Stéréotypes prescriptifs et avantages des groupes dominants

Delacollette, Nathalie; Dardenne, Benoît; Dumont, Muriel

doi:10.4074/s0003503310001053

Download

Article (Scientific journals)

Stéréotypes prescriptifs et avantages des groupes dominants

Delacollette, Nathalie; Dardenne, Benoît; Dumont, Muriel

2010 • In Année Psychologique, 110, p. 127-156

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2268/40736

DOI
10.4074/s0003503310001053

Files (1)Send to Details Statistics Bibliography Similar publications

Files

Full Text

Delacollette Dardenne Dumont 2010.pdf

Publisher postprint (179.58 kB)

Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Keywords :

psychologie sociale; stéréotype; prescription

Abstract :

[en] The prescriptive component of stereotypes is defined as a set of beliefs about the characteristics group members should possess. It has mainly been studied regarding gender stereotypes. We believe that the main function of this prescriptive component is to allow dominant group members to maintain subordinate group members in an advantageous position for themselves. To illustrate our proposal, we present several theoretical and empirical papers, showing that the relative status of social groups is a determinant of which characteristics are prescribed to the members of these groups; that subordinates who fail to conform to the prescription are sanctioned; and that dominants prescribe to subordinates characteristics they see as beneficial to their own group.

Research Center/Unit :

Centre de Neurosciences Cognitives et Comportementales - ULiège

Disciplines :

Social, industrial & organizational psychology

Author, co-author :

Delacollette, Nathalie ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cognitives > Psychologie sociale

Dardenne, Benoît ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cognitives > Psychologie sociale

Dumont, Muriel ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Interface Entreprises-Université

Language :

French

Title :

Stéréotypes prescriptifs et avantages des groupes dominants

Alternative titles :

[en] Prescriptive stereotypes and dominant groups’ benefits

Publication date :

2010

Journal title :

Année Psychologique

ISSN :

0003-5033

Publisher :

Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, France

Volume :

110

Pages :

127-156

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Available on ORBi :

