Request a copy

Full Text

38

CITATIONS

38 Total citations

21 Recent citations

n/a Field Citation Ratio

n/a Relative Citation Ratio

publications

0

supporting

0

mentioning

0

contrasting

0

Smart Citations

0

0

0

0

Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting

View Citations

See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

• Li, Z., Leduc, J., Nunez-Ramirez, J., Combescure, A., Marongiu, J.C., A non-intrusive partitioned approach to couple smoothed particle hydrodynamics and finite element methods for transient fluid–structure interaction problems with large interface motion. Comput. Mech. 55:4 (2015), 697–718, 10.1007/s00466-015-1131-8.
• Habchi, C., Russeil, S., Bougeard, D., Harion, J.L., Lemenand, T., Ghanem, A., Valle, D.D., Peerhossaini, H., Partitioned solver for strongly coupled fluid–structure interaction. Comput. & Fluids 71 (2013), 306–319, 10.1016/j.compfluid.2012.11.004.
• Dettmer, W., Perić D., A new staggered scheme for fluid–structure interaction. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 93:1 (2013), 1–22, 10.1002/nme.4370.
• Nobile, F., Vergara, C., Partitioned algorithms for fluid–structure interaction problems in haemodynamics. Milan J. Math. 80:2 (2012), 443–467, 10.1007/s00032-012-0194-7.
• Wall, W.A., Genkinger, S., Ramm, E., A strong coupling partitioned approach for fluid–structure interaction with free surfaces. Comput. & Fluids 36:1 (2007), 169–183, 10.1016/j.compfluid.2005.08.007 Challenges and advances in flow simulation and modeling.
• Küttler, U., Wall, W.A., Fixed-point fluid–structure interaction solvers with dynamic relaxation. Comput. Mech. 43:1 (2008), 61–72, 10.1007/s00466-008-0255-5.
• Farhat, C., van der Zee, K.G., Geuzaine, P., Provably second-order time-accurate loosely-coupled solution algorithms for transient nonlinear computational aeroelasticity. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 195:17–18 (2006), 1973–2001, 10.1016/j.cma.2004.11.031.
• Matthies, H.G., Steindorf, J., Partitioned strong coupling algorithms for fluid–structure interaction. Comput. Struct. 81:8–11 (2003), 805–812, 10.1016/S0045-7949(02)00409-1.
• Hirt, C.W., Nichols, B.D., Volume of Fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. J. Comput. Phys. 39 (1981), 201–225.
• Osher, S., Fedkiw, R., Level Set Methods and Dynamic Implicit Surfaces. 2006, Springer.
• Idelsohn, S.R., Oñate, E., Del Pin, F., The particle finite element method: a powerful tool to solve incompressible flows with free-surfaces and breaking waves. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 61 (2004), 964–989.
• Oñate, E., Idelsohn, S.R., Del Pin, F., Aubry, R., The particle finite element method. An overview. Int. J. Comput. Methods 1:2 (2004), 267–307.
• Monaghan, J.J., Gingold, R.A., Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: theory and application to non-spherical stars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 181 (1977), 375–389.
• Monaghan, J.J., Smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Rep. Progr. Phys. 68 (2005), 1703–1759.
• Belytschko, T., Lu, Y.Y., Gu, L., Element-free Galerkin methods. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 34:2 (1994), 229–256.
• Idelsohn, S.R., Marti, J., Limache, A., Oñate, E., Unified Lagrangian formulation for elastic solids and incompressible fluids: Application to fluid–structure interaction problems via the PFEM. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 197 (2008), 1762–1776.
• Franci, A., Oñate, E., Carbonell, J.M., Unified Lagrangian formulation for solid and fluid mechanics and FSI problems. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 298 (2016), 520–547.
• Zhu, M., Scott, M.H., Improved fractional step method for simulating fluid–structure interaction using the PFEM. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 99:12 (2014), 925–944.
