Belgium; Breast Neoplasms/therapy; Female; Humans; *Models, Statistical; Quality of Life/*psychology; *Questionnaires; *Treatment Outcome
Abstract :
[en] Quality of life is becoming an important outcome for the comparison of aggressive therapies. To measure quality of life (QOL), questionnaires have been designed that ask patients about symptoms and functionality in several aspects of daily life. Primary analyses of such questionnaires typically focus on a summary statistic, such as a sum score or a single global question. This avoids inflated type I errors or loss of power due to multiple testing of individual items. In return, specific questions and answers that initially mattered to the patient may unfortunately get buried. To avoid reduced specificity and interpretability for both patients and physicians, we propose to also analyse all original questions. In this paper, we seek to detect items of the QOL questionnaire that differ significantly over observed treatments even in the face of multiple testing. We sequentially build a model that combines features which additionally discriminate between treatments. To achieve this, we draw on insights gained in the field of statistical genetics where one is often confronted with a vast amount of predictors, e.g. of a genotypic nature. Specifically, we adopt a permutation based approach to evaluate the null distribution of the maximum of many correlated test statistics and use it to build a regression model that explains QOL differences between treatment arms. We apply the new methodology to analyse QOL data in an observational study of four different treatments of breast cancer. We discover that a single question captures most of the observed treatment differences in this population.
Disciplines :
Oncology
Author, co-author :
Moerkerke, Beatrijs
Goetghebeur, Els
Van Steen, Kristel ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Dép. d'électric., électron. et informat. (Inst.Montefiore) > Bioinformatique
Vanbelle, Simon
Cocquyt, Véronique
Language :
English
Title :
Permutation based methods for comparing quality of life between observed treatments
Publication date :
2005
Journal title :
Statistics in Medicine
ISSN :
0277-6715
eISSN :
1097-0258
Publisher :
John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, United States - New Jersey
Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B et al. The european organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1993; 85(5):365-376.
Osoba D, Zee B, Pater J, Warr D, Kaizer L, Latreille J. Psychometric properties and responsiveness of the EORTC quality-of-life questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in patients with breast, ovarian and lung-cancer. Quality of Life Research 1994; 3(5):353-364.
Bjordal K, Kaasa S. Psychometric validation of the EORTC core quality-of-life questionnaire, 30-item version and a diagnosis-specific module for head and neck-cancer patients. Acta Oncologica 1992; 31(3):311-321.
Kaasa S, Bjordal K, Aaronson N, Moum T, Wist E, Hagen S, Kvikstad A. The EORTC core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30): validity and reliability when analysed with patients treated with palliative radiotherapy. European Journal of Cancer 1995; 31A(13-14):2260-2263.
Cox DR, Fitzpatrick R, Fletcher AE, Gore SM, Spiegelhalter DJ, Jones DR. Quality-of-Life assessment: can we keep it simple? Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A - Statistics in Society 1992; 155(3): 353-393.
Fairclough DL. Summary measures and statistics for comparison of quality of life in a clinical trial of cancer therapy. Statistics in Medicine 1997; 16(11):1197-1209.
Van Steen K, Curran D, Kramer J, Molenberghs G, Van Vreckem A, Bottomley A, Sylvester R. Multicollinearity in prognostic factor analyses using the EORTC QLQ-C30: identification and impact on model selection. Statistics in Medicine 2002; 21(24):3865-3884. DOI: 10.1002/sim.1358
Ribaudo HJ, Thompson SG. The analysis of repeated multivariate binary quality of life data: a hierarchical model approach. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 2002; 11(1):69-83.
Fairclough DL. Design and Analysis of Quality of Life Studies in Clinical Trials. Chapman & Hall/CRC: New York, 2002.
Pesarin F. Multivariate Permutation Tests with Applications in Biostatistics. Wiley: Chichester, 2001.
Doerge RW, Churchill GA. Permutation tests for multiple loci affecting a quantitative character. Genetics 1996; 142(1):285-294.
Nettleton D, Doerge RW. Accounting for variability in the use of permutation testing to detect quantitative trait loci. Biometrics 2000; 56(1):52-58.
North BV, Curtis D, Sham PC. A note on the calculation of empirical P values from Monte Carlo procedures. American Journal of Human Genetics 2002; 71(2):439-441.
Besag J, Clifford P. Sequential Monte-Carlo p-values. Biometrika 1991; 78(2):301-304.
Commenges D. Transformations which preserve exchangeability and application to permutation tests. Journal of Nonparametric Statistics 2003; 15(2):171-185.
Anderson MJ, Robinson J. Permutation tests for linear models. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics 2001; 43(1):75-88.
The EORTC Quality of Life website. http://www.eortc.be/home/qol [8 May 2005].
Manly KF, Olson JM. Overview of QTL mapping software and introduction to map manager QT. Mammalian Genome 1999; 10(4):327-334.
Schmoyer RL. Permutation tests for correlation in regression errors. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1994; 89(428):1507-1516.
Van Steen K, Molenberghs G. Multivariate and multidimensional analysis. In Biometrics, Wilson S (ed.). Eolss: Oxford, 2003.