since 04 May 2010

Statistics

Number of views

292 (22 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

2345 (37 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

OpenAlex citations

Bibliography

Adams, G., Garcia, D. M., Purdie-Vaughns, V., & Steele, C. M. (2006). The detrimental effects of a suggestion of sexism in an instruction situation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 602-615.
Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper & Row.
Alexander, M. G., Brewer, M. B., & Herrmann, R. K. (1999). Images and affect: A functional analysis of out-group stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 78-93.
Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258-290.
Benokraitis, N. V. (1997). Subtle sexism. Current Practices and prospects for change. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Burgess, D., & Borgida, E. (1999). Who women are, who women should be: Descriptive and prescriptive gender stereotyping in sex discrimination. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 5, 665-692.
Cialdini, R. B., & Trost, M. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds), The handbook of social psychology, Vol. 2 (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Conway, M., Pizzamiglio, M. T., & Mount, L. (1996). Status, communal-ity, and agency: Implications for stereotypes of gender and other groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 25-38.
Dardenne, B., Delacollette, N., Grégoire, C., & Lecocq, D. (2006). Latent structure of the french validation of the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: l'Echelle de Sexisme Ambivalent. L'Année psychologique, 106, 235-264.
Dardenne, B., Dumont, M., & Bollier, T. (2007). Insidious dangers of benevolent sexism: Consequences for Women's performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 764-779.
Delacollette, N., Dumont, M., & Dardenne, B (2010). Tell me what is beneficial to dominants and I'll tell you what is prescribed to subordinates. Prescriptive stereotypes in intergroup settings. Manuscript in prep.
Delacollette, N., Dardenne, B., & Du-mont, M. (2010). Benevolent sexism, men's advantages and prescription of warmth to women. Manuscript in prep.
Dickhäuser, O., & Stiensmeier-Pelster, J. (2002). Gender differences in computer work: Evidence for the model of achievement-related choices. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 486-496.
Diekman, A. B., & Goodfriend, W. (2006). Rolling with the changes: a role congruity perspective on gender norms. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 369-383.
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. T. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573-598.
Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M. G., & Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 3-22.
Eccles, J. S. (2007). Where are all the women? Gender differences in participation in physical science and engineering. In W. M. Williams & S. J. Ceci (Eds.) Why aren't women in science: Top researchers debate the evidence. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
Fiske, S. T., Bersoff, D. N., Borgida, E., Deaux, K., & Heilman, M. E. (1991). Social science research on trial : Use of sex stereotyping research in Price Waterhouse vs. Hopkins. American Psychologist, 46, 1049-1060.
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.
Fiske, S. T., Xu, J., Cuddy, A. C., & Glick, P. (1999). (Dis)respecting versus (dis)liking : Status and interdependence predict ambivalent stereotypes of competence and warmth. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 473-489.
Gill, M. J. (2004). When information does not deter stereotyping: Prescriptive stereotyping can foster bias under conditions that deter descriptive stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 619-632.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1999). Sexism and other « isms »: Interdependence, status, and the ambivalent content of stereotypes. In Swann, Jr., W. B., Gilbert, L. A., & Langlois, J. (Eds.), Sexism and Stereotypes in Modern Society : The Gender Science of Janet Taylor Spence. Washington: American Psychological Association.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). Ambivalent stereotypes as legitimizing ideologies: differentiating paternalistic and envious prejudice. In Jost, J. T. & Major, B. (Eds.) The Psychology of Legitimacy: Emerging Perspectives on Ideology, Justice, and In-tergroup Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hamilton, D. L., & Stroessner, S. J. (1994). Social cognition and the study of stereotyping. In Devine, P. G., Hamilton, D. L., & Ostrom, T. M. (Eds), Social cognition: impact on social psychology (pp. 291-321). San Diego: Academic Press.
Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women's ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 657-674.
Heilman, M. E., & Chen, J. J. (2005). Same behaviour, different consequences: reactions to men's and women's altruistic citizenship behaviour. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 431-441.
Heilman, M. E., & Okimoto, T. G. (2007). Why are women penalized for success at male tasks?: The implied communality deficit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 81-92.
Heilman, M. E., Wallen, A. S., Fuchs, D., & Tamkins, M. M. (2004). Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 416-427.
Herbert, J., & Stipeck, D. (2005). The emergence of gender differences in children's perceptions of their academic competence. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 26, 276-295.
Hess, U., Adams, R. B., & Kleck, R. E. (2005). Who may frown and who should smile? Dominance, affiliation, and the display of happiness and anger. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 515-536.
Jackman, M. (1994). The Velvet Glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class and race relations. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false-consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-27.
Jost, J. T., & Burgess, D. (2000). Attitudi-nal ambivalence and the conflict between group and system justification motives in low status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 293-305.
Jost, J. T., Burgess, D., & Mosso, C. O. (2001). Conflicts of legitimation among self, group, and system. The integrative potential of system justification theory. In Jost, J. T. and Major, B. (Eds), The Psychology of Legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2002). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. European Review of Social Psychology, 13, 111-153.
Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498-509.
Jost, J. T., Pelham, B. W., & Carvallo, M. R. (2002). Non-conscious forms of system justification: Implicit and behavioral preferences for higher status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 586-602.
Jost, J. T., Pelham, B. W., Sheldon, O., & Sullivan, B. N. (2003). Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 13-36.
Judd, C. M., James-Hawkins, L., Yzer-byt, V., & Kashima, Y. (2005). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 89, 899-913.
Jussim, L., Coleman, L. M., & Lerch, L. (1987). The nature of stereotypes: A comparison and integration of three theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 536-546.
Katz, D., & Braly, K. (1933). Racial stereotypes in one hundred college students. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 28, 280-290.
Leyens, J.-P., Yzerbyt, V., & Schadron, G. (1994). Stereotypes and social cognition. London: Sage Publications.
Manstead, A. S. R., Hewstone, M., Fiske, S. T., Hogg, M. A., Reis, H. T., Semin, G. R. (Eds) (1995). The Blackwell encyclopedia of social psychology. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Moya, M., Glick, P., Exposito, F., de Lemus, S., & Hart, J. (2007). It's for your own good : Benevolent sexism and women's reactions to protectively justified restrictions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1421-1434.
Phalet, K., & Poppe, E. (1997). Competence and morality dimensions of national and ethnic stereotypes: A study in six Eastern-European countries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 703-723. (Pubitemid 127362998)
Poppe, E., & Linssen, H. (1999). In-group favouritism and the reflection of realistic dimensions of difference between national states in Central and Eastern European nationality stereotypes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 85-102.
Prentice, D. A., & Carranza, E. (2002). What women and men should be, shouldn't be, are allowed to be, and don't have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 269-281.
Rosenberg, S., Nelson, C., & Vivekanan-than, P. S. (1968). A multidimensional approach to the structure of personality impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 283-294.
Rubin, Z., & Peplau, L. A. (1975). Who believes in a just world? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 65-90.
Rudman, L. A., & Fairchild, K. (2004). Reactions to counterstereotypic behaviour: The role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 157-176.
Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (1999). Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1004-1010.
Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 743-762.
Sagar, H. A., & Schofield, J. W. (1980). Racial and behavioral cues in Black and White children's perceptions of ambiguously aggressive acts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 590-598.
Sandnabba, N. K., & Ahlberg, C. (1999). Parents' attitudes and expectations about children's cross-gender behavior. Sex Roles, 40, 249-263.
Schneider, D. J. (2004). The psychology of stereotyping. New York: Guilford Press.
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity and feminity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women's math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4-28.
Spears, R., Oakes, P. J., Ellemers, N., & Haslam, S.A. (1997). The social psychology of stereotyping and group life. Malden: Blackwell.
Stoppard, J. M., & Gunn Gruchy, C. D. (1993). Gender, context, and expression of positive emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 143-150.
Tafarodi, R. W., & Swann, W., B., Jr. (1995). Self-liking and self-competence as dimensions of global self-esteem: Initial validation of a measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65, 322-342.
Tajfel, H. (1981). Social stereotypes and social groups. In Turner, J. C. & Giles, H. (Eds), Intergroup Behaviour. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Timmers, M., Fischer, A. H., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2003). Ability versus vulnerability: Beliefs about men's and women's emotional behaviour. Cognition and Emotion, 17, 41-63.
Yzerbyt, V., Provost, V., & Corneille, O. (2005). Not competent but warm... Really? Compensatory stereotypes in the french-speaking world. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 8, 291-308.
Yzerbyt, V., & Schadron, G. (1994). Stéréotypes et jugement social. In Bourhis, R. Y. & Leyens, J.-P. (Eds). Stéréotypes, discrimination et relations intergroupes. Liège : Mardaga
Wyer, R. S. Jr. (Ed) (1998). Stereotype activation and inhibition. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.