[en] Abstract Crowdsourcing, understood as outsourcing tasks or data collection by a large group of non-professionals, is increasingly used in scientific research and operational applications. In this paper, we reviewed crowdsourcing initiatives in agricultural science and farming activities and further discussed the particular characteristics of this approach in the field of agriculture. On-going crowdsourcing initiatives in agriculture were analysed and categorised according to their crowdsourcing component. We identified eight types of agricultural data and information that can be generated from crowdsourcing initiatives. Subsequently we described existing methods of quality control of the crowdsourced data. We analysed the profiles of potential contributors in crowdsourcing initiatives in agriculture, suggested ways for increasing farmers’ participation, and discussed the on-going initiatives in the light of their target beneficiaries. While crowdsourcing is reported to be an efficient way of collecting observations relevant to environmental monitoring and contributing to science in general, we pointed out that crowdsourcing applications in agriculture may be hampered by privacy issues and other barriers to participation. Close connections with the farming sector, including extension services and farm advisory companies, could leverage the potential of crowdsourcing for both agricultural research and farming applications. This paper coins the term of farmsourcing as a professional crowdsourcing strategy in farming activities and provides a source of recommendations and inspirations for future collaborative actions in agricultural crowdsourcing.
Disciplines :
Sociology & social sciences Agriculture & agronomy
Author, co-author :
Minet, Julien ; Université de Liège - ULiège > DER Sc. et gest. de l'environnement (Arlon Campus Environ.) > Eau, Environnement, Développement
Curnel, Yannick
Gobin, Anne
Goffart, Jean-Pierre
Melard, François ; Université de Liège - ULiège > DER Sc. et gest. de l'environnement (Arlon Campus Environ.) > DER Sc. et gest. de l'environnement (Arlon Campus Environ.)
Tychon, Bernard ; Université de Liège - ULiège > DER Sc. et gest. de l'environnement (Arlon Campus Environ.) > Eau, Environnement, Développement
Wellens, Joost ; Université de Liège - ULiège > DER Sc. et gest. de l'environnement (Arlon Campus Environ.) > DER Sc. et gest. de l'environnement (Arlon Campus Environ.)
Defourny, Pierre
Language :
English
Title :
Crowdsourcing for agricultural applications: A review of uses and opportunities for a farmsourcing approach
Ackoff, R.L., From data to wisdom. J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 16:1 (1989), 3–9.
Allahbakhsh, M., Benatallah, B., Ignjatovic, A., Motahari-Nezhad, H., Bertino, E., Dustdar, S., Quality control in crowdsourcing systems. IEEE Internet Comput. 17:2 (2013), 76–81.
Belden, O.S., Baker, S.C., Baker, B.M., Citizens unite for computational immunology!. Trends Immunol. 36:7 (2015), 385–387.
Betancourt, J.L., Schwartz, M.D., Breshears, D.D., Brewer, C.A., Frazer, G., Gross, J.E., Mazer, S.J., Reed, B.C., Wilson, B.E., Evolving plans for the USA national phenology network. Eos, Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 88(19), 2007 211–211.
Bey, A., Sánchez-Paus Díaz, A., Maniatis, D., Marchi, G., Mollicone, D., Ricci, S., Bastin, J.-F., Moore, R., Federici, S., Rezende, M., Patriarca, C., Turia, R., Gamoga, G., Abe, H., Kaidong, E., Miceli, G., Collect earth: land use and land cover assessment through augmented visual interpretation. Remote Sensing, 8(10), 2016, 807.
Beza, E., Silva, J.V., Kooistra, L., Reidsma, P., Review of yield gap explaining factors and opportunities for alternative data collection approaches. Eur. J. Agron. 82B (2017), 206–222.
Bleiholder, H., van den Boom, T., Langeluddeke, P., Stauss, R., Einheitliche Codierung der phanologischen Stadien bei Kultur- und Schadpfanzen. Gesunde Pflanzen 41 (1989), 381–384.
Boulos, M.N.K., Resch, B., Crowley, D.N., Breslin, J.G., Sohn, G., Burtner, R., Pike, W.A., Jezierski, E., Chuang, K.-Y.S., Crowdsourcing, citizen sensing and sensor web technologies for public and environmental health surveillance and crisis management: trends, OGC standards and application examples. Int. J. Health Geographics, 10(1), 2011, 1.