• Meduri, S., Cremonesi, M., Perego, U., Bettinotti, O., Kurkchubasche, A., Oancea, V., A partitioned fully explicit Lagrangian finite element method for highly nonlinear fluid–structure-interaction problems. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 113 (2017), 43–64, 10.1002/nme.5602.
• Thomas, D., Cerquaglia, M., Boman, R., Economon, T., Alonso, J., Dimitriadis, G., Terrapon, V., CUPyDO an integrated Python environment for coupled multi-physics simulations. Adv. Eng. Softw. 128 (2019), 69–85.
• Edelsbrunner, H., Mücke, E.P., Three-dimensional alpha shapes. ACM Trans. Graph. 13:1 (1994), 43–72.
• Franci, A., Cremonesi, M., On the effect of standard PFEM remeshing on volume conservation in free-surface fluid flow problems. Comput. Part. Mech. 4:3 (2016), 331–343.
• Idelsohn, S.R., Oñate, E., To mesh or not to mesh. That is the question… Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 195 (2006), 4681–4696.
• Cremonesi, M., Meduri, S., Perego, U., Frangi, A., An explicit Lagrangian finite element method for free-surface weakly compressible flows. Comput. Part. Mech. 4:3 (2016), 357–369, 10.1007/s40571-016-0122-7.
• Idelsohn, S.R., Mier-Torrecilla, M., Oñate, E., Multi-fluid flows with the particle finite element method. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 198 (2009), 2750–2767.
• Idelsohn, S.R., Mier-Torrecilla, M., Nigro, N.M., Oñate, E., On the analysis of heterogeneous fluids with jumps in the viscosity using a discontinuous pressure field. Comput. Mech. 46 (2010), 115–124.
• Zhang, X., Krabbenhoft, K., Pedroso, D.M., Lyamin, A.V., Sheng, D., Vicente da Silva, M., Wang, D., Particle finite element analysis of large deformation and granular flow problems. Comput. Geotech. 54 (2013), 133–142.
• Cremonesi, M., Perego, U., A Lagrangian finite element approach for the simulation of water-waves induced by landslides. Comput. Struct. 89 (2011), 1086–1093.
• Idelsohn, S.R., Marti, J., Souto-Iglesias, A., Oñate, E., Interaction between an elastic structure and free-surface flows: experimental versus numerical comparisons using the PFEM. Comput. Mech. 43:1 (2008), 125–132, 10.1007/s00466-008-0245-7.
• Idelsohn, S.R., Del Pin, F., Rossi, R., Oñate, E., Fluid–structure interaction problems with strong added-mass effect. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 80 (2009), 1261–1294.
• Oñate, E., Franci, A., Carbonell, J.M., A particle finite element method for analysis of industrial forming processes. Comput. Mech. 54 (2014), 85–107.
• Oñate, E., Rossi, R., Idelsohn, S.R., Butler, K.M., Melting and spread of polymers in fire with the particle finite element method. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 81 (2010), 1046–1072.
• Idelsohn, S.R., Nigro, N.M., Gimenez, J.M., Rossi, R., Marti, J.M., A fast and accurate method to solve the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. Eng. Comput. 30:2 (2013), 197–222, 10.1108/02644401311304854.
• Idelsohn, S.R., Marti, J., Becker, P., Oñate, E., Analysis of multifluid flows with large time steps using the particle finite element method. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 75:9 (2014), 621–644, 10.1002/fld.3908.
• Ryzhakov, P.B., Marti, J., Idelsohn, S.R., Oñate, E., Fast fluid–structure interaction simulations using a displacement-based finite element model equipped with an explicit streamline integration prediction. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 315 (2017), 1080–1097, 10.1016/j.cma.2016.12.003.
• Cerquaglia, M., Deliége, G., Boman, R., Terrapon, V., Ponthot, J.P., Free-slip boundary conditions for simulating free-surface incompressible flows through the particle finite element method. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 110:10 (2017), 921–946, 10.1002/nme.5439.
