Reference : Flexibility and Security : What forms of Political Regulation ?
Scientific journals : Article
Social & behavioral sciences, psychology : Sociology & social sciences
Flexibility and Security : What forms of Political Regulation ?
Nachi, Mohamed mailto [Université de Liège - ULiège > Institut des sciences humaines et sociales > Sociologie des nouvelles dynamiques sociales >]
Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research
Quarterly of the European Trade Union Institute
Yes (verified by ORBi)
[en] Flexibility of Labour - flexicurity - Security - Regulation - Welfare State
[en] The article examines the strengths and weaknesses of the concept of ‘flexicurity’, calling into question the tendency of the contemporary cultural imagination to regard flexibility as a framework for the expression of individual freedom. It then describes a range of possible policy options, in relation to the market, in the perspective of combining flexibility of labour and security of persons. Tree major options emerge: the ‘procedural’, the ‘neo-substantive’ and the ‘partnership’ options. As a conclusion, this article comes out in favour of different policy which would alter the framework for public intervention. It specially underlines the need for a ‘flexible’ and ‘decentred’ Welfare State, capable of supporting and encompassing forms of regulation emanating from civil society, in particular – but not exclusively – from the social partners.
Researchers ; Professionals ; Students ; General public

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

Open access
Nachi 2004 Flexibility and Security Transfert.pdfPublisher postprint1.31 MBView/Open

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.