Bréda, N.J., Ground-based measurements of leaf area index: a review of methods, instruments and current controversies. J. Exp. Bot. 54:392 (2003), 2403–2417.
Brabham, D., 2013. Crowdsourcing. Mit Press.
Brabham, D., 2012. 'Crowdsourcing: A Model for Leveraging Online Communities, [w:] Delwiche A'. In: Henderson, J., (red.), The Participatory Cultures Handbook, New York, pp. 120–129.
Brabham, D., Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving an introduction and cases. Convergence: Int. J. Res. New Media Technol. 14:1 (2008), 75–90.
Bruce, T.J., The CROPROTECT project and wider opportunities to improve farm productivity through web-based knowledge exchange. Food Energy Security 5:2 (2016), 89–96.
Chaudhri, R., Brunette, W., Goel, M., Sodt, R., VanOrden, J., Falcone, M., Borriello, G., 2012. Open data kit sensors: mobile data collection with wired and wireless sensors. In: 'Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Symposium on Computing for Development', pp. 9.
Conrad, C.C., Hilchey, K.G., A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities. Environ. Monit. Assess. 176:1–4 (2011), 273–291.
Cranshaw, J., Kittur, A., 2011. The polymath project: lessons from a successful online collaboration in mathematics. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1865–1874.
Curnel, Y., de Wit, A.J., Duveiller, G., Defourny, P., Potential performances of remotely sensed LAI assimilation in WOFOST model based on an OSS experiment. Agric. For. Meteorol. 151:12 (2011), 1843–1855.
De Longueville, B., 2016. Citizens as Earth Observation Sources: a Workflow for Volunteered Information Sensing. PhD thesis, Université catholique de Louvain.
Demarée, G., Curnel, Y., 2008. Plant phenology in Belgium. In: Cost action 725: The History and Current Status of Plant Phenology in Europe, pp. 29–33.
Estes, L., McRitchie, D., Choi, J., Debats, S.R., Evans, T., Guthe, W., Luo, D., Gagazzo, G., Zempleni, R., Caylor, K., Diylandcover: Crowdsourcing the creation of systematic, accurate landcover maps. Environ. Modelling Software 40 (2016), 41–53.
van Etten, J., Crowdsourcing crop improvement in Sub-Saharan Africa: A proposal for a scalable and inclusive approach to food security. IDS Bull. 42:4 (2011), 102–110.
van Etten, J., Beza, E., Calderer, L., van Duijvendijk, K., Fadda, C., Fantahun, B., Kidane, Y.G., van de Gevel, J., Gupta, A., Mengistu, D.K., Kiambi, D., Mathur, P.N., Mercado, L., Mittra, S., Mollel, M.J., Rosas, J.C., Steinke, J., Suchini, J.G., Zimmerer, K.S., First experiences with a novel farmer citizen science approach: crowdsourcing participatory variety selection through on-farm triadic comparisons of technologies (tricot). Exp. Agric., 2016, 1–22.
Flanagin, A.J., Metzger, M.J., The credibility of volunteered geographic information. GeoJournal 72:3–4 (2008), 137–148.
Francone, C., Pagani, V., Foi, M., Cappelli, G., Confalonieri, R., Comparison of leaf area index estimates by ceptometer and PocketLAI smart app in canopies with different structures. Field Crops Res. 155 (2014), 38–41.
Franzoni, C., Sauermann, H., Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects. Res. Policy 43:1 (2014), 1–20.
Fritz, S., McCallum, I., Schill, C., Perger, C., Grillmayer, R., Achard, F., Kraxner, F., Obersteiner, M., Geo-Wiki. Org: The use of crowdsourcing to improve global land cover. Remote Sens. 1:3 (2009), 345–354.
Fritz, S., McCallum, I., Schill, C., Perger, C., See, L., Schepaschenko, D., Van der Velde, M., Kraxner, F., Obersteiner, M., Geo-Wiki: An online platform for improving global land cover. Environ. Modelling Software 31 (2012), 110–123.
