[en] Harmonization initiatives in laboratory medicine have a long history. Nevertheless, despite substantial efforts by international federations, scientific societies, and expert working groups, their implementation and widespread adoption remain incomplete, with many initiatives still at a relatively early stage of development. More recently, several initiatives have sought to identify scientifically sound yet pragmatic approaches to the harmonization of measurement units. To contribute to this debate, we invited experts from different disciplines of laboratory medicine, as well as a clinician, to provide their perspectives on the challenges, opportunities, and priorities for achieving greater harmonization. This Forum offers a unique opportunity to assess the current state of the art across multiple areas of laboratory medicine, including clinical chemistry, immunoassays, hematology, coagulation, molecular diagnostics, and serology. The contributions presented herein aim not only to highlight discipline-specific challenges but also to identify common principles and practical strategies that may guide future harmonization efforts. Although this paper does not propose a definitive roadmap for the harmonization of measurement units, its ultimate goal is to stimulate informed discussion and present a comprehensive spectrum of perspectives to international federations, national societies, regulatory authorities, and scientific journals. By doing so, it aims to support the identification of the most effective strategies for achieving greater consistency, comparability, and harmonization of laboratory reporting units worldwide.
Disciplines :
Laboratory medicine & medical technology
Author, co-author :
Plebani, Mario ; Department of Medicine-DIMED, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
Thelen, Marc ; Foundation for Quality Assessment in Laboratory Medicine (SKML), Nijmegen, the Netherlands
Zaninotto, Martina; QI.LAB.MED, Spin-off of the University of Padova, Padova, Italy
Dukic, Lora; Clinical Department of Laboratory Diagnostics, Clinical Hospital Center Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia
Cavalier, Etienne ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de pharmacie > Chimie médicale
Huggett, Jim; National Measurement Laboratory, LGC, Guildford, UK
De La Salle, Barbara; UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme (UK NEQAS) for Haematology, Watford, UK
Busby, Eloise J; Molecular and Cell Biology, National Measurement Laboratory at LGC, Guildford, UK
Favaloro, Emmanuel J ; Department of Haematology, Sydney Centres for Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research, NSW Health Pathology, Westmead, NSW, Australia
Dimech, Wayne ; National Serology Reference Laboratory, Melbourne, Australia
Smeets, Ruben L; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
Hansen, Young Bae ; Department of Clinical Biochemistry, North Zealand Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark
Simioni, Paolo; Department of Medicine-DIMED, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
Plebani M. Laboratory medicine in the COVID-19 era: six lessons for the future. Clin Chem Lab Med 2021;59:1035–45.
Plebani M. Harmonization in laboratory medicine: the complete picture. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013;51:741–51.
Plebani M. Harmonization in laboratory medicine: requests, samples, measurements and reports. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 2016;53: 184–96.
Plebani M, Graziani MS, Tate JR. Harmonization in laboratory medicine: Blowin’ in the wind. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56:1559–62.
Zaninotto M, Graziani MS, Plebani M. The harmonization issue in laboratory medicine: the commitment of CCLM. Clin Chem Lab Med 2022;61:721–31.
Plebani M. Harmonizing the post-analytical phase: focus on the laboratory report. Clin Chem Lab Med 2024;62:1053–62.
Plebani M. Harmonization in laboratory medicine: more than clinical chemistry? Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56:1579–86.
Zaninotto M, Agnello L, Dukic L, Akhvlediani L, on behalf of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group on Harmonization. Assessing post-analytical phase harmonization in European laboratories: a survey promoted by the EFLM Working Group on Harmonization. Clin Chem Lab Med 2024; 62:1966–74.
Zaninotto M, Agnello L, Dukic L, Šálek T, Linko-Parvinen A, Kalaria T, European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Committee-Harmonization (C-H) and Committee-Postanalytical Phase (C-POST), et al. Is it feasible for European laboratories to use SI units in reporting results? Clin Chem Lab Med 2025;63:1279–85.
Junker R, Bietenbeck A, Kiehntopf M, Lichtinghagen R, Streichert T, Nauck M, DGKL working group “Unity in Units”. Unity among the units – a position paper by the DGKL. Clin Chem Lab Med 2026;18. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2026-0075.
