[fr] Cet article s’intéresse aux caractéristiques psychométriques des outils d’évaluation utilisés en clinique francophone lors du diagnostic des troubles du langage oral chez l’enfant d’âge scolaire. L’objectif est d’aider les cliniciens à adopter une pratique réflexive lors du choix des tests diagnostiques dans une démarche d’Evidence-Based Practice, ainsi que de fournir des recommandations aux concepteurs de tests afin de continuer à développer les standards de qualité des outils normés. [en] This paper addresses the psychometric properties of the French standardized tools used in the diagnosis of language impairment in school-age children. The aim is to assist the speech-language pathologists in the selection of assessment tools following an Evidence-Based Practice approach, and to give standardized tests developers psychometric gold standards for future tools.
Disciplines :
Traitement & psychologie clinique
Auteur, co-auteur :
Leclercq, Anne-Lise ; Université de Liège > Département de Psychologie : cognition et comportement > Logopédie clinique
Veys, Emilie
Langue du document :
Français
Titre :
Réflexions sur le choix de tests standardisés lors du diagnostic de dysphasie
Date de publication/diffusion :
2014
Titre du périodique :
ANAE: Approche Neuropsychologique des Apprentissages chez l'Enfant
BETZ, S., EICKHOFF, J. & SULLIVAN, S. (2013). Factors influencing the selection of standardized tests for the diagnosis of specific language impairment. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 44, 133-146.
CHEVRIE-MULLER, C. & PLAZA, M. (2001). Nouvelles épreuves pour l'examen du langage. Montreuil: ECPA.
CONTI-RAMSDEN, G., BOTTINO, N. & FARAGHER, B. (2001). Psycholinguistic markers for specific language impairment (SLI). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42 (6), 741-748. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00770
DOLLAGHAN, C. A. (2004). Evidence-based practice in communication disorders: What do we know, and when do we know it? Journal of Communication Disorders, 37 (5), 391-400. doi: http://dx.doi.0rg/lO.lOl6/j.jcomdis.2004.04.002
DOLLAGHAN, C. A. (2007). The handbook for evidence-based practice in communication disorders. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishers.
FLEISS, J. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley.
FRTBERG, J. C. (2010). Considerations for test selection: How do validity and reliability impact diagnostic decisions? Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 26(1), 77-92. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265659009349972
GEORGE, D. & MALLERY, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.) Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
GILLAM, S. L. & GILLAM, R. B. (2006). Making evidence-based decisions about child language intervention in schools. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 37 (4), 304-315. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461%282006/035%29
KHOMSI, A. (2001). Évaluation du langage oral. Paris: ECPA.
LAVEAULT, D. & GRÉGOIRE, J. (2002). Introduction aux théories des tests en psychologie et sciences de l'éducation. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
MCCAULEY, R. & SWISHER, L. (1984). Psychometric review of language and articulation tests for preschool children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49, 34-42.
PENA, E., SPAULDING, T. J. & PLANTE, E. (2006). The composition of normative groups and diagnostic decision making: Shooting ourselves in the foot. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 15 (3), 247-254.
PLANTE, E. & VANCE, R. (1994). Selection of preschool language tests: A data-based approach. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 25, 15-24.
SALVIA, J., YSSELDYKE, J. & BOLT, S. (2010). Assessment: In special and inclusive education (11th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
SPAULDING, T. J., PLANTE, E. & FARINELLA, K. (2006). Eligibility criteria for language impairment: Is the low end of normal always appropriate? Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 37, 61-72.
SPAULDING, T. J., SZULGA, M. & FIGUEROA, C. (2012). Using norm-referenced tests to determine severity of language impairment in children: Disconnect between U.S. policy makers and tests developers. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 43, 176-190.
STOKES, S. F., WONG, A. M, FLETCHER, P. & LEONARD, L. B. (2006). Nonword repetition and sentence repetition as clinical markers of specific language impairment: The case of Cantonese. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49 (2), 219-236.
THIBAULT, M.-P., HELLOIN, M.-C. & CROTEAU, B. (2010). Batterie informatisée pour l'examen du langage oral et écrit chez l'enfant de 5 à 8 ans version 2. Mont-Saint-Aignan: Orthomotus.
THIBAULT, M.-R, LENFANT, M. & HELLOIN, M.-C. (2012). Bilan informatisé pour l'examen du langage et des compétences transversales chez l'enfant de 8 à 11 ans. Mont-Saint-Aignan: Orthomotus.
THORDARDOTTIR, E. & BRANDEKER, M. (2013). The effect of bilingual exposure versus language impairment on nonword repetition and sentence imitation scores. Journal of Communication Disorders, 46, 1-16.
THORDARDOTTIR, E., KEHAYIA, E., MAZER, B., LESSARD, N., MAJNEMER, A., SUTTON, A., CHILINGARYAN, G. (2011). Sensitivity and specificity of French language and processing measures for the identification of primary language impairment at age 5. Journal of Speech Language, and Hearing Research 54 (2), 580-597.
