[en] A new spin trap, the 5-(diethoxyphosphorylmethyl)-5-methyl-4,5-dihydro-3H-pyrrole N-oxide (3),
is prepared through a four-step synthetic route. The in vitro spin trapping properties of 3 have been investigated and the hydroxyl and superoxide spin adducts characterised. The persistence of the superoxide spin adduct obtained with 3 is compared with those of the analogues obtained with DEPMPO [5-(diethoxyphosphoryl)-5-methyl-4,5-dihydro-3H-pyrrole N-oxide] and DMPO in both phosphate buffer and pyridine. In 0.1 M phosphate buffer at pH 7.0, the HOO-3? adduct is found to be 2.8 times more persistent than HOO-DMPO?, but 5.7 times less than HOO-DEPMPO?. In phosphate buffer, HOO-3? decomposes to give HO-3?. The stereoselectivity of the addition of free radicals on 3 is generally poor, and mixtures of diastereomers have been observed by EPR. The overall spin trapping behaviour of nitrone 3 is more similar to that of DMPO than that of DEPMPO.
(a) Oxidative Stress, H. Sies, ed., Academic Press, London, 1985;
(b) B. Halliwell and J. M. C. Gutteridge, Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2nd edn., 1989;
(c) Special Collection of Papers on Spin-Trapping Chemistry, Can. J. Chem., 1982, 60, 1379;
(d) Special Issue on Spin-Trapping and Aminoxyl Radical Chemistry, Free Radical Res. Commun., 1993, 19, (S1 and S2), S1.
E. Finkelstein, G. M. Rosen and E. J. Rauckman, Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 1980, 200, 1.
(a) G. M. Rosen and E. Finkelstein, Adv. Free Radical Biol. Med., 1985, 1, 345;
(b) E. G. Janzen, in Free Radicals in Biology, ed. W. A. Pryor, Academic Press, New York, 1980, vol. 4, pp. 115-154;
(c) P. J. Thornalley, Life Chem. Rep., 1986, 4, 57;
(d) C. Mottley and R. P. Mason, in Biological Magnetic Resonance, eds. L. J. Berliner and J. Reuben, Plenum Publishing Corporation, New York, 1989, vol. 8, pp. 489-546;
(e) G. R. Buettner and R. P. Mason, in Methods in Enzymology, ed. W. A. Pryor, Academic Press, New York, 1990, vol. 188, pp. 127-133.
E. Finkelstein, E. Rosen and E. J. Rauckman, Mol. Pharmacol., vol. 188, pp. 127-133.
(a) S Pou D. J. Hassett, E. B. Britigan, M. S. Cohen and G. M. Rosen, Anal. Biochem., 1989, 177, 1;
(b) M. J. Turner and G. M. Rosen, J. Med. Chem., 1986, 2439;
(c) G. R. Buettner, Free Radical Res. Commun., 1993, 19, S1.
I. Yamazaki, L. H. Piette and T. A. Grover, J. Biol. Chem., 1990, 265, 652.
(a) C. Fréjaville, H. Karoui, B. Tuccio, F. Le Moigne, M. Culcasi, S. Pietri, R. Lauricella and P. Tordo, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1994, 1793;
(b) C. Fréjaville, H. Karoui, B. Tuccio, F. Le Moigne, M. Culcasi, S. Pietri, R. Lauricella and P. Tordo, J. Med. Chem., 1995, 38, 258;
(c) B. Tuccio, R. Lauricella, C. Fréjaville, J. C. Bouteiller and P. Tordo, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1995, 295.
J. M. Varlet, N. Collignon and P. Savignac, Tetrahedron, 1981, 37, 3713.
A. Rockenbauer, A. Mercier, F. Le Moigne, G. Olive and P. Tordo, submitted for publication.
(a) K. Adamic, D. F. Bowman, T. Gillan and K. U. Ingold, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1971, 93, 902;
(b) D. F. Bowman, J. L. Brockenshire, T. Gillan and K. U. Ingold, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1971, 93, 6551;
(c) D. F. Bowman, T. Gillan and K. U. Ingold, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1971, 93, 6555.
E. Finkelstein, G. M. Rosen and E. J. Rauckman, J. Mol. Pharmacol., 1982, 21, 262.
E. G. Janzen, N. Sankuratri and Y. Kotake, J. Magn. Reson., Ser. B, 1996, 111, 254.
J. Tatzhendler, I. Ringel, R. Karaman, H. Zaher and E. Breuer, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1997, 341.
D. R. Duling, A. G. Motten and R. P. Mason, J. Magn. Reson., 1988, 77, 504.
R. Lauricella, unpublished results.
A satisfactory calculated spectrum was obtained assuming the existence of one diastereomer (Table 1) [Fig. 1(c)]. However, simulations assuming the presence of two diastereomers gave also reasonable calculated spectra. Owing to the poor resolution of the experimental spectra, it was not possible in these conditions to distinguish between the two hypotheses.
P. Livant and R. L. Dudley, Can. J. Chem., 1980, 58, 197.