• Metafor, A nonlinear finite element code, University of Liège. http://metafor.ltas.ulg.ac.be/.
• Belytschko, T., Liu, W.K., Moran, B., Nonlinear Finite Elements for Continua and Structures. 2001, Wiley.
• Babuška, I., Narasimhan, R., The Babuška–Brezzi condition and the patch test: an example. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 140 (1997), 183–199.
• Brezzi, F., Fortin, M., Mixed and Hybrid Finite Element Method. 1991, Springer, Berlin.
• Tezduyar, T.E., Mittal, S., Ray, S.E., Shih, R., Incompressible flow computations with stabilized bilinear and linear equal-order-interpolation velocity-pressure elements. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 95 (1992), 221–242.
• Cremonesi, M., Frangi, A., Perego, U., A Lagrangian finite element approach for the analysis of fluid–structure interaction problems. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 84:5 (2010), 610–630.
• Idelsohn, S.R., Oñate, E., The challenge of mass conservation in the solution of free-surface flows with the fractional-step method: Problems and solutions. Int. J. Numer. Methods Biomed. Eng. 26 (2010), 1313–1330.
• Ryzhakov, P., Oñate, E., Rossi, R., Idelsohn, S.R., Improving mass conservation in simulation of incompressible flows. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 90 (2012), 1435–1451.
• Ponthot, J.P., Unified stress update algorithms for the numerical simulation of large deformation elasto-plastic and elasto-viscoplastic processes. Int. J. Plast. 18:1 (2002), 91–126, 10.1016/S0749-6419(00)00097-8.
• Chung, J., Hulbert, G.M., A time integration algorithm for structural dynamics with improved numerical dissipation: The generalized-α method. J. Appl. Mech. 60:2 (1993), 371–375.
• Malkus, D.S., Hughes, T.J., Mixed finite element methods — reduced and selective integration techniques: A unification of concepts. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 15:1 (1978), 63–81, 10.1016/0045-7825(78)90005-1.
• Simo, J.C., Rifai, M.S., A class of mixed assumed strain methods and the method of incompatible modes. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 29:8 (1990), 1595–1638, 10.1002/nme.1620290802.
• Bui, Q., Papeleux, L., Ponthot, J., Numerical simulation of springback using enhanced assumed strain elements. J. Mater Process. Technol. 153–154 (2004), 314–318, 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.342.
• Adam, L., Ponthot, J.P., Thermomechanical modeling of metals at finite strains: First and mixed order finite elements. Int. J. Solids Struct. 42:21 (2005), 5615–5655, 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.03.020.
• Donea, J., Huerta, A., Ponthot, J.P., Rodríguez-Ferran, A., Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian methods. Encyclopedia of Computational Mechanics, 2004, John Wiley & Sons Ch. 14.
• Boman, R., Ponthot, J.P., Efficient ALE mesh management for 3D quasi-Eulerian problems. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 92:10 (2012), 857–890, 10.1002/nme.4361.
• Koeune, R., Ponthot, J.P., A one phase thermomechanical model for the numerical simulation of semi-solid material behavior. Application to thixoforming. Int. J. Plast. 58 (2014), 120–153, 10.1016/j.ijplas.2014.01.004.
• Jeunechamps, P.P., Ponthot, J.P., An efficient 3D implicit approach for the thermomechanical simulation of elastic-viscoplastic materials submitted to high strain rate and damage. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 94:10 (2013), 920–960, 10.1002/nme.4489.
• Mengoni, M., Ponthot, J.P., Isotropic continuum damage/repair model for alveolar bone remodeling. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 234:7 (2010), 2036–2045, 10.1016/j.cam.2009.08.061.
• Boman, R., Ponthot, J.P., Finite element simulation of lubricated contact in rolling using the arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian formulation. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 193:39 (2004), 4323–4353, 10.1016/j.cma.2004.01.034.
