Princípio da precaução como uma ferramenta estratégica para redesenhar a (sub)política: compreensão e perspectivas da ciência política de língua Francesa
[en] The precautionary principle falls under a decisional context in evolution, marked by a multidimensional uncertainty as for environmental, economic, social, political or ethical consequences of the technological innovations. In French-speaking political science, it is understood as a strategic tool, a political response to the emergence of a new flow of societal uncertainty, mainly directed towards the hesitations of the scientific world. We argue that the precautionary principle redefines the way to manage scientific uncertainty in a society characterized by the blurring of the borders between political and subpolitical actors. Around its application, a line of fracture is drawn, which reduces the decisional breathing space of certain subpolitical entities and/or encourages others to act more. However, we stress that in a world ever more globalised and interconnected, the application of the precautionary principle only has temporary and local effects. Nevertheless, it may contribute to important debates that need to be taken up further in institutional spaces for reflexive anticipatory action and decision-making support
Research center :
SPIRAL, pôle de recherche en science, technologie et société
Disciplines :
Political science, public administration & international relations Sociology & social sciences
Author, co-author :
Brunet, Sébastien ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de science politique > Gouvernance et société
Delvenne, Pierre ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de science politique > Gouvernance et société
Joris, Geoffrey ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de science politique > Gouvernance et société
Language :
Portuguese
Title :
Princípio da precaução como uma ferramenta estratégica para redesenhar a (sub)política: compreensão e perspectivas da ciência política de língua Francesa
Alternative titles :
[en] The Precautionary Principle as a Strategic Tool for Redesigning (sub-)Politics. Understanding and perpectives from French-speaking political science
Publication date :
2011
Journal title :
Sociologias
ISSN :
1517-4522
eISSN :
1807-0337
Publisher :
SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online, São Paulo, Brazil
Blok, A. Experts on Public Trial: On Democratizing Expertise through a Danish Consensus Conference. Public Understanding of Science, 16, 2007.
Brunet, S. Société du risque: quelles réponses politiques?. Paris: L'Harmattan, 2007.
Brun, Jensen C. Citizen Projects and Consensus-Building at the Danish Board of Technology: On Experiments in Democracy. Acta Sociologica, 48-3, 2005.
Blor, D. Knowledge and Social Imagery. Londres: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1976.
Chalmers, A. Qu'est-ce que la science?. Paris: Éditions La Découverte, 1987.
Comte, A. Cours de philosophie positive. Paris: Hermann, 1975.
Cousy, H. A propos de la notion de précaution. Risques, n° 21, jan-mar, 1995.
Crozier, M. Le phénomène bureaucratique. Paris: Seuil, Coll. Points, 1963.
Delvene P. Science, technologie et innovation sur le chemin de la réflexivité. Mise en perspective des offices parlementaires de Technology Assessment, Louvain-La-Neuve: Academia Bruylant, 2011. (no prelo).
Delvene, P.; Rip, A. Reflexive Modernization in Action: Pathways of Science and Technology Institutions. Social Science Information, 2010.
Dubuison, B. Regards croisés sur le principe de precaution. In: Hupet, P. (dir.). Risque et systèmes complexes: les enjeux de la communication. Bruxelles: Peter Lang Edition, 2001.
Eraly, A. Réflexivité, pouvoir, idéologie et rapport à soi. In: Audet, M.; Bou-chikhi, H. Structuration du social et modernité avancée. Sainte-Foy: Les Presses de l'Université Laval, 1993.
Ewald, F. Philosophie de la precaution. L'année sociologique, n( 46, 1996a.
Ewald, F. Histoire de l'Etat providence. Col. Biblio-essais. Paris: Grasset,, 1996b.
Feyerabend, P. Science in a Free Society. Londres: New Left Books, 1978.
Feyerabend, P. Contre la méthode. Esquisse d'une théorie anarchiste de la connaissance. Paris: Seuil, 1979.
Fourez, G. La construction des sciences. Bruxelles: De Boeck, 1986.
Gidens, A. Une théorie critique de la modernité avancée. In: Audet, M.; Bouchikhi, H. Structuration du social et modernité avancée, Sainte-Foy: Les Presses de l'Université Laval, 1993.
Gidens, A. The Consequences of Modernity. Oxford: Polity Press, 1997.
Gilies, D. Philosophy of Science in the Twentieth Century. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1993.
Habermas, J. La technique et la science comme idéologie. Paris: Denoël-Gonthier (Médiations), 1978.
Heideger, M. La question de la technique. In: Essais et Conférences, Paris: Gallimard, 1980.
Hey, E. The precautionary approach, implications of the revisions of the Oslo and Paris Conventions. Marine Policy, jul 1991.
Hotois, G. Le paradigme bioéthique. Une éthique de la technoscience. Col. Sciences éthiques sociétés. Bruxelles: De Boeck Université, 1990.
Jonas, H. Le principe responsabilité: une éthique pour la civilisation technologique. Paris: Les Editions du Cerf., 1990.
Jos, S.; Beluci, S. Participatory Technology Assessment. European Perspectives. London: Centre for the Study of Democracy, 2002.
Kant, E. Critique de la raison pure. Paris: Aubier, 1997.
Kourilsky, P.; Viney, G. Le principe de précaution - Rapport au Premier ministre, Paris: Editions Odile Jacob, La Documentation française, 2000.
Kuhn, T. La structure des révolutions scientifiques. Paris: Flammarion, 1983.
Lakatos, I.; Musgrave, A. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974.
Latour, B. La vie de laboratoire. Paris: La Découverte, 1988.
Latour, B. La science en action. Paris: La Découverte, 1989.
Latour, B. Nous n'avons jamais été modernes. Essai d'anthropologie symétrique, Paris: La Découverte, 1994.
Mol, A. The refinement of production: Ecological modernization theory and the chemical industry. Utrecht: Van Arkel, 1995.
Mol, A.; Spargaren, G. Ecological modernization theory in debate: A review. In: Mol, A.; Sonenfeld, D. Ecological modernization around the world: Perspectives and critical debates. London: Frank Cass, 2000.
Moufe, C. The Return of the Political. London and New York: Verso, 1993.
Moufe, C. The Democratic Paradox. London and New York: Verso, 2000.
Noivile, C. Du bon gouvernement des risqué. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2003.
Poper, K. Conjectures and Refutations. The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1963.
Rip, A.; Schot, J. The Past and Future of Constructive Technology Assessment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 54-2, 1997.
Roqueplo, P. Penser la technique. Paris: Seuil, 1983.
Stebing, A. Environmental capacity and the precautionary principle. Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 24, n° 6, 1992.
Stirling, A. Opening up' and Closing down. Power, Participation and Pluralism in the Social Appraisal of Technology. Science, Technology & Human Values, 33, 2008.
Weber, M. Economie et société. Paris: Plon, 1971.
York, R. Rosa, E. Key Challenges to Ecological Modernization Theory: Institutional Efficacy, Case Study Evidence, Units of Analysis, and the Pace of Eco-Efficiency. Organization Environment, vol. 16-273, 2003.