Fritz, S., See, L., McCallum, I., You, L., Bun, A., Moltchanova, E., Duerauer, M., Albrecht, F., Schill, C., Perger, C., Havlik, P., Mosnier, A., Thornton, P., Wood-Sichra, U., Herrero, M., Beckerreshef, I., Justice, C., Hansen, M., Gong, P., Abdel, Aziz, S., Cipriani, A., Cumani, R., Cecchi, G., Conchedda, G., Ferreira, S., Gomez, A., Haffani, M., Kayitakire, F., Malanding, J., Mueller, R., Newby, T., Nonguierma, A., Olusegun, A., Ortner, S., Ram, Rajak, D., Rocha, J., Schepaschenko, D., Schepaschenko, S., Terekhov, A., Tiangwa, A., Vancutsem, C., Vintrou, E., Wenbin, W., Van Der Velde, M., Dunwoody, A., Kraxner, F., Obersteiner, M., Mapping global cropland and field size. Global Change Biol. 21:5 (2015), 1980–1992.
GNSS Market Report, Issue 4, Publications Office of the European Union, ISBN 978-92-9206-013-8, 84 p.
Goëau, H., Bonnet, P., Joly, A., Bakić, V., Barbe, J., Yahiaoui, I., Selmi, S., Carré, J., Barthélémy, D., Boujemaa, N., Molino, J.-F., Duché, G., Perronet, A., 2013. Pl@ntnet mobile app. In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 423–424.
Hack, H., Bleiholder, H., Buhr, L., Meier, U., Schnock-Fricke, U., Weber, E., Witzenberger, A., Einheitliche Codierung der phänologischen Entwicklungsstadien mono-und dikotyler pflanzen–Erweiterte BBCH-Skala, Allgemein. Nachrichtenbl. Deut. Pflanzenschutzd 44:12 (1992), 265–270.
Hansen, J.P., Melby Jespersen, L., Leck Jensen, A., Holst, K., Mathiesen, C., Brunori, G., Halberg, N., Ankjær Rasmussen, I., ICT and social media as drivers of multi-actor innovation in agriculture. CIGR Proc., 1(1), 2014.
Herrick, J.E., Urama, K.C., Karl, J.W., Boos, J., Johnson, M.-V.V., Shepherd, K.D., Hempel, J., Bestelmeyer, B.T., Davies, J., Guerra, J.L., Kosnik, C., Kimiti, D.W., Ekai, A.L., Muller, K., Norfleet, L., Ozor, N., Reinsch, T., Sarukhan, J., West, L.T., The global land-potential knowledge system (LandPKS): Supporting evidence-based, site-specific land use and management through cloud computing, mobile applications, and crowdsourcing. J. Soil Water Conserv. 68:1 (2013), 5A–12A.
Howe, J., The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired Magazine 14:6 (2006), 1–4.
Hughes, D., Salathé, M., 2015. An open access repository of images on plant health to enable the development of mobile disease diagnostics through machine learning and crowdsourcing, arXiv, 1511.08060.
Koerten, H., van den Besselaar, P., 2014. Citizen science and crowd science in biodiversity research. In: Proceedings of the Internet, Policy & Politics Conference.
Kramer, D., 2016. PhotosynQ: Community-driven plant phenotyping for understanding plant responses to climate change. In: Plant and Animal Genome XXIV Conference.
Lebrun, P., Goffart, J.-P., Glorvigen, B., Report on workshop “Connecting research to practice in the potato sector—top-down and bottom-up approaches”. Potato Res. 57:3–4 (2014), 359–364.
Li, L., Goodchild, M.F., 2013. Is privacy still an issue in the era of big data?—Location disclosure in spatial footprints. In: 2013 21st International Conference on Geoinformatics, pp. 1–4.
Lowry, C.S., Fienen, M.N., CrowdHydrology: crowdsourcing hydrologic data and engaging citizen scientists. Ground Water 51:1 (2013), 151–156.
Lukyanenko, R., Parsons, J., Wiersma, Y.F., The IQ of the crowd: understanding and improving information quality in structured user-generated content. Inf. Syst. Res. 25:4 (2014), 669–689.
Marx, S., Hämmerle, M., Klonner, C., Höfle, B., 3D participatory sensing with low-cost mobile devices for crop height assessment–a comparison with terrestrial laser scanning data. PLoS ONE, 11(4), 2016, e0152839.
McEwan, R.W., McCarthy, B.C., 2005. Phenology: An integrative environmental science.