• Farhat, C., Lesoinne, M., Tallec, P.L., Load and motion transfer algorithms for fluid/structure interaction problems with non-matching discrete interfaces: Momentum and energy conservation, optimal discretization and application to aeroelasticity. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 157:1 (1998), 95–114, 10.1016/S0045-7825(97)00216-8.
• Causin, P., Gerbeau, J., Nobile, F., Added-mass effect in the design of partitioned algorithms for fluid–structure problems. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 194:42–44 (2005), 4506–4527, 10.1016/j.cma.2004.12.005.
• Degroote, J., Bathe, K.J., Vierendeels, J., Performance of a new partitioned procedure versus a monolithic procedure in fluid–structure interaction. Comput. Struct. 87:11–12 (2009), 793–801, 10.1016/j.compstruc.2008.11.013.
• Vierendeels, J., Lanoye, L., Degroote, J., Verdonck, P., Implicit coupling of partitioned fluid–structure interaction problems with reduced order models. Comput. Struct. 85:11–14 (2007), 970–976, 10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.11.006.
• Bungartz, H.J., Lindner, F., Gatzhammer, B., Mehl, M., Scheufele, K., Shukaev, A., Uekermann, B., preCICE — a fully parallel library for multi-physics surface coupling. Comput. & Fluids 141 (2016), 250–258, 10.1016/j.compfluid.2016.04.003 Advances in fluid–structure interaction.
• Beckert, A., Wendland, H., Multivariate interpolation for fluid–structure-interaction problems using radial basis functions. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 5:2 (2001), 125–134, 10.1016/S1270-9638(00)01087-7.
• de Boer, A., van Zuijlen, A., Bijl, H., Review of coupling methods for non-matching meshes. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 196:8 (2007), 1515–1525, 10.1016/j.cma.2006.03.017 Domain decomposition methods: recent advances and new challenges in engineering.
• Degroote, J., Souto-Iglesias, A., Paepegem, W.V., Annerel, S., Bruggeman, P., Vierendeels, J., Partitioned simulation of the interaction between an elastic structure and free surface flow. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 199:33–36 (2010), 2085–2098, 10.1016/j.cma.2010.02.019.
• Joosten, M.M., Dettmer, W.G., Perić D., Analysis of the block Gauss–Seidel solution procedure for a strongly coupled model problem with reference to fluid–structure interaction. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 78:7 (2009), 757–778, 10.1002/nme.2503.
• Wood, C., Gil, A., Hassan, O., Bonet, J., Partitioned block-Gauss–Seidel coupling for dynamic fluid–structure interaction. Comput. Struct. 88:23–24 (2010), 1367–1382, 10.1016/j.compstruc.2008.08.005 Special issue: Association of Computational Mechanics — United Kingdom.
• Rossi, R., Oate, E., Analysis of some partitioned algorithms for fluid–structure interaction. Eng. Comput. 27:1 (2010), 20–56, 10.1108/02644401011008513.
• Irons, B.M., Tuck, R.C., A version of the Aitken accelerator for computer iteration. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 1:3 (1969), 275–277, 10.1002/nme.1620010306.
• Degroote, J., Bruggeman, P., Haelterman, R., Vierendeels, J., Stability of a coupling technique for partitioned solvers in FSI applications. Comput. Struct. 86:23–24 (2008), 2224–2234, 10.1016/j.compstruc.2008.05.005.
• Haelterman, R., Bogaers, A., Scheufele, K., Uekermann, B., Mehl, M., Improving the performance of the partitioned QN-ILS procedure for fluid–structure interaction problems: Filtering. Comput. Struct. 171:Supplement C (2016), 9–17, 10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.04.001.
• Förster, C., Wall, W.A., Ramm, E., Artificial added mass instabilities in sequential staggered coupling of nonlinear structures and incompressible viscous flows. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 196:7 (2007), 1278–1293, 10.1016/j.cma.2006.09.002.
