CIDOC CRM; hybrid ontologies; cultural heritage; spatio-temporal reasoning
Abstract :
[en] Semantic description of cultural heritage information is already widely structured through CIDOC
CRM and its different extensions. This shared understanding of cultural heritage information
has already proved its usefulness. Until now, despite its spatial and temporal data management
proposition, lack standardization limited the possibilities in terms of reasoning and workability.
This paper proposes to increase the potentiality offered by the current scheme by including
GeoSPARQL and OWL-Time in the framework. The result, as hybrid ontology, allows concurrent
spatial and temporal handling. These are used to provide a near-full data management for
complex spatio-temporal reasoning and querying through SPARQL queries. Example queries
depicting the strength of the approach and allowing knowledge discovery in huge archaeological
datasets illustrate its benefits
Disciplines :
Computer science
Author, co-author :
Nys, Gilles-Antoine ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de géographie > Unité de Géomatique - Topographie et géométrologie
Van Ruymbeke, Muriel ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de géographie > Unité de Géomatique - Topographie et géométrologie
Billen, Roland ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de géographie > Unité de Géomatique - Topographie et géométrologie
Language :
English
Title :
Spatio-temporal reasoning in CIDOC CRM: an hybrid ontology with GeoSPARQL and OWL-Time
Publication date :
13 October 2018
Event name :
2nd Workshop On Computing Techniques For Spatio-Temporal Data in Archaeology And Cultural Heritage
Event organizer :
Computer Science Department, University of Verona Geomatics Unit, ULiège
Event place :
Melbourne, Australia
Event date :
28-08-2018
Audience :
International
Journal title :
CEUR Workshop Proceedings
eISSN :
1613-0073
Publisher :
RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
Special issue title :
COARCH 2018 - Computing Techniques For Spatio-Temporal Data in Archaeology And Cultural Heritage
J. F. Allen. Towards a general theory of action and time. Artificial Intelligence, 23(2):123-154, July 1984. doi:10.1016/0004-3702(84)90008-0.
J. F. Allen. Time and time again: The many ways to represent time. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 6(4):341-355, July 1991. doi:10.1002/int.4550060403.
Franz Baader, Diego Calvanese, Deborah L. McGuinness, Daniele Nardi, Peter F. Patel-Schneider. The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation and Applications. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 2010.
S. Batsakis and E. G. M. Petrakis. SOWL: A Framework for Handling Spatio-temporal Information in OWL 2.0. In Rule-Based Reasoning, Programming, Applications, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 242-249. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, July 2011. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-22546-8-19.
C. Bekiari, M. Doerr, P. Le Boeuf, P. Riva. FRBR object-oriented definition and mapping from FRBRer, FRAD and FRSAD Current version (version 3). Technical report, September 2017.
C. Binding, K. May, D. Tudhope. Semantic Interoperability in Archaeological Datasets: Data Mapping and Extraction Via the CIDOC CRM. In B. Christensen-Dalsgaard, D. Castelli, Bolette Ammitzbøll J., J. Lippincott, editors, Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, volume 5173, pages 280-290. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-87599-4-30.
E. Clementini, P. Di Felice, P. van Oosterom. A small set of formal topological relationships suitable for end-user interaction. Advances in Spatial databases LNCS 692, pages 277-295, 1993.
S. Cox and C. Little. Time Ontology in OWL. Technical report, October 2017.
N. Croft, I. Dionissadou, M. Doerr, P. Reed. CIDOC-Conceptual Reference Model-Information Groups. Technical Report version 1, September 1998.
M. Doerr, A. Felicetti, S. Hermon, G. Hiebel, A. Kritsotaki, A. Masur, K. May, P. Ronzino, W. Schmidle, M. Theodoridou, D. Tsiafaki, E. Christaki. Definition of the CRMarchaeo. An extension of CIDOC CRM to support the archaeological process. version 1.4.5 April 2018. Technical report, April 2018.
M. Doerr, A. Kritsotaki, Y. Rousakis, G. Hiebel, M. Theodoridou. CRMsci: Scientific observation model. Definition of the CRMsci. An extension of CIDOC-CRM to support scientific observation. proposal for approval by CIDOC CRM-SIG. Version 1.2.5 September 2017. Technical report, May 2018.
M. Egenhofer and R. Franzosa. Point-set topological spatial relations. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 5(2):161-174, 1991.
G. Hiebel, M. Doerr, . Eide, M. Theodoridou. CRMgeo: A Spatiotemporal Model. An Extension of CIDOC-CRM to link the CIDOC CRM to GeoSPARQL through a Spatiotemporal Refinement. Proposal for approval by CIDOC CRM-SIG Version 1.2. September 2015. Technical report, September 2015.
P. Le Boeuf, M. Doerr, C. E. Ore, St. Stead. Definition of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model. Produced by the ICOM/CIDOC Documentation Standards Group, Continued by the CIDOC CRM Special Interest Group. Version 6.2.3 Mai 2018. Technical report, May 2018.
E. Le Goff, O. Marlet, X. Rodier, S. Curet, P. Husi. Interoperability of the ArSol (Archives du Sol) Database based on the CIDOC-CRM Ontology. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology CAA 2014-21st Century Archaeology, pages 179-186, Paris, 2015.
iligny F., Djindjian F., Costa L., Moscati P., Robert S. 16 O. Marlet, S. Curet, X. Rodier, B. Bouchou-Markhoff. Using CIDOC CRM for Dynamically Querying ArSol, a Relational Database, from the Semantic Web. In Proceedings of the 43rd annual conference on computer applications and quantitative methods in archaeology. CAA2015-Keep the Revolution going, pages 241-249, Sienne, 2016.
S. Campana, R. Scopigno, G. Carpentiero, M. Cirillo. 17 S. Migliorini and P. Grossi. Towards the Extraction of Semantics from Incomplete Archaeological Records. In Proceedings of Workshops and Posters at the 13th International Conference on Spatial Information Theory (COSIT 2017), Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography, pages 349-358. Springer, Cham, September 2017. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-63946-8-52.
M. Perry and J. Herring. GeoSPARQL-A Geographic Query Language for RDF Data | OGC, September 2012.
D. A. Randell, Z. Cui, A. G. Cohn. A spatial logic based on regions and connection. Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, page 165-176, 1992.
P. Ronzino, F. Niccolucci, A. Felicetti, M. Doerr. Definition of the CRMba. An extension of CIDOC CRM to support buildings archaeology documentation. Proposal for approval by CIDOC CRM-SIG, Version 1.4, April 2016. Technical report, 2016.
Ryan Shaw, Adam Rabinowitz, Patrick Golden, Eric Kansa. A sharing-oriented design strategy for networked knowledge organization systems. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 17(1):49-61, March 2016. doi:10.1007/s00799-015-0164-0.
E. Sirin, B. Parsia, B. C. Grau, A. Kalyanpur, Y. Katz. Pellet: A practical OWL-DL reasoner. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 5(2):51-53, June 2007. doi:10.1016/j.websem.2007.03.004.
S. Stead, D. Oldman, J. W. Cloud. Exploring Time ans Space in the Annotation of Museum Catalogues: The Sloane Virtual Exhibition Experience. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology CAA 2014-21st Century Archaeology, pages 221-225, Paris, 2015.
Giligny F., Djindjian F., Costa L., Moscati P., Robert S. 24 Mehdi Teymourlouie, Ahmad Zaeri, Mohammadali Nematbakhsh, Matthias Thimm, Steffen Staab. Detecting hidden errors in an ontology using contextual knowledge. Expert Systems with Applications, 95:312-323, April 2018. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2017.11.034.
M. Van Ruymbeke, P. Hallot, G.-A. Nys, R. Billen. Implementation of multiple interpretation data model concepts in CIDOC CRM and compatible models. Virtual Archaeology Review. doi:10.4995/var.2018.8884.
