Unpublished conference/Abstract (Scientific congresses and symposiums)
The false pretense of the democratization of representative government
Aerts, Vincent; Grandjean, Geoffrey
20265th Global Conference on Parliamentary Studies. Parliaments at a Crossroads
Peer reviewed
 

Files


Full Text
Aerts & Grandjean, The false pretense of the democratization of representative government.pdf
Author postprint (607.74 kB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Referendum; Representative government; Democratization; Democratic Innovation; Representation; Democracy
Abstract :
[en] Since the early 2010s, members of Belgium’s various legislative assemblies have repeatedly voiced concerns about growing public distrust towards representative institutions. In response, several parliaments have initiated institutional reforms aimed at integrating mechanisms commonly associated with democratic innovation into the representative framework. Among the instruments considered, popular consultations and sortition-based deliberative bodies have emerged as prominent options to involve citizens more directly and regularly in public decision-making processes. This paper examines the democratic dynamics underlying the parliamentary institutionalization of popular vote processes. Do legislators conceptualize popular consultations and referendum as genuine tools for democratizing representative government? To what extent – if at all – is decision-making authority effectively transferred from elected representatives to citizens? More broadly, which democratic imaginaries are mobilized and defended by parliamentarians during legislative debates on these reforms? To address these questions, the study conducts a qualitative analysis of parliamentary proceedings related to referendum and popular consultations in Belgian assemblies since the early 2010s. This paper highlights four steps in these processes that could be pave the way for democratization of representative government: the initiation phase, the design phase, the participation moment and the post-referendum impact. Through a cross-level and diachronic comparison of these parliamentary debates, the paper explores how representative institutions reflexively engage with their own transformation. By analyzing the institutional designs advanced in these discussions, it assesses the extent to which democratic innovations are framed as complementary, corrective, or transformative vis-à-vis representative government, thereby shedding light on the parliament-led reconfiguration of democratic legitimacy in contemporary Belgium.
Disciplines :
Political science, public administration & international relations
Author, co-author :
Aerts, Vincent  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de science politique > Institutions publiques et histoires politiques
Grandjean, Geoffrey  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de science politique > Institutions publiques et histoires politiques
Language :
English
Title :
The false pretense of the democratization of representative government
Publication date :
05 June 2026
Event name :
5th Global Conference on Parliamentary Studies. Parliaments at a Crossroads
Event organizer :
Chair of Legislative Studies at the University of Luxembourg -
Event place :
Luxembourg, Luxembourg
Event date :
Du 4 juin 2026 au 5 juin 2026
Audience :
International
Peer review/Selection committee :
Peer reviewed
Available on ORBi :
since 08 June 2026

Statistics


Number of views
19 (4 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
17 (2 by ULiège)

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi