[en] We retrospectively studied outcome of a sample of 36 congenitally deaf children who were fitted with either a conventional hearing aid or a cochlear implant and who received many years of audio-phonatory training.To rate auditory capacity and speech intelligibility, we used commonly used metrics: CAP and SIR. At the end of the 5-Years period, CAP and SIR scores of cochlear implant children are significantly higher than those of conventional hearing aid children. This study is one of few that evaluates outcome of conventional hearing aid and cochlear implant fitting with age matched congenitally deaf children anno 2000.
Disciplines :
Oto-rhino-laryngologie
Auteur, co-auteur :
Lejeune, Brigitte ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cognitives > Département des sciences cognitives
Demanez, Laurent; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > ORL
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
Speech discrimination and intelligibility: outcome of deaf children fitted with hearing aids or cochlear implants.
Titre traduit :
[fr] Discrimination de la parole et intelligibilité vocale: évaluation d'enfants sourds porteurs de prothèses conventionnelles ou cochléaires
Date de publication/diffusion :
2006
Titre du périodique :
B-ENT
ISSN :
1781-782X
eISSN :
2684-4907
Maison d'édition :
Royal Belgian Society for Ear, Nose, Throat, Head and Neck Surgery
Demanez L, Renglet T, Bernard C, Vanderheyden C, Demanez JP. Cochlear implants [in French]. Rev Med Liege. 2000;55:833-838.
Uziel AS, Reuillard-Artieres F, Sillon M, et al. Speech perception performance in prelingually deafened children with the nucleus multichannel cochlear implant. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 1995;50:114-118.
Allen MC, Nikolopoulos TP, O'Donoghue GM. Speech intelligibility in children after cochlear implantation. Am J Otol. 1998;19:742-746.
Cochard N, Vidal MF, Baciocchi D, Cormary X, Honegger A, Fraysse B. Development of different linguistic systems in children with a cochlear implant [in French]. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 1998;119:277-279.
Schauwers K, Gillis S, Daemers K, De Beukelaer C, Govaerts PJ. Cochlear implantation between 5 and 20 months of age: the onset of babbling and the audiologic outcome. Otol Neurotol. 2004;25:263-270.
Waltzman S, Cohen N, Shapiro W. Effects of cochlear implantation on the young deaf child. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 1995;50:125-128.
Inscoe J. Communication outcomes after paediatric cochlear implantation. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1999;47:195-200.
O'Neill C, O'Donoghue GM, Archbold SM, Nikolopoulos TP, Sach T. Variations in gains in auditory performance from pediatric cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol. 2002;23:44-48.
Manrique M, Cervera-Paz FJ, Huarte A, Perez N, Molina M, Garcia-Tapia R. Cerebral auditory plasticity and cochlear implants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1999;49:S193-197.
O'Donoghue GM, Nikolopoulos TP, Archbold SM. Determinants of speech perception in children after cochlear implantation. Lancet. 2000;356(9228):466-468.
International Bureau for Audiophonology. Audiometric classification of hearing impairments. Biap recommendation 02/1bis. Available at: http://www.biap.org.
Bluma SM, Shearer MS, Frohman AH, Hilliard JM. Guide Portage d' Intervention précoce. Editions de la Collectivité, Montréal; 1976:fiches 1-98.
Courtat P, Peytral C, Elbaz P. Explorations fonctionnelles en ORL. Masson, Paris; 1995:30.
Vieu A, Mondain M, Sillon M, Piron JP, Uziel A. The test for the evaluation speech perception and production [in French]. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 1999;120:219-225.
Lafon JC. Le Test Phonétique et la Mesure de l'Audition. Editions Centrex, Eindhoven; 1964:138-149, 235.
Archbold S, Lutman ME, Marshall DH. Categories of auditory performance. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1995;166:312-314.
Archbold S, Lutman ME, Nikolopoulos T. Categories of auditory performance: inter-user reliability. Br J Audiol. 1998;32:7-12.
