[en] Introduction. Several studies have investigated the mediating role of overall justice (OJ) in the relationships between specific dimensions of justice and employee attitudes. However, prior research has neglected to examine OJ during the process of organizational change, as suggested in Fairness Heuristic Theory (FHT).
Objective. This study aims to replicate the results of previous studies and expand them by examining, in two contexts of organizational change implementation, the mediating role of OJ in the relationships between procedural, interpersonal, and informational justice (PJ, ITJ, and IFJ, respectively) and employee attitudes (job satisfaction, turnover intentions, and organizational commitment).
Methodology. We surveyed 537 employees experiencing a company reorganization (Study 1) and 188 employees experiencing a merger (Study 2).
Results. Each dimension of justice is related to OJ, which in turn is associated to employee attitudes. Furthermore, bootstrap results indicated that OJ mediates the effects of PJ, ITJ, and IFJ on job satisfaction and turnover intentions (in both studies), and on affective, normative, and continuance commitment (in Study 2).
Conclusion. Our findings show the importance of fairness during organizational change. Treating employees fairly in times of change is crucial for managers.
Disciplines :
Social, industrial & organizational psychology
Author, co-author :
Marzucco, Laurence ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Départ. de Psychologies et Cliniques des Systèmes humains > Valorisation des ressources humaines
Marique, Géraldine; Université Catholique de Louvain - UCL
Stinglhamber, Florence; Université Catholique de Louvain - UCL
De Roeck, Kenneth; IÉSEG School of Management (LEM-CNRS)
Hansez, Isabelle ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Départ. de Psychologies et Cliniques des Systèmes humains > Valorisation des ressources humaines
Language :
English
Title :
Justice and employee attitudes during organizational change: The mediating role of overall justice
M.L. Ambrose A. Arnaud Distributive and procedural justice: Construct distinctiveness, construct interdependence, and overall justice J. Greenberg J. Colquitt Handbook of organizational justice 2005 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Mahwah, NJ 59 84
M.L. Ambrose M. Schminke The role of overall justice judgments in organizational justice research: A test of mediation Journal of Applied Psychology 94 2009 491 500
J.C. Anderson D.W. Gerbing Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach Psychological Bulletin 103 1988 411 423
P.M. Bentler D.G. Bonnett Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structure Psychological Bulletin 88 1980 588 606
R.W. Brislin Translation and content analysis of oral and written material H.C. Triandis J.W. Berry Handbook of cross-cultural psychology 1980 Allyn & Bacon Boston, MA 398 444
C. Cammann M. Fichman G.D. Jenkins J. Klesh Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire S.E. Seashore E.E. Lawler P.H. Mirvis C. Cammann Assessing organizational change: A guide to methods, measures, and practices 1983 Wiley-Interscience New York 71 138
G.W. Cheung R.S. Lau Testing mediation and suppression effects of latent variables: Bootstrapping with structural equation models Organizational Research Methods 11 2008 296 325
Y. Cohen-Charash P.E. Spector The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 86 2001 278 321
J.A. Colquitt On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure Journal of Applied Psychology 86 2001 386 400
J.A. Colquitt D.E. Conlon M.J. Wesson C.O.L.H. Porter K.Y. Ng Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research Journal of Applied Psychology 86 2001 425 445
J.A. Colquitt J. Greenberg B.A. Scott Organizational justice: Where do we stand? J. Greenberg J.A. Colquitt Handbook of organizational justice 2005 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Mahwah, NJ 589 619
J.A. Colquitt J.C. Shaw How should organizational justice be measured? J. Greenberg J.A. Colquitt Handbook of organizational justice 2005 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Mahwah, NJ 113 154
R. Cropanzano D.E. Bowen S.W. Gilliland The management of organizational justice Academy of Management Perspectives 21 2007 34 48
R. Cropanzano Z.S. Byrne D.R. Bobocel D.E. Rupp Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice Journal of Vocational Behavior 58 2001 164 209
F. De Zanet I. Hansez M. Bossut C. Vandenberghe V. De Keyser Analyse du discours de travailleurs confrontés à des changements organisationnels: Une perspective transactionnelle [Analysis of the discourse of workers confronted with organizational changes: A transactional perspective] Travail Humain-Human Work 67 2004 257 281
R. Eisenberger J. Cummings S. Armeli P. Lynch Perceived organizational support, discretionary treatment, and job satisfaction Journal of Applied Psychology 82 1997 812 820