• Degroote, J., Annerel, S., Vierendeels, J., Stability analysis of Gauss–Seidel iterations in a partitioned simulation of fluid–structure interaction. Comput. Struct. 88:5–6 (2010), 263–271, 10.1016/j.compstruc.2009.09.003.
• Olivier, M., Morissette, J.F., Dumas, G., A fluid–structure interaction solver for nano-air-vehicle flapping wings. Fluid Dynamics and Co-located Conferences, 2009, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 10.2514/6.2009-3676.
• Dettmer, W., Perić D., A computational framework for fluid–structure interaction: Finite element formulation and applications. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 195:41–43 (2006), 5754–5779, 10.1016/j.cma.2005.10.019 John H. Argyris memorial issue. Part II.
• F. Palacios, M. Colonno, A. Aranake, A. Campos, S. Copeland, T. Economon, A. Lonkar, T. Lukaczyk, T. Taylor, J. Alonso, Stanford University Unstructured (SU2): An open-source integrated computational environment for multi-physics simulation and design, in: AIAA 51st Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Grapevine, TX, 7–10 January, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.2013-287.
• Papanastasiou, T.C., Malamataris, N., Ellwood, K., A new outflow boundary condition. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 14:5 (1992), 587–608.
• Griffiths, D.F., The ‘no boundary condition’ outflow boundary condition. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 24:4 (1997), 393–411.
• Renardy, M., Imposing ‘no’ boundary condition at outflow: Why does it work?. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 24:4 (1997), 413–417.
• Walhorn, E., Kölke, A., Hübner, B., Dinkler, D., Fluid–structure coupling within a monolithic model involving free surface flows. Comput. Struct. 83 (2005), 2100–2111.
• Liu, M., Shao, J., Li, H., Numerical simulation of hydro-elastic problems with smoothed particle hydrodynamics method. J. Hydrodynamics 25:5 (2013), 673–682.
• Ryzhakov, P.B., Rossi, R., Idelsohn, S.R., Oate, E., A monolithic Lagrangian approach for fluid–structure interaction problems. Comput. Mech. 46 (2010), 883–899.
• Rafiee, A., Thiagarajan, K.P., An SPH projection method for simulating fluid-hypoelastic structure interaction. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 198:33–36 (2009), 2785–2795, 10.1016/j.cma.2009.04.001.
• S. Meduri, M. Cremonesi, U. Perego, A fully explicit fluid-structure interaction approach based on the PFEM, in: VII International Conference on Computational Methods for Coupled Problems in Science and Engineering, 2017, pp. 299–306.
• Antoci, C., Gallati, M., Sibilla, S., Numerical simulation of fluid–structure interaction by SPH. Comput. Struct. 85:11–14 (2007), 879–890, 10.1016/j.compstruc.2007.01.002.
• Yang, Q., Jones, V., McCue, L., Free-surface flow interactions with deformable structures using an SPH-FEM model. Ocean Eng. 55:Supplement C (2012), 136–147, 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2012.06.031.
• Antoci, C., Simulazione numerica dell'interazione fluido-struttura con la tecnica SPH. (Ph.D. thesis), 2006, Università degli studi di Pavia.
• Hesch, C., Gil, A., Carreo, A.A., Bonet, J., On continuum immersed strategies for fluid–structure interaction. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 247–248 (2012), 51–64, 10.1016/j.cma.2012.07.021.
• Gil, A., Carreo, A.A., Bonet, J., Hassan, O., The immersed structural potential method for haemodynamic applications. J. Comput. Phys. 229:22 (2010), 8613–8641, 10.1016/j.jcp.2010.08.005.
• Wang, X., Liu, W.K., Extended immersed boundary method using FEM and RKPM. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 193:12 (2004), 1305–1321, 10.1016/j.cma.2003.12.024 Meshfree methods: Recent advances and new applications.