Zaninotto M, Plebani M. Measurement units harmonization: “unity in units”. Clin Chem Lab Med 2026;18. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2026-0343.
MacDonald S, Williamsa S, Platton S. Advancing the implementation of standardized reporting units for haemostasis factor assays through collaborative efforts. Clin Chem Lab Med 2026. https://doi.org/10.1015/ cclm-2026-287.
Park K, Kim S, Badrick T, de Geus-Bosma M, Suhas C, Yilmaz F, et al. Addressing property and unit discordance in laboratory interoperability: the role of NPU as a governance layer. Clin Chem Lab Med (in press).
van Assendelft OW. The international system of units (SI) in historical perspective. Am J Public Health 1987;77:1400–3.
Hansen YBL. Recommendations on measurement units – why and how. EJIFCC 2019;30:250–75.
Agnello L, Dukic L, Akhvlediani L, Zaninotto M. European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Committee: Harmonisation (C:H). Current practices and harmonization challenges in Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers: an EFLM Committee: Harmonization. Survey Clin Chem Lab Med 2026. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2026-0168.
Milavec M, Cleveland MH, Bae YK, Wielgosz RI, Vonsky M, Huggett JF. Metrological framework to support accurate, reliable, and reproducible nucleic acid measurements. Anal Bioanal Chem 2022;414: 791–806.
Jefferson T, Spencer EA, Brassey J, Onakpoya IJ, Rosca EC, Plüddemann A, et al. Transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) from pre and asymptomatic infected individuals: a systematic review. Clin Microbiol Infect 2022;28: 178–89.
Evans D, Cowen S, Kammel M, O’Sullivan DM, Stewart G, Grunert HP, et al. The dangers of using Cq to quantify nucleic acid in biological samples: a lesson from COVID-19. Clin Chem 2021;68:153–62.
Brereton M, McCafferty R, Marsden K, Kawai Y, Etzell J, Ermens A. International Council for Standardization in Haematology. Recommendation for standardization of haematology reporting units used in the extended blood count. Int J Lab Hematol 2016;38:472–82.
Lewis SM. International Council for Standardization in Haematology – the first 40 years. Int J Lab Hematol 2009;31:253–67.
Grote-Koska D, Klauke R, Kaiser P, Kramer U, Macdonald R, Lerche S, et al. Total haemoglobin – a reference measuring system for improvement of standardisation. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020;58:1314–21.
De La Salle B. Pathology harmony moves on: progress on implementation in haematology. Br J Haematol 2012;158:804–5.
Miles AA, Misra SS, Irwin JO. The estimation of bactericidal power of the blood. Epidemiol Infect 1968;38:732–49.
O’Sullivan DM, Jones GM, Zolnir-Dovc M, Phillips R, Arthur R, Mtafya B, et al. Methods to improve confidence in the accuracy of molecular testing for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Clin Chem 2026; 72:390–7.
Busby E, Whale AS, Ferns RB, Grant PR, Morley G, Campbell J, et al. Instability of 8E5 calibration standard revealed by digital PCR risks inaccurate quantification of HIV DNA in clinical samples by qPCR. Sci Rep 2017;7:1209.
Deutsches Institut für Normung (DIN). Standard 58932-3-2024-02. Hematology – Determination of the concentration of blood corpuscles in blood – Part 3: Reference method for the determination of the concentration of erythrocytes; 2024. Available from: https://doi.org/10.31030/3502022.
Deutsches Institut für Normung (DIN). Standard 58932-4:2003-07. Hematology – Determination of the concentration of blood corpuscles in blood – Part 4: Reference procedure for the determination of the concentration of leucocytes; 2003. Available from: https://doi.org/10.31030/9448961.
Deutsches Institut für Normung (DIN). Standard 58932-5:2007-10. Hematology – Determination of the concentration of blood corpuscles in blood – Part 5: Reference method for the determination of the concentration of thrombocytes; 2007. Available from: https://doi.org/10.31030/9866520.
