[en] Metacognition is a critical factor that appears to be involved in improving episodic memory during childhood. However, as metacognitive abilities emerge relatively late in development, they have not been expected to influence children’s memory performance before age 7. Nevertheless, in recent studies, as early as age 3, children rely on basic metacognitive abilities to evaluate their memory and use the result of this evaluation to regulate their memory performance. In this article, we consider evidence for the early development of metacognitive skills. We then review studies indicating that children can use inference rules based on the results of their introspection
(monitoring) to regulate their memory decisions, demonstrating the early use of several metacognitive heuristics. Finally, we discuss preliminary findings indicating that changes in how children use metacognitive heuristics can account for changes in episodic memory throughout childhood.
Disciplines :
Theoretical & cognitive psychology
Author, co-author :
Geurten, Marie ; Université de Liège > R&D Direction : Chercheurs ULiège en mobilité
Willems, Sylvie ; Université de Liège > Clinique psychologique et logopédique universitaire (CPLU)
Language :
English
Title :
Metacognition in Early Childhood: Fertile Ground to Understand Memory Development?
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.
Newcombe, N. S., Lloyd, M. E., & Ratliff, K. R. (2007). Development of episodic and autobiographical memory: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. In R. V. Kail (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 35, pp. 37–85). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
Geurten, M., Lejeune, C., & Meulemans, T. (2015). Time's up! Involvement of metamemory knowledge, executive functions, and time monitoring in children's prospective memory performance. Child Neuropsychology, 22, 443–457. doi:10.1080/09297049.2014.998642
Geurten, M., Catale, C., & Meulemans, T. (2015). When children's knowledge of memory improves children's performance in memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29, 244–252. doi:10.1002/acp.3102
Ghetti, S. (2003). Memory for nonoccurrences: The role of metacognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 722–739. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00005-6
Fritz, K., Howie, P., & Kleitman, S. (2010). “How do I remember when I got my dog?” The structure and development of children's metamemory. Metacognition and Learning, 5, 207–228. doi:10.1007/s11409-010-9058-0
Schneider, W., & Lockl, K. (2002). The development of metacognitive knowledge in children and adolescents. In T. J. Perfect & B. L. Schwartz (Eds.), Applied metacognition (pp. 224–257). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Koriat, A., & Ackerman, R. (2010). Choice latency as a cue for children's subjective confidence in the correctness of their answers. Developmental Science, 13, 441–453. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00907.x
Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review, 103, 490–517. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.490
Ghetti, S., Hembacher, E., & Coughlin, C. A. (2013). Feeling uncertain and acting on it during the preschool years: A metacognitive approach. Child Development Perspectives, 7, 160–165. doi:10.1111/cdep.12035
Lyons, K. E., & Ghetti, S. (2013). I don't want to pick! Introspection on uncertainty supports early strategic behavior. Child Development, 84, 726–736. doi:10.1111/cdev.12004
Ackerman, R., & Zalmanov, H. (2012). The persistence of the fluency-confidence association in problem solving. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 19, 1187–1192. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0305-z
Hembacher, E., & Ghetti, S. (2014). Don't look at my answer: Subjective uncertainty underlies preschoolers’ exclusion of their least accurate memories. Psychological Science, 25, 1768–1776. doi:10.1177/0956797614542273
Lipowski, S. L., Merriman, W. E., & Dunlosky, J. (2013). Preschoolers can make highly accurate judgments of learning. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1505–1516. doi:10.1037/a0030614
Geurten, M., Willems, S., & Meulemans, T. (2015). Beyond the experience: Detection of metamemorial regularities. Consciousness and Cognition, 33, 16–23. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2014.11.009
Schneider, W., & Lockl, K. (2008). Procedural metacognition in children: Evidence for developmental trends. In J. Dunlosky & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Handbook of metamemory and memory (pp. 391–409). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Balcomb, F. K., & Gerken, L. (2008). Three-year-old children can access their own memory to guide responses on a visual matching task. Developmental Science, 11, 750–760. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00725.x