Minet, J., Robert, B., Tychon, B., 2015. The potential of OpenStreetMap for land use/land cover mapping. FOSS4G.be, Brussels, Belgium.
Muller, C., Chapman, L., Johnston, S., Kidd, C., Illingworth, S., Foody, G., Overeem, A., Leigh, R., Crowdsourcing for climate and atmospheric sciences: current status and future potential. Int. J. Climatol. 35:11 (2015), 3185–3203.
Neis, P., Zielstra, D., Recent developments and future trends in volunteered geographic information research: The case of OpenStreetMap. Future Internet 6:1 (2014), 76–106.
Newman, G., Wiggins, A., Crall, A., Graham, E., Newman, S., Crowston, K., The future of citizen science: emerging technologies and shifting paradigms. Front. Ecol. Environ. 10:6 (2012), 298–304.
Nov, O., Arazy, O., Anderson, D., Scientists@ Home: what drives the quantity and quality of online citizen science participation?. PLoS ONE, 9(4), 2014, e90375.
Overeem, A., Robinson, R.J., Steeneveld, H., G.-J., P Horn, B., Uijlenhoet, R., Crowdsourcing urban air temperatures from smartphone battery temperatures. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40:15 (2013), 4081–4085.
Pretty, J.N., Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture. World Dev. 23:8 (1995), 1247–1263.
Rahman, M., Blackwell, B., Banerjee, N., Saraswat, D., Smartphone-based hierarchical crowdsourcing for weed identification. Comput. Electron. Agriculture 113 (2015), 14–23.
Ranard, B.L., Ha, Y.P., Meisel, Z.F., Asch, D.A., Hill, S.S., Becker, L.B., Seymour, A.K., Merchant, R.M., Crowdsourcing—harnessing the masses to advance health and medicine, a systematic review. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 29:1 (2014), 187–203.
Reed, J., Raddick, M.J., Lardner, A., Carney, K., 2013. An exploratory factor analysis of motivations for participating in Zooniverse, a collection of virtual citizen science projects. In: System Sciences (HICSS), 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on, pp. 610–619.
Rossiter, D.G., Liu, J., Carlisle, S., Zhu, A.-X., Can citizen science assist digital soil mapping?. Geoderma 259–260 (2015), 71–80.
Roy, H., Pocock, M., Preston, C., Roy, D., Savage, J., Tweddle, J., Robinson, L., 2012. Understanding citizen science & environmental monitoring. Technical Report, NERC Centre for Ecology & Hydrology and Natural History Museum, Final Report on behalf of UK-EOF.
Schenk, E., Guittard, C., Towards a characterization of crowdsourcing practices. J. Innovation Econ. Manage. 7:1 (2011), 93–107.
See, L., Fritz, S., Perger, C., Schill, C., McCallum, I., Schepaschenko, D., Duerauer, M., Sturn, T., Karner, M., Kraxner, F., Obersteiner, M., Harnessing the power of volunteers, the internet and Google Earth to collect and validate global spatial information using Geo-Wiki. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 98 (2015), 324–335.
Senaratne, H., Mobasheri, A., Ali, A.L., Capineri, C., Haklay, M., A review of volunteered geographic information quality assessment methods. Int. J. Geographical Inf. Sci. 31:1 (2016), 139–167.
Sonka, S., Big data and the ag sector: more than lots of numbers. Int. Food Agribusiness Manage. Rev., 17(1), 2014, 1.
Treude, C., Barzilay, O., Storey, M.-A., 2011. How do programmers ask and answer questions on the web?: Nier track, in 'Software Engineering (ICSE). In: 2011 33rd International Conference on, pp. 804–807.
USAID, 2013. Crowdsourcing applications for agricultural development in Africa, pp. 1–6, http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PA00J7P7.pdf.
Wiggins, A., Crowston, K., 2011. From conservation to crowdsourcing: A typology of citizen science. In: System Sciences (HICSS), 2011 44th Hawaii international conference on, pp. 1–10.
Wolfert, S., Ge, L., Verdouw, C., Bogaardt, M.J., Big data in smart farming – a review. Agric. Syst. 153 (2017), 69–80.
Zadoks, J.C., Chang, T.T., Konzal, C.F., A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res. 14:6 (1974), 415–421.
