Reference : A comparison of budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy vs. convention...
Scientific journals : Article
Human health sciences : Cardiovascular & respiratory systems
http://hdl.handle.net/2268/7098
A comparison of budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy vs. conventional best practice in asthma management.
English
Louis, Renaud mailto [Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Pneumologie-Allergologie >]
Joos, G. [> > > >]
Michils, A. [> > > >]
Vandenhoven, G. [> > > >]
2009
International Journal of Clinical Practice
Blackwell Publishing
63
10
1479-88
Yes (verified by ORBi)
International
1368-5031
1742-1241
Oxford
United Kingdom
[en] OBJECTIVE: To study the effectiveness and safety of budesonide/formoterol (Symbicort) Maintenance And Reliever Therapy (Symbicort SMART, AstraZeneca, Sodertalje, Sweden), a simplified management approach with one inhaler compared with conventional best practice (CBP) with multiple inhalers in patients with persistent asthma. DESIGN: Open-label randomised controlled parallel group trial, 6-month treatment. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 908 patients > or = 12 years of age, with persistent asthma receiving treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), either alone or in conjunction with long-acting beta(2)-agonist. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time to first severe asthma exacerbation and number of severe asthma exacerbations. RESULTS: No difference between groups was seen in time to first severe exacerbation (p = 0.75). Exacerbation rates were low in both groups. A total of 12 patients in the Symbicort SMART group experienced a total of 14 severe asthma exacerbations, and 19 patients in the CBP group experienced a total of 25 severe asthma exacerbations (annual rate 0.07 vs. 0.13 p = 0.09). The mean daily dose of ICS expressed in BDP equivalent was significantly lower in the Symbicort SMART group (including as-needed use) vs. in the CBP group (749 microg vs. 1059 microg; p < 0.0001). Mean scores in Asthma Control Questionnaire, 5 question version improved significantly in the SMART group compared with the CBP group (p = 0.0026). Symbicort SMART and CBP were equally well tolerated. The mean drug cost/patient/month was significantly lower for the patients in the Symbicort SMART group compared with patients receiving CBP (51.3 euros vs. 66.5 euros; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In Belgian patients, a simplified regimen using budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy was at least as effective at improving clinical control compared with CBP with a significantly lower ICS dose and significantly lower drug costs.
http://hdl.handle.net/2268/7098
10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02185.x
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/122596958/issue

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Open access
A comparison of budesonide_formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy vs conventional._Louis_09_IntJClinPract.pdfAuthor postprint145.55 kBView/Open

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.