Instrumenting augmented reality in anatomy and histology education: What student usage reveals about engagement, motivation and learning in European and Sub-Saharan African contexts. - 2026
Instrumenting augmented reality in anatomy and histology education: What student usage reveals about engagement, motivation and learning in European and Sub-Saharan African contexts.
[en] The effectiveness of augmented reality (AR) in anatomy and histology education remains variable across literature, suggesting strong dependence on pedagogical context, learner characteristics, and conditions of use. ARanatomy was developed as a mobile AR-learning environment to support spatial understanding of anatomical structures across multiple levels of organization, from macroscopic to histological, and required contextualized evaluation under authentic curricular conditions. This multicentric study involved 2,031 students across five cohorts from three institutions across Europe and Sub-Saharan Africa. Three successive versions of the application were deployed, differing in ergonomic maturity and level of usage instrumentation. Collected data included student perceptions (WBLT framework), motivation (Self-Determination Theory), objective usage traces, and performance outcomes when available. Descriptive, comparative, and correlational analyses were conducted, and usage profiles were identified using K-means clustering (k=3). Perceptions of learning and design varied markedly across cohorts. Engagement differences between users and non-users were limited. Instrumented analyses showed that intensive and diversified use was associated with higher visuospatial performance, whereas no effect was observed on immediate disciplinary performance. Usage intensity correlated positively with intrinsic motivation and positive emotions and negatively with amotivation. These findings indicate that the educational value of ARanatomy depends primarily on its pedagogical integration, ergonomic maturity, and depth of use. AR was associated with higher visuospatial performance than with short-term academic performance, although no causal relationship could be established. Taking together, these results highlight the importance of analytics-informed and pedagogically aligned implementation in anatomy education.
Research Center/Unit :
RUCHE - Research Unit for a life-Course perspective on Health & Education - ULiège
Disciplines :
Education & instruction
Author, co-author :
Mutombo Mwembo, David ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Unités de recherche interfacultaires > Research Unit for a life-Course perspective on Health and Education (RUCHE)
Fries, Allyson ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences biomédicales et précliniques > Histologie
Bonnet, Pierre ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences biomédicales et précliniques
Sul Ilunga Sul, A; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Clinics of Lubumbashi, University of Lubumbashi, Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of the Congo
Prygiel, Olivier ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences biomédicales et précliniques > Anatomie humaine générale
Lagier, Aude ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Unités de recherche interfacultaires > Research Unit for a life-Course perspective on Health and Education (RUCHE)
Kalau, W Arung; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Clinics of Lubumbashi, University of Lubumbashi, Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of the Congo
Sobczak, S; Department of Anatomy, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada
Schyns, Michael ; Université de Liège - ULiège > HEC Liège : UER > UER Opérations : Informatique de gestion
Defaweux, Valérie ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences biomédicales et précliniques > Histologie
Language :
English
Title :
Instrumenting augmented reality in anatomy and histology education: What student usage reveals about engagement, motivation and learning in European and Sub-Saharan African contexts.
This work was supported by the Anatomy Laboratory of the University of Li\u00E8ge [ARES Project-PFS-2022-RDC-VanSintJan: University of Lubumbashi, University of Li\u00E8ge, and Universit\u00E9 Libre de Bruxelles]; by The Universit\u00E9 du Qu\u00E9bec \u00E0 Trois-Rivi\u00E8res [FIP (fonds d\u2019innovation p\u00E9dagogique)]; and by the University of Li\u00E8ge [fonds de soutien \u00E0 l\u2019enseignement ULi\u00E8ge].
García-Robles, P., Cortés-Pérez, I., Nieto-Escámez, F.A., García-López, H., Obrero-Gaitán, E., Osuna-Pérez, M.C., Immersive virtual reality and augmented reality in anatomy education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anatom Sci Educ 17:3 (2024), 514–528, 10.1002/ase.2397.
Tene, T., Bonilla García, N., Coello-Fiallos, D., Borja, M., Vacacela Gomez, C., A systematic review of immersive educational technologies in medical physics and radiation physics. Front Med, 11, 2024, 1384799, 10.3389/fmed.2024.1384799.
Bogomolova, K., Hierck, B.P., Looijen, A.E.M., Pilon, J.N.M., Putter, H., Wainman, B., et al. Stereoscopic three-dimensional visualisation technology in anatomy learning: a meta-analysis. Med Educ 55:3 (2021), 317–327, 10.1111/medu.14352.
Koh, M.Y., Tan, G.J.S., Mogali, S.R., Spatial ability and 3D model colour-coding affect anatomy performance: a cross-sectional and randomized trial. Sci Rep, 13, 2023, 7879, 10.1038/s41598-023-35046-2.
Masoumian Hosseini, S.T., Qayumi, K., Pourabbasi, A., Haghighi, E., Sabet, B., Koohpaei, A., et al. Are we ready to integrate modern technologies into the medical curriculum? A systematic review. Discov Educ, 4(1), 2025, 114, 10.1007/s44217-025-00521-7.
Tzortzoglou, F., Sofos, A., Evaluating the usability of mobile-based augmented reality applications for education: a systematic review. Bratitsis T, (eds.) Research on e-learning and ICT in education, 2023, Springer, 105–135, 10.1007/978-3-031-34291-2_7.
Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L., Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol 55:1 (2000), 68–78, 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.
Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L., Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemp Educ Psychol, 61, 2020, 101860, 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860.
Sakr, A., Abdullah, T., Virtual, augmented reality and learning analytics impact on learners and educators: a systematic review. Educ Inf Technol 29:15 (2024), 19913–19962, 10.1007/s10639-024-12602-5.
Singh, M., Bangay, S., Sajjanhar, A., Augmented reality enhanced analytics for education: a systematic review. J Learn Anal 12:3 (2025), 126–155, 10.18608/jla.2025.8447.
Microsoft Corporation. Microsoft power BI desktop [computer software]. 2024 [ https://powerbi.microsoft.com/].
Kay, R., Evaluating learning, design, and engagement in web-based learning tools (WBLTs): the WBLT Evaluation Scale. Comput Hum Behav 27:5 (2011), 1849–1856, 10.1016/j.chb.2011.04.007.
Kirkwood, A., Price, L., Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: what is “enhanced” and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learn Media Technol 39:1 (2014), 6–36, 10.1080/17439884.2013.770404.
Selwyn, N., 2nd ed. Education and technology: key issues and debates, 2017, Bloomsbury Academic.
Rodriguez-Segura, D., EdTech in developing countries: a review of the evidence. World Bank Res Observ 36:2 (2021), 171–203, 10.1093/wbro/lkab011.