WHO Global Malaria Programme. Malaria parasite counting: malaria microscopy standard operating procedures; 2016. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/HTM-GMP-MM-SOP-09.
Manser M, Olufsen C, Andrews N, Chiodini PL. Estimating the parasitaemia of Plasmodium falciparum: experience from a national EQA scheme. Malar J. 2013; 22;12:428.
Thomson RM, Cunningham JA, Gatton MM, Murphy SC, de la Paz AM, Ding XC, et al. WHO malaria nucleic acid amplification test external quality assessment scheme: results of eleven distributions over 6 years. Malar J 2025;24:94.
Costa GL, Alvarenga DAM, Aguiar ACC, Louzada J, Pereira DB, de Oliveira TF, et al. Improving the molecular diagnosis of malaria: droplet digital PCR-based method using saliva as a DNA source. Front Microbiol 2022;13:882530.
Lippi G, Tripodi A, Simundic AM, Favaloro EJ. International survey on D-dimer test reporting: a call for standardization. Semin Thromb Hemost 2015;41:287–93.
Favaloro EJ, Thachil J. Reporting of D-dimer data in COVID-19: some confusion and potential for misinformation. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020; 58:1191–9.
Selby R, Meijer P, Favaloro EJ. D-dimer diagnostics: can I use any D-dimer assay? Bridging the knowledge-to-action gap. Res Pract Thromb Haemost 2024;8:102335.
Hofstetter RV, Marx CE, Kraaijpoel N, Favaloro EJ, Bossuyt PM, Meijer P, et al. Reporting of D-dimer testing in venous thromboembolism diagnostic management studies: a scoping review. J Thromb Haemostasis 2026;24:2213–21.
Favaloro EJ, Gosselin R, Olson J, Jennings I, Lippi G. Recent initiatives in harmonization of hemostasis practice. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56: 1608–19.
Dimech W. The standardization and control of serology and nucleic acid testing for infectious diseases. Clin Microbiol Rev 2021;34:e0003521.
Baylis S, Nübling CM, Dimech W. Standardization of diagnostic assays. In: Encyclopedia of virology, 4th ed. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Academic Press; 2021, vol 5:52–63 pp.
Australian Government Department of Health. National Hepatitis B Testing Policy v1.2. Australasian Society for HIV Medicine, Viral Hepatitis and Sexual Health Medicine; 2015. Available from: https://testingportal.ashm.org.au/
Carroll KC, Pfaller MA, Landry ML, McAdam AJ, Patel R, Richter SS, et al, editors. Manual of clinical microbiology, 12th ed. Washington, USA: American Society for Microbiology; 2019.
Jinyoung Y, Jong HK, Yeongsic K. Comparison of nine different qualitative HBsAg assay kits. Korean J Lab Med 2010;30:178–84.
Cox KL, Devanarayan V, Kriauciunas A, Manetta J, Montrose C, Sittampalam S. Immunoassay methods. In: Markossian S, Sittampalam GS, Grossman A, Brimacombe K, Arkin M, Auld D, et al., editors. Assay guidance manual. Bethesda (MD): Eli Lilly & Company and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; 2004.
National Institute of Biological Standards and Controls. WHO International Standard anti-Rubella immunoglobulin instructions for use, Version 8.0. Potters Bar, UK: NIBSC; 2018.
Bouthry E, Furione M, Huzly D, Ogee-Nwankwo A, Hao L, Adebayo A, et al. Assessing immunity to rubella virus: a plea for standardization of IgG (immuno)assays. J Clin Microbiol 2016;54:1720–5.
Bouthry EH, Revello D, Furione MG, Grangeot-Keros M, Vauloup-Fellous L. An evaluation of nine rubella IgG assays highlights many discrepancies in the interpretation of the results. Presented at European Congress of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. Barcelona, Spain; 2014. Available from: https://2014.eccmid.org.
Dimech W, Arachchi N, Cai J, Sahin T, Wilson K. Investigation into low-level anti-rubella virus IgG results reported by commercial immunoassays. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2013;20:255–61.
