[en] In a previous study, Hughes et al. [Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93 (1996)
2065-2070] demonstrated that the amyloid peptide is able to interact with itself
in a two-hybrid system and that interaction is specific. They further supported
that the method could be used to define the sequences that might be important in
nucleation-dependent aggregation. The sequence of the amyloid peptide can be
split into four clusters, two hydrophilic (1-16 and 22-28) and two hydrophobic
(17-21 and 29-42). We designed by molecular modeling and tested by the two-hybrid
approach, series of mutations spread all over the sequence and changing the
distribution of hydrophobicity and/or the spatial hindrance. In the two-hybrid
assay, interaction of native Abeta is reproduced. Screening of mutations
demonstrates that the C-domain (residues 29-40 (42)), the median domain (residues
17-22) and the N-domain (1-16) are all crucial for interaction. This demonstrates
that almost all fragments of the amyloid peptide but a loop (residues 23-28) and
the C-term amino acid are important for the native interaction. We support that
the folded three-dimensional (3D) structure is the Abeta-Abeta interacting
species, that the whole sequence is involved in that 3D fold which has a low
secondary structure propensity and a high susceptibility to mutations and thus
should have a low stability. The native fold of Abeta could be stabilized in
Abeta-Abeta complexes which could in other circumstances facilitate the
nucleation event of aggregation that leads to the formation of stable senile
plaques.
Lee J.P., Stimson E.R., Ghilardi J.R., Mantyh P.W., Lu Y.A., Felix A.M., Llanos W., Behbin A., Cummings M., Van Criekinge M., Timms W., Maggio J.E. Biochemistry 1995, 34:5191-5200.
Coles M., Bicknell W., Watson A.A., Fairlie D.P., Craik D.J. Biochemistry 1998, 37:11064-11077.
Hughes S.R., Goyal S., Sun J.E., Gonzalez-DeWhitt P., Fortes M., Riedel N.G., Sahasrabudhe S.R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93:2065-2070.
Lansbury P.T.J., Costa P.R., Griffiths J.M., Simon E.J., Auger M., Halverson K.J., Kocisko D.A., Hendsch Z.S., Ashburn T.T., Spencer R.G. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1995, 2:990-998.
Pillot T., Goethals M., Vanloo B., Talussot C., Brasseur R., Vandekerckhove J., Rosseneu M., Lins L. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271:28757-28765.
Brasseur R. J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266:16120-16127.
Horth M., Lambrecht B., Khim M.C., Bex F., Thiriart C., Ruysschaert J.M., Burny A., Brasseur R. EMBO J. 1991, 10:2747-2755.
Ausubel F.M., Brent R., Kingston R.E., Moore D.D., Seidman J.G., Smith J.A., Struhl K. (1994) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology., Wiley, New York; 1362-1375.
Boyles J., Fox J.E.B., Phillips P.E., Stenberg P.E. J. Cell Biol. 1985, 101:1463-1472.