J. Greenberg The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice R. Cropanzano Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management 1993 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Hillsdale, NJ 79 103
L. Grunberg R. Anderson-Connolly E.S. Greenberg Surviving layoffs: The effects on organizational commitment and job performance Work and Occupations 27 2000 7 31
A.F. Hayes Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium Communication Monographs 76 2009 408 420
A.F. Hayes Mediation and moderation: Modern method and approaches. Course presented at the Stats Camp organized by Kansas University 2012 Lawrence KS, United States
A.F. Hayes Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach 2013 The Guilford Press New York, NY
B.C. Holtz C.M. Harold Fair today, fair tomorrow? A longitudinal investigation of overall justice perceptions Journal of Applied Psychology 94 2009 1185 1199
L.R. James S.S. Mulaik J.M. Brett Causal analysis: Assumptions, models, and data 1982 Sage Beverly Hills, CA
S.J. Jaros An assessment of Meyer and Allen's (1991) three-component model of organizational commitment and turnover intentions Journal of Vocational Behavior 51 1997 319 337
D.A. Jones M.L. Martens The mediating role of overall fairness and the moderating role of trust certainty in justice-criteria relationships: The formation and use of fairness heuristics in the workplace Journal of Organizational Behavior 30 2009 1025 1051
K. Jöreskog D. Sörbom Lisrel 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the simplis command language 2006 Scientific Software International Lincolnwood, IL
T.-Y. Kim K. Leung Forming and reacting to overall fairness: A cross-cultural comparison Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 104 2007 83 95
R.B. Kline Principles and practice of structural equation modeling: Third edition 2011 The Guilford Press New York, NY
E.A. Lind Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations J. Greenberg R. Cropanzano Advances in organizational justice 2001 Stanford University Press Stanford, CA 56 88
E.A. Lind Thinking critically about justice judgment Journal of Vocational Behavior 58 2001 220 226
E.A. Lind K. van den Bos When fairness works: Toward a general theory of uncertainty management Research in Organizational Behavior 24 2002 181 223
T.D. Little Specifying and interpreting a longitudinal panel model T. Little N. Card Longitudinal structural equation modeling (chap. 6) 2013 Guilford New York, NY 180 208
T.D. Little M. Rhemtulla K. Gibson A.M. Schoemann Why the items versus parcels controversy need not be one Psychological Methods 18 2013 285 300
D. MacKinnon C. Lockwood J. Williams Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods Multivariate Behavioral Research 39 2004 99 128
P. Manogran J. Stauffer E.J. Conlon Leader-member exchange as a key mediating variable between employees' perceptions of fairness and organizational citizenship behaviors 1994 Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management Dallas, TX
S.S. Masterson K. Lewis B.M. Goldman M.S. Taylor Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships Academy of Management Journal 43 2000 738 748
A.W. Meade A.M. Watson C.M. Kroustalis Assessing common methods bias in organizational research 2007 Paper presented at the 22nd Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology New York, NY
J.P. Meyer N.J. Allen A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment Human Resource Management Review 1 1991 61 98
J.P. Meyer N.J. Allen C.A. Smith Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization Journal of Applied Psychology 78 1993 538 551
S. Oreg K. van Dam Organisational justice in the context of organisational change Netherlands Journal of Psychology 65 2008 127 135
P. Podsakoff S. MacKenzie J. Lee N. Podsakoff Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies Journal of Applied Psychology 88 2003 879 903
K. Preacher A. Hayes SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 36 2004 717 731
A.E. Rafferty S.L.D. Restubog The impact of change process and context on change reactions and turnover during a merger Journal of Management 36 2010 1309 1338
J.B. Rodell J.A. Colquitt Looking ahead in times of uncertainty: The role of anticipatory justice in an organizational change context Journal of Applied Psychology 94 2009 989 1002
D. Shapiro The death of justice theory is likely if theorists neglect the "wheels" already invented and the voices of the injustice victims Journal of Vocational Behavior 58 2001 235 242
P.E. Shrout N. Bolger Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations Psychological Methods 7 2002 422 445
M. Sobel Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models S. Leinhart Sociological methodology 1982 Jossey-Bass San Francisco, CA 290 312
K.Y. Tornblom R. Vermunt An integrative perspective on social justice: Distributive and procedural fairness evaluations of positive and negative outcome allocations Social Justice Research 12 1999 39 64