Dimech W, Bettoli A, Eckert D, Francis B, Hamblin J, Kerr T, et al. Multicenter evaluation of five commercial rubella virus immunoglobulin G kits which report in international units per milliliter. J Clin Microbiol 1992;30:633–41.
Dimech W, Grangeot-Keros L, Vauloup-Fellous C. Standardization of assays that detect anti-rubella virus IgG antibodies. Clin Microbiol Rev 2016;29:163–74.
Dimech W, Panagiotopoulos L, Francis B, Laven N, Marler J, Dickeson D, et al. Evaluation of eight anti-rubella virus immunoglobulin G immunoassays that report results in international units per milliliter. J Clin Microbiol 2008;46:1955–60.
Huzly D, Hanselmann I, Neumann-Haefelin D, Panning M. Performance of 14 rubella IgG immunoassays on samples with low positive or negative haemagglutination inhibition results. J Clin Virol 2016;74:13–8.
Treger RS, Long TC, Calvey SL, Tacker DH, Kadkhoda K, Wener MH, et al. Anti-rubella immunoglobulin G proficiency testing results suggest consistent manufacturer differences and opportunity for harmonization. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2024;148:862–3.
WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization. WHO Technical Report Series: Report 68. Geneva: WHO; 2018.
National Institute of Biological Standards and Controls. 2nd British standard for anti-rubella serum, human instructions for use. United Kingdom: National Institute of Biological Standards and Controls; 2009.
National Institute for Biological Standards and Controls. WHO International Standard 3rd International Standard for Anti-measles. NIBSC code: 97/648; 2008. Available from: http://nibsc.org.document
National Institute of Biological Standards and Controls. WHO International Standard First WHO International Standard for Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Immunoglobulin (human) NIBSC code: 20/136 United Kingdom: NIBSC; 2020. Available from: https://www.nibsc.org/documents/ifu/20-136.pdf.
Semper A, Rigsby P, Otter A, Mattiuzzo G, Almond N, Rowe C, et al. Evaluating the use of the first WHO International Standard for anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin to harmonise the readouts between commercial SARS-CoV-2 binding antibody tests: the HARMONY multicentre calibration study. Lancet Microbe 2026:101329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanmic.2025.101329.
Hansen YBL, Furuta K, Devaraj S, Yilmaz FM, Nordin G. Misleading nomenclature of units of WHO materials used for standardization of SARS COv-2 serology. Clin Chem Lab Med 2022;60:e151–2.
Plebani M, Galli C. The never-ending quest for antibody assays standardization and appropriate measurement units. Clin Chem Lab Med 2022;60:959–60.
Windsor WJ, Roell Y, Tucker H, Cheng C-A, Suliman S, Peek LJ, et al. Harmonization of multiple SARS-CoV-2 reference materials using the WHO IS (NIBSC 20/136): results and implications. Front Microbiol 2022: 893801. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.893801.
Picone O, Bouthry E, Bejaoui-Olhmann Y, Cordier AG, Nedellec S, Letourneau A, et al. Determination of rubella virus-specific humoral and cell-mediated immunity in pregnant women with negative or equivocal rubella-specific IgG in routine screening. J Clin Virol 2019;112: 27–33.
Dimech W. Rubella serology: a renewed call to action. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2025;149:7.
Hutton J, Rowan P, Greisinger A, Mouzoon M. Rubella monitoring in pregnancy as a means for evaluating a possible reemergence of rubella. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014;211:534 e1–4.
Dybkær R, Jørgensen D. Quantities and units in clinical chemistry: including Recommendation 1966 of the Commission on Clinical Chemistry of the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry and of the International Federation for Clinical Chemistry. Copenhagen, Munskgaard; 1967.
Arndt BG, Beasley JW, Watkinson MD, Temte JL, Tuan WJ, Sinsky CA, et al. Tethered to the EHR: primary care physician workload assessment using EHR event log data and time-motion observations. Ann Fam Med 2017;15:419–26.
Dorgalaleh A, Favaloro EJ, Bahraini M, Rad F. Standardization of prothrombin time/international normalized ratio (PT/INR). Int J Lab Hematol 2021;43:21–8.