Smith, J. D., & Washburn, D. A. (2005). Uncertainty monitoring and metacognition by animals. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 19–24. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00327.x
Goupil, L., Romand-Monnier, M., & Kouider, S. (2016). Infants ask for help when they know they don't know. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 3492–3496. doi:10.1073/pnas.1515129113
Gerken, L., Balcomb, F. K., & Minton, J. L. (2011). Infants avoid “labouring in vain” by attending more to learnable than unlearnable linguistic patterns. Developmental Science, 14, 972–979. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01046.x
Reber, R., Wurtz, P., & Zimmermann, T. D. (2004). Exploring “fringe” consciousness: The subjective experience of perceptual fluency and its objective bases. Consciousness and Cognition, 13, 47–60. doi:10.1016/S1053-8100(03)00049-7
Guttentag, R. E., & Dunn, J. (2003). Judgments of remembering: The revelation effect in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86, 153–167. doi:10.1016/S0022-0965(03)00135-8
Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 306–340. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.110.3.306
Schacter, D. L., Israel, L., & Racine, C. (1999). Suppressing false recognition in younger and older adults: The distinctiveness heuristic. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 1–24. doi:10.1006/jmla.1998.2611
Westerman, D., Miller, J., & Lloyd, M. (2003). Change in perceptual form attenuates the use of the fluency heuristic in recognition. Memory and Cognition, 31, 619–629. doi:10.3758/BF03196102
Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., & Belli, R. F. (1998). The role of ease of retrieval and attribution in memory judgments: Judging your memory as worse despite recalling more events. Psychological Science, 9, 124–126. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00022
Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Leboe, J. P. (2003). Two fluency heuristics (and how to tell them apart). Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 62–79. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00009-3
Geurten, M., Lloyd, M. E., & Willems, S. (2016). Hearing “quack” and remembering a duck: Evidence for fluency attribution in young children. Child Development. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12614
Geurten, M., Willems, S., Germain, S., & Meulemans, T. (2015). Less is more: The availability heuristic in early childhood. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 33, 405–410. doi:10.1111/bjdp.12114
Geurten, M., Willems, S., & Meulemans, T. (2015). Are children conservative, liberal, or metacognitive? Preliminary evidence for the involvement of the distinctiveness heuristic in decision making. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 132, 230–239. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2014.12.010
Geurten, M., Meulemans, T., & Willems, S. (2015). Memorability in context: An heuristic story. Experimental Psychology, 62, 306–319. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000300
Besken, M., & Mulligan, N. (2013). Easily perceived, easily remembered? Perceptual interference produces a double dissociation between metamemory and memory performance. Memory and Cognition, 41, 897–903. doi:10.3758/s13421-013-0307-8
Miller, J. K., & Lloyd, M. E. (2011). The development of the fluency heuristic in childhood: More questions than answers. In P. A. Higham & J. P. Leboe (Eds.), Constructions of remembering and metacognition (pp. 28–39). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9780230305281
Similar publications
Sorry the service is unavailable at the moment. Please try again later.
This website uses cookies to improve user experience. Read more
Save & Close
Accept all
Decline all
Show detailsHide details
Cookie declaration
About cookies
Strictly necessary
Performance
Strictly necessary cookies allow core website functionality such as user login and account management. The website cannot be used properly without strictly necessary cookies.
This cookie is used by Cookie-Script.com service to remember visitor cookie consent preferences. It is necessary for Cookie-Script.com cookie banner to work properly.
Performance cookies are used to see how visitors use the website, eg. analytics cookies. Those cookies cannot be used to directly identify a certain visitor.
Used to store the attribution information, the referrer initially used to visit the website
Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. Websites use cookies to help users navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. Cookies that are required for the website to operate properly are allowed to be set without your permission. All other cookies need to be approved before they can be set in the browser.
You can change your consent to cookie usage at any time on our Privacy Policy page.
