Concertation multidisciplinaire; Projet thérapeutique
Abstract :
[fr] Le patient atteint de cancer bénéficie à l’heure
actuelle d’une médecine très technique, de plus en plus ciblée
et individualisée. Et l’Homme dans tout cela
? Divers outils
ont été développés afin d’aider les médecins et l’ensemble
des soignants à concilier la médecine contemporaine et les
droits fondamentaux du patient. Parmi ceux-ci, on trouve les
Concertations Oncologiques Multidisciplinaires (COM) ainsi
que les recommandations de traitement publiées par les socié
-
tés scientifiques nationales ou internationales. La prise en
charge des patients doit être interdisciplinaire et basée sur une
médecine factuelle. Ce processus de prise de décisions parta
-
gée doit, au final, être en accord avec les souhaits du patient.
Cette approche doit lui permettre de conserver son autonomie
et d’être l’acteur principal dans les prises de décision.
Disciplines :
Oncology
Author, co-author :
BARTHELEMY, Nicole ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Radiothérapie
BOGA, Deniz ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Radiothérapie
PRINCEN, Fabienne ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Radiothérapie
THIRION, Carine ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Salle de médecine interne infectiologie -1C
DAMAS, François ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Anesthésie et réanimation
BRICHANT, Jean-François ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Anesthésie et réanimation
COUCKE, Philippe ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Radiothérapie
Language :
French
Title :
Quelle est la place de l'humain au sein des recommandations, des concertations oncologiques multidisciplinaires et du projet thérapeutique
Publication date :
2014
Journal title :
Revue Médicale de Liège
ISSN :
0370-629X
eISSN :
2566-1566
Publisher :
Université de Liège. Revue Médicale de Liège, Liège, Belgium
Loi du 22 AoÛt 2002 Relative Aux Droits du Patient (Moniteur Belge du 26 Septembre 2002), , http://economie.fgov.be/fr/modules/regulation/loi/ 20020822_l_droits_patient_mb_20020926_.jsp
Orgerie, M.B., Duchange, N., Pélicier, N., Decision process in oncology: The importance of multidisciplinary meeting (2010) Bull Cancer, 97, pp. 255-264
Strong, S., Blencowe, N.S., Fox, T., The role of multi-disciplinary teams in decision-making for patients with recurrent malignant disease (2012) Palliat Med, 26, pp. 954-958
Innes, S., Payne, S., Advanced cancer patients' prognostic information preferences: A review (2009) Palliat Med, 23, pp. 29-39
Sisler, J., McCormack-Speak, P., Bridging the gap between primary care and the cancer system: The UPCON Network of Cancer Care Manitoba (2009) Can Fam Physician, 55, pp. 273-278
Patkar, V., Acosta, D., Davidson, T., Cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: Evidence, challenges, and the role of clinical decision support technology (2011) Int J Breast Cancer, p. 831605
Lamb, B.W., Brown, K.F., Nagpal, K., Quality of care management decisions by multidisciplinary cancer teams: A systematic review (2011) Ann Surg Oncol, 18, pp. 2116-2125
Castel, P., Tassy, L., Lurkin, A., Multidisciplinarity and medical decision, impact for patients with cancer: Sociological assessment of two tumour committees' organization (2012) Bull Cancer, 99, pp. E34-E42
Blazeby, J.M., Wilson, L., Metcalfe, C., Nicklin, J., English, R., Donovan, J.L., Analysis of clinical decision-making in multi-disciplinary cancer teams (2006) Annals of Oncology, 17 (3), pp. 457-460. , DOI 10.1093/annonc/mdj102
Vinod, S.K., Sidhom, M.A., Delaney, G.P., Do multidisciplinary meetings follow guideline-based care? (2010) J Oncol Pract, 6, pp. 276-281
Sackett, D.L., Rosenberg, W.M., The need for evidence-based medicine (1995) J R Soc Med, 88, pp. 620-624
Wishart, G.C., Greenberg, D.C., Chou, P., Treatment and survival in breast cancer in the Eastern Region of England (2010) Ann Oncol, 21, pp. 291-296
Hay, M.C., Weisner, T.S., Subramanian, S., Harnessing experience: Exploring the gap between evidence-based medicine and clinical practice (2008) J Eval Clin Pract, 14, pp. 707-713
Politi, M.C., Studts, J.L., Hayslip, J.W., Shared decision making in oncology practice: What do oncologists need to know? (2012) Oncologist, 17, pp. 91-100
Dimoska, A., Butow, P.N., Dent, E., Arnold, B., Brown, R.F., Tattersall, M.H.N., An examination of the initial cancer consultation of medical and radiation oncologists using the Cancode interaction analysis system (2008) British Journal of Cancer, 98 (9), pp. 1508-1514. , DOI 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604348, PII 6604348
Laude, C., Deygas, S., Withholding and withdrawal decisions in oncology: Legal frame and practice (2009) Bull Cancer, 96, pp. 777-784
Dimoska, A., Butow, P.N., Lynch, J., Implementing patient question-prompt lists into routine cancer care (2012) Patient Educ Couns, 86, pp. 252-258
Razavi, D., Merckaert, I., Marchal, S., Libert, Y., Conradt, S., Boniver, J., Etienne, A.-M., Delvaux, N., How to optimize physicians' communication skills in cancer care: Results of a randomized study assessing the usefulness of posttraining consolidation workshops (2003) Journal of Clinical Oncology, 21 (16), pp. 3141-3149. , DOI 10.1200/JCO.2003.08.031
Audrey, S., Abel, J., Blazeby, J.M., What oncologists tell patients about survival benefits of palliative chemotherapy and implications for informed consent: Qualitative study (2008) BMJ, 337, pp. a752
Hancock, K., Clayton, J.M., Parker, S.M., Wal Der, S., Butow, P.N., Carrick, S., Currow, D., Tattersall, M.H.N., Truth-telling in discussing prognosis in advanced life-limiting illnesses: A systematic review (2007) Palliative Medicine, 21 (6), pp. 507-517. , DOI 10.1177/0269216307080823
Tang, J.I., Shakespeare, T.P., Lu, J.J., Patients' preference for radiotherapy fractionation schedule in the palliation of symptomatic unresectable lung cancer (2008) J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol, 52, pp. 497-502
