptom validity testing in claimants with alleged posttraumatic stress disorder: Comparing the Morel Emotional Numbing Test, the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology, and the Word Memory Test. Psychological Injury and Law, 2, 284–293.
Meulemans, T., & Seron, X. (2014). L’évaluation dans le cadre de l’expertise médico-légale. In X., Seron & M., Van der Linden (Eds.), Traité de neuropsychologie clinique (tome 1) (2nd ed., pp. 637–664). Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium: De Boeck Supérieur.
Mittenberg, W., DiGiulio, D. V., Perrin, S., & Bass, A. E. (1992). Symptoms following mild head injury: Expectation as aetiology. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 55, 200–204.
Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (2007). Mplus statistical software. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
Nelson, N. W., Sweet, J. J., Berry, D. T. R., Bryant, F. B., & Granacher, R. P. (2007). Response validity in forensic neuropsychology: Exploratory factor analytic evidence of distinct cognitive and psychological constructs. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 13, 440–449.
Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC area, Cohen’s d, and r. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 615–620.
Schagen, S., Schmand, B., Sterke, S. D., & Lindeboom, J. (1997). Amsterdam short-term memory test: A new procedure for the detection of feigned memory deficits. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 19, 43–51.
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Seron, X. (2014). Lying in neuropsychology. Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology, 44, 389–403.
Slick, D. J., Sherman, E. M. S., & Iverson, G. L. (1999). Diagnostic criteria for malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: Proposed standards for clinical practice and research. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 13, 545–561.
Slick, D. J., Tan, J. E., Strauss, E. H., & Hultsch, D. F. (2004). Detecting malingering: A survey of experts’ practices. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19, 465–473.
Smith, G. P., & Burger, G. K. (1997). Detection of malingering: Validation of the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS). The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 25, 183–189.
Tombaugh, T. N. (1997). The Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM): Normative data from cognitively intact and cognitively impaired individuals. Psychological Assessment, 9, 260–268.
Van Dyke, S. A., Millis, S. R., Axelrod, B. N., & Hanks, R. A. (2013). Assessing effort: Differentiating performance and symptom validity. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 27, 1234–1246.
van Impelen, A., Merckelbach, H., Jelicic, M., & Merten, T. (2014). The Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS): A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 28, 1336–1365.
Vitacco, M. J., Rogers, R., Gabel, J., & Munizza, J. (2007). An evaluation of malingering screens with competency to stand trial patients: A known-groups comparison. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 249–260.
Widows, M. R., & Smith, G. P. (2005). SIMS: Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Young, G. (2015). Malingering in forensic disability-related assessments: Prevalence 15 ± 15%. Psychological Injury and Law, 8, 188–199.