Ecoefficiency; Hybrid electric vehicle; Batteries; Ultracapacitors; Hydraulic energy storage system; response surface model; multi objective optimization; multi objective genetic algorithm
Abstract :
[en] The main objective of vehicle powertrain hybridization is to improve the fuel consumption and environment pollutants impact (Eco-score) without decreasing the vehicle performances and other user satisfaction criteria. The Eco efficiency is a global index which accounts for both environmental impacts and user satisfaction. The Hybrid vehicles ability to overcome these two requirements depends on the optimal choice of their key mechanical, electric or hydraulic components. Some energy storage systems like ultra capacitors and hydraulic system are environmentally friendly and meet some user satisfaction criteria like daily cost, security, short charge/discharge duration and long life service. On the contrary, others like batteries have some times a environmental impact mitigate. The objective of this study is to establish a comparison between HEV (hybrid electric vehicle) and HHV(hybrid hydraulic vehicle) configuration by highlighting the effect of different energy storage systems (batteries, ultra capacitors, hydraulic system), mechanical and electric components sizes (engine, motors) upon the optimized HEV design taking care of both Eco-score and User satisfaction for different driving scenarios. The approach is formulated as a multidisciplinary optimization problem. At first, the HEV and HHV are modeled and simulated using ADVISOR (advanced vehicle simulator) with respect to several driving situations. Then emissions can be determined and the Ecoscore indicator can be calculated. User Satisfaction can be evaluated based on performance criteria extracted from ADVISOR simulation and on simple evaluation tools relying on the state-of-the art of technological information for safety, reliability and daily cost. The design problem is stated as follows: select mechanical, electric or hydraulic components (e.g. engine, motor and energy storage system sizes) to minimize the Ecoscore indicator and to maximize user satisfaction criteria subject to catalogue constraints on the choice of the components. The approach is illustrated on applications dealing with mild parallel hybrid buses. Results show that the hybrid electric buses using ultra capacitors have almost the same performances as those using batteries. However, the preferred choice would go towards super capacities because they have other appreciable properties compared to the batteries: the very high lifetime, high efficiency of charge and discharge and no polluting recyclability. Despite a smaller fuel saving than a HEV, the HHV technology has a chance to compete with HEV because of the hydraulic components low cost (industrial maturity), no pollutants recyclability due to the possible using of water as motor/pump fluid. HHV technology is a possible alternative in niche markets such as urban buses; bin-lorries or heavy urban delivery vehicles.
Disciplines :
Electrical & electronics engineering Engineering, computing & technology: Multidisciplinary, general & others Energy
Author, co-author :
Nzisabira, Jonathan ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département d'aérospatiale et mécanique > Ingénierie des véhicules terrestres
Louvigny, Yannick ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département d'aérospatiale et mécanique > Ingénierie des véhicules terrestres
Duysinx, Pierre ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département d'aérospatiale et mécanique > Ingénierie des véhicules terrestres
Language :
English
Title :
Comparison of Ultra Capacitors, Hydraulic Accumulators and Batteries Technologies to Optimize Hybrid Vehicle Ecoefficiency
Publication date :
March 2009
Event name :
POWERENG 2009, IEEE Int. Conf. of Power Engineering, Energy and Electric Drives
Event organizer :
IEEE
Event place :
Lisbonne, Portugal
Event date :
March 18-20
Audience :
International
Main work title :
Proceeding of 2nd IEEE Int. Conference of Power Engineering, Energy, and Electric Drives
C. Chan and K. Chau, Modern Electric Vehicle Technology. Oxford Science Publications, 2001.
Z. Filipi, L. Louca, B. Daran, C. Lin, U. Yildir, B. Wu, M. Kokko-laras, D. Assanis, H. Peng, P. Papalambros, J. Stein, D. Szubiel, and R. Chapp, "Combined optimization of design and power management of a hydraulic hybrid propulsion system for 6x6 medium truck," Int. J. of Heavy Vehicles Systems, vol. 11, no. 3/4, pp. 372-401, 2004.
J. Garcelon, T. Market, and K. Wipke, "Hybrid vehicle design optimization," in Proceedings of AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO 8th Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Long Beach, CA, September 6-8, 2000, 2000.
M. Montazeri-Gh and A. Pourmasad, "Appplication of genetic algorithm for simultaneous optimization of hev component sizing and control strategy," Int. J. Alternative Propulsion, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 63-78, 2006.
T. Markel, A. Booker, T. Hendriks, V. Johnson, E Kelly, B. Kramer, M. O'Keefe, S. Sprik, and K. Wipke, "Advisor: a system analysis tool for advanced modeling," Journal of Power Sources, vol. 111 no. 2, pp. 255-266, 2002.
Y. Radovcic and A. Remouchamps, "Boss quattro: an open system for parametric design," Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 140-152, 2002.
MAXWELL, "http://www.maxwell.com," Internet Ressources, 2008.
F. V. Loo, S. Christiaens, J. Nzisabira, P. Mathieu, and P. Duysinx, "Technical and economical study of a new hydraulic motor pump," ENERCARE Project - Technical Report for the Walloon Region of Belgium, 2005, (in French).
T. Gillespie, Fundamentals of vehicle Dynamics. Society of Automotive Engineers, 1992.
H. Joksch, D. Massie, and R. Pichler, "Vehicle aggressivity: Fleet characterization using traffic collision data," Internal Report, The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, February 1998.
J. V. Mierlo, "How to define clean vehicles? environmental rating of vehicles," Int. Journal of Automotive Technology, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 77-86, 2003.
W. J. Roux, N. Stander, and R. T. Haftka, "Response surface approximations for structural optimization," International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 517-534, 1998.
R. Jin, W Chen, and T. Simpson, "Comparative studies of metamod-elling techniques under multiple modelling criteria," Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1-13, 2001.
S. David, "Les plans d'expriences et les surfaces de rponse dans boss-quattro," Internal Report. SAMTECH S.A, February 1998.